Тёмный
No video :(

A Deeper Look at Tradeable Allowances 

Marginal Revolution University
Подписаться 366 тыс.
Просмотров 63 тыс.
50% 1

Since the passage of the Clean Air Act, SO2 emissions have decreased by 35%. Part of this is due to tradable allowances, which created a market solution to the external costs of SO2 emissions. In this video, we look at the lessons of tradable allowances for SO2 and see if a similar market-based solution could work to decrease other pollutants, such as CO2.
Microeconomics Course: bit.ly/20VablY
Next video: bit.ly/1QfdsLj
Help us caption & translate this video!
amara.org/v/GSLA/

Опубликовано:

 

26 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 7   
@crash1574
@crash1574 5 лет назад
Very good video. However, I am wondering how are the tradable allowance distributed by the government in the first place? Like how many tradeable allowance units are given to factory A and B? Does a factory with higher production in the past get more than a smaller factory? Is that not somehow changing the competitiveness of smaller companies for the worse because they get less allowances they can sell? The possibility to buy tradeable allowances to reduce emissions might seem compelling. The crucial element of this concept is how many total units the government is giving to the companies. You should keep in mind that the government has an interest to keep growing the economy which involves emissions. Now if the government takes into account that some organizations or individuals will buy the certificates just to tear them up and hands out more permits in the first place, then you cannot actually reduce pollution. Also companies may choose to move their pollution intensive production sites to less developed countries where regulatory standards are lower and then import the final product to avoid the pollution tax. So it is clear that countries must work together to effectively combat climate change. Finally, would it not be smarter if the government was selling the tradeable permits instead of just handing them out? Then they could set the price which would serve like a pollution tax.
@jasonleelawlight
@jasonleelawlight Год назад
Thanks for these great points! I'm a new learner of this subject and I found your comment very inspiring although it's been 4 years. Here are my personal opinions below. First, I think it's inevitable to impact the productivity and competitiveness of those companies because the goal here is to fight pollution, and since production and pollution just go hand in hand, so if you curb one the other would be impacted as well. However I do agree that giving permits for free might be unfair to smaller companies, so I think charging a price might be a better choice, although setting the price properly could be another challenge. As for the second issue, I think if the government doesn't really want to reduce the pollution, then it may not have implemented the marketable permits policy first off, it can just leave everything to the market for example if it doesn't care, or just fine the companies indifferently if what it really wants is to create more income, let's say; it can also create some kind of funds in name of fighting pollutions and lure in donations from environmental groups, but use it for something else or even worse conduct embezzlement. So to sum up I think what you said could happen in reality but it's not really a problem of the methodology per se.
@jasonleelawlight
@jasonleelawlight Год назад
I just watched the video again, and I found the lecturer already made it clear that if the government gives away the permits for free then the larger companies would be more likely to accept the policy, so yeah, it's an advantage to the larger companies (that's why they tend to accept it) but it may be the price the gov has to pay to get the policy accepted, so as he said this is getting political. One solution might be to take other measures such as tax cuts or tax credits in favor of smaller companies.
@kaseshib
@kaseshib 6 лет назад
Would buying and tearing the pollution allowances shift supply left and demand right? Or just supply? It seems similar to the slave redemption video but the market seems different in that there are a fixed number of pollution allowances.
@kyriakosmak
@kyriakosmak 2 года назад
I think supply will go down and demand will go up
@jasonleelawlight
@jasonleelawlight Год назад
I think individual firm's demand and supply don't change, aggregate supply doesn't change either, but aggregate demand will increase.
Далее
The Hidden Cost of Pollution
6:41
Просмотров 31 тыс.
A Deeper Look at Public Goods
7:56
Просмотров 225 тыс.
🎙А не СПЕТЬ ли мне ПЕСНЮ?
3:09:39
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Музыкальные пародии
00:28
Просмотров 19 тыс.
Maximizing Profit and the Average Cost Curve
12:18
Просмотров 210 тыс.
Elasticity of Demand
13:36
Просмотров 734 тыс.
Maximizing Profit Under Monopoly
11:11
Просмотров 353 тыс.
How do carbon markets work?
9:27
Просмотров 395 тыс.
Why 99 percent of bottles in Germany get returned
11:02
One of the Greatest Speeches Ever | Steve Jobs
10:31