A Grand Tour of TRAPPIST-1 

👍👍👍

The disadvantage is probably hella expensive and very unstable since how small and close it was to the sun...

Why colonize Mercury if you can just disassemble it for ressources?

Isnt Mercurys main possible use just resources for a Dyson Swarm?

I used to always browse that lol icl I’ve switched to Celestia and SpaceEngine, they’re a lot better. Plus in Celestia you can add custom textures to any planet (and star or other body) as well as write very rudimentary code (several lines, 30 tops) to add planets and stars and other bodies

You must have overheard me talking to your mother

AYO THATS SUS

For me, it's the planet Venus for obvious reasons.

Neptune is my bestieeee 😘😌

My pooki is ton618🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰

Literally the alphabet though "a b c d..."

@@michaelchance6125 I mean trappist

@@Faulheit oh yeah right 😅 it's definitely better than most stars who get named [keyboard smash]

Proxima Centauri also sounds sick

yeah, lich is really cool

oh hey extrema, but I totally agree

according to this study c having an atmosphere actually fits the data best: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7.1011M/abstract

@@Kyplanet893 Ahh interesting study, I was looking for what study you were trying to base your claim off of but I couldn't find it. Thanks for the link, I'll give it a read.

He should probably just fly a spacecraft to the actual planets he's talking about. He could record them in 4K HD so we know the exact colors they really are.

Well said 🍻

Also if even the chance is thin as a atom that there's life on trappist-1 it will by some sort of bacteria or small fungi

What a shame. They are all do close to being inhabitable by Earth life, but none of them are quite suitable.

more mass means bigger and more radius means bigger both mean bigger, just bigger in different ways (mass means heavier, radius means wider) whenever i say bigger i almost always mean mass, because finding out the radius of a planet is much more difficult than finding the mass

@@Kyplanet893 ok, ty for clarifying!

The popular belief is there's aliens everywhere and nearby.. but the reality is no, just no. We'll be lucky if there's even bacterial life anywhere nearby (within 1000 lightyears) Truth is we are an anomaly. Earth is special, and so are you.

@@Jay-gf8tm Yeah, those were my thoughts too.

@@Jay-gf8tm I'd think bacteria would be common but multicellular life would be rare.

i’m gonna make a video about it

i have a video about gliese 581 already lol

not in the visible spectrum but we don’t need it to be visible light, there are other wavelengths it emits more that are good enough

maybe

Oh my God, you’re actually did it

we’re only seeing trappist-1 as it was 40 years ago, that’s not long enough for any significant changes to have occurred what we’re seeing is very close to how they look in the present

Trappist-1 system is 40 light years away from Earth, meaning that the observations we saw was 40 years ago. It is correct that huge astronomical distances can allow us to see from the past because the speed of light takes time to reach us but unfortunately, atmospheres can't naturally build up under a century.

that is only noticable for primordial galaxies located at the edge of the observable universe

i’ve made a full video about it already

same way mercury and the moon don’t they don’t have any way to make one, or the sun’s radiation blows it away faster than it can form

helo bidone, it's zelenskiy, we need fiv billion rockets

because you usually have to observe the planets several times which takes weeks on its own then you have to check the data, get it reviewed by others, and there’s a whole thing about studies being embargoed so the people publishing them can do their own experiments and such with it before others can plus jwst also just gives a lot of data so there’s a lot to look through before you can even get the results

@@Kyplanet893 oh wow. Thank you. Didn’t know all that was involved.

Also the fact that there are millions of scientists all wanting JWST to look at different things, Trappist-1 is a popular subject I imagine but there's basically no limit to the things in the universe it has to share the telescope's time with.

why are you posting ai generated paragraphs

@@Kyplanet893 So sorry. I'm testing an AI for video summarization but it doesn't seem to be very good, right?

there were 386 views when you made this comment the youtube viewer count is behind, the actual youtube studio is more accurate

@@Kyplanet893 can you make colonizationn of

colonization of what also i already said to you that i ended the colonization of the solar system series lol

@@Kyplanet893 of this vid

Who wouldve thought an extremely new instrument cannot be completely accurate when measuring from 41 Lightyears away and trying to measure something that would literally appear as a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a pixel in the highest definition screen most have feasible access to, and also in an extremely active star system where the other bodies can fairly easily interfere with the data; Try looking for a single bacterium and stare at it for several days on the head of a pin from 5 miles away at noon thats how hard it is. All scientific experiments and explanations are speculative, thats why you use evidence to support the explanation… and we are going with ones that best suit the most recent observations from our best instruments… like literally all of science ever. Also, Kyplanets does repeatedly say that it is speculative and subject to change several times because research on Exoplanets is constantly changing and on going… the field is less than 30 years old at this point

@@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777 You're so hot for that

There are plenty of interesting things about it. Wdym?

@@Meat_the_turtleExactly. This person is so rude, and even sort of dumb.

get out

@@starcasmlove fr