A house out of the vertical timber. From start to finish 

Harry)

W klapkach na budowie 😉 .

Выглядит как полнейший идиотизм .😭

To jest świerk , spokojnie wytrzyma 100 lat.

👌👍👍👍👏👏👏 GOOD SOLUTION, AUSTRIA IS NR.1, FOR WOOD FACTORY😀🥰🥰🥰

No

i have a house similar to this except the beams/posts are stacked horizontally . then on the outside is 14 cm thick steico wood fiber insulation panels , lattung/furring strips on top of that and finished with wood cladding/siding . The windows are triple pane . The house is heated with a two ton speckstein offen (soapstone oven) . one three hour firing will last for two and a half days at zero celsius .

@@siriosstar4789 Great, it will make you not worry about the cost of natural gas.

CLT, germany and austria are leaders in this tech.

I have similar feelings but I've heard an argument that these kinds of buildings are more environmentaly friendly than a "typical" house because: 1. In developed countries forestry is sustainable and these types of houses don't use a lot of "processed" / petrol based materials which cause more pollution. 2. When it's time to demo this house hundreds of years from now, it'll be basically metal (very easy to recycle) and wood. That will just decompose. So there are 2 sides to this I guess, if done properly.

@@sergeybebenin If it does indeed last hundreds of years, my point becomes moot. :o)

As long as it is sustainably sourced timber then it's gotta be better than cement based construction i think.

Trees can be planted. More can be grown. Gypsum for drywall can only be mined once. Fibreglass insulation bats aren't readily recycleable.

Австрийский брус это тип профиля, а не где обработан лес😁😆 Лес конечно же наш.

Существуют нормы по строительству зданий, насколько я помню выше определённой высоты требуется громоотвод. Россия большая, но там, где я живу не случались попадания молний в здания, а вот в линии электропередач бывают.

@@user-hc2yt8gy6o I believe that there are standards. But how much are they enforced? And the other questions remain unanswered.

@@igorccotoccev1972 я специально посмотрел, как это регулирует закон, так вот, громоотвод не обязателен для такой высоты здания, но нужно учитывать несколько вещей: плотность застройки, близость линий электропередач, характер местности (насколько часто бывает гроза), нужно знать как фундамент способен проводить ток в землю и прочее. Есть свод правил, согласно которому можно сделать громоотвод (система молниезащиты). Насчёт грызунов - мы ставим специальные сетки в тех местах, где они могут проникнуть, но в России дома исторически делали из дерева и мыши сильно не пугают, тк зима часто помогает с ними бороться. У нас нет термитов, а муравьи не вредят конструкции здания. Это вечный спор сторонников каменных и деревянных строений, но в случае дома на видео могу предположить, что такие дома заказывают ради внешнего вида, а не практичность (вроде того, когда состоятельных люди покупают кабриолет).

@@user-hc2yt8gy6o exactly. Because of the outside look and not practicality. Since that is a case, I would think twice maybe three times if I want this kind of house. Although, not even outside of this house is God knows what: it looks like a sarcophagus

Huge moisture problem there the roof is going to rot and rot the whole roof structure, insane. Amateurs'

@@manwhocan9822 That construction method is called a rainscreen. It's how most of the developed world builds and is becoming more popular in Australia. It costs heaps more than how it is typically done here, it designed to let shit try out as quickly as possible (which is obviously more important in Russia than here). Its much better than a "normal" roof it just costs twice as much.

I imagine the white paper was just waterproof layer (although they make that the airtight layer in some climate zones), they didn't show it in the video, but I'm guessing insulation is the same thickness as the rafter, like 300mm??? So it probably performs just fine without the shinny heat reflective layer, if that's what you mean. This layer is somewhat redundant with a metal roof as you suggest, but is effected by color, surf mist (the white Colorbond Color) reflects almost 70% of heat from the sun, but this color would do much worse (like 40 or 50% at a guess). The other thing to consider is the angle of the roof, I've no idea of the numbers, but nice steep roofs like that reflect more heat. The main reason these shinny papers aren't used is they aren't vapour permeable (aka they can't breath), some people don't care, but people that love wooden frames usually love vapour permeable membranes. If I spent that much I a wooden frame, I'd want it to be able to let moisture out as much as possible!

Wood

@@sjefhendrickx2257 I know its Wood, i mean what kind of wood? Name of the wood please 🙏

Сосна,стекло,металл

Not expensive at all, cheap. Its not usa.

And it will not blow away. 😂😂

last only 10 years?

@@JOHNLEXXX good question

ở xứ lạnh loại gổ này cả đống nên rẻ hơn là bê tông cốt sắt. xứ lạnh khí hậu khô khan, ít bị mối ăn nên có thể tồn tại cả trăm năm.

Воин Света, 🤘. В плей-листе увидел название ролика, и зашёл для того, чтобы написать такой-же комментарий. Только ещё хотел добавить, что может и с украинского.

Будет, ещё как будет!