A Low ELO Idiot Explaining Why They Move 

Low ELO games are decided by who blunders less. Also never resign in a low ELO game because your opponent probably doesn’t know how to checkmate you.

bro i literally also just climbed from 500 to the realms of 600 (649 i can proudly state) and the emount of times i've made a move and went "3:09" is 7 times too many

"Can't afford mistakes anymore..." Immediately misses Bf3 forking two rooks.

Again the good old scholar's mate. This time with a better result for you 😋 0:45 Nd4 immediately is better. After Qd1 you can take the g-pawn, because the Queen is bound to the defense of c2 (forking King and Rook) 1:11 again, the g-pawn is hanging here, because the Queen can't leave the c-pawn's defense 2:50 taking with rook to induce the rook trade (If he doesn't trade but saves the rook his knight is hanging) is better, I think. Taking with bishop just pins your bishop to your rook, as you found out later. 3:11 going aggressive to avoid exchanging the bishop was not necessary. The exchange of knight and Bishop is actually good for you, as it gives you the chance to undouble your pawns. 4:25 That is a nice idea. Attacking, but at the same time not abandoning the passed pawn. Using the passed pawn as a distraction and sacrificing it to make progress on the other side of the board is a common endgame idea. Nice game and video again.

Why do 600 ELOs on youtube play like 100, but when I play against 400, they play like Magnum Carlos?

Why would you move pieces to squares that aren't even useful, he has the accuracy of my shoe size :D

you couldve played Nf3 at 3:49

I think he’s faking being low elo