Thank u @Martin and I highly appreciate your feedback, I'll definitely consider your input for my future videos. I'll lower down the music audio track layer next time around.
i guess im asking the wrong place but does someone know of a way to get back into an instagram account? I was dumb lost the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
Thank you so muchh, you explained it very clear and simple that makes me understand it well. Reading in books just makes my nose bleed because of expanded vocabularies require for it to read but you just make it all simple in just short watching time.
Web 2.0 started with no meaning & debatable, until it was by generally accepted by majority of the community by defining it as a feature where user can change the content, in contrast of an static website that's purely displays info. It was eventually defined according to differences in philosophy and implementations, and this concepts reaches formally even on textbooks and found it's way to curriculum of government institutes. Even the meaning of Web 3.0 is literaly evolving even at the moment I write this comment. The term web 1.0 did not even exist at start, only began when internet technology was advancing. So yeah basically these are just terms to differentiate the stages while the internet advances, and normally starts with one influential person/company/group in the field until it receives a majority general acceptance by all users. So by the current definition, if websites with comment boxes happened to exist in the period of web 1.0 they will fall in the category of web 2.0
@@codemutation I know all of that, although I suspect that Web 2.0 was a bit more determined than you imply; The broadband rollout, the adoption of CSS, the introduction of Gmail and the Chrome browser, and the opening up of Facebook to non-students, etc. seemed to all happen in a steady, occasionally simultaneously manner. There were a lot of articles about Web 2.0 hyping it at the time, not just in academia, but in magazines and newspapers as well. But that’s a different topic. I’m only trying to make a small correction about static websites before Web 2.0 being “one way only” and “passive.” But you are certainly correct that the _vast_ majority of these sites were completely static, which is something that I actually miss a little bit. I’ve been on the Internet and the World Wide Web since about 1996 or 1997. The function of an HTML guestbook was a script to write a “signature” on an otherwise static websites (we’re talking about text-on-background HTML Index pages, with maybe a few links, frames, and so on). But some people used guestbook scripts to leave (short) messages which could be read, and comment boxes which would send an email to the webmaster.
@@dethkon Interesting detailed points but anyway at the end of the day web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 are just naming conventions and the current definitions that I expounded in this video is to help students studying this topic, and everything was based on the definition by Tim Berners-Lee being the directory of World Wide Web Consortium and the Inventor of the World Wide Web (1989) In which in simple terms he claims the following: Web 1.0 "read-only web" web 2.0 "read-write" web 3.0 "read-write-execute"
jerome what type of web is amazon.co.uk, wolfram alpha, inquirer.net, youtube, instagram, facebook, siri's apple voice recognition, trio healthcare group, the new york times, enncylopedia britannica?
Some of the websites that you mentioned started as pure Web 2.0 which is "read-write" according to Tim Berners-Lee's definition (Inventor of World Wide Web) but apparently facebook, amazon youtube and some other platforms are now implementing Machine Learning integrated into their systems, A.I and Machine Learning Leads and implies the "read-write-execute" by Tim Berners-Lee definition. Please note that Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Web 3.0 are abstract terms and should not be taken so seriously, the read-write-execute is also an abstract term While Web 1.0 is so clear in definition as being read-only, the emergence of A.I. and Machine Learning starts to blur the definition of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 as technologies continue to evolve these terms and its definition may change over time. Also, it is important to note that a website is not necessarily obsolete if it doesn't include a feature that allows users participation in generating content or being a Web 1.0 or read-only website. There are many landing pages today that the only purpose is for the user to click the call to action button.
Could you re upload without the music? Or at least turn it down.. it really ruins the experience when the music constantly randomly just starts blasting :/
@@jemjem8902 Good thoughts. But decentralization is a different concept. It's already happening. steemit.com for example is a blockchain-based decentralized social-media network, I've been active on that platform for quite sometime steemit.com/@jerome-morales . Web 3.0 is more on symantics of the web and making the use of it more personalized, both centralized and decentralized systems can or may implement web 3.0.
@@codemutation Oh okay thanks. Nalilito kasi ako, merong web3 na sinasabi ang ethereum network, since I'm working with web3, and there's also this web3.0. Thanks for this!
