A Very Simple Tech Stack 

In 2024 we'll go back to HTML and CSS

Very nice video overall, but would've liked if you showed the results at last and how difficult it is to deploy such a app.

I used this stack recently, It was so easy that it felt like something was wrong!

Thank you so much for this, you have reassured me on how I can use this stack on my own projects. I also really like unocss interactive page super newbie friendly.

awesome explanation, thanks ❤ hope this continues with more complex tasks for explaining more of htmx + Go 😊

Literally playing with the stack right now (well with Tailwind instead) and it's really quite nice!

Template engine using custom html props are not new, but adding the ability to make XHR request is pretty cool

Beautiful!

The thumbnail looks like a Fireship video. Good job

love it

pretty infuriating that we didn't see actual result website in the video, lol

Great intro! I wish you'd have shown what the webpage actually looks like with this project though

this stack is 😘, please do alot of go content

How do you recommend to componentize the html in go? I think go/html is missing a lot of tooling (great IDE integration, create and use components, typing, etc...)

It's either just the tightly coupled way we used building things 20y ago. Or it's just another less scalable angle of Phoenix Liveviews. I haven't made up my mind yet.

Nice! How do you prevent end users from modifying the htmx code?

HTMX should the the standard, that's so cool.

Now if only someone could terminate the disaster that is CSS and replace it with something that WORKS - we'd be all happy 😊

Heyy the new animations are cool I love em ❤ Only thing I will suggest is make the videos as dense as possible but don't save that extra 30 seconds man show the f ing output 😅

which editor and OS you use ?

Simplicity is great, how about powerfullness? For instance, components & rich interactivity. React is a library but usually it's self hosted after bundling, seems there's no bundling support in htmx & I have to include a script that points to a MDN source?

more content on this stack please.

Waiting for UnoCSS UI kit video 😊

UnoCSS vs picocss for fastest minimal CSS no JS dependencies?

Getting started with only a webapp i think this Stack is one of the best. However if you have more than one applications or need an API for your App this aproach unfortunatly does not scale that Well as you will need a JSON or XML endpoint at some point and handling json and HTML instead of just json could prove to be quite time consuming.

what font are you using in your code screencaps?

I wonder how those server-event stuff works and If I can do that with php.

Is there any way to self-host the HTMX and UnoCSS packages? Would rather not rely on a CDN for this. Thanks in advance!

Seems we will complete the circle. Html css js to MVC to SPA to SRA to html css js

I am trying to use the Fetch command in go, but it is undefined for me. Anyone know what the issue might be?

The HUG stack 🥰

Wow the random Fiber drop is surprising

ok. you got me. it is a wonderful video but where is the repo?

unocss, picocss or tailwindcss?

👍

The guy on the thumbnail looks like he needs more fiber.

Where is the demo of the project ?😢

Thanks, but I personally prefer you use default pkg golang. I am newbie.

Where are ApiKey, Fetch and Stock defined?

We need CSS-in-Go. 😂

where's the git repo? 🤔

I don't really care what language to use. In my opinion a good stack is when you write your component once. Writing it in BE land for ssr and a second time in JS for interactivity sucks.

How do you componentize in htmx

This type of behavior can be easily achieved with Unpoly too.

Why not Go std lib, htmx and tailwind?

Is there a github for this?

Im getting f**** hearing a new stack every single week

So, PHP but worse?

Why not just load the CSS file directly? Instead of calling it first via JavaScript 4:25

Can we create PWA with htmx?

Remember, folks: KISS! Rock OOOOOOON!!! ✌✌

Bro, this is how they made websites back in the 2008 days, what the actual fk.

why uno and not tailwind css !

My gut doesn't like htmx.

Go might be simple as a language but that actually leads to doing web development in it harder . Even if you use some framework (like Fiber) you are most likely going to miss a lots of features that exist in other big feature-rich frameworks like Laravel, Django, NextJs etc... Because of that I find it harder to do web dev in go regardless of it's simplicity. The mentality of go community that all you need is standard library makes it often very hard because you have do to a lots of things manually while in other languages/frameworks you have those problems already solved. So in that regard go is not freaking easy at all. It's very hard to do it right because you have to do it yourself.

**OWASP Top 10 has entered the room** 🤣

I think go-chi is a better choice.

How is jwt authentication handled using htmx?

PHP with Laravel Livewire needs the same if not more of the attention that HTMX is getting

I'll not write htmx and tailwind css together 😅😅😅

Its all good until fiber... Go was designed to be useful with the std lib and if needed, 3rd party libs. Frameworks, especially fiber, are an overkill to such a language like go.

wonder if htmx is made by the same people who made underscore and lodash? same white/blue theme :DD always makes me think if thoies are invented by finns/estonians lol ; )

Now just dump UnoCSS, use plain and proper CSS and good HTML markup, and we're back on the effectiveness track. 😅

A classless CSS-Framework would be even more minimal

Omg kill me now😂

I wonder how one can put so much work into such a video and not provide the full source code... If you follow this tutorial step by step, your code is just not going to work, because the creator left out some details in the implementation... I found it sketchy from the beginning, that the resulting site was never shown... Really strange, since the video in itself is made pretty well and has a fast pace, so you don't waste time with useless explanations

There is more code in your node_modules folder than the entire linux code base.... to print hello world

i don't get why people are mad about new tools and tech stacks coming out... nobody is forcing you to use them, you can stick with you own tools and let people who love to try new things have their fun!

after 20 years of garbage frameworks and tools people finally figure out what backend is supposed to do and what frontend is supposed to do i thought it will never happen

The reason for the extreme proliferation of JavaScript frameworks is due to the unpleasant nature of JavaScript programming. What developers really want is an alternative to JavaScript, not another framework. It's why there's so much excitement over Webassembly.

another tool creating unnecessary buzz among new developers 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂. I do think this tool can be useful if you want to create a small scale application as various of the important features are missing from this tool like error handling and etc and even if they are they are not as easy as the traditional try/catch in js or js frameworks and it is very crucial tha in the production level you can understand code and can change it very easily if required but if we use this tool in any large scale application like any social media platform application, it would be a huge mess writing 5-6 lines only filled with single html tag and we will be writing comments more than the actual code as the code readability will be a major issue. First of all you are trying to say that the web can work without js which is completly bs and just a stratergy to create a buzz among the lazy newbie deevlopers and nothing. I think this tool can do very good in it's own level but the audience it targeting and the kind of stratergy it is using to make it popular is not good and will result in bad outcome in a long run. That's what I think, your openion can be completely different and I always respect a different valid openion until and unless you are just a fanboy or a hater. 😄

Go is easy? Lol what???))

Htmx is totally a good choice but still has some security issues (xss), I hope the team behind it get it all working

Its so stupid lmaoo, they wrote js for you. Doesn't mean you have a better performing website. xD

You lost me at Go Fiber.

chi + base go http >>>