Тёмный

A320 Descent Management - VVDN, too high on energy 

A320 Descent Energy Management
Подписаться 3,6 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

Too high on energy on arrival due to a shortcut.
The A320 Descent Energy Management book is available here:
www.amazon.com...
The generic jet version of the Descent Energy book (Jet Aircraft Descent Management) is available here:
www.amazon.com...
The Radio Telephony book is available here:
www.amazon.com...

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 18   
@LuisPerez-qj6mj
@LuisPerez-qj6mj 2 месяца назад
I think that scenario was excellent for the FO to learn some energy management. You keep the flight within a safe envelope so nothing to worry about. We tend to learn better by “messing” things up. I’m pretty sure that FO will keep an eye on his energy very well from now on.
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 2 месяца назад
Yes indeed, that's my training style. They learn much faster like that.
@TangodownNZ
@TangodownNZ 6 месяцев назад
You say the 3x distance method only works within 50nm. I think you had another method for >50nm Do you have a link please. Thank you for answering question btw, that is rare for a captain of a A320 on yt
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 6 месяцев назад
It will work a bit further also, but you have to add 1000 ft for every 10 nm more than 50 nm (maximum 3000 ft correction). So at 60 nm (10 nm more than 50 nm) it looks like you are 1000 ft high , but it's notmal. At 70 nm, it looks like 2000 ft high, and at 80 nm it looks like 3000 ft high, all normal. I didn't add that to my method because i doesn't always work and when you are on a mach nr, the whole altitude vs speed situation is very fluid. Also, when you are that far away and you already know you can expect a shortcut, you can just fly below your calculated profile by a certain amount to compensate. You don't need to calculate for more than 50 nm that way. No worries for answering. It's pretty rare someone explains this subject well, and I'm glad to help.
@vuhl2500
@vuhl2500 2 месяца назад
Your videos with real life scenarios help me so much with flying in vietnam. Thanks a lot!
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 2 месяца назад
I'm glad you find it useful. Keep up the good work 👍
@joshuadolan3811
@joshuadolan3811 Месяц назад
How about just using distance rings for the rough estimate and round down?
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 Месяц назад
There are some situations where that will work, but not many. But you can try and see if it works for you.
@doanbay919
@doanbay919 Год назад
Hello Captain. Thanks for your awesome clips. As you said to intercept glide slope, we should use V/S to descend. Just a small question, if we use a high rate, at what V/S rate the speed will start increasing? TIA 😅
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
Good question. The answer is that it depends on your speed. When near green dot speed, the speed will start increasing when you set more than 1000 fpm. To find out what the VS is for higher speeds, do the following: just select OP DES when the speed doesn't change, then observe the VS you get. That VS will be the maximum VS you can set without the speed increasing if you are in V/S mode.
@flyboy970
@flyboy970 4 месяца назад
Hi skipper. Great videos. Sorry to ask but could you explain your calculation in altitude required for deceleration from say 250kts to green dot? I always used to think in 1nm per 10kts but not in altitude required. Thanks in advance
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 3 месяца назад
There is no need to calculate it like that. You just multiply your distance by 3 and fly lower depending your speed. You can find my calculation method here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4odUv3zTxb4.htmlfeature=shared
@TangodownNZ
@TangodownNZ 7 месяцев назад
20nm x 3 = 6000ft, 250kts -2000ft = 4000ft. Where did you get the extra 1500ft from? You said 5500ft?
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 6 месяцев назад
It's 25 nm in that example, not 20 nm. So the 1500 ft extra comes from the 5 nm extra.
@evgeniigrashin5012
@evgeniigrashin5012 9 месяцев назад
Thanks for the interesting video! From my point of view if it was a check flight for the first officer he would more likely fail the check.) He flew behind the AC most of the time.
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
@a320descentenergymanagemen3 9 месяцев назад
In my opinion it's not about being behind the aircraft. It's about not understanding descent management. All videos I post are of people who are not yet ready for a line check. It takes a lot of practice and effort to become good at it.
@君銘陳
@君銘陳 Год назад
Hi, I’ve followed your videos. May I ask how do you calculate when you still got 25 miles and fly 250 knots , you know you should be 2000 ft low? Many thanks 🎉
@a320descentenergymanagemen3
For 5 nm steps, add 1500 ft. First calculate 20 nm = 6000 ft. Then 2000 ft to slow down (for 250 kts), so 4000 ft. Then add 1500 ft for the 5 nm, so at 25 nm with 250 kts, you should be at 5500 ft.
Далее
A320 Descent Management - VVCR glide slope from above
18:02
A320 Descent Management - VVTX, speed mismanaged
22:26
Airpod Through Glass Trick! 😱 #shorts
00:19
Просмотров 647 тыс.
Energy Management Tips
23:24
Просмотров 6 тыс.
A320 Descent Management - VVDN, shortcut twice
15:07
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.
A320 Descent Management - VVNB, glide slope from above
16:45
Efficient Descent | What New Pilots Struggle With
7:33
A320 Descent Management - VVVH correct approach
12:50
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.