how was that not 4 for ringer, he initiated the feet to back motion but they gave it to Brooks. Wow It should have been 4 Ringer and 2 for Brooks on the takedown.
I thought Ringer had the touch fall with the first 4. I also thought the 4 they gave to Brooks was Ringers. I also thought Ringer was pinned on the 4 they gave to Brooks. So... IDK. closer match than the scoreboard.
The sequence starting at 4:17 had to be initiated by dieringer. Freeze frame at 4:19 and you can see the way brooks’ toe is pointing and then the way they both fall he almost blew out his knee. there’s no way brooks meant to do that.
@armanifryeowens5518 I see. But hard to argue that point cause brooks initiated >> forced Deringer to try reveersal >> failed cause brook maintained dominant position still. If deringer forced brooks to let go or scramble then def fair 2 points. But brooks initiated and maintained control
@@blayze98 yeah my bad I didn’t explain my position very well. Brooks took the shot but dieringer stopped him coming forward and changed the direction of the move exposing brooks back. I just don’t see that sequence scoring 4 brooks and no points for ringer when brooks definitely didn’t intend to take the action in that direction. Mb someone who knows the rules better than me can explain why it was scored no points for ringer?
Brooks lost whose move was it that was initiated? D vs Brooks……I mean you can be taught to make A sequence in your favor…..I think Brooks should have been wrestling for third!Nothing wrong that….brooks has been been chose to give yazi the title back. It will be a whole lot of fun
