Acts 10 Explained! You have never heard this before! 

HaShem may not test us directly but He certainly allows us to be tested. See the story of Job. In the case of Peter, however, it was more of an illustration. He used his hunger in order to initiate a conversation about saving the unclean gentiles.

He was talking about eating bread with unwashed hands. Not about eating forbidden foods. Eating pork and so forth is a sin.

@@LapidJudaism You are wrong sir. Yeshua always had deeper meanings than your surface interpretation. It seems to this Christ follower that you are a modern day Judaicer. Christ's church rebuked your types as well as the gnostics in the 1st to 3rd centuries. The only sins are the violations of the moral laws (10 commandments as expounded upon by Yeshua in His sermon on the mount). The New Covenant negates your re-insertion of the burden of Jewish dictates regarding diet and circumcision. And please do a video explaining how you throw out the writings of Paul, Luke (Paul's Gentile Doctor) and Acts to sell your Lapid-ism.

Galatians: A Critical Review ru-vid.com/group/PLJ7u12KbA_Vuzt8tZiZ9D4Rzuhw3FRLEh

The New Covenant ru-vid.com/group/PLJ7u12KbA_Vv8PQB3liS48s_g0Sl1pIRr

You Have Heard it Said ru-vid.com/group/PLJ7u12KbA_VuvnX5AGPSIs7oJesJC5IHQ

Paul is not talking in his letter about eating non kosher food such as swine. He is talking about permitted foods (permitted by HaShem). Moreover, what one can and can not eat comes from the command of G-d. Therefore it is the work of G-d. So, obeying G-d’s Word does NOT “destroy the work of G-d”. That would be ridiculous. Finally, neither Paul, nor any man, has the authority to change the Word of HaShem. Please contact us if you would like further help with this passage.

You stumble because you nullify the Word of God by the words of a man (Paul’s letters).

There is no indication that Cornelius and his family had visited John the Baptist. Please refer to the video Acts 10 Explained on this channel for clear understanding of this passage and what it is teaching.

@@LapidJudaism Thanks for your reply. One of the reasons that I came to the conclusion that Cornelius and his guests had been baptized with the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins by John the Baptist is that repentance and baptism for the remission of sins is the N.T. type of the O.T. cleansing of the temple in preparation for the entrance of the Spirit of God. In the O T. the cleansing was accomplished with water and blood. During the N.T. water baptism the Holy Spirit circumcizes our conscience, removing the guilt from past sins, and restoring to it its original childlike sensitivity to sin. The shedding of the Lords blood at Calvary made John's baptism effective for all who had been baptized of him. Also it's important to understand that the Holy Spirit will not enter snd occupy an unclean temple.

Shalom Robert. I appreciate your explanation it it is incorrect. Your use of terms such as N.T., O.T., and Calvary indicate that you are approaching the topic from a purely Christian (Roman / Gentile / non bIblical) point of view. Even the idea that things are “new” in this time and that spirituality is somehow accomplished in a different method than in the “old” is inherently flawed. This is aside from a complete conjecture, without ANY supporting evidence whatsoever, that Cornelius was “baptized” by John. So here is the bottom line, I encourage you to ask HaShem to help you see things through the lens of Judaism because that is the correct one. Your Messiah is a Pharisaical / Orthodox Jew…not a Christian and there is absolutely nothing “new” in the New Testament. Second, start watching the videos on this channel. And finally, visit ArtScroll.com and buy your study materials from them. Be well and thanks for the interaction.

@@LapidJudaism I agree there is nothing new when it comes to being saved. Acts ch.2:38 is how a believer is saved/ born again.

What does it mean to be saved?

To your first question: no. Leviticus 11:45 makes it clear that the purpose is holiness. As for “Jesus” making all foods clean.....he never said that. It was added by the translators. The Messiah did not nullify any scripture.

There is no Bible translation older than 100 years which has the verse" now I declare all food clean". It is all in the new translation

@@alexblack6634 perhaps it is now in the scrolls found the Cumran Caves. Many manuscripts have been found, especially the name of Elohim. Which is Yahweh 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼. The book of Isaiah was found and many more copies of it. The truth will prevail. Shalom 🤗😇🎺🥁🎺🎺🎺

No! we are to follow the dietary instructions out of love for our Messiah.

@@naphtal not true. If you follow the Messiah the you are grafted into Israel. We are to follow the commandments of Israel. No such thing as two laws one for gentile and other for Jews. Silliness. The nation is the ekklesia and Messiah is the head. Keep Gods commandments out of love and grace.

Baruch HaShem and toda rabbah! So glad it was a blessing.

Very glad that it was a blessing!

Completely understand your point of view. It is shared by many AND it is 100% incorrect. The kosher laws are eternal. To break the Law equal to sin. If you "messiah" teaches this, then he is a sinner, he has broken to whole chapters of scripture and he is the picture of the false Messiah described in Dt. 13. It was a metaphor for Peter. What did Peter say was the meaning of the vision in chapter 11. Did he EVER mention food? No. Why? Because the Messiah isn't a Law breaker nor does he teach other to sin.

Do you understand what this means?