Advocate should be allowed to do work. If BCI or Supreme Court has a problem then they should be paying advocate’s bill to meet their daily expenses. It’s a noble work okay got it but if the person is not earning then he shouldn’t be starving to death.
@@abhisheksrdas-vi3ye noble work is okay but your monthly bills are not gonna pay by its own and what about having a passion and serve society by becoming an advocate but passion doesn’t bring money easily specially when you live in India , where earning for a middle class is getting harder and harder with the burden of family and genius gov who only believe in taxing middle or upper middle class rest rich are exempted to pay taxes.
@@mandishpillai5201 the centering point is at such a situation provided nobility element works as mere on paper statement have less to render in real sense
There are only two things especially for young junior advocates, if you want to practice as an advocate and getting better money then do it. And if not getting money in advocacy practice then join the law firms, LPO's as a legal associate and earn salaried income, if not getting law firms job then surrender the advocate license to Bar council and do any corporate job or start a business as law degree is still with you. Simple logic apply in ur life and earn the money. Earning money is important than from which source you earn that money. Don't make your life complicated with complicate laws
Supreme court all advocates ko 20000 hjar monthly salary fix kerde Taki sabhi advocates apne preevaar ka sahi tarah se palan poshan karein..... advocates bechare pure ki avaam ko insaaf dilate firte hai ..or khud... nainsaafi ka shikaar h.....Jai hind
Sir aapke aaj ke video ka best example main hoon l am teacher,broadcaster, journalist,now advocate....🙏MA(English), DED worked as teacher 6 years,Master in mass communication and journalism ( gold medalist)worked as broadcaster & journalist, lecturer on clockbasis& contract 5 yaers&teaching maths, English,sst,evs in tution,LLM LLb for advocacy, my age is 45 years ,i want say nobody can survive on advocacy in initial years,he has to depend for bread and butter on other earnings which is very less, family members also suffers due that,life becomes miserable due fincial inadequacy therefore who are new they should get 5000 minimum compulsory &who are aged not able to do anything they should get food& medical facilities atleast as respect this amendment is needed, i am on ground level saw the sufferings,there should be some fund, advocate should have dignified life...🙏you are focusing on needful topic its my humble request to all the seniors pls do something for this
जज रिटायर होकर राजनैतिक पार्टि जॉईन करते हैं और मलाई वाली पोस्ट हासिल खरते हैं ,उसके लिए जमीन तैयार करने का काम रिटायर होनेसे पहले लंबे समय से करते हैं ,तो यह किस बातका उल्लंघन हैं ?
This is not a professional misconduct. Because, freelancing is not a full time role or doing business. Just like Advocacy it's work for hire engagement. An Advocate can even be an actor, writer, singer, or anything which is not an employment or of permanent payroll
An adv cannot lead a respectful and happy life, if he is depending only on practice in law. He, perforce, has to do some side work. There should be no restrictions, if an adv is also doing some side work to improve his financial condition.
Ye SC balki courts pagla gye hai. 70% civil judge eligibility ka dekh lijiye chahaiye. Ye no par rank 1 tak nhi aati govt university me courts aur aap private university jo 90% 90% baanti hai money wale baccho ko unko badhawaa de rhe hain
@smartnlegalguidance Sir I had heard that an advocate can only teach law subjects, but you said that an Advocate can also other subjects like maths, science etc. ⁉️Could you please give any reference about it?
Inconsistency to basic rules or law or notifications, or bye-laws, or circulars or Government orders or proclamation directly affecting right to carry on legally any trade or legal profession to sustain fundamental right to life, livelihood, etc. must be declared null and void ab initio and never deemed to have existed in the Statute Book.
Yes section 51 most important. Aur sabhi Advocate successful nahi hote esliye koi extra business ya kaam bhi allowed karne chahiye . Article 19(1) (g) I support it .
Not only this rule there are so many rules of such type which are contradictory to each other.So there should be a comprehensive review of all rules framed by our Constitution.And debate should be conducted by the eminent jurists in central and all state bar councils of India.
भाई बेरोजगारी की स्थिति बहुत खराब है... दाल रोटी के लाले है... BCI को गंभीरता से लेते हुए और छूट देने चाहिए वकीलों को... मेरा तो यही मत है.... ताकि और Businessman भी कर सके... सच्चाई बहुत kadvi होती है... 😢
Saare restrictions sirf vakeelo pe kyu lagaaye ja rahe h ..... Criminals member of parliament bante ja rahe h ....uspe supreme court restrictions kyu nhi lagaata
Must be checked and decided case to case as many aspects of making law is also taken into consideration and for that especially we should/must go to evolution and/or birth of law
Vakeel se nispaksh jaanch or case ladne ki umeed krni hai to , supreme court ko unhone second work krne ko allow kr do isse yw hoga genuine log vakalat karenge , or vaki dusre kaam krna shuru kr denge
is a Person who did LLB while doing private job or govt job eligible for bar counsel enrollment or not if he resigns to his job before enrollment ? Kindly let me know I Will be waiting for your @smart and legal guidance reply
Aap business kr sakte hai per woh business apke name se nahi hona chahiy aap apne family members ke name se business run kr sakte hai our uss business ko aap employee hire kr ke work kara sakte hai aap puri tarha uss business ko manage nahi kr sakte hai aap buss apne business ko 1 to 2 hours de sakte hai usse zada nahi
