Тёмный

Aeschylus's Agamemnon. Lecture 3 by Michael Davis 

Подписаться
Просмотров 9 тыс.
% 139

Lectures by Michael Davis, Professor of Philosophy, delivered in the fall semester of 2018 at Sarah Lawrence College.
Davis works primarily in Greek philosophy, in moral and political philosophy, and in what might be called the “poetics” of philosophy. He is the translator, with Seth Benardete, of Aristotle's On Poetics and has written on a variety of philosophers from Plato to Heidegger and of literary figures from Homer and the Greek tragedians to Saul Bellow and Tom Stoppard. More information about Davis is available at michaelpeterdavis.com.
More philosophical content can be found at www.thinkinvisible.com.
Videos edited by Sebastian Soper and Alexandre Legrand.
Greek tragedy has been performed, read, imitated and interpreted for twenty-five hundred years. From the very beginning it was thought to be philosophically significant-somehow pointing to the truth of human life as a whole (the phrase the "tragedy of life" first appears in Plato). As a literary form it is thought especially revealing philosophically by Aristotle, Hegel, Nietzsche and Heidegger to name only a few. Among others, Seneca, Corneille, Racine, Voltaire, Goethe, Shelley, O'Neill and Sartre wrote versions of Greek tragedies. And, of course, there is Freud. Greek tragedy examines the fundamental things in a fundamental way. Justice, family, guilt, law, autonomy, sexuality, political life, the divine-these are its issues. The lectures that follow treat three plays by each of the great Athenian tragedians-Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides-with a view to understanding how they deal with these issues and with the question of the importance and nature of tragedy itself.
Contents:
Lecture 1: Introduction
Lecture 2: Aeschylus's Agamemnon
Lecture 3: Agamemnon
Lecture 4: Aeschylus's Libation Bearers
Lecture 5: Aeschylus's Eumenides
Lecture 6: Eumenides
Lecture 7: Eumenides
Lecture 8: Eumenides
Lecture 9: Eumenides
Lecture 10: Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus
Lecture 11: Oedipus Tyrannus
Lecture 12: Oedipus Tyrannus
Lecture 13: Sophocles’ Oedipus at Colonus
Lecture 14: Oedipus at Colonus
Lecture 15: Oedipus at Colonus
Lecture 16: Oedipus at Colonus
Lecture 17: Sophocles' Antigone
Lecture 18: Antigone
Lecture 19: Antigone
Lecture 20: Euripides' Bacchae
Lecture 21: Bacchae
Lecture 22: Euripides' Iphigenia among the Taurians
Lecture 23: Iphigenia among the Taurians
Lecture 24: Iphigenia among the Taurians
Lecture 25: Iphigenia among the Taurians
Lecture 26: Euripides' Hippolytus
Lecture 27: Hippolytus
Lecture 28: Conclusion
Translations used:
Aeschylus, The Oresteia, Hugh Lloyd-Jones trans.
Sophocles I, Grene and Lattimore eds.
Ten Plays by Euripides, Moses Hadas trans.
Acknowledgements:
For the content of these lectures Professor Davis is deeply indebted to the work of Seth Benardete (although, of course, Professor Davis alone is responsible for his use of that work) and particularly on the following:
Sacred Transgressions: A Reading of Sophocles Antigone
“The Furies of Aeschylus” in The Argument of the Action
“On Greek Tragedy,” in The Argument of the Action
“Sophocles Oedipus Tyrannus” in The Argument of the Action
“Euripides’ Hippolytus” in The Argument of the Action
“Aeschylus’ Agamemnon: the Education of the Chorus,” in The Archaeology of the Soul

Опубликовано:

 

14 дек 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 9   
@Laocoon283
@Laocoon283 4 месяца назад
42:25 I really like that idea. That she was testing him with walking on the tapestry to see if his motives were pure. She wanted to know if he sacrificed her daughter truly in reverence to the gods or because he was thirsty for glory. If he walks on the tapestry, which is described as heavenly, than he does not actually respect the gods and actually sacrificed her just to glut his thirst for glory. That blew my mind. You always find at least one gem in lectures like these. Philosophers always analyze literature way better than actual literature professors.
@webpagesthatsuck
@webpagesthatsuck 3 месяца назад
Wow! I saw your comment before he spoke it and I was gobsmacked. Never once have I seen it in anything I’ve read on Agamemnon-and I’ve read a lot.
@corruptedflesh1519
@corruptedflesh1519 Год назад
This series 👌
@JLizard
@JLizard 3 года назад
The separation of the Greek Philosophers from the Greek Tragedy being discussed makes me question the title of this series. If Aeschylus is expounding his own philosophy then why isn't he called a philosopher?
@judasseispuertos4163
@judasseispuertos4163 3 года назад
As far as I understand it is because he explored thoughts via the medium of Plays, which makes him less of a philosopher, and more of a tragedian. The difference is important for obvious reasons, in philosophy the ideas are discussed and recognized, in Plays they manifest, so they do not require the title of philosophy.
@JLizard
@JLizard 3 года назад
@@judasseispuertos4163 Thank you. If a "tragedian" is putting forth a tragedy that contributes to philosophy they are a philosopher; stories, myths, parables, fables all go into philosophy. The "Philosophical Wisdom" found in Greek Tragedy, Plato wrote a play about a man in a cave seeing his shadow, It's just not lining up.
@brickingle3984
@brickingle3984 Год назад
@@JLizard the platonic dialogues are not plays, they are not meant to be performed. All art explores son perspective. Philosophy as a practice refers to the discussion and application of reason to problems. The line between the two can be blurry, just look at Beckett or Camus or Sartre, but traditionally we differentiate between works of art and works of philosophy based on the way they engage with their material
@alexrediger2099
@alexrediger2099 3 месяца назад
Really getting a lot out of this series.