Africans & Muslims Enslaved More Africans than Britain or USA Did. Nigel Farage & Rafe Heydel-Mankoo 

Do schools even teach real history anymore?

@@Brookspirit did they ever the school I went to all we were told about in history was the Romans and that was sixty five year's ago,

@@joginns778 I was taught only about the Tudors and Henry's wives. Rome got a skip unfortunately.

@@-j308 did you know it was mentioned that schools should teach kits about the first and second world war the heads of the schools board said no it would be to distressingly for the kids to learn so there goes another part of our history swept under the carpet,

In my school days history ended at the outbreak of the First World War : I gather from those more recent scholars that it's still pretty much the same...

It's disgusting that it's not taught our in schools, i'm 60 and learnt all this after l left school because l love history. but such as the BLM and people like Whoopi Gooldberg are trying to whitewash history

The greatest woman in recent history.

Hardly main stream media, given the view numbers.

Half truths you mean ! Yes king George did alot towards ending slavery under the spot light of the people but thats only because they discovered a new way to achieve the same results ! I believe the term used is ' slave Labour ' !! Ironic I guess .... Pretty much like Prince William's great uncle who hunted the white rhino and many other animals into extinction, only for his great nephew to then do a great speach on preserving such animals and banning the hunting of such animals .... not soon after that same Prince was out shooting wild boar in France on their private hunting grounds !! Prince Charles, now a king , never mentions the 3 hunting islands he owns and leases out to the wealthy Hunter. One of those islands has one of the biggest colony of red deer in the world ! And strictly no guns allowed !! Just bow and arrows !!!

Tide is turning. Slippery slope.

'itchy boots' the dutch explorer and geologist loves Africa, not just for its gems

see Noraly Schoenmaker

Actually, the English in America freed the slaves the truth isn't being shared it is being changed. Abuses of King George III The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. 10He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. 11He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislatures. 12He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power. 13He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; For imposing taxes on us without our consent; For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury; For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses; For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these states. For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. 14He has abdicated government here by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us. 15He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 16He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation. 17He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren or to fall themselves by their hands. 18He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and condition Efforts to Obtain Justice from Great Britain In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.All of what you said about king George the third whom the English in the states exiled and the monarchy that freed the slaves is a lie. Boy some people are in trouble their lies leave them in the dark.

Those whytes who engaged in transatlantic chattel slavery are 💯 responsible for their actions. Freeing someone that you have held captive does not make you a hero. Grow up.

+Franz... Before you believed that narrative and now you believe this narrative. How can you be sure that the new narrative is the "truth" and the old narrative is a "hoax"?

I get your point but saying we "sold our own". Thats like saying the Germans bombed " their own" during the Blitz because British and Germans have the same skin color. That's silly. Are the Russians killing "their own" in Ukraine because they are all white? No. Slavery was a normal economic as well as strategic practise on the continent for millennia. I am an African and I am not ashamed to speak facts and I don't need to treated like kindergartener to speak about "unpleasant" facts of history. I guess the Japanese raped their own because they also have slant eyes.

@@kwakuba9167 I am sure you know that Africa is not a country. It is a continent. So, and given the fact that Europe is also a continent, would you consider wrong if one would say that European killed their own in the many many wars that it has seen? Would you say that it is wrong to say that European sold their own in the countless centuries (thousands of years) where slavery was a fact of life there? Do you object to the "sold their own" expression, because you subconsciously think as slavery as a racial thing instead of a power struggle? If so, then i can only conclude that you have been contaminated by that racial ideology that is trending so much now. And i would propose another idea. This one is a little more far fetched. Why not consider that ideology as a racist propaganda. A propaganda that, in the end, mainly serves to divide people and divert their attention from other more personal worries. Also worries that they may focus their attention otherwise. Divide to conquer is a very old and effective strategy. I am not talking about some hidden intentional conspiracy done by some hidden group. I am suggesting that this is a natural dynamic of the interaction of people and power in general. This "divide and conquer" proposition is not so far fetched if one remembers that individual people have more and more indirect power now, with the new technologies, compared to all the past generations. And our social norms must be stressed to the limit to deal with all these new "stuffs".

The Romans, Greeks and the Vikings sold slaves for hundreds of years

The Irish and the Vikings traded slaves from Britain and W Europe via Kiev to Constantinople for a long while. Kiev was a city state then, of course ,not Russian

@@mavisemberson8737 didn’t know that either

@@newalbion1497 between the 5th to 12th century, Dublin was the largest slave market in western europe. People from Britain were captured or bought by Vikings and Irish, trafficked to Dublin and sold. They traded all the way to Iceland and as far as the Indus river. After the Council of Armagh in 11 71, when the Anglo Norman Henry II went to Ireland, it was negotiated for all English slaves to be released from the kingdoms on the island of Ireland and returned to England.

@@shelleyphilcox4743 I had never been taught that at all ! Is there a name designated to this slave trade time like the “Triangular trade?” for example. Henry 2nd I’m guessing would have negotiated the terms of release because slavery was illegal under Norman law I believe ?!

And Muslims traded slaves from Africa since 8th century.

So this makes the savagery of the British acceptable?? Really?

@@ondolite3789 Most European nations have blood on their hands...My ancestors did some pretty awful things in the name of the Monarchy and the Colonial Empire... However, I refuse to apologise for something I had nothing to do with...

@@brianperry Who is asking you to apologise? Some names please?

Well, the Arabs had been in the African slave trade for like a thousand years before we showed up.

It doesn't exactly fit the woke agenda, does it?

@@chungasrevenge4306 Schools do not have a woke agenda. Quite the reverse in fact.

It is just the whyte innocence project.

@@ondolite3789 aww... Ondo is upset by facts 🙄🤡

@Crafted Ginger Can yoo give moor details of these facts?

It is revisionism. Issues around whyte male genetic survival should be taught in school.

Scotland too. We remember the clearances.

Actually most of the " bad" treatment was by irish themselves . Most Brits were absentee landlords.

Over 75% of Ireland was captured and taken to do grunt work in other continents. 12 million ended up on the shores of the US starting in the 1400's. Look up "Children working in coal mines" then click images. Those white children are mostly Irish and are the origin of why kids are called "Miners." Instead of calling them slaves, which is what they were, they were called various names like "Breaker boy", "Comfort women", ect...

@@MadManUSMC There was no "US" in the 1400s.

There is a statue in Nigeria celebrating Efunroye Tinubu, a notorious slave trader who continued in this barbaric profession until she died in 1887, despite it being outlawed by Britain decades earlier. No one seems to be campaigning to tear it down.

The Igbo were slavers also.

And this us known all around Africa that tribes been fighting each others even before europeans came cuz just like how french and british were fighting wars with each other for 100years. Also africans were different nations, BUT the europeans divided borders in way to both three different tribes into one country to make sure they never unite and always have conflicts with each others, imagine if germany forced spanish and italians into living together, it riduclous

@@rowbearly6128 every one was cuz wars went both ways, one tribe get into war with another tribe they take captives from that tribe and the other do the same, this tribe sell the captives of that tribe and the other tribe do the same, it was cycle, each tribe veiwed only themselves as their own people and the other tribe as enemy, british sold irish into slavery, were british selling their own white people into slavery? Africans are diverse group of people just like asians japanese chinese koreans mangolians etc, just cuz they asians doesn't mean they all same, europeans knew that, that why they divided borders like that making sure conflicts and wars break out once they leave

Stop telling lies, no body has ever said that in Nigeria.

Lol every one knows you have to be black and sold to a white country to be a slave . Always got to be one side or the view's don't work Lol

no no no. sorry the facts do not fit into the victim agenda of some black people.

Bro the british empire it like every other other empire in history it have it's good and bad. You don't have to be ashamed of anything, just don't act like the british were angels

@@gurglejug627 you should acknowledge the good and bad why are every discussion is one sided

@@azouitinesaad3856 As long as you admit that the legacy of the British Empire is to the benefit of billions of people. Of course there were mistakes - people make mistakes - but the ethos behind the Empire was to spread free trade - the rule of law - and to remind others of good habits. Africans, Swedes, Danes and Norwegians, were all pillaging Britain - killing - looting - taking the Brits as slaves. The Romans took the Brits as slaves. France conquered and ruled England for 200 years. The Spanish often attacked. The Dutch had the largest army and set unfair rules on others. Did the Germanic tribes overrun the country or were they invited to stay? The Islamic Empire had conquered Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, and all the Slavic countries. Islam had also cut a huge swathe through Africa - it had established many markets to trade African and European slaves. Then along came the British - don't be ungrateful - you lead an easy life because of those brave men!

@@garyphisher7375 yeah the brits were the only ones who didn't hurt anyone they just made "mistakes" unlike the Africans who pillaged Britain I'm sure I've seen some black vikings lately

@@azouitinesaad3856 But it's isn't is it ? Where's the balance when it's never acknowledged or mentioned the part Africans or Arabs had in slavery or the amount of people taken from the Mediterranean to Africa to be sold as slaves ?

Could you please give back all the stolen things from India and the loots of 200 years.

@@ramasoma2746 Ha are you for real. . Slavery Index estimates that on any given day in 2016 there were nearly 8 million people living in modern slavery in India. India atrocities look at you history before pointing finger English and proud of our British History

​​@@Beta250trialsRafe had to try to engage in civil discourse with a shrieking, hysterical harpy of Indian descent who could do nothing but denounce the British as genocidal maniacs who did nothing to benefit India. One can only suppose she would have preferred to be born an untouchable with no hope of improving her lot, or perhaps be the guest of honor at a sati, or lived her life as a slave. In the absence of the British Empire, such things would have been distinct possibilities.

You are a hypocrite. History is still hidden.

Yes, they despises us.

Funny. As if Nigeria is in every history book.😂 Not even a foot note in most mate.

@@amsterdamcowboy9738 ignorance is much worse when you add arrogance. Keep on going. Every book on this subject makes it clear that the west African kingdoms at the time opposed the abolition. But keep up the woke garbage. I know. The Romans practiced 461 genders. STFU.

​​​@@amsterdamcowboy9738 i think your just dumb mate it wasnt called nigeria back then.multiple different kingdoms.

Sometimes it was fear of being attacked by hostile tribes that led to what we today identify as subjugation of those tribes. It was a case of kill/subjugate or be killed! We weren't there so we don't know the terror of constantly waiting to be attacked. Sadly, those who live in relatively safe high IQ areas and countries are really quite separated from reality so they can afford to be malevolently sanctimonious; living in close proximity to seemingly violent by nature cultures is no picnic! Ben Tuzee.

I agree that the NY Times is trash, but you clearly don't know history do you? The United States started out as 13 colonies of England. Also, the native tribes were not wiped out since there are still native tribes in the United States today. Did we fight them and conquer them? Yes. Did we do so when we were English? Yes and we continued after our independence. It's the way of the world that stronger, larger, more developed nations dominate, intimidate, and conquer nations that are smaller and less developed than they are. Your what about ism is no different than what the NY Times is doing. Your false virtue and signaling about your false virtue that costs you nothing, especially crying over something that happened hundreds of years ago is pathetic.

@@macclift9956 It's reckoned that the differences between the culture of the whites arriving in America as compared to many of the tribes was something likes 7,000 years of evolution. The natives were scooping the brains from the opened scalps of their victims with their bare hands.

@@macclift9956 Many tribes were friendly, and some such as the Cherokee adopted the culture of the Europeans, and yet were betrayed (see the trail of tears) as were others. However, the USA politicians have been hypocritical in the past with their attitude to some African countries during the transition from colonial to self rule - you would have thought they understood the reasons pioneer descendants had put protections into law in the past, and needed to be helped to revise these laws as conflict had been mostly eliminated with modern policing and more widespread education, instead of being the self-righteous "defenders of the downtrodden" when their own history even at the time of these events, were much more repressive!

@Mac Clift Many were civilized enough to make friends with Britain. But the US government wanted more land, and there weren't enough Texases. Just ask Hawaii.

The country of Sudan in Africa is an example. It split into two countries, Sudan and South Sudan because of racial and ethnic differences. Sudan becoming mostly Muslim Arabic and South Sudan, ethnic black African. In that area today of Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia there is long, long history even going back to the Old Testament in the time of Moses of Muslim or Arabic traders and monied people of capturing and trading black African slaves for their workforces. Also in ancient times, I think the area that is now Sudan used to be called the Kingdom of Nubia. I have heard the term Nubian slaves, or that beautiful black African women used to be called Nubian.

Nobody mentions that Portugal began the Atlantic slave back in 1444, long before other European countries and let’s not talk about the Arabs they castrated slaves, Are they being asked for reparations???

3 Arab gulf states didn't even abolish slavery until the early 1960's. The UN claims that there are 18 million people enslaved in India today. Children work the mines in the Congo. The world is awash in slavery today.

YES well done slavery is still been carried on in India, Sudan, North Africa and many Arab counties, China and many other nations including Brazil and other parts of Latin America.

Stealing 45 trillion from India. Killing millions due to famine. List is endless.

True but that goes for both sides of the argument. The pro-british empire types also prefer to ignore any horrors committed by the British because it doesn't align with their own agenda or worldview. Cognitive dissonance and selective memory of history is common on both sides

Who are these 'people'??

A diet of Daily Mail and Express helps to brainwash the masses..

I disagree, they are being indoctrinated by hard left teachers and not educated. Most are complete brainwashed

Education always as a bias towards a teacher politic...For instance I remember our history teacher talking about the flamboyant Cavaliers of the kings army... obviously a monarchist...and those nasty old Round Heads... what ever it was it wasn't history, it was one man trying to brainwash a bunch of little kids in Fifties UK.

Yes, always delighted to see Rafe as well as Nigel.

Ita known.

The left in the USA are eaten by envy.

America is so overrated. The sad thing is they think they are loved all over the world 🌍. Nothing even comes close to the British history. 🇬🇧🇬🇧👍🏼🇬🇧🇬🇧❤️

"....why they went to war to get rid of it." They didn't. They fought a war against the set up in which they were being taxed by a far-away parliament in which they had no representation. ("No taxation without representation!") The revolutionaries actually appealed to the King early on; they assiduously protested, early on, that they were loyal to the King until it became apparent that the King did not sympathize with them. THEN they declared independence and adopted the form of government which all students of the classics professed to admire: a republic.

As a brit I've always been slightly baffled by that.

@@cathrynhesketh5703 King George was a tyrant thief of thieves trying to steal America and stole Britain from the English. Bible says they lie! So does our treaty with them. The English will not have a queen that isn't English or a French family as their royal family that just kills them on whims it is coming for you believe me it is. Abuses of King George III The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. 10He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. 11He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislatures. 12He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power. 13He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; For imposing taxes on us without our consent; For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury; For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses; For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these states. For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. 14He has abdicated government here by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us. 15He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 16He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation. 17He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren or to fall themselves by their hands. 18He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and condition Efforts to Obtain Justice from Great Britain In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

It actually doesent tf?

Agreed. Europeans are the only people who have openly and publicly acknowledged historical wrongs, and worked toward making things right. This honesty has been exploited to our continued detriment.

@@anthonymorris5084 we are villified for everything in the world just because we're white

BLM should go there and tear it down. Would love to see how that pans out

That's a lie they want to say that we know how fake the western media is

Don't forget the Dutch they had slaves in the east Indies,

I believe the Portuguese were the first European nation to start the Atlantic slave trade back in 1444 and exported more slaves because of it than Spain, France and even Britain so how is that not mentioned, it’s all there for anyone who wants to research it, it baffles me it’s never mentioned.

I think I know the one you mean,, Sally. Is it the one where Simon reads extracts from the chronicles of a 15th Century traveller recounting his witnessing slave markets and slave caravans in Africa south of the Sahara?

He is a bigot

@@tonyanderton3521That's the man 👍 Simon Webb has a book being published on Amazon next march on the subject of slavery.

@@derekcable Morning, Derek. Yes, I think that it was a Simon Webb video that I learnt about those early chronicles. Very interesting. And many thanks for the heads-up on his new book - I appreciate it. Should be fascinating. Sadly, however, I can't see him being interviewed on the BBC about the book, in contrast to the air time they gave David Olusoga the other day on his new book about black Britons. All the best.

@@tonyanderton3521 I can't see it either 🤔 All the best Tony & your welcome 👍

Another couple of Hangers on !!

Also Rwanda . With Gabon interested ( Francophone) and Togo joining in June 2022.

@@trevaudio er no, we never passed legislation to allow slavery in England and indeed refused to recognise it (The Somerset case of 1772) Guess we are just different that way.

@@trevaudio Kinda says a lot about you if you think you’d do this in that situation. You’ve just admitted you’d go out and assault somebody, kidnap them, if you were being handsomely paid for it. No, British people don’t think like you. And if we did, we wouldn’t have abolished slavery, despite it ‘handsomely benefitting’ our economy.

@@trevaudio Kinda says a lot about you if you think you’d do this in that situation. You’ve just admitted you’d go out and assault somebody, kidnap them, if you were being handsomely paid for it. No, British people don’t think like you. And if we did, we wouldn’t have abolished slavery, despite it ‘handsomely benefitting’ our economy.

​@@markbrown4955 mate IN ENGLAND mate IN ENGLAND 💀

👏👏Exactly correct, an English lay man Granville Sharp as you described, then William Wilberforce took it through Parliament.

It's not his job it's that bunch of clowns in government job all they have to do is dump echr, and stop give the illegal immigrants and lawyer's legal aid,

It will need more than Just Nigel farage , it needs white English people to stand up for their once Great Country . And stop calling themselves British first!

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 which lady is it? What is the name of the book?

@@Tate.TopG. Efunroye Tinubu was a slave trader in Nigeria a square in Lagos is named after her Inc a statue, also there's a statue in remembrance of her in Abeokuta.

@@derekcable i have to check your claims. Even if it was the case who supported that person? It's always like that. White people go to different places and use local to do their dirt just to be in their shadow while they pulled the strings in the back. We see it every day. Even the current situations we live in in Europe with Ukraine. The USA/UK use Ukraine to destroy Russia at our expense. However, they will say they were not involved and it's all Ukrainian government decisions. It's the same BS we see from centuries. I always used to ideology, if a family sell their daughters for sex and human trafficking. If the buyers get caught , they can go free by just saying it's not their fault they parents allow me to do it. I am pretty sure it will be accepted in court of laws but also in the society.

@@derekcable like I knew it, she was supported by the British until she decided to challenge the British colonial power which was BENJAMIN CAMPBELL . this is when her downfall began cuz they revealed her "trading secrets" and took everything from her. She had to move inside the country and give everything to the British colonialists who continue business as usual by selling slaves to Brazil and north american. White people at their best behavior. Always to blame their puppets once they turn against them or when they dont have anymore use for them . We have so many example Saddam Hussein, Osama bin laden, and so many others... . Its nothing new.