Aggressive Albania Experience (EU4 meme) 

As a Turk i feel same bro

Greeece is albania

@@drinmaliqi9531 sure, but I'm sure that you would know that the whole world is actually Greek so sleep well and have souvlaki and gyros

@@miltiadistzagkas7377 lisent Laskarina bobulina Marko bostaris Kolotrones Andreal mialuis Theodeoros pangalos etc were albanian

@@miltiadistzagkas7377 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-38sZgTjELQo.html

Exactly what peak perfomance looks like

Im Not racist, im From the Balkans*

@@Potato928 i am racist and I am from the balkans

@@asopbob6064 good child

I am not Albanian but I am racist

konstandin was from Opoja

Hail Greater Albania 😆

RED AND BLACK I DRESS

albania is just Isis with a black pigon as a flag D:

I am a Serb, and I am curious to see how strong u are without NATO protecting ur disgusting nation, I mean if NATO didnt exist we would be going trough the Tirana with tanks

@@eliotvarda says the mf that is nothing withour russia

Ur cool too

@@godofvibe Thanks :D

Aye mate what I want to say has nothing to do with your comment, but I want to tell you that Jesus Christ loves you. He died for you so your sins can be forgiven and rose up from the dead so you can have everlasting life. Repent and believe in Him, He's the Way, the Truth and the Life and He's willing to give you strength, victorious life and hope beyond the grave. God bless you mate and I wish you all the best

@@towarzyszkarp I've seen a good number of Christians commenting under my posts trying to reach out to me or just condemn me, and I will say that I do appreciate the kindness you're trying to show me, and the forgiveness you're showing to 'enemies' of your faith. Thank you for your civility and good neighborliness. I'll let you in on that I'm not really a Satanist, I'm more of just an atheist for a myriad of reasons both ingrained into me from childhood and chosen personally over the years. The reason I choose the pentagram to represent me is that it's a good symbol of an antithesis of Christianity, where God appreciates values of loyalty within a community, Satanism, as in the philosophical religion based in the US, represents individual freedom and hedonism as ideals. Personally I would argue that what is good for an individual, what is freeing and uplifting for a single person, is just as important as what is good for society as a whole, or a community as a whole. I posit that the existence of Satanism makes Christianity a stronger, more stable, more good force in the world. It requires that Christians compete in ideology with a mirror opposite that tries to exist within the moral framework of the modern day, as it was created in the modern day. It is a challenge to adopt old ideals of ancient holy texts to the sensibilities of our era, and more importantly, a challenge to be kinder than Satanists. I urge you to keep an eye on the worst excesses of your religion, just as it might be. Just as Scandinavian metalhead Satanists burning down churches must be condemned as the morally and legally criminal act it was, Christians must contend with the sins of their own faith, and seek to right those wrongs so that Christianity can be a better force in the world. I wish you all the luck in these endeavors, and I thank you for all the good your organization does for the community.

​@@seiban8455 individualism is one of the worst diseases of modern capitalist society. the individual is created by and dependent on the community. in this way, by someone being hedonistic and chasing after their *own* temporary pleasures and desires, they inherently chase after *not other's* desires, inherently defining themselves as separate from the rest of everything, from the community, and sense their Self formed as a result of the community, they negate themselves and literally make themselves exist less, as they detach themselves from the Existence that made their Self. i think you should read "the new seeds of contemplation" by fr. thomas merton. for context, i am very devoutly catholic.

@@universal_hyssoap First I want to say that this is an outstanding comment you have made. It's really just fantastic to have such a vivid take about your philosophical ideals that is so different from mine but makes such sense in how it might have come about. Again, I really appreciate the kindness showed in bothering to have a coherent argument to give me. As for your argument, I'm very inclined by my style of argumentation to dodge around issues, so before I do that, let me just acknowledge that I'm in no position in my life to inherently change core beliefs about my morality. Now that I have said that, I think perhaps there's a misunderstanding between what your interpretation of individualism is and what my interpretation of individualism is. Individualism in my view is about the sort of end goal of all the morality and whatnot. I believe that morality is best when it tries to help people on an individual level, of course accounting for that there are a lot of individuals with different wants to consider. At the end, in my view, the wants and needs of the individual being fulfilled is the root of moral good. This doesn't necessarily stand in opposition to what I would call and what you might call collectivism. I see collectivism as a great, perhaps the greatest of all tools for doing moral good. Acting only as tools of a collective, humans are wasted and worthless. Acting only as individuals, selfish and brutish, humans are wasted and worthless. Exalting the individual happiness of people in the framework of a just system where criminality is punished to maintain the good of the individual in the fairest way possible is the ideal way to maintain moral good as I see it. There are many ways to get this sort of framework, I personally advocate in ideal, utopian circumstances for a direct democracy sort of system. As for me as a self proclaimed individual existing less than other people. Well, maybe so, I find it hard to quantify a thing like that, and I'm not so enamored with the idea of leaving a footprint that I need to exist as much as other people. I most certainly am a byproduct of my collective, its cultures and values, but I don't think I'm the sort of person that tends to come out on the other side of this process of cultural molding done to every person. Thinking on what has made me, me, is a long and winding road of different political, moral, and historical introspections, as well as the core feelings I have little control over and challenges that I have either overcome or that I continue to have no answer for. These things have led me to wonder what if any collective I would swear my loyalty to. I'm not religious, I find myself fully disenchanted with the idea of patriotism and nationalism, I hate the idea of people working all their lives for very little gain the way modern society requires. I won't lie, I myself am very lazy, but even if I were to hunker down and settle into a five day workweek 9-5 life for the good of the collective, what's my reward? I get to subsist. The relation the collective has with the individual is parasitic, and it always has been. I am not blind to what the collective can do that individuals just can't. That is my religion, in fact, if I can be said to have one. Modern humans are gods, and only because of the collective. In the days of Mesopotamia and Egypt, the flooding of the rivers determined the attitude of the gods. The gods of Egypt were stern and paternal, but the gods of Mesopotamia were cruel because their rivers were cruel, flooding harshly and irregularly. Today, it is a simple matter to set forth plans to dam a river, and have the dam completed within two decades, complete with an irrigation network that will never have to worry about flooding again. I mean that modern humans are gods in two ways, in that we can do godlike things, and we take on godlike roles. In this framework, there is nothing left but to hoard comforts, reach greater heights, and construct the means of our salvation from the global climate catastrophe we've set the stage for. Snow was once a valued delicacy in Tenochtitlan, in the days when human sacrifices were common in their temples. Merchants ported it down from a mountaintop as an expensive treat each day. Today it is so simple to go down to a grocery store and get frozen treats that it's beyond thought. This is what I mean when I say the wants of the individual are what I value. The individual couldn't solve the issue of making snow common even in hot places, but the collective could, and the collective gave this and so many other things to the individual.

Just use cheat engine

Have a lot of hours xD

@@Cassizz he was albania

@@Cassizz you are the irl Skanderchad

@@Cassizz This is the first time the creater replied to me :)

Of course u lost to Serbia :)

Tengri prussia

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dNQs_Bef_V8.html

I, too, am asking for this important piece of music.

The father of the Serbian nation Dobrica Cosic considers the ability to lie and lying to be the highest moral virtue of the Serbian people and the foundation of foundation of Serbian pride. Here is a direct quote from Dobrica Cosic: "Lying is the greatest virtue of the Serbian people". Dobrica Cosic continues and says: "We lie to deceive ourselves... To console others, we lie to fight fear, to encourage ourselves, to hide our misery... Lying is a trait of our patriotism and the proof of our innate intelligence. We lie in a creative, imaginative and inventive way". Source : Deobe The Second Battle of Kosovo (October 17-October 20, 1448) pitted a coalition of the Kingdom of Hungary and Wallachia led by John Hunyadi, against an Ottoman-led coalition under Sultan Murad II at Kosovo Polje. The Albanian troops under Skanderbeg (🇦🇱 Albanian 🦅), wanted to help the Hungarians, but Đurađ Branković (Serbian 🇷🇸), then ALLIED to Sultan Murad II (Ottoman), prevented the Albanian troops under Skanderbeg from helping the Hungarians... Source: Sedlar, Jean W. (1994). University of Washington Press. p. 393 As a result, Skanderbeg (🇦🇱) ravaged the estates of Branković (🇷🇸) as punishment for desertion of the Christian cause. Consequence = defeat of the Hungarians ... Source: Kenneth, Setton (1997) [1978] Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. p. 100.

Ethnicity = Skanderbeg himself defined himself as Albanian ( Ethnicity ) (handwritten letter). Ex : " Ioannes Antonius princeps Taranti Georgio Albano salutem " = Georgio the Albanian 🇦🇱 salutes the prince Giovanni of Taranto . Source : (Pope Pius II , Commentarii) The same prince Giovanni Antonio described Skanderbeg as "Georgio Albano".. Geography = Skanderbeg always signed himself as "Dominus Albaniae" (Albanian: Zot i Arbërisë, English: Lord of Albania🇦🇱) Source : Frazee, Charles A. (22 June 2006). Catholics and Sultans: The Church and the Ottoman Empire 1453-1923. Cambridge University Press. p. 33. The House of Kastrioti (Albanian: Dera e Kastriotëve) was an Albanian noble family, active in the 14th and 15th centuries as the rulers of the Principality of Kastrioti. At the beginning of the 15th century, the family controlled a territory in the Mat and Dibra regions. Exemple : Great grandfather = Kostandin Kastrioti Mazreku (died ca. 1390) was an Albanian 🇦🇱 regional ruler in parts of the wider Mat and Dibër areas. Grandfather = Pal Kastrioti was an Albanian 🇦🇱 medieval ruler in the latter part of the 14th century in northern Albania. Source : Genealogy of the Kastrioti family, Du Cange (1680), Historia Byzantina duplici commentario Even the Serbs of the time considered Skanderbeg as Albanian, his father (Gjon) was buried in an Orthodox monastery, the Serbs named the tower where he is buried "Albanian tower 🇦🇱"... source : ( Himelstir. p. 45 ) Moreover, even the descendants of Skanderbeg from the Arbëresh community qualify as Albanians 🇦🇱 and not as Serbs ... Example : Shopie Castriota, loris Castriota etc ... Alessandro Cutolo ( Italian historian ) : " Gjon ( father of Skanderbeg ) married Princess Vojsava, the daughter of another excellent Albanian🇦🇱 leader, the Lord of Polog " . Source : in is work "Skanderbeg" , p.20, published in Milan (Italy) in 1940. His mother ( Skanderbeg )came from the Muzaka family (Albanian) and not from the Brankovic family ... Father was Gjon Kastrioti, son of Pal Kastrioti. Mother was Voisava from the Muzaka-Family (as stated in the memoires of Gjon Muzaka written sometime before 1510) Documents from that time only state that she was an albanian. There are no serbian documents that state she was serbian. In his memoires Gjon Muzaka (before 1510) wrote that she is a muzaka. We only have two sources from that era that give us a hint of her origin. One is geographically and the other is ethnically . Geographic source: barleti wrote that it was from polog. Member of a noble house and tribal leader. Why tribal and not Serbian? First of all, the triballi were an ancient Thraco-Illyrian ( Albanian ) tribe. The same name was again used in the Middle Ages / Byzantine era for the inhabitants of the ancient tribal area. All the people who lived in this area were called triballi (Albanians, Bulgarians and Serbs). (And let's not forget that the Tribalians were Slavised for the majority ... But remained Thraco-Illyrian/Albanian in their blood ...) Today, the majority of Albanians in Macedonia live in the Polog region (the eastern part of Macedonia). Exemple : Appianus Alexandrinus (is a Greek historien of the Roman period) who qualified the Triballians of "Illyrian origin". Source : "historia Romana". Stephanus of Byzantium ( Great lexicographer of Constantinople, lived in the 6 th century), was written in the year 528-545, declares that the "Triballians are Illyrian. Source : From Urbibus and Populis. Other authors such as Strabo, Pliny, Ptolemy and Dion Cassius, state that the Triballians are of Thraco-Illyrian origin ( Pelasgians/Albanian ) Ethnical source: Gjon Muzaka wrote in his memoires that she was a muzaka. I think with the latter source we should conclude this whole discussion. As it is a very close source - chronological and physical. The person in this case Gjon Muzaka knew Voisava personally and he fought besides Skanderbeg and skanderbegs son. So he wouldnt dare to write something he would later regret right ? He wrote those memoires sometime before 1510 so basically before the book of barleti was printed.

The original name of the family of Kastrioti (Castriota) was Merzeku. Kastriot, Kastrat in Has (🇦🇱), Kastrat in Dibra (🇦🇱) or the microtoponym "Kostur" near the village of Mazrek in the Has region. Source :Bela 2019, p. 229. In connection to the Kastrioti family name, it is very likely that the name of one the different Kastriot or Kastrat which were fortified settlements as their etymology shows (castrum = Latin) was as their family name. The Kastrioti may have originated from this village (🇦🇱) or probably had acquired it as pronoia. Source : Omari 2014, p. 44 Angelo used the cognomen Meserechus in reference to Skanderbeg and this link to the same name is produced in other sources and reproduced in later ones like Du Cange's Historia Byzantina (1680). Source : Malaj 2013, p. 43 These links highlight that the Kastrioti used Mazreku as a name that highlighted their tribal affiliation (farefisni). Source : Malaj 2013, p. 44 The name Mazrek(u), which means horse breeder in Albanian, is found throughout ALL Albanian regions 🇦🇱. Source : Malaj 2013, p. 45. The Kastrioti themselves where organised in a tribal structure and formed a fis or clan/tribe. Source : Gall, Timothy L.; Hobby, Janeen (2009). Worldmark Encyclopedia of Cultures and Daily Life: Europe. p. 27. Gjergj Kastriot Scanderbeg ( 31, October, 1460 ) : Moreover, you scorn our people, claiming the Albanians 🇦🇱 as nothing more than sheep, and according to your customs think of us with only insults. It would seem you know nothing of the origins of our race. Our elders were the Epirotes from whence Pyrrhus himself came forth, the might of whom the Romans could barely withstand. Those very Epirotes whom with their weapons set forth and conquered Taranto and much of Italy. There exists no challenge to their might from the likes of the Tarentines, a species of wet men born only to catch fish. And since you proclaim Albania 🇦🇱 a part of Macedonia, you grant also then, our elders as nobles who went as far as India under Alexander the Great, defeating all the peoples that came before them with great ease. From those men descend these who you call sheep. But the nature of things is not changed. Why do your men run away in the faces of sheep?" Source : Book VI or Pope Pius the II's Comentaries. Origin of the name "Shqiptar" and Epirus = More concise on the issue, the only Nobel Prize in history 🎓 is none other than Theodor Mommsen 🥇 author of the cycle "Corpus of the inscriptions of antiquity" who says that: - "the brave Epirotes, the Albanians 🇦🇱 of antiquity supported with traditional loyalty the young and brave Pyrrhus or "the Eagle" as they called him" . Let us point out in this regard that the Albanians call themselves "Shqiptar", i.e. "sons or children of the Eagle". The soldiers of Pyrrhus (3rd century BC / Epirote King), called their King "the Eagle" and that the latter gave them back one day that they were his "children", so the Albanians are the children of the Eagle... "Shqiptar = child of the Eagle .... " . (Pyrrhus was the cousin of Alexander the Great, of the Molossian tribe and himself an ambitious conqueror, Pyrrhus is one of the most formidable opponents of the early days of ancient Rome). Let's not forget that nes Epirotes were an Illyrian tribe (🇦🇱) and not Greeks! There is also another interpretation of this ethnonym: the Eagle was one of the symbols of Zeus, Pelasgian god (🇦🇱) by excellence (source: cf Homer Iliad XVI,234). The Albanians would thus be the "sons of Zeus" thus "sons of the Eagle". Besides, these last ones (Albanians), whatever their religion, still call their God Zot (Zeus = Zojz = Zot), thus recalling the divine name of Zeus. On the other hand the word Shqip, before becoming an etnhonym (Shqiptar), has always designated the "Albanian language" (language shqip = clear language). Precision: Zeus was not a Greek god! (propaganda which it is spread)... Zeus was a Pelasgian god (🇦🇱) Example : Achilles : " Zeus, sovereign lord, O prince of Dodona, O you Pelasgic Zeus (🇦🇱), distant god who rules over Dodona, in this rough country of Selles... " Source: Homer, Iliad, XVI,233/234. Achilles did not say: Zeus the Greek, Zeus the Hellene or Zeus the Mycenaean... Then why in the school books, one qualifies Zeus of Greek? (just with this quotation, one realizes that modern historiography is not honest) Karl O.Müller: The more intelligence will enter the history of Greece, the more attention will be paid to the Pelasgic element sacrificed until now. Source : (Prolegomena-1825) Epirus = Historically, tribes like the Molossians or others that made up Epirus like the Kaons, Thesprotians, Paraue, Antintans and others, are historically linked to the Illyrian (🇦🇱) culture or part of it. As Thucydides tells us about the events of the Peloponnesian War, which involved both actually Illyrians and Illyria itself, these tribes were commonly considered barbarian (non-Greek) tribes. Thucydides: - "Among the barbarians there were about 1,000 Kaons who ruled without a king. In addition to the Kaons, the Thesprotians also participated and were also governed without a king. There were also the MOLOSSIANS, the Atintants and the Paraues. Source : ( HISTORY OF THE WAR OF THE PELOPONNESE ) All these tribes, mentioned by the historian of Athenian origin Thucydides for their participation in the famous war of Peloponnese in the 5th century BC, are considered as barbarians, thus not Greek! Source : ( Thucydides II, 80- IV, 126 ) The Kaons, the Thesprotians of Chamerie, the Arintans and the Parauets constitute the backbone of what was called Epirus. Among them appear of course the Molossians where are the roots of the family of the mother of Alexander the Great! And Thucydides is not the only source which defines the Epirotes like non-Greeks. There are many others! According to the encyclopedia Basic Antiquity, composed of 86 volumes... Pauly Wissowa the real "Encyclopedia Alterumswissenschaft" says that the Epirotes are of Illyrian origin 🇦🇱 and have strong ties to the population of southern Italy! Whether or not the Epirotes are Illyrians is a discussion that, from an archaeological point of view, is resolved. The Epirotes and the Illyrians have the same culture, if we consider the Iron Age, the use of tombs, the fortifications with several rows of walls, their material culture, the shape of the pots or the ornaments which are identical to those of Korça (present Albania) and the religion. Not only ancient authors such as Thucydides, Strabo and others have called the Epirotic tribes barbarians (non-Greek), but later serious publications based on documents and archaeological findings point in the same direction. The Molosses were one of the Illyrian tribes of Epirus from which came the mother of Alexander the Great, Olympias, daughter of the king and sister of Alexander the Great. The Molosses were one of the Illyrian tribes of Epirus from where came the mother of Alexander the Great, Olympias, daughter of the king, and the sister of another well known Illyrian prince, Alexander the Molossus. Moreover the Greek armed forces committed an atrocious genocide on the Albanian civil population of Epirus (Çameria)!

@@Universal.. I will read the rest of the text later, but this first caught my eye. Serbian writer Dobrica Cosic never said or wrote that. I read his book "Deobe" and I can tell you that this quote does not exist anywhere. So it is a propaganda lie directed against Serbs.

@@salze834 Stop lying, Dobrica Ćosić did say that. Anyone can verify it. It is you who is saying propaganda by saying that Skanderbeg was Serbian by descent.