Aggressive Basset Hound Dog vs. Cesar Millan! 

Too bad he didn’t treat his employees with any respect.

@@cascooter hopefully he's grown and become a better employer since your last experiences

So he does choke out dogs irl? So he does have a below average IQ irl?

@@violetm9045 what?

@@cascooter what's that mean?

How to deal with extremely ignorant dog owners? How do you stay calm and how do you not just walk away?

@@SnakesandDoggies That is a good one. I have dropped friends because of the way they have treated their dogs. I wanted to kidnap the dogs I was so upset. I had a groomer once and I asked why she had a cast on her foot. She laughed and said, " I got so mad I kicked my dog and broke my foot. " I reported her and of course never went back. Can you imagine? 🤨

Greetings from florida 🐬Cesar Could You make a video about how to help Your dog/dogs cope with being ill and care needed when their master dies. I know it’s not an easy issue. Thank You 🙏 and God Bless You My Brother ✨

HELP! My furbabies bark at every noise they hear, and are very aggressive toward any broom, and mop etc. They're sweet and can be held but that barking is driving me crazy.

Ceasar, I wrote to you about a request for a video. I received a reply from someone claiming to be you. The problem is it is a scam for investing in crypto currency and pet insurance. I never replied. I just investigate the weird initials they used and the person they told me to contact. They are using your name and face on RU-vid. I have the reply.

thanks!

@@CesarMillanOfficial you are welcome 🥰

“Several instances of cruel and dangerous treatment - promoted by Millan as acceptable training methods - were documented by American Humane, including one in which a dog was partially asphyxiated in an episode. In this instance, the fractious dog was pinned to the ground by its neck after first being “hung” by a collar incrementally tightened by Millan. Millan’s goal - of subduing a fractious animal - was accomplished by partially cutting off the blood supply to its brain.” Just remember this guy chokes out puppies

Yeah definitely. Had two pure breed Bassets and they were so innocent I could literally take food out of their mouths and they wouldn't do anything.

Looks like a Jack Russel terrier.

What dog are you tryna get?

I bet you'll be a fantastic dog owner!😊💞 And after watching these videos, you will be trained and ready for a dog to adopt you! Good luck 😉👍

We’ve all been there. Got a Dog 3 weeks after and she’s so well behaved .

@@cookiedee8473 thanks I actually think a lot more nowadays when I go past a dog, watching their behaviour, thinking of how I would need to react or 'lead' the dog 😄

Get a German shepherd puppy if you can

“Several instances of cruel and dangerous treatment - promoted by Millan as acceptable training methods - were documented by American Humane, including one in which a dog was partially asphyxiated in an episode. In this instance, the fractious dog was pinned to the ground by its neck after first being “hung” by a collar incrementally tightened by Millan. Millan’s goal - of subduing a fractious animal - was accomplished by partially cutting off the blood supply to its brain.”

@@violetm9045 What makes the Humane society an authority? WHy can't they get Cesar charged with animal abuse (when they are such a notable authority?). In my area, the Humane Society cherry picks the dogs they'll rescue from the primary shelter required by law to provide care to (and dispose of) unwanted animals. They primarily take the most adoptable/desireable dogs, and leave the rest to face their fate. That's understandable, of course. People can only do what they can do. But, then the Humane Society boasts about being a "no-kill" shelter, and criticizes the primary (statutory) shelter for not being. It's like the Humane Society lives in a different reality than everyone else. (It's easy criticize others when you don't have to live in the same reality.). Even worse, a shelter found an outlet for dogs via "transport" to other areas where they didn't have a lot of stray/unwanted dogs. The Humane Society complained about this. You'd think they'd view it as an opportunity to show off their "no kill" status they brag about all the time (to everyone else's detriment). You know? Start taking the dogs nobody wants? But, no. They were upset and scandalized that other areas were getting these desirable dogs and the Humane Society wasn't. I would advise AJ to take what you're saying with a healthy dose of skeptism. All that glitters is not gold. There's more to the story you're not telling because it doesn't sound as good. There' nothing sacred about the Humane Society. They're just another "non-profit" with politics and a need to define themselves (at others expense).

@@markfuller 1. I don't give an f about THS 2. He still abuses dogs and nothing changes that. 3. Biggest difference between real dog trainers and this guy is that , WE ACTUALLY HAVE QUALIFICATIONS, and don't use extremely out dated (and proven false) information on a completely different species to train domestic animals.

@@markfuller this has nothing to do with the Humane society, I don't know why you're do desperate for it to. They don't even exist in my country, but what does exist are laws against choking animals and prong collars.

@@violetm9045 Of course you don't care. It doesn't fit your ego-serving agenda to use hyperbole and slurs against someone else. If he "still abuses dogs" why hasn't he been charged with that? Have you reported him? (Walk the talk instead of just talking it?). I was involved in "modern (4 quadrant) training" for over a decade. It doesn't work with most dogs, most problems. It's great in some ways. But, it's not balanced. What it does do is attract people like you who need to push others down to feel better about themselves. That was one of the main reasons I got out of it. Very ugly personalities (read Aesop's fable about "the dog in the manger.").It turns into a religion where it's more important to make the theory work than use what works (balanced training). There were "modern training" religionists who had dogs at home they couldn't control, separated in their own rooms. They would still run down other people. They had some kind of disassociation in their mind where they could keep saying all the ego-satisfying things (us vs them), and never cross that thought with the reality they lived. I knew some who sent their dogs off to a trainer to do the "dirty work." The dogs came back and immediately went back to being kept in separate rooms because they were unruly (again). "New and improved" appeals to some people because they can lord over others that they're "outdated and invalidated." It's just more talking the talk. Not walking it. Claims of "abuse" but no charges. That's easy to say over and over, and feel smug about it (if that's what you need). And then the authority of the Humane Society. Nobody can question them right? Even though they put their pants on one leg at a time too (and have some dirt in their past, and seem to not be able to get Cesar charged with abuse either.). But, you don't care about all that because it doesn't work as well as your "shocking" assertions.

Blessings to you!

Yah!! PLUS Basset hounds are very lazy to be aggressive

Looks like a jack russel terrier plus maybe a beagle.

“Several instances of cruel and dangerous treatment - promoted by Millan as acceptable training methods - were documented by American Humane, including one in which a dog was partially asphyxiated in an episode. In this instance, the fractious dog was pinned to the ground by its neck after first being “hung” by a collar incrementally tightened by Millan. Millan’s goal - of subduing a fractious animal - was accomplished by partially cutting off the blood supply to its brain.”

So animal abuse makes sence to you?

@Calamity, I just want to offer a different view: If Cesar commits abuse, why hasn't he been charged with such? It's easy to go around using hyperbole. But, if it were really true, why wouldn't the people who like to overusing words (to the point that mere dog ownership is considered "abuse") report that abuse, and get that person charged & convicted of the crime they claim is committed? Words are always easy. Actions? Not so much. In other words: it's personal opinion for their ego. The ego loves it when someone is wrong. The more wrong the better! Hyperbole is the secret sauce for the ego. But, but... what about the Humane Society? (someone will say). What makes them special? They're just another non-profit whose insiders profit _handsomely_ . Just like the Red Cross, United Way, ASPCA (all with scandals for enriching themselves through crisis, pandering to heartstrings, etc.). In my area, the Humane Society cherry picks which dogs they will accept (as surrenders), and which dogs they rescue from the county (who is mandated by law to provide shelter and dispose of unwanted animals). They leave the less-adoptable dogs to face their fate. That's not bad. I'm not trying to run the HS down. Everyone who helps, helps. Each dog out of the shelter is good. But, the Humane Society turns around and pats themselves on the back for being a no-kill shelter, and lectures everyone on how virtuous this is, and shelters who aren't no-kill aren't virtuous. They're failing. Clearly they live in a different self-fulfilling reality than everyone else. It's easy to complain about others when you don't have to live up to the standards they're required to live up to. The bottom line is that so-called "modern" training attracts people who need to define "the outgroup." I was involved in it for over 10 years. I saw it all the time (I was even that way. I didn't like Cesar either. Mainly because that's what's expected to be part of the "in group."). Search for Aesop's fable about "the dog in the manger." That's the mentality. You can't win with them. It's not about truth or common-ground. It's hate. It's about their ego feeling empowered and special by pushing others down.

A little more about the Humane Society. In one area the statutory shelter (the shelter that can't play games with delusional rhetoric: "we're 'no kill' while leaving all these other dogs in the statutory shelter to be killed") found a way to "transport" scores of dogs to other areas where they didn't suffer the numbers of unwanted dogs. There was a _demand_ for dogs to adopt in those areas. The local humane society (and various other vanity rescues) turned it into a huge scandal. The smaller, more-desirable breeds (mixes) were going to those other areas. That should be a positive (if you're all moist about "no-kill" and wanting to help the statutory shelter in that goal). But, no. They were outraged that these local groups weren't given "first right of refusal." Like the statutory shelter has the luxury to even coordinate _that_ (while handling their statutory volume of intake, and at the same time trying to be the "no kill" shelter the Humane Society shames it about _not_ being). The Humane Society has no shame, and they live in a different universe than the rest of us. That they would call something abuse (but not seek charges) fits the same self-serving stuff I've seen. They have a narrative that works for their favor. They don't care how it affects others. It's just what a "Humane" group should say (in order to hold the position they claim to hold -- and reap a lot of profit from, while being non-profit.).

@@markfuller maybe the same reason a lot of tv personality's aren't charged.... Y'all let them get away with it.

Thank you for watching our videos!

thank you so much!

Some people don't know anyone. They might not have family. Nowadays people often don't know their neighbors. I knew someone in that situation a few years ago. It caused me to think about creating a web site where people could "check in" and if they didn't within the period of time they defined (3 days? a week? One day?) the system would contact whomever they designated (which could be a police non-emergency number for a welfare check). It could all be automated. I never did it. But, I gave it some thought because it seemed like a needed service. There must be quite a few people in that situation. (I worried there could be false alarms. Someone forgets, they lose their internet connection, the police are being contacted for no reason. That could be problematic if it were excessive.).

@@markfuller Nothing in life is perfect but that app sounds wonderful please please please work on it!

@@markfuller it is my biggest concern. I mean if I fall dead, ok, but I don't want to melt and not be discovered for months. Automated bill payments make it more likely than in the past. More and more my neighbour's are migrants and immigrants who actively ignore me. So I'd love a check in app of some type. It could have a tone alert or icon that flashes for a set time reminding people that they haven't checked in to help minimize 'false alerts'. Keep working on your idea

@@joywebster2678 I am a migrant, I suspect if I drop dead tomorrow it would be months before my body was found. My neighbours dont really care

@@Stettafire well my migrant neighbour's won't move their coverings enough to acknowledge my existence when I say hello to them and their children on the elevator. You are correct, what happens to them is their choice.

Thank you for watching!

blessings

You guys have a nice day

Hello how are you doing?

FWIW, Amazon Prime has it. No subscription. $2.99 USD for the episode (4). You then own it and can watch it there anytime. (It ends with him being adopted by one of the 3 families vying for that privilege. One of them does the best with him, being his leader controlling him, setting boundaries, interrupting unwanted behavior.).

Hello how are you doing🕊🕊🕊🕊

The Basset Hound I have now was aggressive when we got him from the rescue. We had to get a trainer who specialized in aggressive dogs.

Hello how are you doing👍👍👍👍

It's a 4-minute clip from a 40-minute episode of Leader of the Pack (season 1, ep. 4). The prior upload about a week ago was from the same episode. That might add something. The series is an "elimination" reality show where 3 families hope to adopt the dog, but only the one most capable of being a leader to the dog is awarded that honor. So, it's not really a documentary about rehabilitating the dog (the way Dog Whisperer or Cesar 911 is). It's a bit more entertainment oriented like H***'s Kitchen (as each participant is eliminated through the show). It's worth watching. It has some good stuff. It was released on dvd which you can find online used/cheap. Amazon Prime has it (no subscription. You just buy it and own it.). The way it goes is that the dog needs to learn to walk properly on a leash, with less excited "everywhere" energy. That will help it meet dogs with a better energy. The three families demonstrate their abilities to do that. Cesar guides them, and they do their best. He chooses one family to give the dog a home.

Cuz its a mix basset that's why.

The previous upload (a week ago) comes from the same episode of Leader of the Pack (season 1, ep 4). That might help. If you want to watch the full episode, it was released on DVD. Often used copies can be found on ebay cheap. You might need a region-free dvd reader. Amazon Prime has it (no subscription necessary. From what I've read, Prime is available almost in almost every nation.). It's a good episode. it's worth watching. I wish Cesar's youtube admin would include this kind of info in the description so people would know where to learn more.

It's from Leader of the Pack, season 1, ep 4. It was released on DVD, and streaming services have it. (Amazon Prime has it, which isn't a subscription model. You pay for an episode or season, and own it. But, can only play it there. I've read Prime video is available worldwide except for 4-5 countries. Good chance you could watch it there.). It's worth watching. I like the original Dog Whisperer series better. It seems more focused on educating. LotP is more entertainment, like H Kitchen where contestants are eliminated. It's not bad though. I just think some things would be more understandable if someone had watched DW first. To me, DW is the gold standard.

@@markfuller Thank you.

I would say that lip-licking in that circumstances is act of submission. That's a good sign (if I'm right). The dog wants to follow you, or accepts your correction (understands what you want). Sometimes lick licking can be a warning. I'm thinking of a dog laying in a spot it shouldn't (on the bed, on a sofa) and you're going to remove the dog. Lick licking then might signal "I'm going to bite in order to own my space." But, that doesn't sound like the circumstance you see it in. If you watch the original Dog Whisperer series (highly recommended, it's a forgotten resource), you'll see the unwanted behavior _a lot_ . It's almost every other episode. The usual mistakes people make are 1) a harness (control the body, but not the mind). 2) too much leash (they don't keep the dog at their side as a matter of practice). 3) They ignore the signs of the dog becoming excited/fixated. (FOr some reason, it is a human trait to consider the dog innocent until proven guilty. We wait for the dog to lunge rather than interrupt the early signs, and not let the dog's energy raise to a level 6, where it's harder to interrupt). 4) People often let the dog lead them out the door for the walk. Or, they don't wait for the dog to be calm, and looking at the person to be invited out for the walk only when calm. (That little seeming symbolism can have a big effect on who's walking whom). Add to that #2, and it's clearer who's walking whom. 5) The dog doesn't get enough exercise. It can't hear the discipline. (Take the dog for a run first. Release that pent up energy. Then work on discipline/expectations. Then give affection. People get the order wrong.). If you watch a couple seasons of DW, you'll see all of that. Plus, you'll see 6) that it's often a lack of leadership at home. The dog doesn't have to earn its affection at home. The people think it's cute, and they enjoy the relationship at home when nothing really matters. It's only when some challenge in the environment occurs that it matters (that the dog won't listen). But, if they practiced calm-assertive leadership at home (rules, boundaries, limitations), then the dog would understand more what the person means when they do it when in the face of real challenges. In that sense: even the episodes that aren't about this problem will help because it's usually the same thing over and over (different problem): a human who isn't the leader.

That you know of?

Is Amazon Prime available to you? Leader of the Pack is on it. No subscription required. You pay for it, and own it. But, that's the US. Maybe it's not available that way elsewhere? It was released on DVD, but you'd need a region-free player. I don't think he can post the entire episode. Nat. Geo owns it. I'm sure they want to make their money selling it on streaming (but then, they might not make it available everywhere. So, it's them doing it.).

@@markfuller Truth is that I dont pay for entertainment. Games, movies,... maybe except for cinema. I'll just click on something else. Other YT creators are happy to do it for YT money

@@trollmcclure1884 I understand. In that vain, I have seen *a lot* of high-quality Dog Whisperer & Cesar 911 episodes on the "invisible internet project." It's kind of slow downloading due to its nature (privacy). But, some good stuff there. I think Cesar got screwed in his relationship with Nat Geo. There is a Jordan Harbinger vlog (ep 162) titled "Cesar Millan on the Biggest Mistake Dog Owners Make" where he talks about it. (If I recall, nowhere in that video does it actually say what the "biggest mistake" actually is either. Just warning you in advance. ha. ).

Hello how are you doing?

The Basset Hound I have now was aggressive when we got him from the rescue. We worked with a trainer and gave him lots of love, six years later he is a sweet heart. The dog trainer specialized in aggressive dogs and this was the first Basset he ever worked with.

FWIW: Dog Whisperer season 3, ep. 6 (Sophie) is about a dog-aggressive basset (possessive of the owner against the other dog in the house). You could be right that bassets aren't this way. But, there's always exceptions to the rule. It's probably the people who make them this way (like most dogs. Too humanizing, not enough boundaries/discipline. People will often feel sorry for a dog due to its past, and cultivate this kind of insecurity toward other dogs.).

It's Leader of the Pack season 1, ep. 4. The 4-min video is the beginning of 3 families seeking to be the dog's owner. It's kind of entertainment that way. Not so much "here's the solution." You see 3 people trying to provide the solution, and the best person takes the dog home. You should watch it. It's good (much more to see). But, the solution is teaching the dog to walk properly (not lead/pull). In a larger sense it's about being the leader, not letting the dog's excited energy reaching that level which can trigger a fight.

@@markfuller It's weird because I try to apply the same techniques of relaxing around my little dogs, but they always go off on another dog passing by, no matter how I'm relaxed or pulling/not pulling, and no matter where the leash is. Just can't get them to relax, even though there's no actual danger. I'll have to watch the full episode

@@vladonyoutube3578 That stuff's usually not relaxation (or lack thereof). It's the dog believing it's the leader. When you have more than one dog, all it takes is one instigator (one dog who believes its the leader) to marshal the others into "backup" to its lunging/reacting to things on the walk. You might walk one at a time to try to identify if there's one starting it. If you focus on that one. Usually this stuff has to do with the human not being the leader at home, in small things. They let the dog get away with a lot, but want the dog(s) to behave in one circumstance (which is harder to correct when the dogs don't receive "rules, boundaries & limitations" at home in the easy things.). If they're not used to listening to you, then it's harder for them to hear outside with distractions. Little things like letting a dog lead you out the door for a walk (or follow you out excitedly) can make it impossible to control the dog during the walk. I always encourage people to go back to the original Dog Whisperer series and watch that. I think people expect a simple how-to for these things. Like, a special leash (or "tsch") will fix it. It's more about how to "be" all the time, a leader, the energy, who you are to the dog. It's multi-dimensional, not simple like "how to teach a dog to sit." It's about meeting the dog's needs psychologically as a leader (not just loving a dog as a human). You'll see the problem you describe many times in those episodes. It's probably the most common problem. As you see it over and over, you can glean how all the elements come together (the little things that add up).

@@vladonyoutube3578 Just to clarify about my comment that this isn't usually related to relaxation. I meant that more about your dogs' state of relaxation (when you said "can't get them to relax."). Your relaxation is important to being seen as a leader. People often fake/act being calm. But dogs sense the underlying frustration. Dogs can have frustrated energy which makes it hard for them to listen to your discipline. That's usually working breeds who might benefit from a long run before trying to have a structured walk, teaching them to follow you as the leader. So, that can be part of it. But, usually it's lack of leadership overall (in things unrelated to the walk). Not enough calm-assertive energy all the time. Too much affection for the wrong things. If you watch the original DW, you'll see what I mean. it's the common theme. And then, trying to do this with more than one dog at once is even harder because, as I said, there's usually one that is the leader to the other(s). You have to work on that one first.

He is a mix of Basset Hound and some other breed. Maybe Beagle?

FYI: It's Leader of the Pack season 1, episode 4. The full episode is worth watching. It was released on DVD (you can find used on ebay). Amazon Prime has it streaming (pay for it, own it. Not a subscription thing.). I wish whoever administers Cesar's channel would include these details so people would know where to learn more. It's a missed opportunity. All they have to do is put the info in the description.

I agree. I've seen the full episode and it struck me that Harry wasn't as bad as the rescue woman said. The issue was that his unstructured walking (leading the walk) provoked other dogs. I think Harry learned to expect that response, and was on edge for it. But, he didn't seem "aggressive" in the entire episode. He could have been that way with the rescue woman's handling of him. (She may have been -- probably was -- using a harness. Something could have been more enabling in her handling, thus her depiction of him being worse than he appeared with Cesar through the entire episode.).