I can understand why creatives are threatened by AI. Some people doubt it, but in a few more decades, you wont be able to tell an AI generated movie apart from a human one. A few decades after that and AI will have figured out how to write, direct, and film perfect works in every genre.
"Evil cannot create, it can only imitate... " according to the naysayers. We just had an interesting debate at work about this when I referred to some AI generated art and movie trailers like this one. The Oxford online dictionary gives 2 primary definitions for art, in #1, art is defined as created by human activity, in other, song, dance, & other products of creative arts are defined as art. I think it's art, and like the man said, "It's better than most of what Hollywood has produced recently..."
Each of the individual scenes looked great but there was no connection or obvious story. It would of been better to stick with one scene and then provide a little direction to the AI. Perhaps just ask it to move the androids head quietly towards the "camera" suggesting it's either noticed you or, better, it's sentient and doesn't want to be noticed.
Smart cyber being and digital dogs could be helpful in find stolen kids and humans, and create order in families around planet. They also could be helpful in finding professional breeders(abusers) of humans around planet. In complex behavior on different professional places
