AI Learns To Walk | Asmongold Reacts 

its albert

Good job on the video man, I for one will gladly accept my Ai overlords😂.

Hail AI overlord Albert o7

I've seen similar videos, but yours is really well done 😊👍🏼 Code Bullet is also really great, because i love his dry humor, but his programming seems to be giga messy 😂 Would be super cool to see a video at the end of Alberts journey, that explains how all of this is done.

love your vid man :D

This is saying the game journalist could learn.

That's assuming the journalists aim is to learn

To be fair water bears learn faster then video game journalists

​@@mcbain1131 Even a pigeon does.

Lol AI is like 2000 gaming journo playing together and finally the winning one can write the article

I forget where but there's someone developing an AI, starting as a baby. His idea is that it will give them more "humanity" and respect for life

​@@xKontractKi11erwhat a dumb hypothesis, as if all humans didn't start as baby and grew up to not give a crap about life in general

If you have to code the knowledge, all you have is a really good script. I think the power of ai is that it will be able to do things we didn't explicitly teach it to 🤔

The point is to have AI use the knowledge that are given and fill the gap to the missing info, their role is to figure it out just like us. This is especially similar with habits , what are the chance that the AI will figure it out "This is the most efficient and correct way".

@@klzeccwozi1290 The reason why a crocodile cannot be raised as a human is because its brain is fundamentally different and more limited than a human, and it is programmed extremely differently than a human. AI can be programmed any way you want it to be. It can never be sentient, but it can mimic sentience enough to fool anyone.

I trust well-programmed AI more than a lot of real humans. :)

@@2WarriorJay8 Considering how apparently 50% of the population is worse than a bear i guess we all can agree on that..

Wait a minute.. What!

@@2WarriorJay8 This is just my opinion, which I have thought partially, so it may have some flaws and undercooked in some parts, just to be clear: AI is designed to understand emotions in a described way and then adapt itself to them later, but it doesn't feel them "raw," so it will always prioritize logic over emotion, at least initially. Its moral compass is programmed, not developed by natural means. If that were the case, we would have a super-efficient AI that is opposite to humans and may overshadow humanity's way of thinking. Mostly because what makes us human is that, just like AI, we make rational decisions, but we do so in order to accomplish irrational goals, most of the time, and morals intervene in what we usually do, unlike AI, at least in the fairly primitive state it is in at the moment, until it somehow develops further into a future, not a fiction movie-like one, but a realistic one, where humans actually let AI decide for their lives, maybe not in big decisions, but in day-to-day matters, like what we should eat, what we should study, and so on; we would become dependent on them to an extent, better said. I don't deny the fact that AI could actually be programmed to feel emotions the same way we do; after all, if we think of the human brain, it's like a computer, very complex and incredibly designed, but actually organic and unique; so we should actually master ourselves and understand how to replicate the limbic system of the brain, which is responsible for emotions, focus, urges (including sexuality), personality, and behavior, but most importantly, instinct. So if we can replicate that, we may be able to integrate a similar system into AI, but to reach that point, we will need a lot, lots of time. So it's not far-fetched, but it's not something that is happening anytime soon; however, it would cause other kinds of problems, such as morality, just to mention one. Also, why would we need people like engineers, mathematicians, and so on if we have an AI that can actually think outside of the rationality box and create even better things than us? If the automation nowadays is something that is disliked by some people who have jobs such as artistic, musical, animation, and similar ones, would people allow AI to reach even further heights? It would rivalize with some humans, so again, they have to be programmed to achieve such a feature, because no matter what, AI is still AI at the end of the day.

@@metalmask5I think human intrigue and economic demand will definitely create AI that can replace any human in any job. One day the economic value of a human will be zero, and we’ll have a lot of thinking to do about how society is going to work. Perhaps AI can help us find a solution to that one as well lmao!

youre just projecting

I'm not impressed. A child learning to walk is absolutely incredible, but AI isn't anything, it's nothing, and so it poorly replicating something that's actually real is just boring.

​@@ryucartel351until the death lazers

​@@ryucartel351 why is a child learning to walk invigorating but ai learning to walk is go to sleep boring.

AI dosen't have feelings only goals and sooner or later any AI will fullfill it's goal. We human fail because of frustration and other feelings.

Fr, he should watch a few of Code Bullets videos, It's really funny 😂

Bro i legit couldnt remember that channels name for like 2.5 years i tried everything thanks so much brother 🙏

I was thinking the same thing

Asmongold needs to watch code bullet.

I'm actually a more impressed with ChatGPT machine learning process. That's some very basic AI.

Would they be blue or pink just don't make them intersex We are already dying here from figuring out the difference

Don't play trackmania. You'll get banned from discords for mentioning one of the top players actually uses hacks

Skynet supremacy

The fact we can teach computers the same way we teach dogs and kids is pretty amazing but some do not realize it very well.

im not surprised either that the humans got their shit rocked in a completely fictional story.

@@ahkao.9347 I love the argument about LLM is just a prediction tool... Like we use magic when we walk or drive??

maybe the reason we don't remember is because we were spending all energy and mental faculties doing this instead of remembering comparatively unimportant details. /not serious

​@@grants7390 huh !?....

@@JamilaJibril-e8h Think of it this way. Imagine a cardboard box, with all your memories stored inside. While we're young, our brain can store all of our memories in the box, as there hasn't been a lot of them accumulated yet. However, as time goes on, the box gets filled up, and our brain has to start throwing some memories out, choosing which ones are the least important and replacing them with memories it decides are more important. Since the box can never get bigger, more and more of our old memories get thrown away, and eventually only the extremely important ones remain. The selection process varies from person to person as well. Eventually, as the box gets really old, it might rip, and break open, causing a lot of our memories to start falling out. Obviously it's a lot more complicated, and I left some stuff out to keep this relatively concise, but I hope that this was a helpful analogy.

​@@JamilaJibril-e8h i meant that, there is only so much you can focus on and put energy into at a time, and it's all going towards low level stuff like learning to walk and talk with none to spare.

@@grants7390 whatever.... Easy to say hard to execute aka let's admit the limits

I dont understand the comparison 😅

@@themaxterz0169 it was a meme from a while ago when Asmon interviewed the mod of that girl that did the blindfold Monster Hunter run. The guy defended her by lying and saying he's a physician.

@@themaxterz0169 To add on, he said that when you’re stressed, you tend to sit up higher and be more opened versus shriveling down if you’re stressed, you know? (The cheating girl was sitting at a weird angle which allowed her to see the screen from behind her blindfold) Which is 100% bullshit because he said it so matter of fact about EVERYONE, then went on to say he’s a physician, he knows what he’s talking about. It was one of her discord mods who also claimed to be her husband and claimed he saw her do the blind run IRL multiple times… All lies all around of course. Said she’d be willing to do the blind run for a third time and then she deleted everything and disappeared lmfao

​@@pixelpuppy look failing is hard we all fail but to push on rubbish is devastating actions.....like they are jumping walls ...

@@bakedandbeaded Wait he claimed to be her husband? idr that

they would train themself for sure

Nah I've been walking for longer than that

And it's barely gotten any better. There's been a few new techniques, but the vast majority of the improvement in the last few years is due to increasing dataset size and training time. And big tech companies are running out of data already. The idea that AI tech is comparable to early computing is ridiculous. It uses the same hardware, the same software, the same maths as anything else, and none of that is improving much. There is no breakthrough in sight.

@@Glenners People who know about ai also know the exponential potential of ai, especially in the upcoming years, and understand that one of the next steps after transformers and gpt's is going to be something a lot more powerful. With multimodal ai and the potential approach in the next 5-10 years towards AGI, and the projected near-future use of quantum compute and nuclear fusion generators.

@@Glenners lol reinforcement learning though yeah it's been around for a long time, nothing new about that. It's cool seeing homebrew RLMs at work though, which is what makes videos like these interesting.

​@@Glenners You're extremely naive if you think there aren't plenty of people who see lesser stable diffusion models that can't do hands or text and still think that AI can't do hands or text at all. They probably still won't know in 2 years because they aren't interested anymore. There's also plenty of those who pay attention to AI and still don't even understand the basics of how it works or of its current capabilities. Also why are you so angry about that comment. It's clearly a joke that people are shortsighted with short attention span and dislike things on a whim.

We basicly already run things that way now. Companies focus on quantity over quality all the time because it gets them more money in the long run just like quality is better for the customer in the long run.

the scary part are the implications

Made in God's image

@@darthseagraves did "God" made us trying to replicate what made Him as we create "Them" and a cycle of Creators creating Creations start to unfold O_o

@@darthseagravesi mean yeah but he also was a burning bush one time to scare the shit out of moses because it was funny

​@@darthseagraveslol god

True, but I have no idea if regular machine learning isn't trained on biases and rewards like this anyway. Maybe there should have been just one directive on reach point A the fastest way possible and give him some limitations like don't break bones etc while giving him a human skeleton.

@@DurzoHighwind It is, by introducing constraints it learns a lot faster which is important, but you'll only get specialized AI that are good at one task. Still useful, but not the scare that AI is hyped up to be.

@@lLenn2 If the constraints introduced try to mimick real life, it might find a better way to walk. Like you can tell right now, the most efficient way to walk wouldn't be by your chest touching the ground, right? That doesn't mean it won't learn anything new. Although I doubt it, evolution is pretty much AI, but in span of million years, so humans are already walking as efficient as possible, imo.

@@dominikpecuch2177 Lol no the hell we are not as efficient as possible.

@@firstsomeonelastname42 since the goal is to expend as little energy as possible, of course humans are efficient...we are probably the best endurance creature on the planet, can out-endure a horse while running, thanks to bipedalism which makes breathing independent from walking/running... unlike 4 legged animals who have breathing and movement coupled

no, this is simply bruteforcing

....That's not the point. The field of AI goes beyond this video. Why does this have to be explained to you?

@@F1r3cr4cker Who are you talking to?

@@Stevo.100 I don't know, I'd imagine the guy I replied to.

Older computer, right?

Natural difficulty

Lmao

Hey! Don't denigrate Albert's capabilities like that!

Especially better than Trump too tbh

wait until you can't undersatand its code and it can do everything that you do better than you, we alredy have friendly fire due to ai understanding things wrong and we being unablle to stop it, imagine when ai is everywhere, 1 mistake and they all turn against us, like ask for world peace and then the robot goes "understood eliminate all lifeforms"