Didn't IBM manage to make a computer called Deep Blue that managed to play a successful game against a master in chess? That would be decades after this computer, though.
Replying from the future (2023) there are more powerful chess games online, I'm sure. I'm pretty sure that would have been true in 2011, as well. I remember playing with some hand-held games back in the 1980s that I couldn't beat. But then, I've never been a great chess player.
Can you imnagine one day we will have devices like these at home and be able to use them for personal use? What a time to be alive! I like to imagine people would call them "Personal Computers" once they are small enough to fit under a desk. .
@Serpico261 Probably because most AI's use those complex arrays and algorithms. They probably are using something much more simpler though, and probably not very efficient ether. I don't know though because I'm terrible in math and only have a small understanding of programming logic. : 3
hmm... well you have a point. Loads of memory with an average computer, you'd go nowhere fast. Just like traveling the world on a tricycle. Uh, I think thats how it's like, right?
No, not even close. Dozens of orders of magnitude wrong. I don't think I've ever seen anyone that far off on any kind of estimate :D A 10Ghz cpu running for the estimated age of the universe would only manage ~4,600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000operations. A far cry from 10.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 (A googol)