Alien Conquest | Action | HD | Full Movie in English 

Kudos to this comment most people can't see the behind the camera, making of and the writing. Most can see that it is bad, but can't tell you why.

It's been done before, they used Head ang Shoulders in Evolution

It looked like Windex. No drips, no streaking, guaranteed to kill hostile aliens with two sprays or your money back.

It was a strain of bacteria they were sensitive to !

The musical version from 1978 by Jeff Wayne has much less dialogue. Although, the radio version from 1938 was a classic. All from a book written in 1898. So everyone knows how it was going to end.

Потому что весь свой арсенал дали Украине : )

​@@user-jp8xe7tc7u soo true😅

in real life its not that easy, we'ed be tofu against an advanced race... if I were them, be a seal clubbing... A take out all satellites... B bombard all major instalations from orbit.. you lose since your race is split like the states and its 50 some different states.. that have different laws? thats not united at all, and unless you ALL unite, you'll never get to our level. We've been watching you since your creation

Enjoy living in your dream world.

Is it really that "hard"? The most famous of the June 2005 "War of the Worlds" adaptations (you know, the one starring Tom Cruise and Miranda Otto, and some guy, I think it was Dan Hamburger, directing) was very different from both the legendary 1938 Orson Welles radio play and the 1953 movie. The other two June 2005 versions, from the legendary "mockbuster" studios Asylum Films (and released on DVD literally the day before the David Cheeseburger version hit the theaters) and the Pendragon Studios version released a week earlier, were very different. This one has so many plot similarities to the Stephen Cronenberg version version that it's like a shot by shot, unless the shot would have cost substantial money, of course. Still, having a different plot doesn't really guarantee the movie will be anything special. The Pendragon version could have been something, and mainly because it was so different from either the Asylum or Greta Thunberg versions of the movie. "H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds" (note the extra "the" that distinguishes it from the Asylum version) was a period piece, set in the 1890s, and directed by Timothy Hines, who really, truly loved the story. Despite this love of the source material, Timothy Hines managed to make what is inarguably the worse version, ever. Seven year later, Hines got someone to give him another chance, and he released "War of the Worlds: The True Story". Not many directors get to bomb twice with the same story. Some people call Hines "The Ed Wood of the 21st Century," although that was mainly based on what a mess he made of "A Midsummer's Night's Dream" back in 1999. The actors, such as they were, who played the starring roles of Puck, Titania, and Hyppolita had never acted before or since, and the one who played Oberon (a juicy part) had a handful of credits like "cook", "valet", or "second guy on the left". This was another Pendragon mockbuster, trying to cash in on the "other" 1998 version, the one with Kevin Cline, Michelle Michelle Pffeiffffer, Stanley Tucci, Calista Flockhart, Christian Bale, Dominic West, David Strathairn, Sophie Marceau, etc. (The closest thing "the good version" has to an "unknown actor" in a major role is Anna Friel, who only has 76 film credits). No, I'm going to stick with the premise that "Alien Conquest" was simply a bad version. Oh, and it's not helped by DVD cover art that doesn't depict anything even remotely like the movie.

@@josephwisniewski3673 I am saddened that you feel the 2005 version of War of the Worlds is the best one, but you are entitled to your opinion. The best versions are the ones that inspire, which would be the case for the earlier version and not the overhyped CGI crap made in more modern movies.

You mean like Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning, Miranda "Eowyn" Otto, and Tim Robbins? Maybe with someone like Morgan Freeman doing the narration? That kind of "decent actors"? Never would have worked.

@@josephwisniewski3673, great actors working under a great director would make it happen. Yeah, they probably would have to change some of the hmmm…… never mind, they’re better at it than me. Then you have one of the main characters instructing to stick to the tree line and be quiet. The very next thing out of his mouth is AN EXPRESSION, extremely loud scream of R U N !

@@MissMarinaCapri hahahahahahah

WHEN U DON'T TAKE CARE OF URSELF. U GOT NOBODY'S TO BLAME BUT URSELF!!!

@@gregspangler4461 YOU BETTER CUT OF DRUGS... ITS HARMING YOUR HEAD, DUDE

@@vascoapolonio2309 U BETTER WAKE UP.& GET UR HEAD OUT THE TOILET. IT'S KILLING UR BRAIN CELLS. BUDDY...

F

Just askWikipedia "Tom Sizemore", the answer is there. 2021: 2021 - War of the Worlds: Invasion from Mars (Alien Conquest) 2021: Central Park Dark 2021: Megalodon Rising - Dieses Mal kommt er nicht allein (Megalodon Rising) 2022: Battle for Pandora 2022: Bullet Train Down

Anything in the past 15 years with Tom Sizemore will accurately depict ‘so bad it’s funny” 😁👍🇺🇸

​@@dereklucero5785o😅

Just save me 90 mins of my life I could never get back 👍

Isn't that usually the point? 😂

I think the director must have come straight from Uranus ... 😮

Always enjoyed Tom's movies.

Well he did it his way.

Post is taking so long that Tom Sizemore still has movies being released in 2024. He had about a dozen posthumous released in 2023, and another dozen in 2022. I imagine people are going to be finishing unreleased movies as Tom Sizemore's last movie well into 2025.

Maybe in a dress with high heels but definately no beard!

Of course not. Only real men have beards.

It's the end of the world. Expect disasters like buildings imploding in there footprints in 10 seconds, subways exploding exactly as planed in an exercise and a woman deceived of not becoming a president. Well, the last one might have only been a close call...

@@dieselgypsy1100 Hey, with TODAY'S military, probably a dude in a dress, high heels, AND the beard. Slight identity crisis there.

Gastarbeiter?

Probably using AI. But to use the dials and knobs, buttons etc you still need fingers

Most of the parts for the machines had MADE IN CHINA stickers.So i guess the USA is not the only buyer of Chinese goods in the world? Or should i say UNIVERSE?

@@kooisengchng5283Elon musks neural Link ?😂

Slave Labour

Only in B movies on an low budget.

Haven't watched the movie, but good to know 🙂

I just love these movies with scripts written by children of the 5th grade. Some of them may become great writers in the future!

The early-1950's films did that too. Handsome hero, pretty officer/politician who knows it all, an uptight scientist, and a full Colonel. Nothing to it. OHHHHH, don't forget the young boy and the dog.

Turning a budget walkie talkie upside down turns it into a military grade communication device....

I'd give the production crew 10 lashes for putting this together. And yes, Sizemore does look sick.

If it’s the scene I believe your referring to , there was even a Russian T34 tank from WW2 burning

Glad to see that I wasnt the only one to catch that. Lol.😊

Yeah, and THAT stunk, too.

So much misinformation about hemoglobin in this movie... hemoglobin is responsible for the transport of oxygen from the lungs to the organs. It has absolutely nothing to do with the intake of oxygen from the atmosphere. It also only contains like 4 iron atoms in comparison to literally thousands of carbon and other atoms... hemoglobin is a VERY large molecule.

Not windex, gatorade, but still fantastic! 🙂

You missed on how her cut on the forehead changed size in each new scene. Another thing was how the EMP wiped out crude circuitry like light switches even when the circuit is open but didn't effect computers or electronic ignitions in vehicles. In fact of matter an EMP works exactly the opposite. It's one of the reasons that for years military vehicles with gasoline powered engines still used points for ignition even though electronic ignitions were available for years. This whole movie is nothing more than a cheap version of the original movie "War between the worlds". The idea of multiple threes, three legs, three eyes, three fingers, when it came to the Martians and their lack of an immune system to protect them from the simplest of organisms is a direct concept taken straight from the book and the preceding movies.

That's clearly a lie!! In every scene tripods are being bombed and apparently the area was evacuated of people but there's literally thousands of people walking around the footpaths and thousands of car's driving around normally kids playing in parks and gardens.. absolutely 0 effort went into the production process or the cutting of the movie!! They at the end used 3 jars of liquid as different viruses but they magically seem to change the virus 6x lol so each jar has 2 different viruses per jar and with a eye dropper can separate the two as needed lolol 🤣😂 it's a really good movie NOT!!

H G Wells was an Englishman not an American.

This comment of yours fits the definition of word salad - it's nonsensical.

H.G Wells was born in Kent in England and was not an American writer. I believe England dropped the first atomic bomb on Japanese and ended the Second World War , maybe I may have to do more study on the subject. How ever there was an Orson Welles that wrote a modernised version of War Of The Worlds as a radio play back in the late 1930s . He did a lot of excellent works for the Mercury Theatre from the mid 1930s and one of his plays was done as a News Report that caused a panic as people actually believed it was true . That play was called The War Of The Worlds.

You may be confusing "Orson Welles", the brilliant American writer, director, and actor who directed and narrated the 1938 radio play version of "War of the Worlds" with the brilliant English writer Herbert George "H. G." Wells, who wrote the 1897 novel "The War of the Worlds" that served as the basis for Orson Welles' broadcast, as wells as some fifteen movie and television adaptations.

What main plot? This is not a remake of War of the Worlds, a comparison is inappropriate.

@@vladdracul5072 I was making a comparison between this movie and the way present day major Science Fiction are made.

@@frankreynolds445 And what are your conclusions? Science Fiction movies should consist to 90% of inane exaggerated dialogue and only 10% of that which defines Science Fiction? I'm 20 minutes in and so far absolutely nothing has really happened. Where is the action you have promised? Well, I guess I will see if I make it that far without falling asleep.

@@frankreynolds445 Ah, there's an alien! Very promising indeed.

It's simply a matter of finding the right tool for the job, which isn't a hammer every single time no matter what tradesmen think.

@@grindupBaker Militarily warheads on foreheads beats a fucking wrench every time. If a wrench can crack it so can a 155mm HE.

Never cared for the Tom Cruise version but loved the 1950's version. The tech babel is okay, just as long as you have no idea what they just said. They needed a real military advisor to make sure some of the military scenes made sense. Uniforms, are okay I guess, but there is more to the US military besides uniforms.

In what country? India?

@@canufi6my 🤣