Buy Me a Coffee: ko-fi.com/logicbeagle In this video I take a look at the life of Mia Farrow. Take a look at one of my other videos on the subject: TEN QUESTIONS FOR MIA FARROW: • Is Woody Allen Innocen...
Excellent. Well done. This work should be given the same exposure - in all forms of media as the nefarious lies, misrepresentations and character assassinations against Mr Allen have been given over the years. Reasoned, Logical, Factual, and well presented. The Farrow camp should be ashamed of themselves. Unfortunately, that is not in them. 'Ronan' Farrow is a particular disgrace to his profession. Thank You LogicBeagle for this important work. Woody Allen is Innocent.
Paul McCartney later came out and said (rather quietly) that the accusations against the Maharishi (supposedly molesting a girl when The Beatles were in Rishikesh) turned out to be nonsense. What he didn't say loud enough was that the accuser (all the way back in 1968) was Mia Farrow. Mia has had a history of doing this sort of thing for decades.
And it has nothing to do w/male Patriarchy that allows women to be grabbed by their p-word here and then raped in a dept store dressing room, by a now a disgraced criminal X-pres?
Right on that Farrow was behind the false allegations against the Maharishi. See what I say above I forgot to put that one in. Well done Farrow has far too many coincidences and that is what gives her away. There is another interview where John Lennon said the accusations came from Farrow.
He said, she said....Focusing on the fact that Mia is fCkd up and away from the fact that Woody broke in his mentally tortured virgin step daughter. I mean ...the fuuu ....They are BOTH unfit to be parents
Paul never had anything to do with those accusations. They were started by Magic Alex and were then spread by John and George for a few years. It was George who publicly apologized to the Maharishi about it. Paul only stayed In India for a month, and the rumors only started when Alex came around after half a year to pick up John and George.
Mia's nanny admitted that she lied to the cops because she was pressured by Mia after Mia accused Woody of molestation. She said she actually believed Woody was the better parent.
If the nanny was not a material witness to anything directly related to the alleged molestation, than with all due respect, this is distracting noise. For consideration: 1. There have been prior cases of child molesters who appeared to be good/better parents to the public eye. Manipulators know when they're being watched, and what to do. They sustain power that way. They are pros at it. 2. Wanna see a good human snap? Leave him/her to take care of X children alone for the foreseeable future. Must we create distraction from the victim, and have impossible expectations of single moms? 3. If anyone can lie, why can't the nanny, one way or another? Lied under oath, then confessed to a crime? Maybe she was pressured by gossip mags or Woody or his friends to fess up for money? Or she didn't lie under oath. We. Don't. Know. Hollywood nannies lying are not exactly news. 4. Even if a nanny/human was pressured to lie by the mother... Put yourself in the shoes of a mother whose daughter describes being molested by your husband, and your husband is super influential, and maybe your finances are at his mercy, in a culture where money is power and women can quickly be turned into poor and discredited sub-humans by a powerful man, with(out) good reason. Of course you'll try your best to protect your child's voice from the start, strategically, I'd hope. If we could rely on the truth showing itself naturally, and there were no influential people manipulating a story, then no strategy would be needed by victims and their supporters. Anyway... Too. Much. Noise. Focus on the child. The alleged victim. She's the one that needs to be seen & heard first and foremost. She could by now have clarified that she was a little kid confused, and that it was all a big misunderstanding. This story likely does not help her in life: her career, her relationships etc. It's a lot of lie to carry around for that long, if your life doesn't depend on it.
Mia, like so many others, has Muchausen By Proxy, where the mother seeks attention from her children's suffering. When your kids keep killing themselves, that’s a tell.
Never thought of that. At least, not Munchausen's by proxy, that Farrow is looking for attention for when her children are hurt or suffering. Rather, I thought Farrow was a classic narcissist. Adopting all those kids was part of her narcissistic image building, providing her with narcissistic supply - all these naive and easily manipulated humans placed under her supreme control and dependent upon her. She definitely paraded those kids around in the media and in public. She seems wily, manipulative, self-serving, controlling, abusive and unscrupulous. The kids who grow up and reject her control, she tosses aside and disavows. And then turns her other kids on them, like attack dogs.
I can't count the times I've had to remind friends that Sun Yi was adopted by Previn, not Allen, and was not a minor at the time of her and Allen's original affair. He was never her stepfather in any real sense, and it was not incest. The success of their marriage speaks for itself.
lol you imagine projecting your preferences onto others? how is it 'moral' to expect others' behaviors to conform to your wishes? perhaps such 'morals' are the old religious spectacle. If you speak for the gods, have courage to admit it @@voulafisentzidis8830
@@voulafisentzidis8830You can be mad about the affair with Soon-Yi all you want. It still doesn't suggest that Woody Allen is a pedophile. He had a consensual affair with a 20/21 year old. That's not evidence that he would molest a 7 year old - only an idiot would say so. He had a consensual affair with someone he was not related to and not a father figure to. That's not evidence that he'd be incestuous with his own child - only an idiot would say so.
My wife was Hal Holbrook’s and later Dixie Carter’s personal assistant for 15yrs. Many in the Acting profession are just as “off center” and obsessive as Mia. I wish I could tell you the details but I don’t want any legal actions. I never bought her “poor little innocent “ act….and it IS an acting role for her.
Farrow's greatest acting role! The role of her lifetime: Earth mother, the celebrity saint who rescued children from around the globe from dire circumstances.
My mother pulled a lot of this crazy shit against my father when they divorced. She spent every day of my life trying to drive a wedge between him and his own children. And the 'coaching,' discussed in this video, was real. Mothers do this. My mother's coaching was especially effective with her sacred favorite child (my older brother). To this day he's convinced my dad abused him--my mother was categorically abusive, which he admits, while my father was not, which he won't admit. It sickens me most people don't understand how nefarious women can be. Instead people always believe they are the default victim.
Mia used to visit, then stole, Andre Previn from Dory Previn (singer-songwriter) while Dory was having a mental breakdown. Listen to 'Lemon Haired Ladies' (written about Mia). Dora had her pegged years before she even met Allen.
That boy looks so much like Frank Sinatra. I know it's possible for Woody to be the dad even though he looks like Frank, but I think it's ridiculous that Nancy Sinatra would deny it so hard
@@freemagicfunFrank Sinatra had a vasectomy long before Ronan was conceived and Mia clarified the matter by saying she was just joking. Ronan looks just like his grandfather, John Farrow, and continues to refer to Woody Allen even with serious accusations as his father. So, he doesn't give a shit about what people say or what sick sense of humor his mother has, he's not a Sinatra (who probably wouldn't even recognize him if he were alive because of his preferences). Anyone in Nancy's position would deny it. I wouldn't take shit like that from my dad's crazy ex either.
Allen brings up some interesting points in his autobiography. He recounts an incident where Farrow made a public appearance with her children. One child, who wore leg braces, wanted to wear modern plastic braces that could be worn under his clothes. Farrow insisted he wear the heavier metal braces that are worn on the outside. Clearly more interested in appeances than her child's comfort. He says in a documented exchange during an interview with both Allen and Farrow for the investigation into the molestation allegation, Farrow said that Dylan ran to her older sister for comfort after the alleged act. Allen reminded her that that sister was in New York at the time. Farrow said that she meant that she ran to her in spirit. Inconsistency of the stories by both Mia and Dylan is a major reason the allegation was found not to have merit. Another point, for what it's worth, it is that Farrow has a brother who went to prison for child molestation.
I've read the autobiography and do remember the recounting of that incident where Dylan was alleged to have ran to her older sister for comfort. Apropos of Nothing is an excellent book. The chapter about the allegation is very interesting, and Woody brings to light so many things we as ordinary observers weren't privy to at the time, particularly the backroom shenanigans by Mia. Woody deals with the subject with his usual intelligent humour.
@@logicbeagle I thought it was interesting that after Farrow made the public allegations concerning Dylan, she called Allen to inquire about costume fittings for the next movie they planned to make. Allen was dumbfounded. Manhattan Murder Mystery was made with Diane Keaton in the role written for Farrow.
@@ardalla535 Moses Farrow said there was never a train set in the attic. He said the attic was just used for storage and contained exposed nails and insulation.
I'm almost 70 now and it's been my observation that the loudest proclaimers have the most to hide. (often the case with politicians and religionists) Most times the best rebuttal to an accusation is silence. 🤔
Mia and Angelina are very similar. Two very toxic individuals with narcissistic tendencies. There is something pathological about adopting lots of children.
These rich women adopting kids by dozens always call my attention I always got the feeling of something no right,pure exhibisionism,using kids as puppies for fill up their dark emptiness but it is always women the perpetrators but in part is men fault as well for no being man enough to balance her agresiveness of being dominant so she end up running the show miserably,destroying lives right and left because in their minds they never stop being the superstarts once the cameras going off
@@logicbeagle -- Gotta take exception with your last sentence. I have known people who adopted lots of children, including among my relatives. Usually it's because of wanting to keep abandoned, neglected or orphaned siblings together rather than letting them be farmed out to multiple new families. Some have adopted lots of children just because they love kids and accept those in need who come to their attention. All have done a fine job of it. Now most of those kids are grown and set upon independent lives and careers that very likely would have been denied them had they not been adopted by people who cared.
About time. Farrow's credibility as a witness of any type of misbehaviour, has to be scrutinised. Her motives and patterns in life are so odd and borderline crazy, I think we should rather listen to the most logical and frank partner of this relationship. Just because she's a woman is no guarantee that she's not a liar.
"Just because she's a woman is no guarantee that she's not a liar." and of course, just because he is a big Hollywood actor doesn't mean he isn't a liar also.
I don’t believe Woody did anything to Dylan but he was a predator of teenage girls. I think both Mia and Woody are unhinged and Soon-Yi is a casualty of these two weirdos.
Clown mode engaged 🙄. Gary Ridgway the green river killer mudrrer of upwards of 36 women passed a Polygraph... if you believe your own bullsht without regret or flicker of remorse you'll pass it. The only value in a Polygraph is the line questioning proceeding or post-polygraph. Polygraphs are unscientific and aren't admittedly in Court for this reason.
Regarding Woody’s affair with SUNY I don’t condone it, but they have stayed together as a married couple for over 30 years and have successfully adopted two children. Mia had a right to be angry and hurt and upset upon discovering the affair but conflating that affair with child abuse and maintaining a campaign of bullying and harassment for 30 years IS TOTALLY DISPROPORTIONATE! Who is the real victim in this situation?
What the heck, didn’t Dory Previn take her into her home and Mia did the same thing to her, hooking up with Andre? That erased my sympathy right there.
its messed up that Ronan and Mia both speculate about affairs and fathers - yes Ronan looks like Sinatra but in the sense that MIA looks like him, compact facial features, defined jawline, blue eyes - it goes further though Ronan has his mothers hair colour and his blue eyes are via coloured contact lenses. he wears Icy blue for effect but has the dullest darkest version of blue eyes if you can scour the net for photos of him sans contact lenses or with his glasses on over a decade ago. its so farcical as to imply sociopathy or something else seriously wrong with Mia and then imparted to her son. I don't think Ronan is anything near his mother and such a messed up environment to grow up in is so monstrous I give him some degree of pass, you need some anchor to sanity in order to be sane and his siblings are either fractured into factions or DEAD! every kid ever involved in that whole picture needs therapy for the rest of their lives
Mia clearly applied favoritism to her kids. She was kind and nice to the white kids while harsh and mean to the kids of other races and disabilities. Shame on her. A despicable woman.
Last time I looked he is not only an adult but an investigative journalist. Some investigator. At some point, he is responsible for what he believes, not his messed up mother.
@@free_gold4467 the "public" in this country is too a large degree a know nothing lynch mob believing they have the right to punish people in the absence of evidence and the willingness of the authorities to level charges.
In my mind, the main sick thing in our current society is celebrity worship. Its alright to admire their art, but geeze folks; a lot of us need to get a grip. Spend more time with our families or friends....or better yet get a hobby.
Just watched the HBO series, wanted to see what the other side said. Woody Allen is disgusting for marrying Soon-Yi, period. I acknowledge that Soon-Yi wasn’t Woodys daughter, stepdaughter, daughter of any kind. He didn’t actually raise her in any way. However, it was still gross… he was in a long term relationship with her adoptive mother not to mention the age gap and balance of power. I’ll never defend Allen on this although I do think the truth should be corrected when possible. However, I do lean towards the allegations being fabricated when it comes to Dylan. It’s my belief that Allen is guilty of a lot of moral shortcomings, but molesting a child is not one of them. I do believe 100% at the same time that Dylan believes this happened!! I read Moses essay… and it sounds way more credible to me. I do think the white kids were treated FAR differently!! Notice NONE of the minority, adopted children actually appeared in the HBO documentary. The living ones anyway… audio clips of Daisy, but that’s it!! Mia Farrow gives me very evil vibes. I can’t explain it exactly. I do think all the children were adopted because she holds a white savior complex for narcissistic purposes. I feel most sympathy for the children… Dylan very much included.
Is it, in general always bad in your opinion for an older person to have a relationship with a younger person? I'm just trying to understand which factors of this weigh more for you.
Oh wtfever. For ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY it's been like this. Only in the 20th Century and only in the West do we have the Abundant Resources and Social Arrogance for people like you to consider it "Gross". Look at yourself, Your Cultural-Discrimination is showing. Most places on the Planet have no issues with this happening, and in-fact encourage it, as the older man has way more resources to provide for and protect their daughter in order to keep the family-line going. But you call those 6 Billion people "Gross" because they don't fit into your narrow-minded view of how the world should be. Be ashamed.
@@donut_life12 But I don't think they were partners at the time. So it was an x-partner. And I don't think Allen ever lived in the house or served any kind of parental role over her.
No, he was not "found" innocent. The DA in Connecticut did not prosecute because they lacked evidence to convict. I have concluded based on the publicly available evidence that the alleged event likely did not happen, but words are important. When the wrong ones are used it undermines an otherwise solid argument. So, no, while it strongly appears that he IS innocent, he was not "found" innocent. In fact, even if he had been tried and acquitted, that still would not mean he was found innocent because that's never the standard in a criminal trial.
@@gheller2261 He couldn’t prosecute because 2 and now 3 investigations found no evidence: They rule what Dylan said didn’t happen: Allen wax found innocent
@@lynnewebley7270 Nobody "ruled" that what Dylan said "didn't happen" and Woody Allen was not "found innocent." You seem to lack understanding about what actually occurred and what words mean. Even if you come to the right conclusion (i.e., Woody Allen likely did not molest his daughter), you cannot argue persuasively if you get basic things wrong.
@@gheller2261 Not to beat a semantic dead horse, but after being exonerated in multiple investigations, could not the term "innocence" be applied, or at least affirmed as innocence is supposed to be automatically presumed?
The new generation is "Enabling the smearing of people (perpetrators) without evidence" vs the old generation that "Enabled the smearing of people (victims) without evidence"?
Very true - it would be nice to find the mysterious middle ground - ie. Respect for someone who might have been a victim followed by the careful use of evidence to form a conclusion. - lazy assumptions about events we know nothing about seems to be problem!
Woody never MARRIED Mia. He has been married to Soon-yi THREE TIMES as long as his relationship with Mia. The most damning thing of all is that the 'timeline' of the 'attic abuse' of which Woody was accused was IMPOSSIBLE and absurd. The court latched onto this right away.
Everyone should be sorry for that unfortunate brainwashed girl... Only to a point, though: she's shown her intellectual limitations and total blindness by having never 'reasonably doubted' at all about who's in good faith around her and who is not. She knows all too well on which side her personal interest is -- including a comfortable, wealthy life -- and definitely chose to be indifferent visavis any notion of truth or justice. What I see in the other camp, in the meantime, is how Mr. Allen has helped escape -- if not literally rescued -- both Soon Yi & Moses from the quite dysfunctional family gathered by an hypocritical and pretty insane adoptive mother who destroyed psychologically (but not only) most of her ten 'babies'. PS: Honestly, regardless of her confirmed cheats and wickedness, even such a mother should also deserve some compassion for behaving the abusive way she does... What kind of terrible trauma the acclaimed actress has very possibly suffered from when she was still a child herself remains however her utmost secret. (Unless she's completely 'repressed', cancelled the memory of it throughout adulthood?)
@@marionhartmann249 What "household?" Not his. He never lived with Mia and was never a "Father figure" to Soon-Yi. The photos were at his house. But I'm sure you know more about it than every expert, investigator, and Soon-Yi herself.
I saw the documentary in HBO against Woody Allen after many, many years of being divorced. I felt at the time that this woman and her trained daughter were lying, don't ask me why, it was a deep feeling, I found Mia vindictive and still trying to destroy Allen. You have no idea how happy I'm to found your site. She is like Amber Heard, capable of lying and hurt people around them.
About 6:34 and "With my Daddy in the Attic", it worth mentioning the lyrics: "With my Daddy in the attic, That is where my being wants to bed (...) Where we’ll live on peanut butter, Spread across assorted crackers, And he’ll plays his clarinet" (as everyone knows, Woody Allen plays clarinet). Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” (Woody Allen)
Yeah that is a revelation. She is so twisted. That's what happens when kids are raised with minimal discipline and attention. They eventually become psychopaths.
@@mewho6199 sure André Previn was a bit of a predator too (Frank Sinatra too), but I think Mia became a bit of a monster of her own too. Her father dying when she was 17 couldn't have helped either.
I never believed Mia’s account of what happened as she had been in a relationship with Woody for many years and then all of a sudden when she found out he was dating her daughter she made the allegations. I can understand Mia’s anger for Woody dating her daughter however her contempt was so massive she made the worst allegations anyone could make about someone. Since that time there’s never been any other claims against Woody and usually this type of behavior is repeated.
Mia Farrow is a woman scorned who made it up. All the actresses who worked with Woody over the years and, with no credible evidence, now denounce him and regret their involvement in his films should be ashamed.
They all had no problem working with him after these allegations , as soon as they got their woody Allen film Oscar or credit under their filmography/ acting belt they suddenly denounced him. Except Scarlett Johansson.
Have you not looked this up? It wasn’t his adopted daughter. That’s illegal. You have been hypnotised by Mia Farrow into believing things that didn’t happen. Which proves my point. Though I could be wrong about that. He may have married his adopted daughter somehow and broken all kinds of laws. So all you need to do is google it and prove me wrong. I’ll wait right here. Take all the time you need.
@@logicbeaglea technicality in nomenclature. She grew up with him as a father figure together. It’s like if I married my x-stepdad, downright disgusting.
@@Ausgar-yc1ylshe’s his adopted step daughter! I don’t care what you say, that’s not right. Even if she only met him a handful of times (which I don’t believe) but even if that’s true he’s still the father figure. He still took advantage.
Jesus, she reminds me of my ex-wife. In my case she ended the marriage by cheating, and ever since then she tells everyone that I was abusive. Even though she actually put me in the hospital before. All I can think about is her wanting to rewrite history. Bullshit
Mia reminds me of my ex wife. A complete monster and abusive towards my children behind closed doors and as soon as I filed for divorce she began to accuse me of things she was actually doing. Mia, Ronan and Dylan strike me as narcissists. 😮
The 20th century's most humiliatingly public case of Hell Hath No Fury. She said she doesn't think about Woody Allen anymore , but it's obvious she'll take her triumphant vengeance to her grave. Welcome to the dark side of the Me Too Movement.
what I most like about this narrative is that our story teller sticks to facts and avoids opinions(sarcasm). This is a sad tale of two terribly flawed individuals
When I was young I hated watching her in movies. It was inconprehensible to me that she was a famous actress. She was always a crazed weirdo, but I never knew she was also evil. Thanks for the upload.
Mia Farrow's parent's were in the industry. That's how she became famous. Her family life was dysfunctional, to say the least. Still not okay with Woody Allen, being Mia Farrow's boyfriend would turn around and marry a daughter figure.
This video gives me food for thought. I’ve always assumed Woody was a weirdo. But whenever I saw Mia speak I thought she was a bin of a loon. Maybe Woody isn’t the villain Mia makes him out to be. Further research is in order.
@Not only does Woody look like an oddball but he IS an oddball. But that does not mean that he molested his 7 year old daughter! I think the fact that he was funny looking and made unconventional movies has always worked against him so people just assume he's guilty before researching the facts. The truth is if people look more closely people will see that not only is Mia also weird but she is crazy and people don't wanna believe that because they're afraid of how it'll make them look.
If Woody Allen were a Leading Man-type like Frank Sinatra was no one would have believed this crazy b***ch. But he wasn't, and she KNEW that people would automatically label him as guilty without questioning or looking into anything.
Why hasn't anyone done a documentary showing all of this & more? Showing the side of Woody, Moses, etc?? It makes way more sense to me that she is the horrendous person here, not Woody. I vaguely remember her saying at the time that she would ruin Woody's life. And so she has obsessivlely worked on this for decades. Why doesn't Moses get more credibility? He lived there! He was old enough to remember what happened that day & beyond. No matter to Mia that, in my opinion, she has destroyed Dylan & her peace of mind. Who knows what her 3 dead children suffered at her hands. Dory Previn was used to get closer to Andre, then kicked in the face by her "friend" Mia Farrow. Saint Mia is lauded as an activist while the people she has destroyed, in my opinion, contine to suffer or are dead.
Actually, I recall reading articles covering much of the same ground here, back in the 90s (in the wake of the Woody/Soon-Yi scandal) and again after the accusations of abusing Dylan, and even more recently with media interest in Ronan Farrow. These articles have surfaced from time to time, but Mia hasn't really ever been under intense public scrutiny for her behavior. One of the things that I remember hearing way back in the early 90s, I believe, was that Mia treated the older adopted children like servants and nannies, constantly in charge of taking care of the younger kids. And that she treated her adopted children differently, favoring her biological children. I hadn't heard Moses' story about the tape measure and the drilling of an apology, but I'd read of other tales of Farrow verbally abusing the kids, guilt tripping them about her adopting them, and sometimes slapping the kids - although to be fair, in that time period, probably a lot of parents did things like slap kids and it wouldn't have really qualified as child abuse back in those times (70s, 80s). I recall some incidents where my parents hit me, with slippers and other objects, and on one occasion I was dragged backwards under a chair, by my hair, and once my father kicked me. So I suppose I never thought that what I'd read about Farrow doing was really all that terrible (for the standards of the day that is). And I'd also read about the fate of some of the adult children of Farrow (Moses, Lark etc.) and it seemed to me that Farrow could have been giving them more financial support, and that it seemed that they had grown very distant from her. It seemed like she had either cast them out, or they had cut off contact with her. It made me very suspicious of how Farrow had treated her children. And I'd always felt that Farrow's motives for adopting so many children, so publicly, were very selfish and self-serving. Now I see that Farrow is most likely a narcissist, and the children were her pawns and props for creating her saintly public image, as well as to feed her manipulative desires at home. She seems to love control and to manipulate others. I'd heard about the stories about Dory Previn, and what she had to say about Farrow. She might have been a lot younger than Andre Previn, but Farrow was a shark, brazenly zeroing in on Previn right under Dory's nose without scruple or hesitation. Despicable. And then in what could be seen as karma, Farrow lost Allen to the much younger Soon-Yi, right under Farrow's nose and under her roof - although I do think Allen kind of took advantage of Soon-Yi, who according to some, is not very bright. Anyway, I'd always thought since way back then, that Farrow was vindictive (I'd heard about the Valentine's Day card) and unscrupulous and was making up those accusations of abuse in order to harm Allen. Farrow must have Ronan and Dylan under her thumb still, but it's despicable that she would put Dylan through all that, and convince her that she was abused. But I have to wonder what Allen saw of how Farrow treated those children, since they were together for such a long time. Did he never think of how those children would be harmed by her abusive behavior? Didn't Allen have a clue? But he stayed with her, all those years, and then went ahead and had a child with her and adopted another young child.
@f. But the mainstream media is where I read a lot of articles mentioning Farrow's past and her treatment of the children. But that was many years ago. It seems to have changed in more recent years. Nobody wants to contradict or question Dylan Farrow's statements. I suppose it just wouldn't make them look good, in today's climate. Dylan and Ronan have been everywhere in the media, making these abuse claims. It's very hard for public figures to seem to be not believing a victim as Dylan claims to be (and I'm sure she believes it, that's why she's convincing to others).
@@helenpatterson3858 Yes, I knew that Farrow and Allen had always maintained separate homes. And they were never married. So Allen was never a stepfather - well, legally. He was still the long-term boyfriend of Farrow, so Allen and Soon-Yi having an affair is still scandalous and repulsive. Since they didn't live together, Allen would have seen a lot less of Farrow's bad treatment of the children. But he did still see the children, especially his own. And he might also have heard the kids complain or talk about Farrow.
Its probable that Mia will always have more people on her side, unfortunately. It doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense. So frustrating! When Moses came out with the article in his blog he was written off as just being angry and/or having some sort of mental health problem if I remember correctly. Clearly, a lot of the actors who have turned against him care more about their careers than they do of slander.
Mia Farrow is almost as hypocritical, malicious, n deceptive as Trudeau n Biden (n the Bushes n Clintons, etc., for that matter) n acted as much w impunity as them. And the media act the same way in their case on 1 hand n Mia Farrow on the other: favourable to the wrong-doers.
Before this case took on the melodramatic, tragi-comic dimensions it has now achieved, I read Mia’s autobiography, What Falls Away. It was clear to me then that this was a woman not to be trusted-she says she (who grew up in Hollywood) had no idea how famous Frank Sinatra was when she married him! Please!-and whose ability to sidestep facts and reality and conveniently edit out troubling details rendered her perspective entirely suspect. I came away from reading the book convinced that she was not only capable of deceiving herself and others, but that she was psychologically unsound. Thank you for this intelligent, measured take on an unsettling situation. There are no good guys in this story, but neither is Allen the epitome of evil he is now held up to be. It’s disgusting to see so many in the entertainment business pile onto this cause of the moment when he has been proven not guilty multiple times, and was responsible for propelling so many actors to stardom, including Mia herself, who’s career would have ended a decade or more before it did, had it not been for Allen.
I read in an article that Farrow stated in that book that Soon-Yi was about five when she was adopted. That would lead people to think that Soon-Yi was several years younger than she was when her affair with Allen began, possibly even a minor. But records including her passport state October 8, 1970 as Soon-Yi's birthdate. So she was 7~8 when adopted in 1978. Not 5! And in 1990 Soon-Yi was 20. Not a teenager but an adult. What does Farrow have yo say about the way she betrayed her former friend Dory Previn? FYI I read that Mia's father John Farrow was known for being a fabulist, telling all kinds of tales - not just the kind of standard Hollywood glamorized fake personal history, that was very common back then (like changing names, claiming a different ancestry such as Merle Oberon passing for white and Australian, and Rita Hayworth passing for white/Anglo when in fact her father was Mexican and her name Rita Cansino, claiming to have aristocratic ancestors etc.) but going way beyond that into all kinds of stories.
Narcissistic personality type. That's what Farrow seems to be. Maybe Mia's Catholic mother had some kind of influence in that regard, I don't know. But Mia has replicated her own mother's life of raising a large brood of children (of course most were adopted, whereas Maureen O'Sullivan gave birth to all of her kids). Actors have been told by their publicists and agencies to publicly denounce or sever ties with Allen, state that they won't work for Allen etc. These days every actor is no doubt being told (pressured) that in regard to any actor or director or producer etc. about whom allegations have been made. Doesn't matter if it goes to trial or anything. If there are any public allegations they'll be dropped like a hot potato.
I am always pleased to see a video for a change that isn't against WA but is in fact supportive of him. So sick of all of Hollywood for condemning him of a crime he did not commit! They need to do more thorough research so that they can see Farrow is actually the guilty party.
Lo peor de todo el asunto es que los de Hollywood. Todos esos actores son unos hipócritas. Ellos supuestamente apoyando a Dylan Farrow. Y bien que ganaron su sueldo trabajando con Woody Allen. Chalamet diciendo que donará su sueldo. Para que trabajo con él en un comienzo? Cómo no iba a saber lo de su acusación? Sus agentes se encargan de eso. Además todos estos actores saben de los abusos que se perpetran allá en Hollywood. El caso Epstein. Todo esto es lo que más me desagrada. Hablan y hablan de Woody Allen como si ellos no fueran igual o peores. Solo al ocultar y no decir nada ya son igual de culpables. Todo lo relacionado a Weinstein. Esas actrices que ganaron Oscars gracias a él. Lo abrazaban y alababan. Bien que sabían todo. No nos dejemos engañar. Hacen buenas películas pero nada más.
Mia Farrow adopted many children.But she didn't gave them good love and support. Instead she was very destructive and confusing them of wrong accusations. I'm glad that Woody Allen's name was cleared.
I agree that women and children's accusations of sexual impropriety need to be carefully considered and given a proper audience. That said, it should not give women or children carte blanc for their accusations to be accepted without proper proof. Today a conviction of sexual assault is now a LIFE SENTENCE. You get less long term consequences for MURDER. Someone who gets sentenced for sexual assault must be registered as an offender for the rest of their life and even their ability to live near urban areas is limited. Face it, how do you avoid living within 5 miles of an elementary school unless you live in the middle of nowhere?
I always wondered how she could afford to support all these children. She has barely worked as an actress (outside of the roles she played in Woody Allen's films and that ended decades ago). The documentary was very revealing; her serving up Dylan to Woody was very strange and despite Ronan's self righteous attempts to defend his mother, the evidence is pretty blatant.
Vanessa, you’ve just stated a big misconception when it comes Woody Allen. That he married his stepdaughter. Are you aware that he did no such thing? His wife was never his child, legally or otherwise. This is one of the reasons I made this video: people have been hoodwinked by Mia Farrow into believing all sorts of nonsense. I’m sorry you fell for it.
@@logicbeagle As soon as Woody had a bio child with his girlfriend, the rest of her children became that child's sibling as well as stepchildren to Woody. Quit standing up for a perverted old man who bedded down the child his partner raised from a young age. He's a groomer. He's lucky all he got was a bad rep out his lustful behavior. Many others wouldn't have been so gracious with respect to their own child being groomed by their partner.
"His (Woody Allen's) demonization depends on her sainthood." DOES it? Why? I don't have a strong opinion about Allen's "guilt," but if he did unacceptable things, he did them. Regardless of Farrow's list of sins.
Even if true, being a creep isn’t criminal. It also has no bearing on the thesis of this video: that Mia Farrow used her child to make a false allegation of abuse against a man she wanted to destroy.
@@logicbeagle When I look at evidence I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. However stories about Woody liking very young females were already circulating in New York circles before he was ever with Mia. He didn't hide it. Manhattan with Mariel as his love interest when he was 42 shows it. The joke was" she was too old for him" Often predators pick a romantic interest with lots of children. I believe Dylan because it fits with his pattern.
It does seem like a lot about Mia Farrow is being overlooked. Her marriage with Frank Sinatra thirty years her senior. Her being a house breaker between Andre and Dory Previn, who had invited her into their home, where she got pregnant with a married man’s child. Her brother, guilty of something to do with assaulting children. And then her insinuating it was possible her son could be fathered by Frank Sinatra, which hints at an affair while being intimate with Woody Allen, while having him pay child support for perhaps 18 years, made believable by that the son has a strong resemblance to Frank Sinatra. All this, while leveling hell at Woody Allen for beginning an affair with her then 20 year old adopted daughter Soon-Yi. Justifiable outrage, but coming from Mia, who had taken a very similar course to both Soon-Yi and Woody Allen, downright hypocritical. behavior from
She and Ronan know Mia's innuendo is false, and that is why there has been no DNA test done. It is possible that Ronan is afraid of losing mommy's approval. Maybe he fears she with his son destroy him. It's much easier to support the script his mother has created than to dare question it. A DNA test would be easy and I'm sure Woody would cooperate with his son to help him.
I don't want to excuse Woody Allen's alleged involvement with teenage girls back in the "Manhattan" era, but this was not all that uncommon back then. Look at the rumors surrounding Mia's first husband (Frank) and his buddies' relationships with many 60's teen actresses and models like Tuesday Weld, Joey Heatherton, Sue Lyon, and perhaps Mia herself. In the 70's you had Margaux Hemingway (the "Manhattan" stars older sister), Nastassia Kinski, and the notorious teenage groupie scene that swirled around 70's male rock stars. I'm not saying these girls weren't victimized to some extent, but I am saying you can't always judge the past by the standards of the present. My parents weren't terrible people because they drove around drunk with me in the car back in the 1970's. People thought differently back then. Of course, there was a line you could cross--as Roman Polanski found out in 1978. But Woody Allen ironically gets pilloried because he was HONEST about what he was (perhaps) doing in "Manhattan". Regardless, as with the Soon-Yi Previn incident, this does NOT necessarily mean he would molest his own 6-year-old daughter. A 16 or 17-year-old girl in the 70's is the equivalent of a say a young college-girl today. It is a little sleazy for a middle-aged man to date a woman that young, but it doesn't necessarily make him a "pedophile" , nor should it be used as "evidence" in a custody trial. The same thing is true if the gender roles are reversed (which they often are these days). BTW, in Allen's latest film 20-year-old Elle Fanning is running around in her underwear. But if that makes Woody Allen a child molester, what does it say about the rest of us?
Frankly it's also not hard to see why soon yi would fall for woody. Raised by a mother from hell for years she was desperate to be rescued, and she found her escape in Woody.
And don't forget her total support for Roman Polanski, who cannot ever reenter the US for his statutory rape conviction of a minor back in the 70's. The scary thing about Ronan, her son, is that he will, probably end up a powerful politicos who further manipulates the truth to serve his carreer.
People said the same of Elvis Presley. His friends would supposedly find girls in the audience and ask them if they wanted to meet Elvis after the show.
Luc Besson is a LOT creepier than Woody Allen if you look into his early relationships. I can't watch 'The Professional' aka Leon any more because of its parallels with his own IRL creeping. And on that subject, one high-profile actress I'm particularly confused about is Natalie Portman. She has gone on-camera saying she believes Dylan. She also did a film with Allen when she was a young teenager. So did she get crept on by him? Or no? And if no, what makes her believe Dylan? I have to say, watching the footage of her 'believing Dylan', she's sort of trying to be nice to Dylan almost, like she's practically saying "I (listen and) believe you(r BS story), Dylan." Like, 'I'm believing you to be nice because I'm nice and I need to look nice' is how she came across. It's especially confusing because I know young Portman rejected the lead in the 90s adaptation of Nabokov's Lolita, saying it would be trash. But she did work with Besson, who is legitimately creepy, and they made a rather creepy movie together, which had to have creepy parts cut out because the American audience found them way too creepy. Has Portman said anything about Besson and the creepy movie she made with him, when she was a kid? I see her with all this #metoo and #timesup stuff, but what has she said about her career start in a creepy movie made by indisputably creepy Frenchman Luc Besson, I wonder.
@@system-error Portman is doing it for political reasons. It would not be the first time such a thing happens. I, actually, believe Ronan Farrow is siding with his sister because of all his accolades received for his investigative weinstein/ NBC pieces. He, initially, did not believe his sister, but changed his tune, per the winds of change.. The allegations against Allen were investigated and he was cleared While Mia Farrow has serious allegations lunged at her per her, now grown up adoptive kids. She has a history of gold digging, power grabbing and sexual accusations against againts men in power. In the 1960s she supported her sister Prudence ( Made famous by The Beatles song) in allegations againts the Maharishi. And on and on and on... Let's not forget Mia Farrow's public support for Roman Polansky, who, actually, drugged, and had sex with a minor in the 1970's. She is, hardly believable and there are plenty of eye witnesses accounts of her coaching Dylan, and siblings, incessantly. Total manipulator. I bet in a few years when Dylan and her husband divorce, he will shed light on how Dylan preserves the Mia TRAITS for bedding the truth.
As mentioned in the video, On Dec. 17, 1991, when Woody Allen officially adopted Dylan and Moses Farrow as a co-adoptive, single parent, Mia Farrow filled an affidavit. Farrow’s affidavit said Woody Allen, was “far more of a father than most natural fathers are or choose to be” and that he is “a loving, caring, attentive parent to Dylan and she can only benefit from having him as an adoptive father. He has acted as Dylan’s father almost since her birth and adoption by me….He is present with us during nearly all of Dylan’s waking hours.” The affidavit is mentioned in the Supreme Court document.
Farrow is horrified by Amber Heard's trial. That is how I end up here. Why would she be horrified? Everybody watching the trial could see Amber was the abuser. It was a fair trial.
"Believe all victims narrative" YES we should believe all victims. Not all accusers are victims so we should listen to all accusers and believe some of them.
The piano music drives me nuts. Is this some gesture to Woody's films or some sort of intellectual posturing? The narrative is enough of itself; no need for any music.
Late to this as it has only just appeared in my feed. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". The "crime" that Farrow can't forgive is that she was passed over for a younger woman & it was all the more galling that it was her adopted daughter. Even as a young boy I remember the hubbub & raised eyebrows in the press that Mia Farrow's marriage to Sinatra cause as at the time she was most well known for her role on the soap/drama "Peyton Place". A point of note is that Farrow has not been in a significant relationship since the break-up with Allen, yet in contrast Allen has had an enduring one with Soon-Yi. It seems a stretch to believe that the couple that were allowed to adopt 2 children share a warped morality.
So sad that Mia's anger over his affair with her adoptive child encouraged her to spread such vicious lies. I mean she couldve walked away and he wouldve always been that bastard that preyed on his girlfriends daughter. Which is predatory enough within itself without having to lie. Traumatic
True. Though I very much doubt the reason was her daughter's feeling, security etc. She seem very much like a narcissist with lots of daddy issues herself.@@Pomisher
I hate this , and know there is no way any of this hear say , on either Woody or Mia really will fairly unravel the truth . The real world is not black and white , it's mostly gray and shades of gray . Every one who is in the public spotlight is like a human target for spiritual ridicule . The truth is we all have sinned and are guilty , so we deflect this shame on others who seem to have it all . No one gets through life clean .
"Acuse"? He never denied having sex with his stepdaughter and he married her. Your thinking issues can be easily resolved with a dictionary and a thesaurus.
If a person makes an allegation about someone and after the investigation, no evidence is found the accused MUST be guilty. This seems to be the way. I find that view absolutely disgusting. Is Allen guilty? I do not know but as there was an investigation we MUST treat Allen as he is innocent.
They are both guilty of creepy stuff Mia and Woody had threesums with a 17 yr old, sound familiar..And she broke up marriages Previn wife was very hurt to the point she wrote a song. And she, like her adopted daughter did the same thing she did. Then claiming her son with Woody was Frank's because he doesn't look like Woody, and she also threatened Woody also sent a Scarry Valentine's day cards. And she pushed her daughter on Woody asking him to be around her then be mad when little innocent never dated or had boyfriend.. natural she was gonna have a crush on him. She like old men too.
Fantastic video man. I'm glad there's at least one voice of sanity in regards to this blind hysteria. You got a subscribe from me. Well-reasoned and well presented. You've got a great speaking voice by the way. There's a couple of RU-vid videos in the pro-Allen camp that just sound like it's being read off a prompter.
They are both horribly unhealthy people and parents, but come on, woody seeing his daughter as a romantic partner at some point is disgusting whether there was a biological connection or not.
I wish that were true. But such people usually suffer only when they get caught. I actually feel sorry for Dylan. I think she truly believes she was molested. When it happened, she was getting psychiatric help with an inability to distinguish fantasy from reality. I believe her mother used that to convince her that the abuse happened.
@@richardb6260 Agree, it's not Dylan's fault. It's my belief that she's been brainwashed by Farrow since childhood. Can you imagine how relentless and insidious Farrow might have been? And it seems that Farrow has gotten her hooks deep into Dylan and Ronan, and they're just her puppets, serving Farrow's disturbed and dark aims.
Honest? Well Allen was concealing an affair with the daughter of his children's mother. Happening under Farrow's own roof! Nevertheless, I do believe that Farrow fabricated all of this out of rage for being made a fool of (just as she made Dory Previn a fool) and for losing control over Soon-Yi and Allen. Control freak narcissist is what Farrow seems to be. This definitely seems like a vendetta that Farrow is conducting against Allen and Soon-Yi. And even more despicable is that she's roped in her kids and is using them as her proxies to wage her war. Not that I feel too sorry for Allen. He stayed with Farrow all those years, and I have to wonder what he thought of Farrow's treatment of her (and their shared) children. Did he not notice her abusive, manipulative behavior? He allowed her to have their child, and adopt another child into that awful mess. Was he just never around that he never saw how she treated those kids?
I remember when the whole Soon-Yi/Woody scandal erupted, and I recall even back then, articles covering Farrow's morally dubious past (the Previn affair) and her treatment of her children. So even way back then, before the allegations of abuse brought by Farrow, there were already stories circulating that broke through the apparently rosy surface of Farrow's life with her many adopted children.
