ALMOST UNWATCHABLE: John Kennedy Asks Democrats' Witness The Same Question Over & Over 

Sen. Kennedy got the answer to his question.

I think she's been exposed. Sounds to me like she's presented her findings to the IRS. Now we get to see who is honest in the IRS. Are they going to do a cover up? Are they being paid off? If yes, good bye, because they too are being exposed as part of the deep state.

It seems like this is the new way of governance now. Canada here.

I used to (and still do) enjoy the quip, "Pro is to Con as Progress is to Congress." But in time, I learned about the discussion in the Federalist Papers and elsewhere that USA's founders were quite concerned about the "tyranny of the majority" hence many of the check and balances; in short, government was designed in some respects to be *inefficient* so that a slim majority 50.01% couldn't impose unfair burdens on the slim minority. I think the American people are safest (especially budgetarily) when Congress is in gridlock and gets next to nothing done. Hope that eases the pain of this otherwise wasted time.

It's just smoke in mirrors. Our goverment has no intention of fixing any problems in the country.

ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS!!

FACTS! ☑️

No. Sen Kennedy is a liar.

Yes!! Kennedy is 💯 % worthless

Zorka Milin is not a government employee. She works for FACT. It's right there in the description....

J h j h j

There is so much gray with tax law. Companies have an incentive to avoid taxes, just like you. These are large firms, with large, sophisticated accounting systems. Tax lawyers will tell you to avoid the gray, but in the case of these large corps, the benefits may outweigh the risks of possibly losing in court. I have watched many of bidens nominations avoid questions, but she had no real way of answering the questions. Yes, companies try and avoid taxes, but the line of legal vs legal is usually decided by courts. Maybe the IRS is right, and maybe some of these corps is right, but the courts will decide.

​@@whycomes9562, nothing he said is disputed by your tirade against a strawman. Everyone tries to minimize what they pay. We all accept this. She accused companies of cheating, and then wasn't willing to name those she accuses. Why? Because she's arguing for more government power and wants to deny the accused the right to debunk her claims.

​@v44rgtuy0l3 If there are active cases, she probably isn't allowed to talk about them. If say Apple wins their case, they could go after her for defamation. I think if you are the government, taking action, then you would have to "believe" they are breaking the law, thus the reason you are bringing them to court. You may be completely wrong. The courts decide. I agree, we don't need more IRS funding. They shouldn't be going after gray areas, and instead should be focused on black and white illegal activity. But these government officials can make big names for themselves if they win a case against say Apple, for billions of dollars.

Ummmm.....yeah, I think she doesn't understand the definition of a cheat! If we "crossed the legal line", I'm pretty sure we'd be in trouble!!! Nothing ever happens to them, never will!!! Too many swamp people protect and cover for each other!

I’m proud to have voted for him! He’s no-nonsense!

He is not underrated. He is much loved.

He comes across as misogynistic and creepy as hell. A shameful remnant of a once respectable family.

Underrated by WHO ?

@@timothykelly7974found the marxist

He's a gift to the American people.

Love Senator Kennedy ❣️ he has balls and asks real questions unfortunately none of these people answer anything straight 😢

He’s a massive bellend. Nothing substantive just playing gotcha politics. He achieves nothing

Yes! But the Republican party does not deserve him.

1000%

Is that right 🧐.....be careful who you tell on..... The Boeing whistle blower was found dead in his car.... The FBI already knows....RIP John Barnett.... NWO 👁️....

No, she just doesn't want to end up like the Boeing whistleblower.

Vote blue no matter who 🤡

Or she wants them to donate to her NGO.

Not to mention a massive defamation suit against her if she names any corporations who can convince a jury she defamed them.

Because they'd have to punish people when they lie, as well..

Because responsibility and consequences would subvert the purpose of this kind of testimony, which performs roughly the same function as the orchestra did while the Titanic was sinking.

Because this is all just a dog and pony show. Non of this matters. Just an excuse for them to get a paycheck from the tax payers

Because if they did then politicians would have to be held to the same standard and, if they can't lie, they can't function. Ever notice how all laws are written with just enough slack to allow exploitation, appeal and interpretation to enable the very lawyers who write the laws to make tons of money by exploiting that inbuilt slackness? It's like a plumber fixing your boiler but instead of properly fixing it he doesn't tighteni all the bolts fully so it'll leak in the future and ensure he'll get a callback to fix it again.

and...…for lying under oath, which they do consistently …

But im sure she facebooks the allegation all night

She doesn't want to be charged with slander.

@@QuantumMechanic_88

@@QuantumMechanic_88 If she is not brave enough to substantiate her allegations by naming names, she's just another gossip/publicity hound/ rumor mill. It's easy to make allegations without naming the offender (s). She's not very smart either way. Credible? No. Waste of time watching.

She wants to make a truth claim based on her statement alone, no evidence needed. In other words, she seems to want to mislead the American public.

Everyone including Kennedy knows that it is true

😂savage

Praise GOD ! Very well said, I agree!

Removed from what? Put on trial for what specific crime? What are you attempting to say here?

Kennedy's question is built upon an entirely faulty premise. You can know something is true in the aggregate without knowing specifically who's responsible. For example I can say there's a high likelihood that an active serial killer is operating somewhere in the US without knowing who it is.

Exactly! Just like Donald Trump.

@@johnwest8785 LOL

😂😂😂😂😂

You mean you do NOT like when lawyers and career politicians answer a question without answering the question?

And so is the Kennedy name these days.

Yeah, just keep our mouths closed, keep working and let the huge corporations funnel the money offshore to avoid tax. Let the world turn into a shit hole for the poor whilst the execs laugh in the sun off the hard work of people trying to get along. Cool.

Truth

Actually, I bet that talk cost the taxpayers tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars.

​@@batterybuildingWhat is your point? I don't think he's related to RFK Jr.

with absolutely zero teeth. Congress is so week it's hilarious!

​@@elzippo488Not as hilarious as your lack of writing ability.

I would like to see him be President.

No…he really isn’t …what the hell are you watching?

​@@lynndawomack5496- nope. Absolute lefty

All of Bidens people know nothing say nothing told to say nothing, protecting each other and protecting the corruption going on. SAD DAYS IN AMERICA

Yes you are so right!

Actually, it was better than being stricken. Her testimony only demonstrates her willful ignorance, thus exposing her biases and her hidden agenda. Now her "Expert" opinion is on record, and she has been weighed and found wanting.

@@JohnBrown-ce6uf Valid point.

She answered. You dont like them. HUGE difference

Senator Kennedy knows that by law the expert cannot name a company that has not been convicted. If the expert would have answered it would have been a libel. So “pure gold”? Meh

he seems like he's suffering from dementia. shouldn't a senator understand that this question cannot be answered in these circumstances? she explains why like 40 times, and he still doesn't get it.

Guess she wasn't trying to let time run out.

And we pay millions of dollars to people to prepare people like her to testify before Congress. That's the result. They learn to dance.

Or 'That's a great question.'

& “SENATOR” 5B times

Anytime someone responds with. Thank you for that question means they’re not gonna answer that question, gonna run around in circles

You should really read that statute then to see how dumb that statement is

So, she says (for legal reasons, to avoid defamation) that she will not name any companies since these lawsuits are still being litigated, he asks her to do it anyway. And you call that a lie? Everyone else that has a shred of intelligence is uncomfortable with how stupid you are for recommending jail time for that.

tax laws to allow cheating

Said it for years. If you don't like the tax code, change it instead of bitching when people push it to the limit.

Tax avoidance vs tax evasion..

🎯🎯

@@LanceManthe people who can change the tax law (members of Congress) are paid to make laws to make it easier for corporations to avoid paying taxes (lobbyists). Corporations have way more of a say in what becomes law in this country than the American people.

lol compelled to answer gtfo and go back to school.

You DID use the word cheat, lady.

If she can't provide information to congress, when asked then let's not spend taxpayer money on her. If you take tax dollars, you must answer to congress. And these beaurocrats are useless to us if they don't operate transparently. It's just wasting money. No need. Let's get it together, get people who report to the people, not operate in the shadows. It's just so much money being wasted on people that are lying and hiding the truth from us. And pretty sure gov employees have qualified immunity.

You'd think HE would know that as well!

They can't sue her if it's true, and if she says it with no proof or evidence then it's a hollow allegation.

@@rascalme9754 exactly she comes there without evidence just like a tin foil hat theorist. Big companies surly try to minimazie taxes like evryone else in the borders of the law.

She doesn't have to worry about that if it is true or she has reasonable evidence to suggest it is true. She would only be liable if she said something false that she knew to be false. That's the beauty of his questioning of her, if you understand why he was asking these particular questions. The truth is gleaned, whether she answers or not.

It's not her place to name names and Kennedy knows it. It's the job of the IRS. Note that Kennedy doesn't bother to check with them.

Hope in one hand....

Be careful who you tell on...... you think the FBI doesn't already know???..... The Boeing whistle blower was found in his car dead..... she knows better than to say....NWO 👁️

The government doesn't MAKE money, they TAKE OURS...so of COURSE we pay her.

Why isn’t this obviation meeting out JAIL TIME !

She is afraid. Of being murdered. Like the Boeing whistleblower.

From what I've seen over the last 9 years is that government is irrevocably broken to the point of no return if Democrats rig another election.

I can tell you what the cost is for the Federal Government Salaries, Pension Funds, Premium Medical, Vacations etc.. It's $3.6 Trillion in Annual cost..That includes the cost to build, house, maintain, utilities, business supplies, computers, electronic devices etc...

Don't assume the gender

I wonder if you ever see anything else about John Kennedy and how much of a dishonest slimy guy he is?

@@fjbsdoa1976 you trollin?

@@duncanantern7377you bowlin

He's a plain speaking man. Wonderful.

"i do not recall~"

Expert Pontificators! 🙄

Their position of non answering is all we need to now

That’s not fair. People answer the questions they can back up with evidence. Facts matter

sometimes they don't ask any questions

The vast majority of federal income tax, over 98% IIRC, is solely used to make interest payments to the federal reserve, a private bank with a hundred year contract that was just renewed a couple years ago (during Obama admin). Interest, on our own money, "loaned" to the government, printed with nothing to back it up. Federal income tax was supposed to be temporary. Americans were promised it would be temporary, just as we were promised the economy would be fixed when the government illegally demanded all privately owned gold be turned over to the government, under threat of incarceration for something like ten years or more. It did not fix the economy. Are you angry? You should be.

​@debacofzomb9889 You have to consider the alternative this day in age, though. Before income tax, there were much higher terrifs. We live off technology now. That $1000 smart phone you made this comment through would cost a WHOLE lot more with higher trade terrifs. If we raise the prices through terrifs, these nations producing these gadgets for cheap would quickly realize that it doesn't matter how cheap they put the devices out for if we still get charged so much on top of this. The price of computer technology would skyrocket even higher. The solution to that is, of course, products produced in the US. That will take some time.

Your taxes don't pay for anything except the interest on their debt. 100% is sent to the federal reserve, who sends it on to the bank of England, who in turn keeps 40% and pushes the remaining 60% to the bank of the Vatican. You folks are extremely and dangerously uneducated in facts.

@@debacofzomb9889 Indeed! The (Zionist!) banksters - and the Congressional Military Industrial Complex (which is not solely American, but a global phenomenon, and which they also own!) are ultimately responsible for virtually ALL of the modern world's problems. And guess who is their leader? And guess who also owns 80% of Israel and over 50% of the rest of the world's wealth too! Here's a clue, their family name begins with an 'R' and it's NOT 'Rockefeller' (Though they too are also among the banksters and are almost as bad!)

@@debacofzomb9889 you should go back and read the 16th Amendment again. Its was never temporary. And its just under 40%, but I wouldn't really expect facts from someone with your 'position'.

Only for us peasants. AKA US citizens.

Yes!

But she does state they are cheating, but has no proof. That’s the exact point Senator Kennedy is trying to make……simple as that.

Then why do you watch and comment on them?

Republicans don't have a majority in the Senate, so they can't do what you are saying.

Or they could stop wasting so much time and money on useless hearings and instead actually pass laws.

she doesn’t work for the government.

​@@patrickbateman1660in general, we have enough laws, too many actually. The excessive regulations are the issue.

@@patrickbateman1660 If they made laws, would Biden sign them? Only if they are laws that enshrine surrender, like that idiotic law that "limited" illegal immigration to 5000/day.

Not at all. I am learning a lot about how to act and respond disingenuously. Fundamental life-skills in our days and age.

@@jean-jacqueslavigne3109 well played sir

@@jean-jacqueslavigne3109Absolutely sir, it’s the name of the game.

so you think that corporate America is paying me fair share of tax

The FBI already knows..... so be careful who you tell on..... little example.... The Boeing whistle blower was found dead in his car... RIP John Barnett.... so I recommend you think about what is truly important to you and your.... FAMILY.... NWO 👁️

She will not mention it because Boeing murdered a whistleblower and is facing no consequences.

Exactly. She’s smart.

I don't think that was the reason entirely. At the end she said the companies she was referring to are "Big Tech and Pharmaceuticals". If President Biden would say this when he talks about corporations not paying their share of taxes I would not mind it but of course he isn't referring to tax cheats rather than their % is not high enough (to send them out of our country and take jobs with them like his boss..oops I mean former boss did)

​@@sweetpain67is 'smart' the right word here? No, it's 'corrupt'.

@@tykeorama9898 She’s corrupt for not being badgered into self-incrimination? Besides she actually named a couple, and a couple industries, so Kennedy, as much as I LOVE him…failed.

This woman is lying.

Probably because she knows what happens to people who make rich people poor.....

​@andyfitz1992 you mean... nothing? More like she knows none of the companies are actually committing tax fraud, but she sure wants us to think they are so congress approves a budget increase for her department.

She can't answer publicly because that would be obstruction of justice.

Typical CommuRat…accuse…then go back and fabricate the evidence later.

Coward? Yes. Dumb? No.... sorta. Let me explain. She knows that until something is PROVED in a court of law, it would be considered slander to make unfounded spoken charges that damage a company's reputation. So she can't let names slip, or she risks being sued. So she was smart not to name names. What she SHOULD have said is she believes there is sufficient evidence that, when brought to trial, will show that Company X, Y, and Z and not following all IRS regulations. That would be truthful and an opinion only, which would keep her out of hot water. But, she decided to go for sensationalism by pretending to have confirmed names.... that's where her behavior was dumb. But also smart enough not to get herself in trouble other than simply being embarrassed, which doesn't seem to be much of a worry to many folks presently. The SMART thing would've been to shaddup and not say a word about it.

She's smart. Why would she name names outside of a criminal trial setting under oath?

Because she's there to voice about it without giving them the information to do something about it ​@@dzoinc1555

I'd like to see you appear there and name corporations when you know the last guy who did that was the Boeing whistleblower who "committed suicide" very conveniently for Boeing.

They are the corporations. I thought she covered that part. lol.

She covered nothing

If she names one she'll be liable for defamation - because they AREN'T CHEATING just following the law.

​@@mscolli3 the law democrats put in place.

@@mscolli3 And...she knows that!!! So she will not provide any specific names.

And born in my home state of Mississippi!! From tiny Centerville ❤

If she talks, she's the one under the bus. Big corps hold grudges

Another lie.

No. Sen Kennedy is a liar.

If she names one she'll be liable for defamation - because they AREN'T CHEATING just following the law.

EXACTLY! It's just like V P Harris!

@@mscolli3 Exactly. Sen Kennedy who puts on the good ol boy act , even though he went to ivy league schools and Oxford. Sen Kennedy is a fraud and a liar.

@@tonytiger8451 Nope.

Are we sure that's a woman it sounds suspicious 🤔

@@beetlejuice4693 😂

Everything WOKE turns to CRAP.

Kennedy is a joke.

It's a man up there, listen to the voice

I wish he ran my country. 🇺🇲🇨🇦

They are against corporate tax cheats.

The only person who hates paying taxes more than me is Hunter Biden.

@@batterybuilding They've never gone after the corporations before. Just us middle class Americans.

Go after the small business people they are always the brunt of the Federal government not big corporations that donate millions and have a bevy of lawyers who know each other

More lies. That's all they got.

Not even close to correct. She wants irs to come down on them for tax avoidance, but can explicitly name companies without exposing herself to lawsuits

I'm not sure I blame her just because they would maybe sue her. But she shouldn't accuse companies without being willing to say who it is.

who? him? her?

It’s not “no!” It’s: “I can’t”

Didn't Earn It

Confirmation bias in effect

Why ?

Beautiful, isn't it?

Yeah the guy is an absolute a55 and he knew it

Huh?

I can see you are a corporate Disney Fan

What’s her crime?

Not knowing anything about this but she is not on trial, ffs...

A jail cell wouldn't protect her from assassins anymore than it protected Epstein. And considering Boeing murdered a whistleblower without consequences barely a month ago...

B.S. All she needs to do is show evidence.