In Yakut we have "bas" for "head", but it's used more rarely than "töbö". Also, we have "as" which means "hair (on the back of the head, edges)". Also, we have "kös" only in "bas-kös" (head-eyes) which means chief, master. We have "uos" which means lips, mouth. We also have "xol" which means "arm". Many common Turkic words exist in Yakut but they've changed their meaning a bit.
I am Mongolian here. The lady who represented Mongolian language is not actually Mongolian nor she is a native Mongol speaker. Tongue in Mongolian is "hel" but mouth in Mongolian "am" and she was wrong with the word for tongue!!!!! Turkish people are trying very hard to prove the Altaic language family but it will never be proven because it is a political ideology supported by Turanism.
There's no definite Altaic here. As far as similarities / overlaps in words, I see the Turkic languages - Turkish, Azeri, Turkmen, Chuvash, Kazakh, Krygyz, Tatar, Uyghur, Yakut, Mongolian with similarities to Manchu, with Korean and Japanese as isolated languages.
If research had been done on the Altai language for years, it would have been proven that Koreans came from the Altai Mountains. If these studies had been done, this language would not be a hypothesis right now ff course he's a racist, that's it,If you look at Westerners, it turns out that they are related to Hindus who have nothing to do with them.
I am a Mongolian and enough research has been conducted on Altaic but it failed to be true. Altaic will never be proven because it is now serving more a political ideology of the Turkish government to expand its influence in Inner Asia but unfortunately it is very short-sighted agenda, which will never work out.
@@kts437Actually, all the governments of Turkic states do support Turkic ancestry connection. They even established many political and cultural organizations about this. They support Altaic linguistics lightly, not strongly. I have researched all of them.
After 6,000-7,000 years, you can no longer expect word matches. There is an ancient Altaic language from which Turkish, Mongolian, Tungusic, Korean and Japonic are descended. The reason why there are now so few similarities after such a long time is substrates. The Altaians were very mobile, but no matter where they went, there were already other languages. So each of the Altaic language groups got a different substrate. There are more similarities in the proto-languages and grammar structure.
Çuvaşça ve ön türkçenin 3000 yıldan daha az zaman önce ayılmasına rağmen bu kadar farklılaştığı düşünülürse 6000-7000 yıl bunun için oldukça uzun bir süre.
