Can you explain in as few words as needed exactly what the issue is? I read the station was closed because of access problems. Access for passengers, workers, what? If latter, what has changed since the station was first built to cause the issues? Seems so much has been filmed and written to be able to get to the nub of the issue.
There obviously is an issue here otherwise Network Rail would simply have gone to court and got an order to access the property. Why haven't they? Most likely answer is because they don't think a court would find in their favour. It is time for you to take them to court and press the issue.
there seems to be a lot written about the heavy handed attitude of scotrail and lies etc but what are the property owners actually proposing as the solution here if they want the station to remain open?
Thank-you for your quiet reporting. I am, for family reasons, a rail enthusiast. I have also holidayed as far north as Dornoch, so have driven close by on visits to Wick and Thurso. I am at a loss to understand why the station should be closed. I look at the stations at Rannoch and Corrour that are wonderfully remote but seem to have a growing attraction (it's on my bucket list to visit.)
So I've seen a few videos now, but I'm not seeing all the pertinent information that we all need to see to make sense of the full situation. It seems very disjointed. I think that for sure you need to make at least 1 video, (if you haven't done already), of the register scotland evidence and your deeds, that apparently clearly shows that it is your land that is in question. This is the corner stone of your argument and if you show this to the viewing public, and can get them all on your side (if it is as clear and obvious that it shows it as your land, as you claim), then that will help it to make sense to everyone and they will then be rooting for you for sure! Such mass public support and awareness of how Network rail are robbing you of your land, (presuming your claim is clearly shown on the register and your deeds) will help to ensure that any judge wont just steam roller over your case, ignore your evidence, and grant a win to the mega corp with it's own police force. Also, given that network rail and BTP have clearly topped their hand and revealed how they are proceeding, rather than stop attempting to access the dispited land and let a civil court decide whis land it really is, you now must make a claim against them, and become the claimant. If you don't now do this and do it as quickly as possible, then you are going to steam rolled over and either end up in jail with the loss of your land or judt having g to peacefully give up your land. You must now take the fight to them or accept that you are not rich enough/have the stomach for a legal fight in court with a mega corp. But remember, if you can win the people over on you tube by doing what i have stated above, you could even make funds if the videos success and start a go fund me for your legal expenses. I think that a lot of people once they learn the full facts in this case, might be prepared to venture a quid into your kitty to see david fight goliath once goliath is shown to be villain of the story.
If you want to see the station open again why not let them dig the new path. Still no clear explanation of what the dispute is about. Waste of 8 minutes.
This is something of a long and unstructured ramble with no coherent statement of what the grievance is , or indeed its history . There is no need to cross private property to access the station when it can be accessed from the railway . However , since there is an established and extant railway station , there must be a public right of access ; if the right of access was mistakenly sold off along with the station house , then there would be a grievance with the solicitor who carried out the conveyancing , and if access is required for the station , then a compulsory purchase order can be sought in court - this would be the obvious remedy , although given the area is predominantly open countryside , a CPO for a path beyond the poster's property would seem to be the obvious remedy ( along with sufficient space to build a station car park for rail travellers to use ) .
There really is a lot that needs exposing, we will get there in due course. We've got all these massive energy companies setting up all around us and all the local old peoples care homes, hospitals and local shops closing down! 👍
You always get thumbs down on almost any video, even fluffy kittens. It's currently at 16 and they could be anyone who didn't like the accent, the scenery, the length of video, the audio levels, or the indeed, the reason for the video. You just can't tell.
@@WeeBurnip-lz3fr Yes, I know. And you also wrote "there's vested interests watching and worrying about this exposé", so I guess that is also 'your point' too. I'm merely explaining that other videos get the same treatment and we'll never know the reason why.
The bias of the law has always been toward the corporate and authority interests against those of the little people. This corruption has become much worse over the years and is now quite blatant. If as you say, there is evidence and proof of your standing in this matter, then with that and the legal understanding of your good lady, you should prevail and then seek redress against those that victimised you.
It`s nice to hear the other side of the story, it seems to be a totally different story than what I have read in the media. Keep up the good work and good luck.
Take it to your MP if you have no joy take it past your MP. Wright to as many MPs as you can, Someone may take it up. Keep pushing it with your local press. Go to your local TV station. Think out of the box. Keep going 💪
They are doing everything to help themselves and the energy companies, they are knocking down houses to get wind turbines around corners. And in the meantime, local elderly care homes and health services are being forced to close.
Good for you for keeping it real and for being decent human beings. With your fair & accommodating attitude, they will hopefully back down and see the light of common human decency.
So they are building a path to a station that they are closing to make it safer for the workers going there? That’s like putting on a condom after you’ve got her pregnant. Got no need for it.
No, they have temporarily closed it becsuse, they claim, of safety reasons, on the basis that they currently can't get road access to it! The fact that this coincidentally adds pressure from the community against the couple for seemingly causing the closing of the station because they are allegedly being "difficult" or are "unreasonable " is not also lost on me!
@@grahamnimmo4656 it’s pathetic that they are blaming 2 people for it all. I presume the station has been operating for years with no issues until someone with a hard hat, hi-viz vest and a clipboard came along and made it a problem so he could justify his own health and safety job.
Hello, seems like a good question, maybe there is more than this video maker is telling us? Like you say, no need for an access to a station thats closed. 2 sides to every story
I assume You'll be Having a Private Prosecution Against Network Rail for Attempted Theft of Property by Fraudulently Claiming Ownership of Privately Owned Land Namely Your Land of which You Have the Title Deeds . including Mental Harassment Brought about by amount of Visits from Rail Police & Arrests by Railways Police Force Outwith their Jurisdiction which ends the second they step off Railways Land. a Claim for Damages covering Both of You is Required .
Hopefully yes, we definitely need help with that. Fortunately, we have so much evidence it's overwhelming, photos, audio recordings, videos and documents. Thanks for your comment 👍
@@ALTNABREACyou need to go from being the decendants to being the claimant ASAP aka counter suing. Claimaints get more rights than a defendant. You can only defend. The judge can ignore you as a defendant. He can not ignore you as the claimant. Private prosecutions on individuals including police and railway workers and then also sue the company it's self. Judges won't make summary judgements without the claimant being there and they can just not turn up and the case gets postponed until a later date. Where as when you are the claimant they will make summary judgements without the defendant being there. When you take a claim to a judge, they have to listen to you and make make ruling. If you have them.bang to rights the judge will have no choice.
I wish you well with this I don't understand the legal position so won't comment but wanted to send you support you are clearly impacted by this. Regards Haley
Sorry, but I don’t understand your problem with NetworkRail upgrading the path? It seems harmless enough to me, bearing in mind that the station has been there for over a hundred years.
Network Rail have no need to come by road : there is a railway line there so THEY CAN COME BY TRAIN to do whatever they need to do on THEIR LINE . They have these things called maintenance trains , and if they do need to venture off the track they also have vehicles which can travel on the railway line then leave it to work elsewhere on their land .
Local MPs are just as corrupt. My local MP (same area) helped along with the police, local council and SSSC protect and cover up a sexual assault of a child by a female social worker who had a history of assault, so don't think the local SMP will help anyone but their own interest.
@@ALTNABREAC I took my case to Jamie Stone, he claimed to be helping with my case but turned out he was running back to social services and having a good laugh with them behind my back with no intention of protecting the child concerned.
@@bobp6742 I am sorry to hear that. The corruption in the system is like a poisonous tree. Cover ups like this are happening all the time at all levels of the world system. Is it very encouraging to see many people beginning to see how corrupt and oppressive the system is.
Did you record audio/video the chats with QTS? I feel your pain mate over this alleged persecution. Although I would be very careful how you phrase anything you say that is being recorded as any of your vids may be used evidentially at a later date by the scum at BR in my opinion and they can spend a lot more on dodgy lawyers than you can. Wish you all the best with hopefully getting this sorted to an acceptable level.
Sorry but I quickly gave up listening, you're attempt at explaining 'whatever' this was about failed miserably. This video, like all your other ones, are all just a rambling confusion.
Sadly I have to agree. I think the guy must have a good case but he is too emotional and incoherent to give us an accurate objective account (without repetition, please) of what the story actually is.
I just looked on the map. Seems the main access to the station is past your house and you seem to be claiming that that road is not Public Right of way? Ordance survey map would soon sort it..does it show public right of way? Hmmm.
A genuine mistake you can sort it out...but this looks like big brother bulling down south a person can own the land but a neighbour has the right to cross it not sure if this is like it but the way they are using large hammers on you the more it looks like big brother bulling the law is the law if you own it its yours if you got paperwork to back it up great ..but the more they try to ignore fact ...roast them all the best
Oh so this area they are wanting to put this path in is your land!?! You have the land deeds etc dont you? Does Network Rail have proof its not your land?
It is possible for a public right of way ( which must exist for passengers to get to and from the railway station , and which the poster states he wishes to remain open ) to run across private land . A public right of way can be deemed to exist if it can be shown to have been used for a period of 30 years without opposition or obstruction . If the residence is indeed station cottage and the poster purchased it , then it ought to have been in the title deeds that there would be a public right of access to the station . As for station maintenance ( gritting etc ) the rail staff to do this can COME BY TRAIN without going over the poster's property ; they can set up a salt bunker on the platform , and it can be brought by train , and can be replenished by bags of salt , brought on the train . I see no problem here , other than that there needs to be a public right of access to the station so that passengers can use the station ; also in a rural area like this , where passengers will come from a distance , there needs to be a station car park as most users will come from further than a reasonable walking distance .
Their property is the old station house. The only access to the platform runs along side their drive way and they have blocked access to passengers and rail staff forcing the closure of the station. Network rail are trying to install a proper path between the road and the station. Sales information from when the property was sold in 2014 show the boundary ends at the very edge of the concrete of the drive way leaving a public path to the station. You can watch other videos on RU-vid from a few years ago showing people walking this path also you can look at the satellite picture to give you a good idea of what is going on. The couple have inticts against them from Network rail and this dispute has been going on since 2019.
Ukraine is fighting a War against bully boys. Seems you have your own battle going on. Stay strong. Hope its all sorted out soon. It must be stressful for you both.. ATB
Sorry, but how exactly are they being a Karen here? He seems to be saying that Networkrail have been making a claim to his land, which he claims is clearly shown as his in the official register of Scotland. Normally, when 2 parties despute land, the only solution is to take the matter to civil court for it to be resolved. However here, it appears that because this other party (Networkrail) happen to be a mega Corp with their own police force, they are refusing to do the civil court route and are instead threatening the couple with arrest, fines and or jail for simply defending their own land that network rail is basically stealing from them by force, and lies and criminal activity....just my opinion on how I see it based upon the register showing thst the coupme clearly own the land in dispute. Why don't network rail take it to civil court to be resolved rather than assume they own it, contrary to what the land registry states, and then instruct their own biased police force, BTP, to coerce and force the couple into giving up their land for free, which is exactly what they are actually doing?
