For copyright matters please contact us at: copymanager.mn@gmail.com Mind Warehouse ► goo.gl/aeW8Sk Dance of the Pixies by Machinimasound licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 int’l / @incredible-qq2zi
Thats what the motor controller would be for. If you were going the other way you would have to wait.it would work the same as manual operation.you couldnt move it manually without the same problem you described. Using the controller would be a safety so that the stairs would not raise if an obstacle was in the way.
Seems a wee bit weird that the harvester at 3:50 requires the user to stoop bearing its full load. Shouldn't it have one, two, or three wheels (for that insane price)?
@@lalehvontofu5860 Think it through: SoftHead: The thing that kills anybody working in that position is the weight of their own upper body. It isn't the weight of the envelopes that destroys postal sorters with Repetitive Stress Injury. It's their own lower limbs.
Well, but it doesn't cost as much time, and a hurt back can be massaged and therefore helped instantly, broken knees need more time, so yes, it does make sense
@@Neetneet007 no it doesnt XD ur logic makes no sense cus a normal flight of starirs is 2 at and acute angle above one another this star is ay an about 85 degrees angle on the SAME LEVEL it would be saveing space if it was at differents hights but its not its the same hight forming and X not an
I actually own one of those hand held printers It works pretty well and is so cool EDIT: oh my god thank you all for 22 likes that is more then I have ever gotten 🥳 EDIT: holy cow 🐮 I can’t believe I have gotten 36 likes thank you all so much
Kai._. Gilligan the proximity sensors would know if the one is activated,the other would not function.a controller would solve that. I'm not real smart with motor controllers, i was just offering a thought. Thanx for a kind reply.
Don't get me wrong new inventions are super cool but most of the times their just going to put people out of jobs or encourage people to become super lazy.
It's called productivity. Not lazy. In fact being "lazy" is good because you are able to accomplish more in the same time. Increases the GDP which is improvement in the economy.
Inventions rarely decreases the available jobs, they rearrange them. Though, granted, some expertise will become more or less useful, potentially leaving some of the older generation without a job. This will, however, open new jobs for others. If, for example, a factory replaces workers with machines, the maintenance of those machines creates new jobs. Furthermore, since the demand for said machines increased, the quantity supplied would increase to meet the market equilibrium, opening work space there as well. The equilibrium is merely where the quantity supplied is equal the quantity demanded. There's various principles behind it, but the gist of it is that people are more willing to sell larger quantities at greater prices, and less willing to buy larger quantities at larger prices. If you imagine the demand and supply as two intersecting linear (though usually not linear in real life) curves taking the forms of an X, the demand curve would slope downwards to the right and the supply curve would slope upwards to the right. If the demand for something increases, the entire demand curve moves to the right, in doing so the equilibrium (where they intersect) will move upwards to the right along the supply curve. This means that the quantity supplied, AND the price increases, as though people are more willing to sell more at greater prices. All in all, new inventions are always good if they create a demand. Don't be afraid of progress in whatever form, just aim for a job that you imagine will be relevant in the future, or be prepared to branch out your expertise as the demand is eliminated. TL;DR: New technology doesn't only take jobs, it creates new ones. There's balance there, so there's little reason to fear progress.
1:43 for the same ammount of space, you can get a chair with a table that has a drawer 1:57 that's so impractical not to mention a safety hazard, imagine if there's a fire
That herb cutter might be a great time saver. But, no way are you convincing me that leaning over at that angle and cutting herbs with this machine is not going to hurt your back. It might not hurt as much as the old way but it’s still hurting.
Nurse: Get the Robert ! Other nurse: What is a Robert?... Nurse: Didn’t the boss tell you? Other nurse: No... Nurse: Oh... he didn’t tell me too! *both nurses laughing* Me: Uh... what about me? 5:43 .-. IT IS CALLED ROBERT
Roll top desk with barely any elbow room for anyone wanting to use it as a desk. Farmers friend company probably funded by a pharmaceutical company with a great line in medication for back pain. Robert, can move from room to room. Unlike medical staff? And it will have zero impact on the patients mental well being that comes from simply chatting with their physio.
grumples it should either be “on another level entirely,” “on an entirely. New level,” etc. there are many ways of displaying what I think this person was thinking. If it helps you understand, “entirely” is a word that is not needed in this sentence, it’s describing. “ON AN ANOTHER LEVEL”
"on an Entirely Other Level" would improve the grammar but not the message, which remains vague as "other" can only mean "different" but not better or worse. If you think your content is important, why not take the time to make the title compelling AND grammatically correct? It's too bad that so many people are lazy about the titles of their own work.
Someone please tell me in what situation would I need two flights of stairs going between the same floors in the same spot, and how it would be not confusing and frustrating if two people tried to use them at the same time.
True with the confusion and frustration. But maybe if they made the foldable parts of the stairs glass (strong type of course) people can see the other person crossing and wait for them? Or maybe they can put sensors so it locks automatically when sensing weight, pressure, or maybe movement? Then again, this would most likely be used in Hotels and other places similar to that but many don't have the money or need for it. It is kind of useless if you ask me-
@@SikReality Then maybe, not glass. But something that could feel the weight on the stairs, and the person below could see that someone is walking above them and they can wait? For example, with sensors something below (Like a light) could indicate that there is another person?
I had that printbrush idea quite a few years ago but I realised it was impossible to develop alone. The biggest challenge was driving a print head since no data is published on how this works.
That Robert is brilliant. Think of all the PT's we lose every year to work injury. Clients getting better care from employees who aren't breaking their backs working out all day on the job. Genius!
