Тёмный

America's new STEALTH FIGHTER revealed on INSTAGRAM? 

Sandboxx
Подписаться 406 тыс.
Просмотров 276 тыс.
50% 1

On July 1st, Lockheed Martin's official Instagram account posted a series of images in celebration of the 80th anniversary of their famed Skunk Works division. And one of those images caught the world's attention...
Here's a rundown on what we know about the Air Force's Next Generation Air Dominance program, and what this image may mean.
📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social
Twitter: / sandboxxnews
Instagram: / sandboxxnews
Facebook: / sandboxxnews
TikTok: / sandboxxnews
📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social
Twitter: / alexhollings52
Instagram: / alexhollings52
Facebook: / alexhollingswrites
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Citations:
- www.instagram....
- theaviationist...
- www.sandboxx.u...
- www.sandboxx.u...
- www.thedrive.c...
- www.thedrive.c...

Опубликовано:

 

6 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 972   
@perfectectlylegitimatename631
The year is 2035. There are over 2500 f35s and 200 ngads. There are 30 su57s
@ye7576.
@ye7576. Год назад
@@suny1265 u meant backwards right? 2 f 35 can shoot down 10 su57 and the rest can never land because they are a trash can
@Wonderwhoopin
@Wonderwhoopin Год назад
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@EslytheCrow
@EslytheCrow Год назад
Crazy analysis, but very realistic 👍🏼
@jessemills3845
@jessemills3845 Год назад
You are Breaking the FIRST RULE OF WAR! NEVER UNDERESTIMATE YOUR ENEMY! SUGGEST you read "SUN TUZ, the Art of War"! It is the 2nd most read book in China! KNOW YOUR ENEMY! Due to OBAMA, BIDEN AND DEMS, WE HAVE NO CLUE OF WHAT OUR ENEMIES HAVE !
@Admiral-General_Aladeen
@Admiral-General_Aladeen Год назад
Let's be real here in a war Russia would stand to chance against NATO the only real threat is China now but even then the US allies around China
@williamromine5715
@williamromine5715 Год назад
It's hard to believe the "skunk works" would transport it's super secrete next generation fighter on a flat bed, in the day light and not covered by a tarp. If it did, it wanted it to be photographed and shown on the internet. With its history of secret aircraft development, this didn't happen by accident.
@recoil53
@recoil53 Год назад
Seriously, there are test sites in the remote desert. But it's known the NGAD prototype has at least flown. so we know it can be moved quietly. Maybe a misdirect or trolling.
@Neeboopsh
@Neeboopsh Год назад
clearly intentional. psyops are everywhere :)
@mikeboosh8776
@mikeboosh8776 Год назад
I was thinking exactly the same. If this was seen, it's because they WANTED it to be seen. Likewise, if they're putting out a shape on instagram it's either nothing like that, or it's so generic a shape it doesn't matter.
@pdexBigTeacher
@pdexBigTeacher Год назад
I saw their Top Gun mock-up at an airshow at Edwards AFB. I got the sense that mock-up was more real than people may believe, 'hiding-in-plain-sight" vibe, because some design aspects made sense.
@Holiday_Ringo
@Holiday_Ringo Год назад
All this crap is coming out in an extremely controlled manner
@ThirdLawPair
@ThirdLawPair Год назад
While it's too soon to know that that's the actual design, it's probably not too soon to know that it's going to strongly emphasize BVR over dogfighting.
@MrDJAK777
@MrDJAK777 Год назад
It's gonna fly high and fast to maximize stealth advantage and give missle kinematic/range advantage+ easier/wider communication area for better wingman drone control. Also helps with connecting to all the upcoming and any existing satellite/space based tracking systems.
@protorhinocerator142
@protorhinocerator142 Год назад
@@MrDJAK777 And as lasers get smaller, a high-altitude NGAD will have better line of sight.
@patclark2186
@patclark2186 Год назад
@@MrDJAK777 It's going to burn money faster than any other fighter in history
@PigeonHoot
@PigeonHoot Год назад
@@patclark2186 thats been the case for any new fighter...
@MrDJAK777
@MrDJAK777 Год назад
@@patclark2186 ooh noooooo what will we do........ invade a country to bankroll it? Maybe, but I'm okay with that cause me want shiny 6th gen.
@mikebridges20
@mikebridges20 Год назад
Alex, as you've pointed out in previous videos; these images aren't "accidents" that are left in the public arena; they're vetted through the DoD well beforehand. Thanks for keeping us informed!
@Cactusfruitsquisher
@Cactusfruitsquisher Год назад
But why? Genuinely asking, what’s the purpose?
@mikebridges20
@mikebridges20 Год назад
@@Cactusfruitsquisher Alex has a good segment on the intentional release of our capabilities into the public arena: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3jBfic4AWcc.html TL/DR: If your adversaries are intimidated by your publicly-released capabilities, maybe they'll think long and hard before doing nefarious deeds.
@Cactusfruitsquisher
@Cactusfruitsquisher Год назад
@@mikebridges20 thanks
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 Год назад
I can only imagine what YF-23 would have been after update with 30-40 years worth of advancement in materials, manufacturing, GE engines and electronics.... btw: that shape resembles on of visions of supposed SR-72 Aurora.
@bnblasercleaning
@bnblasercleaning Год назад
Id imagine regardless of who won the f22/yf23 fight, both would have gradually evolved into something similar
@bigearl3867
@bigearl3867 Год назад
Back in the early 1980's, a model kit maker called Testor sold a kit called the F-19 stealth fighter. This thing looks a lot like it. These where the days before the public knew what the F-117 looked like. I often wonder how long the technology we see today has been around before the public sees it.
@dextermorgan1
@dextermorgan1 Год назад
I saw a video not long ago that showed the B21 design in the 1990's. So, likely they've been around for a while.
@baomao7243
@baomao7243 Год назад
1-2 decades
@dongately2817
@dongately2817 Год назад
I remember the 1st version of Microprose’s Stealth Fighter game had a similar design - like a frisbee with stubby wings
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
In the end there never was anything like F-19 "Frisbee". It was a fun bit of model designing imagination but it wasn't based on anything.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@dextermorgan1 That's because it's essentially an evolved B-2 which itself came out of the Advanced Technology Bomber program that began in 1979 and its designer, Hal Markarian produced an early concept sketch in that year that looked a lot like both the B-2 and the B-21.
@protorhinocerator142
@protorhinocerator142 Год назад
I for one am pumped for the NGAD. It's supposed to be a new evolution of the fighter concept, not just a faster stealthier F-22. Of course I want it to do everything the F-22 does, as a baseline. But then take it to the next level and do some amazing things we never considered.
@ThirdLawPair
@ThirdLawPair Год назад
Maneuverability is not going to be one of the top design goals.
@Jasonnnnnnnnnnn
@Jasonnnnnnnnnnn Год назад
f15ex The location is very awkward😂😂😂
@pushinP87
@pushinP87 Год назад
Such as what. Shoot a high off bore site next-gen missle from half way around the world..ooorr. Completely stop in forward motion and let the enemy fly right by (says Maverick)
@thuydoan7496
@thuydoan7496 10 месяцев назад
The NGAD doesn't have to perform like an F-22. Since there will probably be lasers on board the fighter jet, it doesn't have to be maneuverable. Furthermore, there will be drones as loyal wingmen, it ensures that it has no need to be maneuverable. However, the NGAD must be very fast in order to dodge any missile chasing it. That is the premise of the new fighter jet.
@protorhinocerator142
@protorhinocerator142 10 месяцев назад
@@thuydoan7496 Or super stealthy.
@ek2156
@ek2156 Год назад
I know 2 things from just knowing that the Skunk Works is working on the NGAD.... 1) It will be impressive as hell once we to officially see it perform. and 2) the Chinese are going to shit their pants wanting to steal the plans for it!
@StrokeMahEgo
@StrokeMahEgo Год назад
Probably already have the plans
@zamar2158
@zamar2158 Год назад
The chinese already know. How many Chinese Americans working there? How do you separate the spies from the non spies. You can't do anything due to human rights. At this time you probably have to give reparations for hurt feelings to Chinese spies. Only a fool under estimates the enemy. The inscrutable Chinese never let anything out. Whereas the usa takes a film crew to broadcast everything secret.
@regular7156
@regular7156 Год назад
@@StrokeMahEgo there's protocols to prevent this from happening. It's clearance stacked on multiple clearances and i'm pretty sure they have a "dud" plan/blueprint or fake information out both the public and private to start a psyop to confuse spies on which information is correct, accurate or misleading. It'll be hell for any Chinese spy.
@bloodyspartan300
@bloodyspartan300 Год назад
Not really, Joe bidet and his son already sold them the plans.
@Xenomorphine
@Xenomorphine Год назад
Also worth keeping in mind that there won't be a singular design for the NGAD programme. Not only is the US Navy's F/A-XX simultaneously a part of it, but there are meant to be multiple different planes arising from it and future evolutionary 'upgrades' won't even necessarily use the same platform, but could look completely different. It won't be like F-XXA, B, C, etcetera. That's in the past.
@dwwolf4636
@dwwolf4636 Год назад
20 year platforms, max.
@MarkBarrack
@MarkBarrack Год назад
Who doesn't enjoy Sanboxx videos and Alex Hollings? No one. Thank you for another great video.
@keithlillis7962
@keithlillis7962 Год назад
I still think the Northrop YF23 was a superior concept to what eventually became the F22. I think that in the end, Lockheed just had a better PR team and shmoozed the USAF into choosing their design to go forward with.
@rcons1g262
@rcons1g262 Год назад
YF-23 was stealthier and faster. Northrop has only to develop the platform for 3D vector engines and the design can be ready to go and out the door faster than Lockheed. You have to think Northrop has the tail-less design experience with the B2 locked-in.
@RavenSL65
@RavenSL65 Год назад
Northrop bought a Gen6 fighter to a Gen5 competition.
@gatorspad3632
@gatorspad3632 Год назад
Maybe a case of changing AF requirements. The F-23 had a lot going for it in stealth and range (probably also slightly better speed) but did not have the maneuverability that the AF wanted. With the industrial base continuing to shrink and the desire to keep several companies working, I expect to see the evolutionary programs spread over several companies versus a winner take all approach. Except for Boeing. Until they get their house in order they will be shut out. The T-7, KC-46, AF-1 are all a disaster as programs. The 737 Max and other issues will give AF acquisitions pause. And I worked for LM Skunkworks for 5+ years…
@JAlucard77
@JAlucard77 Год назад
Keeping everyone guessing with all these different images and shapes is the GREATEST way to redirect the public attention from the real thing.
@wayausofbounds9255
@wayausofbounds9255 Год назад
That could be a silhouette of a Loyal Wingman aircraft too. It would make sense for the them to have a faux cockpit even if unmanned.
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND Год назад
"make" sense. just a little help with your english there. in spanish, for example, things "have" sense. in english things "make" sense. no offense intended here. my spanish grammar is horrible, and i'm always grateful for the help.
@hgfkowgxnfkpeosuvjgosa4431
@hgfkowgxnfkpeosuvjgosa4431 Год назад
@@USS-SNAKE-ISLANDyup you say “have age” in french so you have 5 years as an example instead of are 5 years old
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade Год назад
we already know what loyal wingman looks like. google it. it's not a secret.
@protorhinocerator142
@protorhinocerator142 Год назад
I'm not sure the faux cockpit is useful. I don't expect any enemy fighters getting close enough to an NGAD to see if it's manned or not.
@ImMrHibachi
@ImMrHibachi Год назад
@@protorhinocerator142 Pretty sure he meant faux just for the silhouette picture to throw people off a bit, not that it would be an actual production feature of the drone.
@brendanedwards2277
@brendanedwards2277 Год назад
That tail number is the Dark Star in Top Gun Maverick, the silhouette is almost identical too, besides the rear of the aircraft.
@johnross6314
@johnross6314 Год назад
☝🏻He is right, you know.
@MrDANGEROUSIDEAS
@MrDANGEROUSIDEAS Год назад
that was simply a test shape for radar. There are many more that are close to it seeking the best shape you have to actually build a model in order to test the radar cross-section so I imagine there's 30 or 40 advanced radar, cross-section reducing shapes that people haven't seen over the last 20 years. But the shape of an aircraft is also determined by other factors, payload fuel load pilot, safety systems, sequestering the engines, etc. etc. so let's not get too excited about a shape they've Sean although they do have a habit of slyly placing certain advanced aircraft or ideas within some logos, that's not the first time the shape has shown up in case you don't know.
@TwstedTV
@TwstedTV Год назад
This looks so awesome. 🥰🥰🥰🥰 Hope to see it live with my own eyes before I pass on from this world. 👀🤓👍
@Scott079
@Scott079 Год назад
You also left out the darkstar and although it is a movie aircraft Lockheed did have a hand in designing it
@smachaff
@smachaff Год назад
I thought the shape was very similar to the fictional aircraft as well. Makes sense to use it since won’t reveal their actual NGAD
@majorborngusfluunduch8694
@majorborngusfluunduch8694 Год назад
The Darkstar is influenced by the SR-72 concept, not the NGAD.
@onetruehitman7623
@onetruehitman7623 Год назад
@@majorborngusfluunduch8694I’d say the SR-72 may already exist in the black world. However, it’ll take some precarious circumstances to reveal it publicly (like a China vs Taiwan conflict)
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@onetruehitman7623 The SR-72 doesn't exist because if it did we'd know about it already and because the fundamental concept of a hypersonic replacement for the SR-71 would be a really bad aircraft in all sorts of ways. A subsonic stealth drone would be better in every respect.
@onetruehitman7623
@onetruehitman7623 Год назад
@@trolleriffic If we assume that what you’re saying is true, how is current investment by the US military on drones? I know NGAD is supposed to have some flying around it but there has to more to it
@PCcardboard1354
@PCcardboard1354 Год назад
If Lockheed is working on something its gonna be DOPE!!!
@dentalnovember
@dentalnovember Год назад
So interesting that there is such a gap between the u-2 and SR-71 and the f-22/f-35. We all can assume skunkworks has many other aircraft designed and produced from that period which are still classified to this day.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
Other projects were happening in that time such as the D-21 drone, CL-1200 Lancer, AH-64 Cheyenne, Have Blue, F-117, Senior Peg, X-33, RQ-3 Darkstar, X-35. As for why there was no direct successor to the SR-71, that's because there was no point in building one - satellites could carry bigger and better sensors with better ground resolutions and were near-impossible to shoot down on top of the fact that they didn't violate airspace. Overflights of the USSR by American aircraft were banned in 1960 by Presidential decree so the A-12 and SR-71 never flew the missions they were specifically designed to conduct and instead were limited to flying along international borders where they could legally operate without causing an incident or risking conflict.
@recoil53
@recoil53 Год назад
I am sure some of the project cost overruns (historically) have been in part to fund test projects we don't know about.
@ericmason349
@ericmason349 Год назад
When the American military industrial companies post things that really should be 'top secret' I just think their executives wanted to boost their stock at the expense of the U.S.
@kerbalairforce8802
@kerbalairforce8802 Год назад
By the time F-117 was unveiled, it had flown for I think 11-19 years. If the NGAD is unveiled, assume there's something 10-20 years more advanced being tested.
@markmitchell457
@markmitchell457 Год назад
You nailed it. Quarterly earnings are direct cash in a VP 's pocket. Doing business three months at a time is no way to do business.
@JMurph2015
@JMurph2015 Год назад
My dude, it's just an outline of a generic tailless fighter. We have zero idea whether that's accurate, and even if it's accurate, that information is next to useless.
@rick7424
@rick7424 Год назад
They do not post "top secret" info. That is delusional. Any benifits would be undone by the costs of violating the law and giving your competitors your bloody specs.
@pdexBigTeacher
@pdexBigTeacher Год назад
Take artist's renderings with huge grains of salt. During the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition one of the more common artist renderings was very little like either aircraft, but one of China's current stealth aircraft looks like a copy of that artist rendering.
@recoil53
@recoil53 Год назад
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the stuff released are just trolls, since we know everybody is watching and copying. Somewhere there is a foreign engineering team frustrated that they can't figure out how to get these things to fly.
@Grenadier311
@Grenadier311 Год назад
I wonder if it wouldn't be a terrible idea to combine everything we've learned from the F22 and F35 programs and manufacture a new fleet of 5th generation + long-range and fast air superiority capable fighters for the air force and navy to accompany the 6th generation fleets and the F35 and replace the F22, F15and F16's plus a naval model for the carriers to replace the F18.
@recoil53
@recoil53 Год назад
I'm not sure there would be a huge cost savings. A 6th Gen fighter is a 5th gen with AI and networking for wingmen drones. In other words, a 5th gen with more computing hardware and some communications gear. Now yes, they are probably going to add more than that because technology has progressed, but that is the bare bones definition. So the basic physical platform probably does use what we have learned on the practical & theoretical side of stealth. There is known to be a new radar absorbant coating that is a ceramic rather than the current paint that is more durable and easier to take care of.
@thomaspohl5845
@thomaspohl5845 Год назад
Looks kind of small (F-16 sized) given the NGAD's publicly stated range and payload requirements. Could this shape be one of the three NGAD technology demonstrators that were recently said to already exist? 🤔
@benson4820
@benson4820 Год назад
The Northrop design looks massive by comparison
@maxpower19711
@maxpower19711 Год назад
Looks small if you assume the cockpit is a single seater, but if the cockpit is a twin seater then it’s definitely a lot bigger than the F16
@aidanwilliams9452
@aidanwilliams9452 Год назад
@@maxpower19711 Is there a real need for a twin seat now? Unless they need someone to manage any drone wingmen
@skirata3144
@skirata3144 Год назад
@@aidanwilliams9452Considering that drone wingmans are very much a part of the program a second dude to manage those isn’t really far off.
@nicholasmaude6906
@nicholasmaude6906 Год назад
0:52 - He forgot to mention the SR-71's precursor the A-12 Oxcart.
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
Most of what I see from Lockheed under-appreciates the prevalence of IRST, by failing to get the exhaust nozzles up onto the topside of the blended wing/body, to hide the exhaust from below. YF-23 further expands on this aspect, with the V-tail hiding exhaust from the sides fairly well too. IRST puts a clamp on the maximum effectiveness of stealth. It should be a very high priority. That "shape" was put forth in other NGAD publications previously. I think it has just become synonymous with the NGAD program, with or without representing the actual aircraft design. It appears to pretty much just be the shape for lockheed's concept for the wingman (even though it has a canopy in a few renders). It's worth noting that the B-21 had 'drawings' in circulation which were accurate except for the window configuration, well before the big reveal. So it may be a sneak peek. Hard to say.
@Youtubeuser1aa
@Youtubeuser1aa Год назад
You known of anything that can see IR from above planes?
@willpugh8865
@willpugh8865 Год назад
You know what IRST systems love? Flares
@jonathanpfeffer3716
@jonathanpfeffer3716 Год назад
@@RU-viduser1aaSats, but those come with massive trade offs and can be planned around.
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
@@willpugh8865 Flares are for when you're trying not to get hit by a missile. Flares do nothing for maintaining your stealth and the element of surprise.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@jonathanpfeffer3716 If there's a network of them (which I believe the US is working on although it's primarily for missile early warning and tracking) then it could be difficult if not impossible to plan around them.
@falcon16czz
@falcon16czz Год назад
So Fast That The Skunk's Hairs Are Forced Back To It's Ass 😂
@Meatball1407
@Meatball1407 Год назад
Alex, I have always wondered about the abilities of the USAs war time economy. Especially if we where to go to war over Taiwan in the coming years. Do you think you could do a video on that and the production plans for the US if they went to war! As always great video and I appreciate your work.
@GLoveJF
@GLoveJF Год назад
Being that we are sort of* bringing back factories here it’d be interesting to see a fully WW2 type mobilization.
@zamar2158
@zamar2158 Год назад
Why go to war over some country in Asia? Didn't you learn anything from Vietnam? Why doesn't Taiwan look after itself? After all, it's full of Chinese. Don't bother going to war with China. The USA is debt to China in the trillions. And they manufacture everything for the usa thanks to your greedy ceos
@Inertia888
@Inertia888 Год назад
@@GLoveJF It would be interesting to think about what the US could do with full WW2 production, in the new millennium, but it is not something that I would want to see actually happen.
@GLoveJF
@GLoveJF Год назад
@@Inertia888 Ikr lol. We need a simulator just for the shit of it.
@corey8420
@corey8420 Год назад
​@@Inertia888I'd be curious to see how the generation z people would react as it seems they don't like to work and only 16% say they are proud to be American.
@danonorato8862
@danonorato8862 Год назад
In 1988 Microprose made a PC game call F-19 Stealth Fighter and this looks Exactly like the jet in the game.
@michaelvaughn1496
@michaelvaughn1496 Год назад
BEST military reporting ever! I love Janes but it is sometimes indecipherable and so dry. Of course I know that Janes isn't meant for general public consumption even though it's open source, and Alex is intended for all. Which makes his work as good at least as Janes. Informative; clear; excellently written; honest; and precise all while being utterly accessible. Thanks Alex and your entire team! Keep up the great work!
@jrdsm
@jrdsm Год назад
who is janes and why do you love her?
@verdebusterAP
@verdebusterAP Год назад
its certainly an interesting question So many proposed designs have been popping up, no one really knows for sure till we see the prototype roll out its just easier to wait then keep guessing
@waynemccormick4773
@waynemccormick4773 Год назад
If our OPSEC is getting that bad, its truly frightening!
@joshuaschmidt5222
@joshuaschmidt5222 Год назад
No love for the f-117 in this skunk work’s lineup?!
@bennymutant
@bennymutant Год назад
The F-22 isn't a legend with one downed balloon. The F-15 is a legend.
@pkt1213
@pkt1213 Год назад
Oh, I thought skunkworks trained skunks for behind the lines and asymmetric warfare...also to fly F14s.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
That's a ridiculous suggestion. As if skunks would ever fly anything built by Grumman!!!
@minibuns5397
@minibuns5397 Год назад
What is your video setup??? With RU-vid compression and and iPad this looks really really great!! Are you shooting sony or?
@lorentzcoffin4957
@lorentzcoffin4957 Год назад
The F-22 is the greatest fighter jet to never fight
@PigeonHoot
@PigeonHoot Год назад
Well it did get a balloon...
@samuelcaballero9966
@samuelcaballero9966 Год назад
@@PigeonHoota big ass balloon
@Admiral-General_Aladeen
@Admiral-General_Aladeen Год назад
What stealth figter did actually go into combat?
@qwertyuiop1234567180
@qwertyuiop1234567180 Год назад
@@Admiral-General_AladeenF117
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND Год назад
That's the idea.
@rob_nice1
@rob_nice1 Год назад
This is why the government downplays all the UFO sightings
@Scriobh
@Scriobh Год назад
The YF-23 was either deliberately overlooked for aesthetic reasons OR it was vastly superior to the YF-22 so they decided to keep it under wraps and create Next Gen aircraft from it. I'm predicting the NGAD is going to look more like a modified YF-23 than anything else.
@xLeeroycranex
@xLeeroycranex Год назад
Yeah, I expect it to look similar to the YF-23 and/or X-36 but don't think the YF-23 was superior to the 22. The 22 actually could fire missiles and matched what they were going for - maneuverability mixed with speed and stealth. Regarding aesthetics of YF-23....knowing the military, looking cool is important lol. Still confused why some people think the YF-23 looks better but tastes are subjective, I guess. Either that or internet people are weird
@michaelwerkov3438
@michaelwerkov3438 Год назад
I mean, that story is already known. The f23 was slightly superior, but the f22 showed off flashy moves to the committee
@daggerace9918
@daggerace9918 Год назад
it lost because the top brass thought that Lockheed was more likely to deliver on time than Northrop and Douglas.
@Scriobh
@Scriobh Год назад
@@daggerace9918 ...despite the fact that YF-23 outperformed the YF-22. Allegedly by quite a large margin.
@Scriobh
@Scriobh Год назад
@@michaelwerkov3438 Yup, didn't have thrust vectoring but excelled in every other area.
@thomask2210
@thomask2210 Год назад
People, the silhouette is none other than Lockheed’s Darkstar made for the movie topgun.
@ronboe6325
@ronboe6325 Год назад
Management could have told the art department to submit some Marvel Comics fighter designs, picked one or two that did NOT resemble the NGAD and told them to run with them. Just to troll other countries. Toss in some R&D experiments and we have some classic FUD.
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND Год назад
I've thought that, too. Probably the image is just "similar" at most.
@sethb3090
@sethb3090 Год назад
Make it look cool, then run it past the engineers to be sure it's not an obviously nonviable design
@NickNightingaleYT
@NickNightingaleYT Год назад
Love your content. This video inspired an unsolicited background suggestion: Make it look like a government hole in the wall, sparse vibe. In the background a filing cabinet, a red phone, moody light sources, a la “Night Agent”. 🤷‍♂️ 😎
@Admiral-General_Aladeen
@Admiral-General_Aladeen Год назад
Instagram? At least release it on a WT forum
@SirHargreeves
@SirHargreeves Год назад
The skunkworks needs to realise its latest UFO anti-gravity machine.
@tarmaque
@tarmaque Год назад
Thanks for bringing up the YF-23, an aircraft who's fate still makes me mad. I'm still convinced that they chose the F-22 because it looked more like a traditional fighter than because of performance. (And a little bit of politics too.)
@Quidisi
@Quidisi Год назад
The YF-23 was so very sexy.
@Scriobh
@Scriobh Год назад
100% agree.
@alexfortin7209
@alexfortin7209 Год назад
Catastrophic management of the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit program was the real reason - no one wanted to take a risk with that team.
@marksanney2088
@marksanney2088 Год назад
Interesting. Thank you for the update, my friend. 👍🏻🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸
@jessemills3845
@jessemills3845 Год назад
So Why didn't they had it covered up? Apparently NO ONE IS CONCERNED WITH SECURITY, TREASON OR GIVING OUR CHINESE ENEMIES MORE TECH DESIGN!
@Admiral-General_Aladeen
@Admiral-General_Aladeen Год назад
You can't get a lot of insight from just the shape don't worry about it😂
@riccccccardo
@riccccccardo Год назад
😂 I can’t wait for china to copy paste thx yankies 😂😂😂
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@Admiral-General_Aladeen You say that but my I showed my Chinese neighbour this video earlier today and as I'm typing this he's rolling a 6th Gen stealth fighter out of his garage. True fact.
@leeofallon9258
@leeofallon9258 10 месяцев назад
Nobody builds 'em better than the outrageous Skunkworks!
@suny1265
@suny1265 Год назад
It looks like the AI from Stealth Movie
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND Год назад
Yeah, still waitin' to hear if you live in a barn.
@suny1265
@suny1265 Год назад
@@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND You can't hear it but if you read you might be surprised.
@christianlong-lo3jm
@christianlong-lo3jm Год назад
little Putin fanboy who is always ignorant and knows nothing but too spew out what is taught in their Soviet schools because that's the only way they can cope with reality
@christianlong-lo3jm
@christianlong-lo3jm Год назад
(Reality)The United States military invents weaponry on the side that Russia has wet dreams about the best military invention to ever come out of Russia was meat boxes (humans)
@suny1265
@suny1265 Год назад
@@christianlong-lo3jm I don't speak Chinglish. Pls use proper Translation or learn English.
@kayinoue2497
@kayinoue2497 Год назад
NGL, this will get some laughs but it has some serious prequel triology Jedi Starfighter lines to it LOL
@Opusss
@Opusss Год назад
That leaked photo reminds me of Flight of the Navigator lol.
@cahg3871
@cahg3871 Год назад
As you stated Alex,what these manufacturers test can be a basic rendering of what they eventually will mass produce.Trial and error is part of every R&D program.
@thuydoan7496
@thuydoan7496 10 месяцев назад
The NGAD doesn't have to perform like an F-22. Since there will probably be lasers on board the fighter jet, it doesn't have to be maneuverable. Furthermore, there will be drones as loyal wingmen, it ensures that it has no need to be maneuverable. However, the NGAD must be very fast in order to dodge any missile chasing it. That is the premise of the new fighter jet.
@PaulLe-jk4uq
@PaulLe-jk4uq Год назад
Thanks for Good research and tracking about this topic, Alex. I'm sure many can't wait to see what it really looks like, the NGAD. 👏👈👍🗽
@Wannes_
@Wannes_ Год назад
the planview looks a lot like Italeri's "F-19 Stealth" model kit
@markprescott303
@markprescott303 6 месяцев назад
I think the new shape is the single engine version. There will be a larger twin engine version much like the F-15 and F-16. New adaptive cycle engines and optical cloaking(in the infrared spectrum and electronic cloaking will further hide the jet. Hypersonic missiles will be the next generation of long range attack options. Love it and can’t wait to see what they come up with! I would name the single engine version the “Dagger”.
@Itsjustme-Justme
@Itsjustme-Justme Год назад
If I was the USAF, I would park a new fantasy movie prop on Edwards AFB every year to fool everyone who has a satellite.
@kaneo1
@kaneo1 Год назад
"Skunkworks made (these planes)." Forgot to include a little side project called Nighthawk. Been on a couple missions. They made the shape, the Hopeless Diamond, based off a 30+ year old (forgot the time frame) Soviet paper on radio waves. Computer-controlled outputs were the only thing making it flyable. Air Force & everyone else had to upgrade their testing criteria to realize just how good it was.
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Год назад
It's 10:00 on a Saturday, the usual crowd shuffles in....
@nick_steele9790
@nick_steele9790 Год назад
Great song :)
@dentalnovember
@dentalnovember Год назад
“The regular crowd!”
@samuelleal6149
@samuelleal6149 Год назад
i just feel a lot of things coming together, the f-18 with thrust vectoring, the x-47b, the work of jack northrop, etc.
@philgooddr.7850
@philgooddr.7850 Год назад
You forgot to list the F117 in the Skunk world list of success …definitely a technological breakthrough …
@recoil53
@recoil53 Год назад
Yes, one that has yet to be equaled by foreign powers.
@erikcourtney1834
@erikcourtney1834 Год назад
They’re trolling us. They know we’re all excited about the new fighters.
@DeetexSeraphine
@DeetexSeraphine Год назад
~~Dude, that 3D print is awsome, you gonna share that STL?~~ NEvermind, question answerredd.
@LunaticTheCat
@LunaticTheCat Год назад
What if the appearance of the Blackbird in Top Gun 2 was to create a front for a real top secret plane that looks the same from the birds eye view of a spy satellite... 🤯
@mistysowards7365
@mistysowards7365 Год назад
Careful what you read, see, and even imagine. Sometimes your thoughts are in fact not your own.
@loganskiwyse7823
@loganskiwyse7823 Год назад
There is a second reason for the variation in designs, it makes it more difficult to understand what is coming out in relation to what is actually being done. Aka: industrial scale 3 shell Monty.
@55Reever
@55Reever Год назад
People question the production number of the F-22. May be the F-22 replacement has been on the drawing board for a LONG time.
@JeffDAPG
@JeffDAPG Год назад
@3:48 That kind of looks like an SR-71 Wing...🤔
@TheBadBunny87
@TheBadBunny87 Год назад
Everytime a prototype is shown, the more closer they resemble a ufo.
@bored383
@bored383 Год назад
the F19 Stealth fighter outline lives on!
@I_am_MeriumT
@I_am_MeriumT Год назад
China: Dayumm brother, you mind if we copy that shape?
@williamwilliam
@williamwilliam Год назад
One prototype aircraft is not of much use if they don't have a squadron which, based on all their previous "new" fighter aircrafts, takes years to materialize.
@NWguy83
@NWguy83 Год назад
That definitely doesn't look big enough to have the range for the pacific theater like the air force wants. Based on the canopy size, assuming its single pilot.
@robertthomas1286
@robertthomas1286 Год назад
The F-22 is far from legendary. It’s done nothing to date to justify that moniker
@waaki
@waaki Год назад
Deterrent is the best weapons
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 Год назад
Thanks Alex.... Old Shoe🇺🇸
@matchesburn
@matchesburn Год назад
Lockheed-Martin: "Look! A tail-less stealth design! Truly innovative!" Northrop-Grumman: "...That's cute."
@tigerpjm
@tigerpjm Год назад
It looks more like an outline of NGAD unless they have some crazy miniaturisation, 2D manufacture, and zero volume stores carriage technology going on...
@JamesOMalley-hb4tf
@JamesOMalley-hb4tf 9 месяцев назад
Its the X 44, they probably decided to pull the trigger and build it back in the early 2000s. Its a super maneuverable, more aerodynamic f 22 with a huge delta wing, no vertical stabilizers, thrust vectoring and far more range for sure. Its more like a 5.5 gen aircraft.
@machdaddy6451
@machdaddy6451 Год назад
It'll be interesting when the NGAD does come out to see how close the renderings turn out to be.
@jf5336
@jf5336 Год назад
Am I not seeing the 3D print file? Would love to print one out. Please and thanks.
@ThompPL1
@ThompPL1 Год назад
3:18 . . . Now SkuunkVerks will have to make everyone check their cell phones at the gate driving into work ! 😆😎
@cturdo
@cturdo Год назад
That cutout would make a cool light switch plate!
@AlbertCloete
@AlbertCloete Год назад
Some of those designs are starting to look pretty alien.
@ericvosselmans5657
@ericvosselmans5657 Год назад
The biggest feat of Skunk works is how they hire new personell.
@RedSinter
@RedSinter Год назад
So, Alex does the X-59 have any carry over in any of this.
@AnimeSunglasses
@AnimeSunglasses Год назад
... I just want a bottle opener in that shape.
@michioaluna5799
@michioaluna5799 Год назад
That song in the credits is badass who made this beat?
@brianv1988
@brianv1988 Год назад
@sandboxx can you do a video on Russia's so-called new stealth interceptor the mig-41 I would like to know more about it if it's actually in production or are they still developing it and its capabilities I'm sure you probably would know more than I do on that topic
@alfredmakaveli6622
@alfredmakaveli6622 Год назад
the yf 22 was way ahead of its time. it wouldve skipped 5th and been a straight 6th gen fighter..
@wjckc79
@wjckc79 Год назад
I would like to believe that we passed on the YF-23 largely because it was so advanced the military was forward thinking and decided to keep advancing the platform in secret.
@carygrant8796
@carygrant8796 Год назад
Good reporting with no fluff.
@NBC_NCO
@NBC_NCO Год назад
They are always looking 20-30 or more years into the future to produce the aircraft they think we need. In other words, this aircraft is already 30 years old.
@bertg.6056
@bertg.6056 Год назад
A great presentation, Alex. Remember, there may be some misdirection involved.
@hughgrection3052
@hughgrection3052 Год назад
The shape resembles the viral video of that manta ray looking UFO that flies in front of a jets cockpit. Seemed slot smaller than that tho
@antonioduenas8342
@antonioduenas8342 Год назад
Congrat Alex, another fine video. So could you find information about Northrop NGAD? I saw intakes over the wing because radars becomes from ground to air and it helps to be stealth. Thanks. It goes to law!
@darylcampbell5952
@darylcampbell5952 Год назад
They still need to make the YF-23. Now that was a jet.
@AdamosDad
@AdamosDad Год назад
I would say this is just misdirection, as well as keeping interest hot.
@stealthsmoke5780
@stealthsmoke5780 Год назад
I always make it to the end of your videos and you do a good job! Which 6th Gen fighter jet in the US will be better? Also you think the 1 of 3 goes to the Air Force & other(2nd) go to Navy?
@paimonisfood4986
@paimonisfood4986 Год назад
The NGAD is the Air Force's while the Navy has their own which is the F/A-XX
@Zetler
@Zetler Год назад
Huge shock. It’s diamond shaped.
@adamgully2371
@adamgully2371 Год назад
This stealth plane is sandbagging for what Skunkworks can really do. You have to have something that the people can see so they THINK that’s where the cutting edge is.
@jerrywatson1958
@jerrywatson1958 Год назад
I wish they would license a foam RC model plane of this. But made in the US, NOT IN CHINA like all the others we have on the market.
Далее
Lockheed Martins 6th Generation NGAD Fighter Tactics
18:57
ПРОСТИ МЕНЯ, АСХАБ ТАМАЕВ
32:44
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Прохожу маску ЭМОЦИИ🙀 #юмор
00:59
The 5 secret stealth aircraft you've never heard of
14:19
Deep Intel on the 6th Generation Fighter
33:41
Просмотров 211 тыс.
Is THIS Really The Future of Jet Engines?!
22:39
Просмотров 553 тыс.
F-22 Raptor: The Ultimate King of Air Supremacy
16:28
Su-57 - Russia's 5th Gen Fighter
17:53
Просмотров 20 тыс.