Тёмный

American Civil War from The European Perspective | Animated History 

The Armchair Historian
Подписаться 2,3 млн
Просмотров 2,2 млн
50% 1

Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS: clcr.me/lN041J ✅ ANDROID: clcr.me/TrZxmd ✅ PC: clcr.me/7F9yjq and get a special starter pack 💥Available only for the next 30 days
The American Civil War was a defining event in US history, but its effects were hardly isolated to the Americas. The political, ideological, and economic impacts of the conflict were felt around the world, and especially in the nations of France and Great Britain, who had the most to gain or lose in this American war. In this Animated History video, we look at how the great powers of Europe responded to the Civil War, and why.
Sign up for Armchair History TV today! armchairhistor...
Merchandise available at store.armchair...
Discord: / discord
Twitter: / armchairhist
Sources:
Jones, Howard. Blue & Gray Diplomacy: a History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations. University of North Carolina Press, 2010.
“Civil War Diplomacy.” American Foreign Relations. Accessed May 11, 2020. www.americanfo....
Hubbard, Charles M. The Burden of Confederate Diplomacy (1998)
Doyle, Don H. The Cause of All Nations: An International History of the American Civil War
Music:
Armchair History Theme by Zach Heyde
The Ambush by Dream Cave
Never Complain, Never Explain by Howard Harper-Bernes
Victoria II Civil War Soundtrack

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 4,4 тыс.   
@lanzknecht8599
@lanzknecht8599 4 года назад
Fun fact: the German state of Wurttemberg sent a young military engineer named Ferdinand von Zeppelin as a war observer to the Union. He joined the Potomac army where he saw the use of military balloons. That inspired him to something...
@polygonalfortress
@polygonalfortress 4 года назад
i didn't know that thanks for sharing that information
@archdukefranzferdinandofau375
@archdukefranzferdinandofau375 4 года назад
Uh oh
@jamier65551
@jamier65551 4 года назад
I watched knowledgehubs video on that. It's still pretty cool
@SpaceMonkeyBoi
@SpaceMonkeyBoi 4 года назад
"Hmmmm... Das isht gut"
@brokenbridge6316
@brokenbridge6316 4 года назад
I remember hearing about that. It was thanks to his observations that he created the Zeppelin. God I wonder how different history would've been had that thing worked in the long run.
@kimjungoof9343
@kimjungoof9343 4 года назад
Europe during the American Civil War: I'm the Armchair spectator.
@СтенькаТрольеводов
*HOW THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE SAVED THE UNION BY PREVENTING EUROPEAN INTERVENTION. SOURCES* www.rbth.com/politics_and_society/2017/08/16/what-role-did-russia-play-in-the-us-civil-war_823252 american_almanac.tripod.com/russcwar.htm
@justastickman4321
@justastickman4321 4 года назад
Drew Durnil moment
@iainbagnall4825
@iainbagnall4825 4 года назад
Europe during the Civil War: That looks like a good idea, we should have one of those, but everywhere.
@aidanator8008
@aidanator8008 4 года назад
@@mooseontheloose-2531 I mean, the American Civil War was still a large conflict even by European standards. With 2 million men fighting for the Union and 1 million fighting for the Confederacy, it was about as big as the Franco-Prussian War, only spread out among a much larger area of fighting. The only conflicts in the 19th Century that were bigger than the American Civil War were the Napoleonic Wars and the Taiping Rebellion.
@JuniorJuni070
@JuniorJuni070 4 года назад
@@aidanator8008 yeah as a European i was confused by the replies.. the American Civil War Was a worthy war we knew that war is going to shape the world. And it did. United States done alot as result of the war. We extended the west with this big ass country
@rolfe2000
@rolfe2000 4 года назад
I like how the Prussians are full-on Gordon Ramsey like, "Congratulations, you guys are f*cking terrible at this." 😂
@TheAtomBuilds
@TheAtomBuilds 3 года назад
Then the soldiers are like - will you idiots shut up we’re trying to kill each other we don’t need you to critique our shooting skills
@monkeman5578
@monkeman5578 3 года назад
I could just imagine in my head in the battlefield of Gettysburg some dude saying “Congratulations you guys are fucking terrible at this.”
@SStupendous
@SStupendous 3 года назад
WW1 Trench Warfare: Yeah sorry about about that Yankees, you were right
@andreasbonaparte8171
@andreasbonaparte8171 3 года назад
@@SStupendous No bro, British and France that actually change the situation with tank. America just come there to test their Shotgun but never ready for German gas and artillery
@ObywatelMurawjow
@ObywatelMurawjow 3 года назад
@@andreasbonaparte8171 don't be delusional, USA changed the war dramatically, they haven't done heavy lifting, and make relatively little damage, but entrance and present of big fresh American powerhouse just tip the scale and was final nail in coffin of central powers
@prestongarvey6933
@prestongarvey6933 3 года назад
America: has a civil war* Spain: ITS FREE REAL STATE!! Dominican Republic: No
@scaryhobbit211
@scaryhobbit211 3 года назад
France: ITS FREE REAL ESTATE! Mexico: Que?
@animeneweablet
@animeneweablet 3 года назад
Haiti: *eating popcorn
@KOCChristian
@KOCChristian 2 года назад
@@animeneweablet Haiti actually supported DR, help get their land back. But everyone hates Haiti and DR would later forget that hardcore fact.
@PlayfulDoggy
@PlayfulDoggy 3 месяца назад
​@@KOCChristianDR still tries to help Haiti tho
@dikko7010
@dikko7010 4 года назад
The USA : *Starts a civil war* Prussian officers and generals : "What strategy are they using? Are they using modern rifles? How did they mobilize? Are trains good? How is the Union losing against General Lee? I WANNA KNOW EVERYTHING BEFORE AN INEVITABLE WAR WITH FRANCE STARTS"
@khklkhcvtvreff
@khklkhcvtvreff 4 года назад
Why does this remind me of how i act before my exam?
@lordyaromir6407
@lordyaromir6407 4 года назад
Small note: before 1866, only thing that Prussia cared about, is to prepare war with Austria and become the ruling state in Germany, after that, they only needed war with France to finnish the unification without going against the will of South Germans (that is, without the Northern German Confederation occupying the Southern German countries) and to get international recognition.
@dikko7010
@dikko7010 4 года назад
@@lordyaromir6407 Ah I forgot the Austro Prussian war was 1866, I thought it was sometime before the civil war
@lordyaromir6407
@lordyaromir6407 4 года назад
@@dikko7010 nah it's fine, the war where Austria and Prussia fought together against Denmark was during the second half of the Civil War, but when they fought against each other, the civil war was.already over.
@kgw72
@kgw72 4 года назад
- Why are we watching this? We're Prussians. - I AM BORED! There hasn't been any good war to follow in the last years!
@rocklob069
@rocklob069 4 года назад
Prussia: "So you're saying you didn't prepare a choherent and organized military force for this completely sudden civil war that forced both sides to scramble for conscripted soldiers and oficer voilenteers? Pathetic."
@GabeNsApostle
@GabeNsApostle 4 года назад
But it wasn’t sudden, though. The hostilities between the North and the South have been there for quite some time. Moreover, being in a state of war does not excuse anyone from not paying any attention to the training of their officers because it is they who can most determine the outcome of the war.
@MrShawnReese
@MrShawnReese 4 года назад
@C.F.P.N Hans bring ze luger after they got beat up fighting everybody else
@GabeNsApostle
@GabeNsApostle 4 года назад
C.F.P.N Hans bring ze luger You’re still five decades too early and we’re not even discussing Germany. We’re talking about Prussia.
@dflatt1783
@dflatt1783 4 года назад
@@MrShawnReese So when the US got involved in Northern Africa they were 'beat up' by everybody else? In control of most of Europe and half of populated Russia? Looks more like they were beating everyone's a*. Or are you talking about WW1 where the front was locked in a bitter stalemate? I suppose you might be a wehrbo so your just going to rewrite history anyway ;)
@rocky2332
@rocky2332 4 года назад
It wasn't until after WW2 that we made a conscious effort to have a large well trained military ready for conflict. Prior to that the United States was always reactionary to events with a small and underfunded force.
@tonyhawk94
@tonyhawk94 4 года назад
Fact : it's after the French intervention in Mexico that the term "Latin America" was born, used by Napoleon III. As he saw the US intervining, funding and helping Juarez, his aim was to remind the Latin Americans their Latin European origins thus culturally cutting them from the Anglo-saxon sphere.
@Bryan-bd5kc
@Bryan-bd5kc 4 года назад
Yeah but isn't the term Latino for America is to break away the Spanish colonized mentality from the term Hispanic
@RannonSi
@RannonSi 3 года назад
@@Bryan-bd5kc Good question! The few times I've seen people differentiate between Latin American and Hispanic they usually define the Latin-American part as coming from a country with a Latin based language (including Portuguese or French) and the Hispanic part being more defining as from a Spanish speaking country. But then again, it might not be the official/widely used definitions or maybe the common use of them have changed.
@association3cm675
@association3cm675 3 года назад
@@RannonSi WonderWhy did a video on that topic. He also explain that some are including portuguese speaking countries, considering the fact that ''hispanic'' and even ''España'' are coming from the roman province of Hispania, which basically consisted of the iberian peninsula, therefore including Portugal.
@hydrolito
@hydrolito 3 года назад
French was also Latin put not Hispanic.
@sensey07
@sensey07 3 года назад
Except one important note - Mexico was the only one of those countries to have established both Scottish and York Rites in Freemasonry, along the British model
@EndOfSmallSanctuary97
@EndOfSmallSanctuary97 3 года назад
San Marino sending Lincoln a letter of their support and offering him citizenship is one of the cutest and most wholesome moments in history.
@ecksdee1637
@ecksdee1637 3 года назад
ikr lol
@pfftt2885
@pfftt2885 2 года назад
Honestly same, so adorable needs to be recognized more 😭
@friendlyneighbourhoodbushm1904
@friendlyneighbourhoodbushm1904 4 года назад
“I didn’t lose, I merely failed to win”- George B. McClellan
@morganv7895
@morganv7895 4 года назад
Harley O’keefe the Council will decide Ur fate
@vucko9201
@vucko9201 4 года назад
@@morganv7895 the council has decided his fate, to the giullotine!
@nono-kr7um
@nono-kr7um 4 года назад
@@harleyokeefe5193 theres no such thing as taste, and humor isn't subjective at all, at least not to you redditors
@vucko9201
@vucko9201 4 года назад
@@harleyokeefe5193 so you love reddit? Alright, redditor
@vucko9201
@vucko9201 4 года назад
@@harleyokeefe5193 i was being sarcastic, are you brain dead?
@InquisitorThomas
@InquisitorThomas 4 года назад
“President Davis, San Marino has declared its support for the Union.” *Jefferson Davis pulls out a pistol and rest it against his temple* “Then the war is truly lost.” *blam*
@TheMedicalDemon
@TheMedicalDemon 4 года назад
Inquisitor Thomas they had no chance.
@theinsanepumpkincarver
@theinsanepumpkincarver 4 года назад
We need a Jefferson reacts to San Marino, in the style of Hitler reacts.
@dirtysniper3434
@dirtysniper3434 4 года назад
@@TheMedicalDemon actually they could win, and their were many instances of union moral nearly succumbing do to the high mortality rate of every battle and how embarrassing some defeats war. many historians believe if the battle of antinem never happen the south could have easily won the war buy burning capturing Philadelphia and encircling Washington which was a very true possibility.
@АдамХамлин
@АдамХамлин 4 года назад
@@dirtysniper3434 not if San Marino intervened
@therealcollin1201
@therealcollin1201 4 года назад
dirty sniper * inhales * WOOOSH
@republicofglarnesia186
@republicofglarnesia186 4 года назад
Arm Chair Historian: our go to guide to the different perspectives of war
@CMDRFandragon
@CMDRFandragon 4 года назад
And its glorious. Its interesting to see them. Always wondered how it was from other sides.
@republicofglarnesia186
@republicofglarnesia186 4 года назад
CMDRFandragon yes! That’s why subscribed!
@СтенькаТрольеводов
A forgotten perspective *HOW THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE SAVED THE UNION BY PREVENTING EUROPEAN INTERVENTION. SOURCES* www.rbth.com/politics_and_society/2017/08/16/what-role-did-russia-play-in-the-us-civil-war_823252 american_almanac.tripod.com/russcwar.htm
@СтенькаТрольеводов
@Colette Marie Del Carmen Maita As a history teacher myself, I disagree with you respectively.
@СтенькаТрольеводов
@Colette Marie Del Carmen Maita Depends upon what true-facts mean. I agree with the animation, however, even if you paint s**t golden it is still s**t just in the golden color.
@FelipeJaquez
@FelipeJaquez 4 года назад
*Civil War happens* Europe: "get the popcorn Mary" *WW1 happens* America: "should we send help? Nah get the popcorn"
@vincentjudeorit9745
@vincentjudeorit9745 4 года назад
😂
@ehs1452
@ehs1452 4 года назад
@Stock Name Yes.
@prestigev6131
@prestigev6131 4 года назад
Stock Name Germany was the one who tried to get Mexico to declare war on us. They shot themselves in the foot. Who knows, they just might’ve been able to take Paris and turn the tide of war
@austinj.8981
@austinj.8981 4 года назад
America got was enjoying its popcorn until Germany tried to get Mexico to declare war on us....also Germany caused mass casualties by sinking the Lusitania due to unrestricted submarine warfare, so America set aside its popcorn and grabbed the guns.
@austinj.8981
@austinj.8981 4 года назад
@Stock Name I mean that’s what I was taught so just going off of that!
@luis_zuniga
@luis_zuniga 4 года назад
America: *goes into civil war* Mexico: *chuckles* "I'm in danger".
@SlurryNoises
@SlurryNoises 4 года назад
Saw a video about that a while back... supposedly the Austrian dude in charge of Mexico wasn't actually a bad dude... Just couldn't gain the trust of Mexicans and ended up getting killed i believe.
@carloschillin1038
@carloschillin1038 4 года назад
Jaime yes got executed.
@luis_zuniga
@luis_zuniga 4 года назад
@@SlurryNoises the Mexican conservatives lied to Maximilian I, they told him the citizens wanted him to govern them. The conservatives wanted a monarch that aligned with their ideas, one that would oppose the liberal/secular reforms of President Juárez. Much to the displeasure of the conservatives, Maximilian turned out to be as liberal as President Juárez, which caused him to loose their support. After the French left Mexico it was pretty much over for him. The liberals won the war and executed him. Sorry for my bad English.
@tamilly7941
@tamilly7941 4 года назад
@@luis_zuniga Si tenía el sponsor de Napoleón III, por más que sea Austriaco, deberían haber sabido que era liberal...
@merdab8
@merdab8 4 года назад
@@luis_zuniga Your English is fantastic.
@Greyspecies9999
@Greyspecies9999 4 года назад
Pope: you should start to free slaves, y'know Confederacy: ok Also Confederacy: the pope is supporting our cause!
@FlagAnthem
@FlagAnthem 4 года назад
Pope addressed to Davis as Mr. President
@whafflete6721
@whafflete6721 4 года назад
@@FlagAnthem Maybe just me but how does that count as "Supporting their cause"
@darkrogue1495
@darkrogue1495 4 года назад
Democrats have not changed that tactic since
@FlagAnthem
@FlagAnthem 4 года назад
@@whafflete6721 it doesn't. It's just the confederate inflating it
@joehill4094
@joehill4094 3 года назад
@@FlagAnthem yeah it does, the pope legitimized the title by calling him a president
@ethanrepublic
@ethanrepublic 4 года назад
The Prussians actually took a lot from the Civil War. They noted that war was getting more deadlier and the importance of advancement in technology and smaller units and trains . This is what made them so good during the Austrian war and the Franco-Prussian war.
@thodan467
@thodan467 4 года назад
The Prussians´d the Dreyse rifle since 1840, breechloading artillery at least since 1857 and designed their train system for war. What could the ´ve taken from the ACW, which wasn´t known since the crimean war
@WorldArchivist
@WorldArchivist 4 года назад
Well Europe as a whole failed to see the big picture until the Great War.
@ottersirotten4290
@ottersirotten4290 4 года назад
@@thodan467 >smaller Unitsize >more indipendance in quick decision making for lower Ranks (Auftrags Taktik) >drawing Conqlusions from seeing a wide Array of Tactics used in a big War is always good
@zefft.f4010
@zefft.f4010 4 года назад
This is Prussophilic revisionism. Disregard.
@ottersirotten4290
@ottersirotten4290 4 года назад
@@zefft.f4010 The Idea that prussian Officers were able to draw Conclusions from foreign Battlefields that influenced domestic Doctrines is now "Prussophilic revisionism" You seem to have a preety cartoonish View of the World Dude
@hunterappling
@hunterappling 3 года назад
The Emancipation Proclamation was such a masterful power stroke by Lincoln. He referred to the Confederacy as Rebels against the Union, showing that they are still a part of the U.S, just in rebellion. Keeping it “in house” basically. This was huge is thwarting any attempt by a European power to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation, thus destroying any attempt at military support for the Confederacy abroad. Awesome video
@williamowsley9771
@williamowsley9771 3 года назад
Lincoln was a masterful politician. And I say "politician" in the best sense of the word. By comparison, Davis was just another self deluded fool with no concept of the bigger picture and a single card to play in cotton.
@pyromania1018
@pyromania1018 3 года назад
@@williamowsley9771 All of the Confederate "politicians" were basically just spoiled brats whose only weapon was waving money at the right people, then throwing a tantrum when that didn't work.
@MrShadowThief
@MrShadowThief 2 года назад
He was so good at it that the general public opinion of the war is still almost absolutely influenced by this.
@WanderingLibertarian
@WanderingLibertarian 2 года назад
@Robert Well no, because slaves would be freed by Union armies that retook the territory
@chinsaw2727
@chinsaw2727 2 года назад
@Robert Well, it’s hypocritical in hindsight. It only abolished slavery in the Confederacy because it was a punishment for the South not surrendering yet, and it was also to discourage foreign powers from intervening on the Confederacy’s side. Also by turning the cause of the Civil war from a political war that was about concepts like “unity” into a fight for the moral cause of abolition, which is less complicated for the average person to understand and simplifies the conflict. He did exclude the parts of the Confederacy that were under Union occupation because he wanted to keep the support of local collaborators, who might switch sides if they thought Lincoln was taking away their slaves. Because at the end of the day slavery was abolished throughout America, people do question why the Emancipation Proclamation is so specific with its abolition, it’s because it’s purpose was as a piece of war legislation to serve short term issues. That’s why America needed a constitutional amendment to end slavery, because the Emancipation proclamation only got the ball rolling, but could not get it into the hole.
@sgtsmith501
@sgtsmith501 4 года назад
The British Empire be like: *Grabs popcorn and chair*
@i.z2335
@i.z2335 4 года назад
could you say that they grabbed a A R M C H A I R
@mollkatless
@mollkatless 4 года назад
@@i.z2335 Not to be a jerk, but *an* armchair
@Gussyboy06
@Gussyboy06 4 года назад
@@mollkatless not to be a jerk but Understandable have a nice day
@i.z2335
@i.z2335 4 года назад
@@mollkatless im not a native english speaker so i may make some spelling mistakes
@Alfie-ft3bx
@Alfie-ft3bx 4 года назад
Sgtsmith good
@augustogalindo8687
@augustogalindo8687 4 года назад
History told from different perspectives is interesting. There was a war of my country (Peru) against its neighbor (Chile) that we lost, in school we were taught we lost because we didn’t have many ships, nor soldiers and equipment was old. When I visited Chile, it was exactly the opposite, they portrayed themselves as the ones with few ships and bad equipment and heroes that won despite of that. So, I decided to research from foreign documents, not written by Peruvians, nor Chileans, it turned out that both countries were pretty equal in terms of ships, in the case of soldiers, we had about 5 times as much, but because of bad administration, were sent only a fraction (less than what Chile sent), and in terms of equipment, Chile was better, but not big difference. So, I believe education should be more neutral, teachers believe that portraying the country as the victim is gonna make children more patriotic, but they’re simply not showing the reality. And it causes rejection to other countries, I still find people from both Peru and Chile that hate each other because of something that happened 200 years ago.
@hadracks
@hadracks 2 года назад
When I moved to Mexico I learned about "historia patria". The idea was that there are two histories- those of academics where truth and understanding is the goal and historia patria where schoolchildren are taught what will make them more faithful to their country. Lots of countries do it- it helps recruitment, citizens question their government less, and it makes a more cohesive (if stupider) society. Not defending it and patriotic history teaching goes up as the competency and security of the government goes down.
@mattmckane9454
@mattmckane9454 2 года назад
My mother was from Peru! I know a little bit of the War of the Pacific, which I believe is the war you're talking about. Peru and Bolivia should really get their territories back.
@sirkeeper2885
@sirkeeper2885 2 года назад
@@hadracks I entered historical academia and I've noticed that. People who follow this education path have a more nuanced and less hyperbolic view of history. It makes sense of course, but it's not like the difference is between a sumarised understanding at the mandatory education level and a more comprehensive level at the college level education. The non-academic education actually embues bias. It shows the history of the country in a mostly self-justifying way. For example, we learned how the Reconquista was a totally legit war of conquest, though in academia we refrain from atributing legitimacy to the entities perpetrating the actions and rather look at what it was and what caused it. The imperial phase those were the glory days. People learn about slavery but get all defensive when anyone tries to actually reflect on what that means. It's quite frustrating and the grounds for extreme nationalist movements that see absolutely no wrong in the actions of our forefathers.
@hadracks
@hadracks 2 года назад
@@sirkeeper2885 Interesting comparison between the academic and the biased versions. It makes sense. Academics are really interested in the causes and effects and they get promotion and acclaim for knowledge. Others are using history (like they use any other field of knowledge) for their own ends. A well known phenomenon in psychology is that people simply cannot take criticism and shut down all thought once they hear criticism and it takes a lot of mental energy to overcome this. If I were to look at my parents I would say I have a distinct advantage by "virtue" of being born in a middle class family that values education, went to nice schools in a wealth country, and got university scholarships. All of these are unearned advantages over most of my peers. People who are insecure get very troubled by the idea of unearned advantages as it indicates they do not deserve what they have. This could cause thinking and the world suddenly becomes a confusing place.
@kellynolen498
@kellynolen498 2 года назад
@@hadracks yeah it's real bad there the founding myth which our for Father's did no wrong and slavery is glazed over and sugercoated there were many compromises but the truth is most were for slavery like the promise not to make laws about it for like 40 years or the 3/5th law counting 3 in every 5 slaves were counted towards state representation all this did was give the south more power there's also the liberal college history that war to focused on what pushing a narritive that our past was pure evil I remember the Dutch colonies were the least racist and nicest to the natives but then they immedietly say it's just because of there capitalist economic policy implying if it wasn't profitable they would be killing them like the Spaniards there's also the confusion over what nation's collonies did what to the natives the Spaniards were definitely the worst considering they had just finished the reconqesta and wanted to send there now idle soldiers somewhere for national security reasons the college say that all of europe was killing was doing the same rape and pillage as Spain but provide no proof then there's the slavery if a white people thing narritive I know slavery's evil but why do you only speak about the whites use of slavery why not the African warlords selling there own people no europeans waded deep into Africa to catch them themselves basicly the only history you can trust is after you pull every source together from Evey party involved
@Achillez098
@Achillez098 4 года назад
Prussians: "We are impressed..." Americans: "You are?" :D Prussians: "By how noob you guys are..." Americans: :(
@leopard2a6yes85
@leopard2a6yes85 4 года назад
Now who's laughing
@shelty3178
@shelty3178 4 года назад
AMERICA DUCK YEA AMERICA yes
@atrumphasmatis6719
@atrumphasmatis6719 4 года назад
AMERICA DUCK YEA AMERICA the world... at us.
@bartek920
@bartek920 4 года назад
@@leopard2a6yes85 now everyone is laughing at us
@arvalb0
@arvalb0 4 года назад
AMERICA DUCK YEA AMERICA everybody is laughing at us
@sirreepicheeprules7443
@sirreepicheeprules7443 4 года назад
Russia sent ships to the Union partly in support of the North and also because they just fought the Crimean war with Britain and they wanted a naval squadron in the Atlantic. The Russians were unexpected but enthusiastically received by the Union as friends. The Russian fleet had standing orders to support the Union if any other European power, namely Britain or France joined the Confederates.
@WickedHebrew
@WickedHebrew 2 года назад
Ppl just gloss over this...it goes a little deeper tho because a particular demographic supported the confederacy. After the war, that said demographic undermined the Russian czars which eventually led to their demise.
@aegis6485
@aegis6485 7 месяцев назад
​@@WickedHebrewWho is this "particular demographic" you speak of?
@WickedHebrew
@WickedHebrew 7 месяцев назад
@aegis6485 Google who was the confederate secretary of war🤫
@nestpascamillekazeyquiveut9984
@nestpascamillekazeyquiveut9984 4 года назад
There was a naval combat between a Confederate and a Union ship that took place along the french shores, at Cherbourg, the 11 june 1864 People even came from Paris to spectate it.
@cjstanky
@cjstanky 4 года назад
Spectating battles happened a bit in the Civil War, 1st Manassas/Bull Run had people picnicking to watch. Like hey let's go watch people die, what a quant way to spend the weekend
@johnalden5821
@johnalden5821 4 года назад
@@cjstanky So far as I know, that only happened once. Turns out the Civil War was no picnic.
@grahamturner2640
@grahamturner2640 4 года назад
I wonder how the CSS Alabama was able to make it that far, as there was a Union blockade on the South.
@chrisbruce5711
@chrisbruce5711 4 года назад
@@grahamturner2640 it was a sneaky boy.. look it up its an interesting boat.
@tomfrazier1103
@tomfrazier1103 3 года назад
Monet painted a picture of the combat he watched.
@todo9633
@todo9633 4 года назад
Prussian Officers: "Trench warfare is nice and all but I doubt it'll be all that important in Europe." But little did they know.
@Tyr1705
@Tyr1705 4 года назад
... you realize that the Prussians broke Trench systems superior to Civil War trenches in 1864 and 1870/71? The battle of dybbol is a prime example. The civil war was from a front-fighting perspective completely uninteresting because it all happend for quite some time already since Crimea. The logistics and support area is were most development took place.
@lettuceman9439
@lettuceman9439 4 года назад
many plans against france during the franco-prussian war was based on both the incompetence and brilliance of the civil war
@tomfrazier1103
@tomfrazier1103 3 года назад
The siege of Vicksburg.
@anthonyendack3138
@anthonyendack3138 3 года назад
lol
@RRaquello
@RRaquello 3 года назад
@@lettuceman9439 If you read BH Liddel Hart's writings on the Civil War, the Prussians were impressed with American logistics more than strategical or tactical abilities. They studied and were influenced by the use of railroads in quickly mobilizing and moving troops and supplies, not by anything that actually happened in combat. The ability of the Union to quickly change fronts and attack emerging Confederate weak points was perhaps the key to winning the war, which is why, when the Union forces moved into the South, they built railroads, and why the main goal of Confederate irregular forces was destroying the railroads the Union forces built, as well as already existing roads when they were forced to give up territory.
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un 4 года назад
People: No, you can’t be sponsored by Raid. They’re everywhere Armchair: Haha sponsorship go brrr Seriously having a sponsor is better than having none at all
@sammysocks6801
@sammysocks6801 4 года назад
I feel like I know you from something
@josepho3366
@josepho3366 4 года назад
blocking spartan Supreme leader is spying on all.
@Rndm9
@Rndm9 4 года назад
He could just start a patreon. Even if it isn't enough to replace sponsorship yet, at least he could go with a sponsor that doesn't force you to spam green checkmarks all over your description
@chuofearth9672
@chuofearth9672 4 года назад
yeah but Raid is ILLEGAL
@cherrykmy7336
@cherrykmy7336 4 года назад
WHY ARE YOU EVERYWHERE????????????
@LordTeaboBaggins
@LordTeaboBaggins 4 года назад
The Condeferacy: We fight to preserve our economy of which slavery is an integral part! The Union: We’re fighting to abolish slavery and hold the United States together! Europe: Ooooh! Raid: Shadow Legends!
@ilosttehlegs4517
@ilosttehlegs4517 4 года назад
Allow me to drown in controversy Yo what about state autonomy
@LordTeaboBaggins
@LordTeaboBaggins 4 года назад
Born Again outlaw It was a joke, my guy. Please stop with your virtue signaling garbage
@LordTeaboBaggins
@LordTeaboBaggins 4 года назад
Incidentally- I found the SJW
@LordTeaboBaggins
@LordTeaboBaggins 4 года назад
Born Again outlaw it is when you’re ranting off from a fucking joke.
@LordTeaboBaggins
@LordTeaboBaggins 4 года назад
But I expect nothing less from an SJW as yourself
@TailcoatGames
@TailcoatGames 4 года назад
“ Imagine being too lazy to pick ur own cotton “ -this post was made by the union gang
@user-dd8vo7or2d
@user-dd8vo7or2d 4 года назад
@Fiasco Still managed to kick the confederate's ass. Must be some incompetent soldiering in the south huh?
@jaypea30
@jaypea30 4 года назад
@Fiasco and the South still lost?
@YAH2121
@YAH2121 4 года назад
@@user-dd8vo7or2d Confederates had better generals but the union had more resources and better strategy
@user-dd8vo7or2d
@user-dd8vo7or2d 4 года назад
@@YAH2121 Doubt it
@dingus6076
@dingus6076 4 года назад
@@user-dd8vo7or2d Not "Doubt it," they teach in schools about the superiority of Confederate Generals.
@CTViewer07
@CTViewer07 4 года назад
McCellan's Defense to the Prussians: "I didn't lose! I merely failed to win!"
@sirreepicheeprules7443
@sirreepicheeprules7443 4 года назад
McClellan was a coward, he could have won the war much earlier had he been more aggressive and used his head a little. He ran for president in 1864 as the democrat's peace candidate calling for a negotiated peace with the Confederacy; thankfully he lost due to the war turning decidedly in the North's favor after Grant was given command of Union forces and Sherman's victories in his march to the sea capturing Atlanta.
@LERRlX
@LERRlX 4 года назад
Heh Good oversimplified anecdote there
@edthesecond
@edthesecond 4 года назад
McCLellan ran against Lincoln in the 1864 Presidential Election. One could probably safely say that he was trying to sabotage Lincoln and the Union for personal gain. Quite possibly the Confederates were hoping for his victory because they figured he was more likely to recognize their 'nation' than Lincoln would. Gettysburg and Vicksburg shot down that plan.
@galoon
@galoon 4 года назад
@@sirreepicheeprules7443 McClellan was a better Confederate general than Braxton Bragg ;-)
@brianthomas2434
@brianthomas2434 3 года назад
@@galoon you wonder why there's no "Fort McClellan. "
@Marngel
@Marngel 3 года назад
Confederacy to Britain: if you don’t support us, you won’t get out cotton. Britain: Oh no. Anyway. *uses cotton from India*
@crimony3054
@crimony3054 3 года назад
The Confederacy's strongest leverage -- its cotton monopoly -- was collapsing even before the fighting began.
@laqueenawilliams4762
@laqueenawilliams4762 3 года назад
@@crimony3054 - why was it collapsing?
@crimony3054
@crimony3054 3 года назад
​@@laqueenawilliams4762 India was ramping up its cotton production. Cotton from India is the specific reason that Great Britain did not recognize the Confederacy, and the Confederacy was so certain that they'd be recognized that they fashioned their battle flag after the Union Jack flag.
@m1a1abramstank49
@m1a1abramstank49 3 года назад
@@laqueenawilliams4762 Industry was basically better as the Union was ramping its production, and as someone stated there were already cotton production via the use of slaves
@pyromania1018
@pyromania1018 3 года назад
Plus the UK had seen this coming and had been stockpiling cotton for years by that point. The Confederates were complete idiots who thought they could bully stronger nations into giving them legitimacy.
@El.Gatito.
@El.Gatito. 4 года назад
Europe: >Respawn >Change Team - > [Spectate] >Leave match
@RRaquello
@RRaquello 3 года назад
An interesting, little discussed sequel to all this was that after the Civil War was over, US General Philip Sheridan was put in charge of collecting a large force in Texas to persuade, peacefully if possible, the French to get out of Mexico. He was also surreptitiously supplying the Juarez army with arms & supplies to fight the French. The French took the hint and went home, leaving Maximilian behind to get shot. A few years later, during the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-71, Sheridan was sent to the battlefront as a supposedly neutral observer of the conflict, but since he spent his time observing as a highly honored guest with the highest ranks of the Prussian army, there was little doubt which side he favored, and he got the satisfaction of being present at Napoleon III's surrender to the Prussian forces. It's difficult, after all that happened in the World Wars, to realize there was a war between France and Germany where the Americans, unofficially, backed the Germans, but there you have it.
@Prizrak131
@Prizrak131 4 года назад
The Chinese government covering up the Tiananmen square massacre 1:12
@isutahraptor9969
@isutahraptor9969 4 года назад
Nice
@whafflete6721
@whafflete6721 4 года назад
What you mean by "chinese governemtn Covering up" then leaving a blank space
@rockcary4122
@rockcary4122 3 года назад
Lmao
@spiko-ou3bp
@spiko-ou3bp 3 года назад
😂
@theishaanandankitashow
@theishaanandankitashow 3 года назад
Why is this blank??? Just a time stamp????
@destubae3271
@destubae3271 3 года назад
Whenever an empire sees a war somewhere else, they don't even hesitate. They just crack their knuckles and try to take the Dominican Republic
@DonTitoNYC
@DonTitoNYC 3 года назад
Actually, the country was given to the empire by annexationists. My family is from the Dominican Republic.
@bm9727
@bm9727 4 года назад
4:50 “These Prussian officers were consistently impressed..with Themselves” 😂😂
@ottersirotten4290
@ottersirotten4290 4 года назад
Prussia reformed a bunch of their military Doctrines shortly after the War, framing the prussian Observers just as uppity A***holes more concerned with reasuring their own Superiority than to actually observe and learn is a bit of an D***move
@Tyr1705
@Tyr1705 4 года назад
@@ottersirotten4290 ... they changed doctrine between 1864 and 1866? Tell me when and what...
@nbewarwe
@nbewarwe 4 года назад
@@Tyr1705 From what I know it was mostly the use of railroads and transportation. Tbf, making your armies move faster isn't really that reflective of what your soldiers can do on the battlefield.
@adamdrenko7495
@adamdrenko7495 4 года назад
The art style is stunning...
@KDH-br6hy
@KDH-br6hy 4 года назад
Yes it is
@Chenoah.
@Chenoah. 4 года назад
There's a game called thronebreaker that uses similar art if you like games.
@ramicane1671
@ramicane1671 4 года назад
US: starts fighting itself Europe: Drew.exe has been activated
@Universe2
@Universe2 4 года назад
heh i get it
@Nugcon
@Nugcon 3 года назад
gamemode has been updated to spectator
@juliomarcus
@juliomarcus 3 года назад
3:58 Portugal was actually an empire, as well. One of the longest-lived in world history, it existed for almost six centuries, from the capture of Ceuta in 1415, to the handover of Portuguese Macau to China in 1999.
@endzordays
@endzordays 2 года назад
Portugal ceased being a monarchy in 1910....
@Illegal_man-gi5gp
@Illegal_man-gi5gp 2 года назад
@@endzordays dont have to be a monarchy to be an empire. Key example being the late french empire
@endzordays
@endzordays 2 года назад
@@Illegal_man-gi5gp As far as I'm aware there are only two periods in history when France was an Empire.. Under Emperor Napoleon I and II and then later under Emperor Napoleon III. There are 2 schools on what constitutes an empire. Both are fairly equal in size. I subscribe to the following viewpoint... To be an empire you have to have some form of monarch whether it's a king/queen, archduke/archduchess or an emperor/empress at the top. Roman Empire, Japanese Empire, Chinese Empire, Germanic Empire of Rome, British Empire, Spanish Empire and Portuguese Empire The second viewpoint is that nations fall under the definition of empire when a central state rules over large amounts of territory that are treated unequally. Such as colonies or protectorate states. Entities under dominion.
@Kelvin-ql9ed
@Kelvin-ql9ed 4 года назад
I’m so early the CSA is still alive
@zealousdoggo
@zealousdoggo 4 года назад
Annnd it just fell
@tricksor6589
@tricksor6589 4 года назад
wow this one was so original i havent heard this one before
@user-dd8vo7or2d
@user-dd8vo7or2d 4 года назад
@@tricksor6589 The south lost oops
@lucaspagottoguido2625
@lucaspagottoguido2625 4 года назад
Fun fact: Brazilian general "Duque de Caxias" imported hot air ballons used in the American civil war to observe the paraguaian postions during the paraguaian war (1865-1870)
@m.a.118
@m.a.118 4 года назад
I always found this perspective fascinating. Why is it almost for every other civil war (Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Syrian etc.) we love to discuss the "foreign angle" but when it comes to the American Civil War, we treat it like an isolated incident (when it wasn't). It's nice to see this perspective given some limelight. The international aftermath/fallout is also interesting. For example, how the US Civil War caused Alaska to be purchased, Canada to become a dominion (and refuge for Confederate exiles like Davis who lived in southern Quebec after the war.), the European acceleration in the scramble of Africa to name a few. Some other fun international things about the US civil war - Canada (Then, British North America comprising of several Canadian colonies): How the port of Halifax served as a clandestine base for blockade runners. Saint Alban's Raid: Clandestine Confederate forces launches a raid on banks in Vermont stealing 150,00$ USD which caused the Union to launch a counter raid in to Canada to find the raiders... Causing incident. Lastly between 33,000 and 55,000 men from British North America (Canada) volunteered with the Union. - Japan: Also sent observers which played an important role in their ongoing Meiji Restoration/westernization. - Russia: Mentioned in the comments about the Russian chartered fleets in San Fran and Boston - Debt: the US debt in 1865 at *41 times* higher than in 1860. A good chunk of that was foreign, but details seem spotty.
@James-kv6kb
@James-kv6kb Год назад
Of course you're not allowed to know that Australia was there helping as well like every other war that you have ever started
@DiracComb.7585
@DiracComb.7585 4 года назад
For a second, I actually thought that France intervened on a small scale with the Confederacy .
@Zachomara
@Zachomara 4 года назад
They technically did... in Mexico. Then after 1865, Maximillian I was overthrown rather easily just by sending 50,000 now highly trained and battle tested American troops to the Texas border.
@DiracComb.7585
@DiracComb.7585 4 года назад
Zach Omara true, but I meant directly by supplying troops to the confederacy.
@miguelangelamezcuarosales7687
@miguelangelamezcuarosales7687 4 года назад
@@Zachomara That is wrong. Maximilian was overthrown because the french withdrew their armies mostly because the threat of war against Prussia (the ending of USA´s civil war and possible intervention was another motivator but a minor one). Then, the mexican liberals were able to defeat the conservatives who supported the monarchy. However, USA did send weapons and resources to the mexican liberals to speed up the process. But USA´s placement of troops in the border did little to overthrow Maximilian. If the French didn´t have to worry about Prussia, they would have exterminated the liberal resistance and would probably even manage to defeat the USA if they intervened in Mexico.
@tamilly7941
@tamilly7941 4 года назад
@@DiracComb.7585 the Frenchs supported the Union with gun trade, so they would never had supported the CSA
@miguelangelamezcuarosales7687
@miguelangelamezcuarosales7687 4 года назад
@aaron guest Not at all. If they didn´t have to worry about European affairs, they would send even more men to mexico, totally defeat the liberals and supported by mexican food and some resources would be able to defeat any invading american army. French discipline, training and technology, was very superior. Maybe they won´t be able to conquer USA but would definitely humiliate them in the battlefields.
@ethanwmonster9075
@ethanwmonster9075 4 года назад
when the army with a state thinks the democracy the size of a continent that barley even fights continental wars up till that point has the bad army. me: *of course*
@fzzy5739
@fzzy5739 4 года назад
Angel Navarro they gave a hell of a fight for a country the size of texas tho
@miniaturejayhawk8702
@miniaturejayhawk8702 4 года назад
@Angel Navarro yeah, that's what happens if you essentially fight all of your rivals at once...
@brittakriep2938
@brittakriep2938 4 года назад
With the exeption of independance war,1812 and the corean war, the US only fought against weaker enemies, so it is easy to win.
@jaypea30
@jaypea30 4 года назад
@Angel Navarro that's what happens when you fight every powerful empire on the planet
@beezelbombgaming9491
@beezelbombgaming9491 4 года назад
@@brittakriep2938 Don't forget Vietnam, even though that was intervention, and the US is pathetic tbh, they join in on wars when the 'bad guys' are about to lose and take all the credit.
@purplefire2834
@purplefire2834 4 года назад
6:58 Those birds colliding was a fun detail
@CloneCaptainMaxCC-
@CloneCaptainMaxCC- 4 года назад
England be like: *Hmmmmm... Nyes, let my child in fight and fall.*
@lithium1770
@lithium1770 4 года назад
Clone captain. I have news for you. The clunkers are invading by air tomorrow at dawn. Our commandoes have intercepted encrypted codes signaling these plans.
@CloneCaptainMaxCC-
@CloneCaptainMaxCC- 4 года назад
“Get your men to their battle stations! I need 4 companies to help defend this area!” I’d exclaim “Right away, sir!” The Sergeant would reply. “Men! Ready the artillery!” The Sergeant would order the artillery men. “I need coordinates!” The artillery man would reply. “Fire on coordinates 6, 2, 14, 32, 43, 3, 9, and 12!” The sergeant would reply. “Sir, yes sir!” The artillery men would aim at their targets, and fire away. *To be Continued.*
@scottishboi6035
@scottishboi6035 4 года назад
*britain SMH
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 4 года назад
that same child would come to save your ass in about 80 years.
@James-dq7oi
@James-dq7oi 4 года назад
@@livethefuture2492 *laughs in ussr*
@joesanchez9216
@joesanchez9216 2 года назад
When talking about the French intervention in Mexico, you forgot to mention the fact that Mexicans stopped the French by winning the 5 de Mayo battle in Puebla. This prevented the French from taking Mexico for a full year (taking Mexico City in mid 1863, instead of 1862). By then, Grant's victory in Vicksburg MS and Gettysburg had happened an the tide of the war favored the Union. If it were not for the Mexican victory in 5 de Mayo, the French might have entered the war in the side of the south, and the US map would be quite different. That is the reason for which the US celebrates 5 de Mayo with parades, while in Mexico just celebrates this just as if it were Normandy or Iwo Jima.
@D.F.P.M.A5631
@D.F.P.M.A5631 2 года назад
that it was not in itself why General Ignacio Zaragoza was because he was born before in Texas? And what made it the day of friendship between Mexico and the United States?
@shelv9538
@shelv9538 2 года назад
Just like the guy said in the video the French wouldn't have intervened without the British.
@looneytoonz5280
@looneytoonz5280 Год назад
True
@ramonvizcarra8335
@ramonvizcarra8335 4 года назад
As a Dominican I am really overjoyed that you included accurate information about the annexation of the Dominican Republic to Spain. However it was not much of an occupation since the president of the time, Pedro Santana, was the one who was trying to annex the republic back with Spain. Besides that really good information 😁
@GrantHolmstrom
@GrantHolmstrom Год назад
Haha and then the United States got interested in the annexation of the Dominican Republic under President Grant
@Patrick_3751
@Patrick_3751 4 года назад
Thank you so much for talking about how wheat dissuaded Britain and France from supporting the South. To this day it is somewhat overstated how Southern Cotton almost caused Britain and France to intervene on the side of the South, but as you demonstrated, leaders with an ounce of common sense will choose food over fancy clothes any day. On this matter, one historian cleverly remarked that King Cotton was trumped by King Wheat. However, I am somewhat surprised that you didn't talk about private/non-official support from Britain for the Confederacy. For example I've heard that several Confederate blockade runners were captained by Royal Navy officers who were on leave and that several British shipyards received private contracts to build ships for the Confederate Navy, the CSS Alabama being one of them.
@debo2665
@debo2665 3 года назад
"they were impressed-" "with themselves" you know how many feelings you hurt just by saying that
@someguy6369
@someguy6369 4 года назад
Yessss. More history.
@whywhy1865
@whywhy1865 4 года назад
History?
@someguy6369
@someguy6369 4 года назад
@@whywhy1865 ye.
@piperjj4486
@piperjj4486 4 года назад
Super biased history, but history.
@whafflete6721
@whafflete6721 4 года назад
@@piperjj4486 How tho,sorta curious
@mirakouam
@mirakouam 4 года назад
I love the fact that you always use different point of view, I think this makes your history videos more complete and interesting!
@chroniquesJDR
@chroniquesJDR 4 года назад
America Civil War : *Happen* France : It's free real estate
@Guestyinnit
@Guestyinnit 3 года назад
Mexico: Surprise you frog France: *Sweats*
@WombRaider001
@WombRaider001 4 года назад
Entirety of Europe: "dafuq they doin over der?"
@barricadedpurifier
@barricadedpurifier 4 года назад
Do a vid on the Native American allies of the Confederacy
@Frank-mm2yp
@Frank-mm2yp 4 года назад
There were Native Americans who were on both sides during the Civil War; Heads they lost----Tails they lost.....
@ulisesjorge
@ulisesjorge 4 года назад
5:52 You took a bit chunk of land and handed it over to Haiti in the southwest of the country but I was glad that this bit was included there. You even showed the Dominican flag with the coat of arms and the rebel uniforms were accurate. That war actually started with rebels lowering the Spanish flag as soon as it came up, so outside of the map thing I love the attention to detail. Also, I’m seeing a bunch of ads with your videos so I hope that means that RU-vid is letting you make money out of your content which is awesome. Keep up the good work!
@irisgaming2011
@irisgaming2011 Год назад
USA: I thought we were friends France! France: We were never.
@edgemaxxer1573
@edgemaxxer1573 4 года назад
2:53 is when the sponsor ends
@Fugitive685
@Fugitive685 3 года назад
Thx
@pop5678eye
@pop5678eye 3 года назад
Far too many people ignore that non-interference, not taking sides can also be a powerful diplomatic tool.
@watcherzero5256
@watcherzero5256 4 года назад
"The US established diplomatic relations with the mighty empire of San Marino".. Wondering how many Americans will take that at face value and not look up who San Marino are :P
@gregb6469
@gregb6469 4 года назад
Mighty empire of San Marino was said tongue-in-cheek.
@watcherzero5256
@watcherzero5256 4 года назад
@@gregb6469 Yeah but how many Americans will know how small it is or even of heard of it. Even in Europe its a name that only comes up when your talking about other microstates like Liechtenstein, Monaco or Vatican City.
@gregb6469
@gregb6469 4 года назад
@@watcherzero5256 -- Stuipd people with no interest in history aren't going to watch this anyway, so it doesn't matter that they wouldn't get the joke.
@sleepyboi8060
@sleepyboi8060 4 года назад
GLORIOUS SAN MARINO LIVES ON
@remr4598
@remr4598 3 года назад
They may be small but I'm damn glad they're supported us
@marselluswallace6
@marselluswallace6 4 года назад
Very lucky that no one full capitalized on the war. History shows that this is very common, a country fighting itself often has much trouble fending off a significant invading force.
@couldbeanybody2508
@couldbeanybody2508 4 года назад
THIS VIDEO IS SO GOOD. THE QUALITY OF ANIMATION
@PripyatTourist
@PripyatTourist 4 года назад
Fun fact that I learned in my Modern Middle Eastern History Class in College! In order to supply the demand for cotton in England, they spread the cotton seed all across their empire! And it stuck incredibly well in Egypt! Hence, the American Civil War is why we're able to buy Egyptian cotton pillows at the store today!
@tomfrazier1103
@tomfrazier1103 3 года назад
And Tahitian cotton.
@alexlyster3459
@alexlyster3459 3 года назад
@@gerhardschulzy There are no useless classes, only people who are useless at learning anything of value from them.....
@alexius23
@alexius23 4 года назад
The English upper classes favored the Confederates. They understood the potential of the US in the future. On the other Hand thousands of unemployed textile workers (Union cotton blockade) signed a petition supporting the North because of the Emancipation Proclamation. There was no way the population of the UK would fight in a War to prop up Slavery. As far as Northern grain imports....one Northern politician noted, “King Wheat was more important that King Cotton”
@dirtysniper3434
@dirtysniper3434 4 года назад
@FireIron 36 well it took them 3 years to decide to not intervene, and parliament still was wondering about how cheap cotton could be. the only problem was it meant taking a gamble, it would cost alot of money to assemble an invasion force and time as well as supplies to fight a near pointless war, knowing their public is sick of war since the Napoleonic wars. to britian it was like paying 20,000 dollars for one lottery ticket.
@ZontarDow
@ZontarDow 4 года назад
The Emancipation Proclamation is what did any possibility of British intervention in as it repainted the war as a fight against slavery rather then putting down a secessionist rebellion (propaganda so successful most believe it today despite how counter-intuitive the idea is), where as before that it was painted as maintaining the Republic vs leaving a state that had become tyrannical.
@spiffygonzales5899
@spiffygonzales5899 4 года назад
@@ZontarDow The war was always in large part about slavery my guy. Don't get me wrong, the people who say it was ONLY about slavery (or even that slavery was 50% of the issue) are wrong, but it was always an issue for the south.
@italia689
@italia689 4 года назад
An Irish rebellion could have easily happened if Britain sided with the Confederacy.
@italia689
@italia689 4 года назад
@@ZontarDow To say slavery had absolutely nothing to do with the civil war is ridiculous. I do not say it had everything to do with the war...
@sirxarounthefrenchy7773
@sirxarounthefrenchy7773 4 года назад
British vessel in the intro be like : So anyway, I started blasting.
@samueleandriolo4517
@samueleandriolo4517 3 года назад
To be fair the Italian Garibaldi refused to serve the Union because , at the start of the war, freeing the slaves wasn't the main goal of the Union and, despite his flaws, Garibaldi deeply belived in the ideal of freedom
@FlagAnthem
@FlagAnthem 3 года назад
He openly demanded Lincoln both to make a declaration of TOTAL emancipation and to get full independent control over expedition, 1000 style.
@samueleandriolo4517
@samueleandriolo4517 3 года назад
@@FlagAnthem well, at lest, old and crippled as he was he would have done better than McClellan during the peninsula campaign
@FlagAnthem
@FlagAnthem 3 года назад
@@samueleandriolo4517 and yet he still had the will to help France against Prussia
@samueleandriolo4517
@samueleandriolo4517 3 года назад
@@FlagAnthem only because French was a republic by then and he was always arepubblican at heart, and he did not like the mhilitaristic and agressive new German Empire
@waynebrinker8095
@waynebrinker8095 3 года назад
better title: An American Perspective on the European Perspective of the American Civil War.
@loszhor
@loszhor 4 года назад
How interesting! We don't get enough outside perspectives for the Civil War. Thank for uploading.
@scottydu81
@scottydu81 4 года назад
Dude- President Grant actually got to meet with Otto Von Bismarck after his terms. Bismarck saw them as similar, having both united their countries. Grant insisted that unification could not have happened without abolition of slavery. Really cool story look it up
@EPWillard
@EPWillard 3 года назад
gb: "yeah whatever, we can make our own cotton." messenger: "sir the americans messed with one of our boats" gb: *drops teacup* "prepare for war"
@peterbound2119
@peterbound2119 2 года назад
Great video but interesting how you didn't mention Giuseppe Garibaldi (the unifier of Italy). He was asked by Lincoln's office to serve as a general for the North in the American civil war in 1862 after his great military victories for the unification of Italy the years prior. It is a well-known fact in Italy :)
@smokyblackeyes3615
@smokyblackeyes3615 4 года назад
0:55 british Admiral: oh we're taking a stroll into San-Francisco by firing our guns on you Union Commander: WHY!
@iainhowe4561
@iainhowe4561 4 года назад
British Admiral: No idea! This has no strategic value whatsoever!
@kousand9917
@kousand9917 3 года назад
Oh boi are people gonna be mad at you that's new york
@Egilhelmson
@Egilhelmson 3 года назад
Obviously, to support Emperor Norton, who was British before his self-promotion.
@surprisedchar2458
@surprisedchar2458 4 года назад
Great Britain between the end of the Revolution and the War of 1812: “Come lads, we shall board American ships and kidnap their sailors, forcing them to serve us.” Great Britain when the US boards one of their ships to arrest her own rebels 40 years later: *violent screeching*
@hobbabobba7912
@hobbabobba7912 4 года назад
When you are the global superpower, people doing to you what you do to them is unacceptable.
@hobbabobba7912
@hobbabobba7912 4 года назад
@@HerewardWake In hindsight, their plan had a very little chance of passing.
@LuisBrito-ly1ko
@LuisBrito-ly1ko 4 года назад
aaronison So, you talk about propaganda, but then you proceed to state more propaganda, just the one you like more 🤔
@LuisBrito-ly1ko
@LuisBrito-ly1ko 4 года назад
aaronison It’s propaganda. Before 1812, the US had no army nor a navy. Suggesting that the US wanted to fight against the British Empire to take over “Canada” with zero preparation and zero armed forces is ridiculous at best. That’s the fairytale Canadian Nationalists tell to make their war more just. Same with the Americans taken away being actually British. Just because SOME were “deserters,” it doesn’t mean that the British didn’t force Americans into their ranks.
@surprisedchar2458
@surprisedchar2458 4 года назад
aaronison you’re kidding, right? The Royal Navy was notorious for forcing men into her ranks. The term Press Gang comes specifically from groups who would stalk through port towns and grab deserters or sailors or really any able man they wanted. 15,000 US men were forced into British service between the end of the Revolution and 1812, simply because Britain knew they couldn’t challenge her naval might. The US didn’t need much propaganda to get people mad at Great Britain. 1812 isn’t very far from the Revolution. The Royal Navy gave the people a reason to support the war because of their practices.
@gregorybrennan8539
@gregorybrennan8539 4 года назад
I Quote "During the American Civil War, Russia supported the Union primarily because its main geopolitical enemy at that time was Great Britain, which was sympathetic to the Confederacy. ...Russia winterd it's fleets in New York and Sanfransisco Harbors 1861-1862. Although the Civil War in America ended more than 150 years ago, it still generates controversy" Thank You! Your work is exemplary and nourishes the intelectual being.
@shaunryan6
@shaunryan6 3 года назад
Britain led the way on abolition of slavery. Even used to capture US slave ships and free the slaves. Remember the sacking of Washington by the British. British workers used to refuse to process cotton if they knew their was slave labour involved.
@gregorybrennan8539
@gregorybrennan8539 3 года назад
Shaun You seem to have your events confused. GB was a champion of the oppressed.Just look at all the great work they did with the Irish Catholics ... 💥 Boom mike drop!! Thank you. Elvis has left... The Building.
@j5eze
@j5eze 4 года назад
Thank you for your insight. The international aspect often gets over looked by many historians and documentaries in relation to this topic. Not only was this an American civil war but it also acted as a proxy for rival European empires. Keep up the great work!
@James-kv6kb
@James-kv6kb Год назад
The Australians would like to know why no one will ever mention us ? and yet we're the only country that has fought in every single war including this one that the Americans have started or been involved in
@John-ci8yk
@John-ci8yk Год назад
Thank you for giving me a perspective on a subject I never would have thought to even ask about. Thumbs up.
@LedosKell
@LedosKell 4 года назад
UK & France: Oh boy, we're going to get some cotton. Russia: *nyet*
@Nietabs
@Nietabs 4 года назад
Armchair Historian, can u make the forgotten Allied Intervention in Russian Empire? I haven't seen any history channels made this topic yet
@bigdurk4115
@bigdurk4115 4 года назад
Interesting topic ,your right its hardly touched upon
@polygonalfortress
@polygonalfortress 4 года назад
That's an interesting suggestion I'd love to see a video discussing that particular topic
@danieltsiprun8080
@danieltsiprun8080 4 года назад
The great war channel made videos about it.
@West_Coast_Mainline
@West_Coast_Mainline 2 года назад
“The guy that gives my clothing and the guy that gives my my other things are fighting”
@einflogel4979
@einflogel4979 4 года назад
I love how the German just vibes in the balloon in the thumbnail
@SonOfExcess
@SonOfExcess 4 года назад
Remember when the New York Times was the pinnacle of journalism? Oh how they have fallen.
@ReydelCiguay
@ReydelCiguay 4 года назад
Great video! Although I know the videos main focus is on the US civil war, I am glad that you mentioned in passing my country of Dominican Republic’s war of restoration against Spain! After being a long time viewer, it’s amazing to see my country be mentioned even as a footnote lol 😂 🇩🇴🇩🇴🇩🇴
@dr.history3567
@dr.history3567 4 года назад
Abraham lincoln also received a letter from the king of Thailand, the king promised to send elephants but lincoln denied the king's offer
@whafflete6721
@whafflete6721 4 года назад
@@elmascapo6588 Hannabi crying on heaven
@spary5751
@spary5751 4 года назад
Ooh my god, this looks amazing, from a purely graphical prospective. Cheers to the animation department
@srk_vader5211
@srk_vader5211 4 года назад
Germans in 1861: “These soldiers are poorly trained, they can’t possibly hurt us!” Germans in 1917: “I take that back...”
@celticdevildog1309
@celticdevildog1309 4 года назад
Regular army troops yes, marine corps were very good professional troops, ex, the battle of Bellow wood.
@WhiteCamry
@WhiteCamry 4 года назад
@@celticdevildog1309 The Regular Army troops - what few there were - fought well; the National Guard units needed certain things like training, leadership and competence.
@celticdevildog1309
@celticdevildog1309 4 года назад
@@WhiteCamry agreed them being part time soldiers.
@prophetfuture9225
@prophetfuture9225 4 года назад
Not like the germans had been at war with the world for 3 years by the time the Americans joined or anything, but yeah America won WW1 😂
@chaosXP3RT
@chaosXP3RT 4 года назад
@Pepe the Frog That's like saying the USA won WWI
@alexius23
@alexius23 4 года назад
All the major armies sent officers to observe the War up close...
@HotdogFish1
@HotdogFish1 3 года назад
I used to watch you back a few years, and your level of production is off-the-roof
@rumrunner8019
@rumrunner8019 4 года назад
I *can't believe* Armchair Historian didn't mention how Guiseppe Garibaldi, one of the leaders of the Italian Unification, was almost put in charge of the Union Army. Lincoln wanted him to be the head general, but he declined because Lincoln didn't want to make it a war to end slavery at the time he asked him to. But many of his soldiers did volunteer for the Union in the Garibaldi Guard.
@rumrunner8019
@rumrunner8019 4 года назад
@@baneofbanes I did. He never mentions Garibaldi.
@baneofbanes
@baneofbanes 4 года назад
rum runner There’s more to the video than just what he says.
@theliberaldestroyer3796
@theliberaldestroyer3796 3 года назад
Dude. 5 minutes in and ive already got 4 advertisements. I love your content bro. Id come to you everytime for a history lesson vs Schools and colleges. But my god the ads...
@lesdodoclips3915
@lesdodoclips3915 3 года назад
There are literally 2
@_flargy
@_flargy 4 года назад
Financial support from Britain to the Confederate States had great influence on Canadian history aswell! With the Union's victory, and knowledge of British intervention, bored armies looked North for revenge on Britain's colonies. Fear of the US was a key factor in Canada's confederation in 1867. By becoming a separate entity from Britain and combining forces with other British North American colonies, supporters of Canadian confederation were confident in expelling fears of another US invasion.
@inconnu4961
@inconnu4961 2 года назад
Did they REALLY become a separate entity of Britain, BEFORE 1982? it does seem like the british had incredible influence on Canada well past the day of Confederation! The US had had eyes on Canada since the concept of manifest destiny! Britain had waning interest in Canada as it was a less profitable colony than India; it was a money pit essential. As I understand it, fear of the US was the DECIDING factor that brought on the Confederation, as Canada East had little interest in being the minority partner in the numerically stronger, and growing, Canada West. And without Canada East (Quebec), the maritimes would be effectively cut off from Canada west (Ontario). So the US Civil War seems to be the ultimate motivating factor.
@cra2690
@cra2690 4 года назад
To add a bit to the Restoration War (expulsion of the spanish from the Dominican Republic) It wasnt exactly an occupation, it became one once their troops arrived, but at the start it was a formal annexation asked from the queen of spain by dominican leaders. The country had been plagued by poverty, political instability and disease ever since its independence from Haiti. The leaders thought the best way to help the country move forwards and help the people was to annex us to spain, since they still had some interests in the caribbean, they thought this was the most achieveable goal. At the start, the East of the country was mixed towards it, the west was completely against it, with some rebellions in cibao even before the treaty was signed. Once they came, rebellion didnt start (except on the western side) until they started implementing laws that put the dominican people as second class citizens and many crimes against said dominicans were comitted, when rebellions began and the treaty was denounced by dominican politicians is when it became a full on occupation. Coming from a dominican, thank you for actually thinking about us in this video, mister griffin! :)
@SouthernGentleman
@SouthernGentleman 4 года назад
Today people seem to be ignoring Harpers Ferry. All wars start because of pre war violence.
@fatalshore5068
@fatalshore5068 4 года назад
Most civil wars start with a bread tax. No really.
@tollbach
@tollbach 3 года назад
Thanks for another great episode! However, it was a mistake to say that Russia never came close to the conflict and supported the Union only verbally. Actually, in 1863-1864 Emperor Alexander II sent an expedition of Russian navy to both coasts of the US in order to show Russia's support to the actions of the Federal Government, as well as to keep an eye on the the trade routes of Great Britain. The expedition to the East Coast, under the command of rear admiral Stepan Lesovsky consisted of 3 frigates, 2 corvettes and 1 clipper, while to the West Coast were sent 4 corvettes and 2 clippers under the command of the rear admiral Andrei Popov.
@ritaDas-xl4kz
@ritaDas-xl4kz 4 года назад
Me:watches an armchair historian video with happiness Sponsor and also ads:raid shadow legends Me:i think they have a plan to take over youtube
@thegreenbaron6439
@thegreenbaron6439 4 года назад
"The mighty empire of San Marino" 🤣😅
@paulbunyan4421
@paulbunyan4421 3 года назад
"But since the Union didn't have a border with Mexico, they couldn't really do anything about it" California, Arizona and New Mexico left the chat
@Guestyinnit
@Guestyinnit 3 года назад
CA, AZ, NM: ¿Somos una broma para ti? (are we a joke to you?) Sidenote: California Arizona and new mexico did belong to mexico and these three states spoke spanish around the area so thats why it says are we a joke to you in spanish.
@poppy63765
@poppy63765 3 года назад
@@Guestyinnit they were American and still are during the the civil war
@Guestyinnit
@Guestyinnit 3 года назад
@@poppy63765 true
@australium7374
@australium7374 3 года назад
I think what he meant was there was open accessible border there were no railways leading to California at the time movements would be slow however texas was a perfect way to reach the Mexicans and that’s actually how most of it was done in the Mexican-American war.
@Boxygirl96
@Boxygirl96 4 года назад
6:27 that sounded less like a friendly letter landing on a desk and more like a quill being snapped in a fit of rage
@asd6557
@asd6557 4 года назад
The British feared that intervention would eventually result in the loss of Canada. That’s why Canada became independent so soon after the American Civil War.
@piggysew797
@piggysew797 3 года назад
?? Canada was not independent for a while what you on about. plus after 1812 Canadian nationality stated to rise so they were fiercely opposed to being subjected by the USA
@NaviRyan
@NaviRyan 3 года назад
@@piggysew797 Canadian nationalism may have been on the rise but the government was British. Confederation was just so that the Americans didn’t have the world’s largest empire on their doorstep and Canada had a well functioning government that didn’t implode every few years due to infighting. The Governor General who was basically the king of Canada which is now a ceremonial role was British until 1952.
@slightlyistorical1776
@slightlyistorical1776 4 года назад
Fun fact: Karl Marx was a very vocal supporter of the Union, constantly getting newspapers translated in Russian describing the outcome of the war. He even wrote a letter to Abraham Lincoln, along with the rest of the International Workingmen’s Association, denouncing the South and praising his presidency as the “single-minded son of the working class”
@ZontarDow
@ZontarDow 4 года назад
Why would he translate them to Russian?
@BarryWillBuck
@BarryWillBuck 4 года назад
I'm all about seeking truth, so I'd like sources. I assume this is a small error on your part, but Marx couldn't read Russian. He was German, and he could read English.
4 года назад
So Karl Marx supported the Republicans, against the Democrats...? 🤣
@ZontarDow
@ZontarDow 4 года назад
@Chris Smith The thing about the party switch is that no Democrat can tell you when it happened, because FDR was unarguably on the left, yet it was only a decade after he died that the Klan stopped being an official part of the Democratic party.
@ZontarDow
@ZontarDow 4 года назад
@Chris Smith FDR appointed a Klansman to the Supreme Court, the divide was less pronounced then people pretend, especially since it wasn't until the 80s that the South flipped red. So just when did the parties flip, given it was at the very least before the 1930s?
@stevearizona521
@stevearizona521 4 года назад
Fun Fact: On 8 March, 1862, the Confederate States Navy was the most powerful navy in the world (even more powerful than the Royal Navy). Then, on 9 March, 1862, the CSS Virginia (AKA: The Merrimac) met the USS Monitor. These two ironclads fought to a draw, but they were the two most powerful warships in the world at the time.
@SouthernGentleman
@SouthernGentleman 4 года назад
"The cross of St. Andrew indicated descent from British lineage, while the red bar was taken from the French flag, as many other Southerners were descended from French lineage." - Arthur Rogers designer of confederate flag
@sleepyboi8060
@sleepyboi8060 4 года назад
And the white part of it stands for surrendering
@SouthernGentleman
@SouthernGentleman 4 года назад
wutwut wut Nope. It’s purity
@dr.strangelove9815
@dr.strangelove9815 4 года назад
I never knew that, thanks. I've know about the Cross of St. Andrew representing the British Isles, but I never knew of the red bar representing French heritage; there were quite a few French Huguenots that immigrated to the Virginian Colonies, in addition to the Louisianan French added afterwards too.
@dr.strangelove9815
@dr.strangelove9815 4 года назад
​@@sleepyboi8060 It boggles my mind that in 2020 some people still disrespect Southerners, it's absolutely stupid, especially considering most Southerners don't dislike Northerners. We may had began as two separate colonies, we in the Colony of Virginia and the North in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, with two distinct lenses of British culture, but both originated from the same initial colonists that became the USA. It's possible for people to be good neighbors.
@SouthernGentleman
@SouthernGentleman 4 года назад
Thank you!
@gentlemanvontweed7147
@gentlemanvontweed7147 4 года назад
Great video! Thanks for covering something relatively new to me. Here in Denmark we don't learn at all about the American Civil War in school so it is nice to understand something about it.
@JamesTilsley1
@JamesTilsley1 3 года назад
7:15 Nice reference to the absolutely amazing animations from the film charge of the light Brigade.
@The_Wei-a-nator
@The_Wei-a-nator Год назад
Richard William's work if I'm not mistaken
@naughtiusmaximus7103
@naughtiusmaximus7103 3 года назад
Russia and Prussia not intervening isn't true. It's their opposition and hostility to the French and English that prevented intervention from the two. The Prussians were eager to unite the German state, which was in direct conflict with French interests. The Russians were still antagonized over the Crimean War, and saw the French and English as hostile. The Russians and Prussians paired eagerly with one another against mutual enemies. So much so that Bismark managed to rope them in with an alliance with Austria Hungary later in the century. The US was historically hostile to the British, something that only waned once Britain became dependent on US oil (Churchill switching navy to oil) and it became clear over time who the junior partner in that relationship would be. That dominance through oil came early 20th century, outside this time frame. Until then the US was not friendly to the British. The French invasion of Mexico and their alliance with Britain also antagonized the US. It's no surprise that the US was close to both Russia and Prussia throughout this century. America and Russia being allies during the Civil War should not be a surprise. It was not out of nowhere that the US managed to buy Alaska from the Russians, and at dirt cheap prices too. It didn't help that the English had just recently attacked China over the Second Opium War as well, further heightening wariness other countries had about British imperialism. Britain had every intention of intervening in this war. They had incentives to break up the US, which while united (and cold) constantly threatened Canada as well as their Caribbean possessions should war start. The Monroe Doctrine also irritated their imperial ambitions, but they didn't have the military might to send across an ocean to contest it. French had ambitions in the Western Hemisphere and as noted took advantage of this to invade Mexico, something they would not be able to do under threat of a united US applying Monroe Doctrine. It was not just the Trent affair, the Liard Rams also almost sparked a war. What caused Britain and France to back down was Russian threats of war and Prussian military buildup towards German reunification. Prussia was building up its forces in Germany, culminating in the Second Schleswig War and then heightening tensions in Central Europe. France even pulled out of Mexico to consolidate their own forces because of this threat of German reunification. Russia and England's cold war over Central Asia always threatened to boil into a real war, with India threatened. There's also the January Uprising, a Polish revolt that led to possible war with Britain and France. Meanwhile it was not true that Russia sent no help. Due to rising tensions and the threat of possible war with Britain and France over the January Uprising, Russia sent its fleets to New York and San Francisco. Russia had the third largest navy, and was stationed there to further deter British and French interventionist plans. It had the added benefit of not being bottled up in the Black or Baltic Sea should hostilities with Britain begin. Had this war started it would have gone global, a world war. A war between the French, British, Spanish, and Confederates likely losing to the superior and more numerous armies of the US, Russia, and Prussia. By the end of the Civil War the Union had chiseled veterans accustomed to industrialized warfare and brilliant generals in Grant and Sherman (amongst others.) Meanwhile the Franco-Prussian War would give a good grasp on who had the superior army during this time period.
Далее
Seven Years' War | Animated History
32:38
Просмотров 3,7 млн
ДЕНЬ УЧИТЕЛЯ В ШКОЛЕ
01:00
Просмотров 763 тыс.
КОТЯТА В ОПАСНОСТИ?#cat
00:36
Просмотров 433 тыс.
Civil War from the Confederate Perspective
27:54
Просмотров 243 тыс.
The Pig War - OverSimplified
38:43
Просмотров 31 млн
WW1 From the American Perspective | Animated History
19:42
Armed Neutrality | The Animated History of Switzerland
16:50
The Austro-Prussian War, 1866 (ALL PARTS)
2:34:05
Просмотров 281 тыс.