AMERICAN REACTS To How Powerful is Finland's Military 🗡 Finland's Military Strength Explained

Подписаться 28 тыс.

Просмотров 4,2 тыс.

50% 1

I do NOT own the copyrights to this video so please go and check out the original video in the link below!
• How Powerful is Finlan...
___________________________________
Subscribe to the channel!
/ @darthetraveler
Subscribe To Darting Around The World
/ @dareuropereactions
ROAD TO 30,000 SUBSCRIBERS!
Comment what videos you want to react to next!
Send Video Recommendations!
forms.gle/SyEh...
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
Ways To Donate:
Paypal: www.paypal.com...
Cashapp:$Dart4D
buymeacoffee.com/darthetraveler
join our discord!
hey come check out Discord with me / discord
Follow me on Twitch!
/ dartannon15
Follow me on social media if you need daily motivation/inspiration!
Instagram: dartannon
Twitter: dartannon
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Tags
how powerful is finlands military,finlands military strength explained,military trends,finland military,finland military power,finland military power 2023,finland,how powerful is finland,military power,military,military power comparison,finnish military,military comparison,how powerful is finland military,finland military strength,finnish military power,finland military strength 2023,military strength,finnish army,finnish defence forces,finland nato

Опубликовано:

16 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 29

@darthetraveler 8 дней назад

click this link to add Nordic military videos to the playlist on RU-vid so I can react to them. ru-vid.com/group/PLfH-QKxjyz5L8VMeKycL3Ws4mMRrMo60k&jct=e0rqD4GivnejKxrmu12JDg

@merjakotisaari9046 9 дней назад

We also have 54,000 bomb shelters for civilians, which can accommodate almost the entire population

@tuijakarttunen9164 12 дней назад

I`d like to see your reaction to the movie, Sisu. It is very... interesting. And very good.

@stoner84x 10 дней назад

The names were Paasikivi and Kekkonen

@Baddo692 12 дней назад

Pretty good explained in the video but we do have more vehicles, jets etc for war for ex the midnight hawk for jets and im pretty sure we got like 60-120 of the jet and we defo have more they didnt mention

@harrilaamanen5910 6 дней назад

The defense forces have about 1,500 artillery guns. There are more than 700 of these cannons, just under a hundred rocket launchers and more than 700 heavy mortars.

@SK-nw4ig 10 дней назад

You have to remember that Finland is very small in population, so 51st is pretty amazing. I dont know if there is a military stronger or as strong than Finland when comparing to the size of the country? Maybe Israel?

@seppokarjalainen2409 9 дней назад

I think this number is not based on any kind of expert estimation on military strength but just on monetary spending towards military. Since Finland has conscription, it can direct most of the money towards More capable material. If capability to fight land war was actually appraised, Finland would be much higher.

@SK-nw4ig 9 дней назад

@@seppokarjalainen2409 you might be right. Would be interesting to know the source.

@JPPVESA 9 дней назад

To better understand the total defense system, check out a short film made by the Finnish Defense Forces on their YT chanel called Taistelukenttä 2020 (Battlefield 2020)

@markoruotsalainen1161 12 дней назад

Ita true Paasikivi&Kekkonen .The Paasikivi-Kekkonen line means Finland's foreign policy line of neutrality after the Second World War. It got its name from the post-war presidents J. K. Paasikive and Urho Kekkones. The term was launched by Kekkonen's supporters. The aim was first to support Kekkonen's presidential campaign and later to transfer to him the prestige enjoyed by Paasikivi. However, even the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union considered Kekkonen's line to serve the goals of the Soviet Union, quite different from Paasikivi's line. source?

@suorsah 7 дней назад

Not to say as hate, but you need to adjust your mic a little. Sound levels go up and down way too much. Some sentences can be heard clearly but some are just like a tiny mumble.

@harrikuusjarvi3795 9 дней назад

The video has so many faults. As usual.

@sampuke1 8 дней назад

Best way to pronounce sisu is; sesy/sezy

@Pataassa 7 дней назад

Rank 51. I don't know why, but maybe it only counted the size of the professional army? Which in Finland is quite small, due to the huge educated reserve. Was it even noticed? A country with modern technology, a lot of weapons and ships needed for the defense of its own country and nature, and the largest army in Europe if the reserve is included, surely cannot rank at number 51.

@Pataassa 7 дней назад

And 85% of Finnish people are ready to fight for their country. Every Finn is a child or grandchild of some winter war soldier. Because hole nation took a part of that. So we have never forgot that a country size 150 million people attached a country size 3,5 million people in 1939. We love our country, we love each other and we love our families. So we are ready to fight for them if it is necessary. Hope it won't tho.

@mhh7544 12 дней назад

Video is showing US troops...... That cant be the level if you want to run war history channel.

@Jantzku 12 дней назад

And many others...

@DR_REDACTED 12 дней назад

😂

@mhh7544 12 дней назад

@@Jantzku Jep, to be honest I couldnt watch it tll the end, it was so poorly made.

@pekkaerholtz3163 7 дней назад

Finland has bought last 30years us weapons.

@mhh7544 7 дней назад

@@pekkaerholtz3163 Quita reasoning you have. Us buying US arms in modern age has nothing to do with WWII GIs.

@thelahna-8747 9 дней назад

we ranking 51st in the military rating probably mainly for low population.

@sampsani 7 дней назад

I think the ranking is heavily focused on active military personel. Also many rankings/statistics doesnt have the full wartime reserve, only the active reserve numbers.