Тёмный

Amtrak Empire Builder Siding Reverse move RARE VIEW 

robwarner3rd
Подписаться 796
Просмотров 267 тыс.
50% 1

Here's a shot you won't see every day. The friendly conductor on the Amtrak Empire Builder let me stand by and record their reverse move off of a siding after a BNSF coal drag flew by. Thanks to the conductor for putting up with us railfan types. Unfortunately moves like this prove that it looks like passenger service has taken a back seat to freight traffic on the nation's railroads.

Опубликовано:

 

2 мар 2015

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 130   
@paulsmith5398
@paulsmith5398 2 года назад
In the days of steam, the Nickel Plate Road put the varnish in the sidings instead of the freights, their reasoning was, "its easier to start and stop a short, fast passenger than a long, slow freight".
@jonathanwilliams7195
@jonathanwilliams7195 2 года назад
I mean they ain't lie it's faster and more efficient to stop the passenger than it is the freight
@Doing_it_right_the_first_time
@Doing_it_right_the_first_time 2 года назад
@@jonathanwilliams7195 The Amtrak probably had multiple stops ahead of it so that’s why they put the passenger train in the siding and the coal train/freight was nonstop so it made more sense to put the faster yet multiple stopping Amtrak behind the freight in this case.
@likesanddislikesetc
@likesanddislikesetc 2 года назад
Makes sense- I know because I’m a former freight conductor
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
It is/was. Different designs, the passenger engine is build for top speed and acceleration. That leads to fun effects when former freight engines now pull a museum train of passengers and go off like a drag racer
@paulsmith5398
@paulsmith5398 2 года назад
@@mbr5742 i agree to an extent, most museums have trackage where they can do that, but the
@trainliker100
@trainliker100 3 года назад
It is likely that it isn't due to priority so much as train length versus siding length. The coal drag may have been too long for the siding, so the passenger trains had to take it. This is usually called a "saw by" (if one train is short enough to fit in the siding.) A "double saw by" is when both trains are two long to fit into the siding. That requires complicating switching moves and uncoupling to get the trains past each other, bit by bit. So this doesn't necessarily prove passenger trains take a back seat (although that's possible). It could just as easily prove that it is the standard way to get train longer than a siding past a train shorter than the siding.
@timengineman2nd714
@timengineman2nd714 2 года назад
What really happened with Casey Jones was that due to the upgrades from a 4-4-0 steam locomotive to the 4-6-2s steam locomotives is that the sidings were too short for the now longer freight trains. Since this was his standard run he should have known that there was going to be a freight train waiting at a certain siding! He should have known that he would have to slow to a stop just before the second switch so that his train would be between the two switches which would have allowed the freight train to pull around his passenger train!! He apparently forgot this, went too fast and couldn't stop in time (this was before Westinghouse developed the air brake) and hit the rear part of the freight train that was still on the main line!
@DevonMopiedmont1143
@DevonMopiedmont1143 2 года назад
@@timengineman2nd714 What I had happen once was my train had to enter a dead end siding to let maintenance equipment through for a felled tree in a storm and once they finished we backed out and continued. What I'm guessing happened here is they had to go onto a dead end or onto a track that wouldn't rejoin the main or as someone else said that could have put two trains in the same siding and hence they backed up after.
@paulnicholson1906
@paulnicholson1906 2 года назад
@@timengineman2nd714 Westinghouse air brakes were invented well before the Casey Jones accident.
@timengineman2nd714
@timengineman2nd714 2 года назад
@@paulnicholson1906 OK, I thought that they were invented afterwards... Or was it just that it took a long period of time for all railroads to use them since that would obsolete all of their rolling stock until retrofitted?
@paulnicholson1906
@paulnicholson1906 2 года назад
@@timengineman2nd714 the photo of Casey in a locomotive shows an engine fitted with a single stage Westinghouse air compressor. I don’t know the specifics of the Vaughan wreck equipment wise but I thought it was that he crashed into a freight too long for the passing siding. He had passed the north end and they were trying to push back the train in the hole to clear the main when he ran into it. He was going too fast to stop after he went by the flagman protecting the freight. There was controversy that the flagman didn’t go out far enough to give Casey enough time to stop. There is an interview with Webb his fireman that is interesting. He jumped clear and survived.
@ArtStoneUS
@ArtStoneUS 2 года назад
Amtrak trains have a time window that they have to stay within. If they start getting late, then the freight railroads work them in as best they can, but they lose their priority. On long-distance trains, they’re just Cascades into more and more delay
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
you mean like amtrak cascades? I see what you did! lol. perhaps unintentional
@jeremykhn
@jeremykhn 8 лет назад
More than likely they pulled up behind another train in the siding, it's a fairly common practice
@bmwtravel1100
@bmwtravel1100 2 года назад
50 years ago I worked freight on the CNW and ran quite a few of those Wyoming coal trains into Chicago (northbound). The agreement with Union Pacific was that the 100 cars of coal and the slugs would be unseparated and never stop rolling as the UP crew hopped off and we hopped on. Of course things are different now, but those coal trains had a separate contract back then.
@EliChristman
@EliChristman 2 года назад
My grandfather was a conductor in the 1930s or 1940s... I'm hoping to begin as a conductor shortly as my second career. Just waiting to hear back after a conditional job offer. 🙂
@LegoTrainFan92
@LegoTrainFan92 2 года назад
You jumped on a moving train?!
@CrazyBear65
@CrazyBear65 2 года назад
@@LegoTrainFan92 You say that like someone who's never done it. People hop trains all the time. Not unusual for the train crew to do it. I used to hop trains all the time when I was younger. Too old for that shit.
@LegoTrainFan92
@LegoTrainFan92 2 года назад
@@CrazyBear65 I guess I just assumed that one crew would bring the train to a stop before getting out. So that it wouldn't be moving with no one at the controls.
@scottmccloud2894
@scottmccloud2894 5 лет назад
Don't have video, but had same thing with Carolinian (79). Freight traffic blocking our track, and when passing freight cleared, we backed up to get on the other main.
@DevonMopiedmont1143
@DevonMopiedmont1143 2 года назад
I have a video of something similar shame it was in the dark though.
@galolito
@galolito 2 года назад
Looks like the Mississippi in the background so they've just crossed the river going west.
@R7300
@R7300 2 года назад
As a dispatcher I'll have Amtrak do backup moves occasionally like this, often times it'll save several minutes on the trip
@sclm046
@sclm046 2 месяца назад
Putting Amtrak in the hole for a coal train. I thought this was UP until I saw the four position signals.
@TheChucksGreatTrainJourneys
@TheChucksGreatTrainJourneys 2 года назад
Love the Empire Builder! Thanks for sharing!
@wmhoward2249
@wmhoward2249 2 года назад
MY GUESS IS THERE WAS A TRAIN IN FRONT OF THEM ALSO, IN THE SIDING AND IT WAS THE ONLY WAY FOR THEM TO KEEP TRACK AND TIME ON THE MAIN, WITHOUT FOLLOWING A FREIGHT TILL THE NEXT SIDING.
@michaelglass4701
@michaelglass4701 6 лет назад
Loooooove your video.
@robertmonaghan5420
@robertmonaghan5420 2 года назад
That was Incredible! Cool Video!
@thebnsftracker1317
@thebnsftracker1317 5 лет назад
Nicely done!
@hh5944
@hh5944 2 года назад
Which direction was the coal train heあding to?
@JustinCastleberry117
@JustinCastleberry117 7 лет назад
The reason why Amtrak has lower priority is because they mostly use track that is owned and operated by other companies, such as BNSF. So of course their trains are going to have the highest priority. Amtrak does however, own most of the Northeast Corridor tracks, where the Acela operates. Until Amtrak or another competing passenger service company can lay down their own track, passenger service will never improve, and we will have to wait on freight trains.
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
yes but even when not waiting for a freight train their average speed in the LD trains is like 40...those will never be a viable transportation option. They're for the experience of seeing the country. :)
@nx9100
@nx9100 2 года назад
@@neutrino78x They run faster than 40. Usually 60 to 80 is norm. Of course, it depends on any local speed restrictions, and track priority. By law, Amtrak has priority, but most freight companies ignore it, and it isn't enforced
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@nx9100 hmm you're suggesting the amtrak capitol corridor averages 80? That's the max not the average. Do the math. Average is under 60, about 53 or so. For coast starlight and other ld trains it's more like 40.
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@nx9100 actually I just did the math on amtrak Sacramento to San jose, average 40 mph. 3 hours to go 121 miles. It's probably related to number of stops but yeah too slow. That's another reason why I support upgrading the speed of existing public transit trains rather than spending 100x as much building train a petite vitesse. Typically the existing ones are way too slow. Caltrain is slow and it averages 56, significantly faster than capitol corrridor.
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
@@neutrino78x That is really slow. In germany passenger and cargo trains (mostly) share the same tracks and until the late 1990s where all run by the same "company" (Actually the state like many european rail roads). Even with cargo having priority the longer ranged "intercity" operated at 160-200km (InterCity trains is a train class in germany). Modern regional trains (stopping at every milk urn) are build for 130-160kph. And the engineer is happy for that if he has to share tracks with a BR01.10 steam engine(1) Even the lovely BR38/Prussian P8 from 1908 was rated at 100kph in regular service and that was a mass produced engine not a fance "express/high speed one" (1) For whatever reason during a set of round trips of 01-1075 in the region the train was slotted between two regional trains. While a tad slower (150kph) not having to stop let the huge steam loco close the gap to the regional train. When I took pictures the engineer on the RE was hunched over the wheel in a "go faster" and "please no granny with walkers" body position while on the horizon the HUGE smoke cloud of 192 metric tons of steam engine roared towards him ;)
@NJW1973
@NJW1973 2 года назад
I would think there is a freight already in siding with enough room to park Amtrak in siding also. Back out and get in front of train in siding. Am I wrong?
@vthome78
@vthome78 2 года назад
Awesome video nice catch
@derisleybrittain
@derisleybrittain 2 года назад
Excellent 🍾🍾🍾🍾🍾🍾🍾🍾
@kevinhoward9593
@kevinhoward9593 6 лет назад
The line single tracked there. what did you want the Amtrak train to do? crash? he had no choice to go to the siding. Question is why are the signals upside down?
@ericemmons3040
@ericemmons3040 2 года назад
The one thing I find interesting is that the signals have 4 heads and that red is on top instead of green. Also, for the siding, yellow is on the bottom, and so maybe there is no green. Can anyone elucidate?
@mikemanning5019
@mikemanning5019 2 года назад
I don't know BNSF, but CSX's signals have four lights, Red, Yellow, Green and white or "lunar" for restricting.
@colevoncole3180
@colevoncole3180 2 года назад
It's a diverging route which is always yellow no need for green aspect asthe speed is restricted over the switch
@jdm1039
@jdm1039 9 лет назад
Why did they have to reverse instead of moving forward and exiting the siding on the other end?
@eddieg749
@eddieg749 7 лет назад
Was this location Lakeview East?
@WesternWisconsinRail
@WesternWisconsinRail 6 лет назад
eddieg749 Yes
@mikeef747
@mikeef747 2 года назад
"RARE VIEW", ironically, it was also the "REAR VIEW"
@aattura1541
@aattura1541 2 года назад
"passenger service has taken a back seat to freight traffic on the nation's railroad". In all my 16 years of riding AMTRAK long distance that's all I see-- Freight trains having priority
@mikemanning5019
@mikemanning5019 2 года назад
I'm guessing they pulled in behind a train and then backed out and ran around it after the coal train went by.
@tracynation2820
@tracynation2820 2 года назад
Excellent. 💙 T.E.N.
@stephenmiller4554
@stephenmiller4554 2 года назад
What kind of signals are these? They look quite odd, and I never knew BNSF used them (thought another railroad did).
@greaternyrailfan
@greaternyrailfan 2 года назад
Is nobody gonna mention the executive Mac leading that freight??
@SIGINT007
@SIGINT007 2 года назад
Canadian Pacific along the Mississippi?
@railroad9000
@railroad9000 2 года назад
Freight traffic is the money maker for the railroad and not the little bit Amtrak pays to use their tracks!
@stevedec46
@stevedec46 2 года назад
This happens on Crescent #19 from time to time between Tuscaloosa and Meridian
@AndersonPrototypes
@AndersonPrototypes 2 года назад
Is that just East of White Rock BC?
@kitanisthe
@kitanisthe 2 года назад
Passenger service, especially one runned by Amtrak will NEVER be a priority on BNSF, UP, CSX, or NS rails.. You expect an Amtrak train to take priority to freight traffic that makes them money while Amtrak trains like the Empire Builder that runs maybe once a day on the same rails.. your dreaming. I love how people want passenger trains to come back but Amtrak constantly reduces services...
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
Texas Central is more like rail coming back. Back in the days people are thinking of, most of those passenger trains were run by private companies for fun and profit, fame and fortune. Not sure why they think it was public transit? But it wasn't. In fact private companies still provide the high speed long distance service, but they switched to aircraft long ago because (1) a lot faster and (2) a lot cheaper (they don't have to own land between A and B (3) more flexible/easier to change/remove routes (see (2)). :)
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
It is the same in Germany (Freight over Passenger). And unlike the US the german passenger trains ARE a major part of the traffic infrastructure. France and Japan did the right thing - their long-range/high speed trains run on seperate tracks. In Japan due to the train needing standard gauge (Japan more typically used 1067mm "Cape gauge"), in France it was a deliberate decision Funny if you take the Cologne to London train. It takes longer to reach France than for the rest of the trip.
@wearerailfans1
@wearerailfans1 2 года назад
Actually most dispatchers try and always have them be the highest priority and they work with Amtrak but if a q train or z train is close they have to go into a siding.
@douglasengle2704
@douglasengle2704 2 года назад
I’m surprised how many of these major railroad lines are single track. I would think that major rail lines would be at least double tracked.
@ArtStoneUS
@ArtStoneUS 2 года назад
Several decades ago, the Wall Street types push the metric of revenue per mile of track. That incentivized railroads to pull up double tracking, which in many cases there now having to put back in place
@railroad9000
@railroad9000 2 года назад
@@ArtStoneUS The bean counters and not always right!
@Prolificposter
@Prolificposter 2 года назад
Many portions of the BNSF Northern Transcon are double-tracked and a lot of that resulted from capacity improvements to handle the shale oil boom a few years back. However, geology limits it to single track in many areas. Right now, after lengthy environmental review, BNSF is installing a second bridge for a second main track across Sand Creek and Lake Pend Oreille in Idaho. On the other hand, all but a few miles of the Southern Transcon is double tracked, (with both tracks signaled for bi-directional operation) in some places triple, and even quadruple at some crew change points. Btw, BNSF and CP are rated highest among Amtrak’s host railroads for handling passenger trains.
@billloffler8637
@billloffler8637 2 года назад
Taxes have a lot to do with double tracks
@R7300
@R7300 2 года назад
$100,000 a mile, adds up quick!
@yanuarnandapratama
@yanuarnandapratama 2 года назад
Greetings railfans from Indonesia
@fantasticrailways5340
@fantasticrailways5340 2 года назад
Nice
@user-qf5hg8kq2f
@user-qf5hg8kq2f 2 года назад
красивая природа
@mikemanning5019
@mikemanning5019 2 года назад
Surprised she called it a yellow signal. Approach is probably the most universal signal aspect.
@iggyjill
@iggyjill 2 года назад
This is common for Canadian passenger trains. Hurry up and wait is a common saying.
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
Seems to be very common in mixed use tracks (Germany does the same)
@hattrick6701
@hattrick6701 2 года назад
Thought Amtrak had prior over freight trains ?
@paulnicholson1906
@paulnicholson1906 2 года назад
I think they are supposed to but in practice not so much.
@damianpeters4321
@damianpeters4321 2 года назад
This is the part that always boggled me. If amtrak is faster then frieght? Why does amtrak always pull over in to the sidings and let a slower train pass? 🤔
@CrazyBear65
@CrazyBear65 2 года назад
So, you're _on_ the Amtrak, _onboard_ it, as it's backing up. So it's actually a short video of a coal train going past, then the view out the back of the train, but not an actual video of the train backing up. That would be someone with a camera on a tripod filming the train from trackside. Ok. So, why did it back off the siding instead of just rolling on thru it back onto the mainline? Seems kinda counterproductive to me.
@georgethornton3728
@georgethornton3728 2 года назад
Like a reply earlier, probably another train on the siding that was short enough to allow Amtrak to fit.
@trainzguy2472
@trainzguy2472 2 года назад
Why did they have to reverse off the siding? Is it because it's a stub track?
@robwarner3rd
@robwarner3rd 2 года назад
Yes. It didn't join back up to the main line.
@bnsf6902
@bnsf6902 2 года назад
Thats actually CP trackage
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
Guys lol it doesn't matter who takes priority when the train averages 35 mph. Even if it went 173 MPH -- the average speed of the TGV in France -- it would still be too slow to replace aviation out here in North America and Australia, that's why none of us (USA, Canada, Australia) use it. If the next town is 200 miles away sure, you can get there as fast as a jet, but most people are driving that distance. Like Washington DC to New York, most people drive I-95 and take shorter trips. But anybody who needs to get from DC to NYC as quick as possible isn't going to be on the slow ass train, they're going to use a jet airplane or jet helicopter. Amtrak gets slightly more market share than aviation in the NEC but remember it's still 80% car. And they're getting slightly more because of the intermediate stops, like I said most people are doing short trips WITHIN the NEC, not traveling from one end of it to the other. That's why amtrak and aviation combined are only like 10% of the traffic and 80% is car. And for longer trips, 500-3000 miles, the airplane becomes dominant, the train can never hold a candle to its speed, not even a French TGV. Maybe a maglev in vacuum tunnel...at least until we do supersonic flight over land again (NASA and Lockheed recently figured it out. If you make the plane long and end in a small point, you can break the sound barrier with a barely audible sonic boom. Thus go supersonic over land and not break anyone's ears or windows. NYC to LA in 3 hours instead of six.).
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
Train vs plane is a matter of what you value more. Example: In my last job I had to go "Ruhr valley to Berlin" on occasions and had the option "train or plane". The plane was faster by a couple of hours. But I always took the train (and an overnight in Berlin) Why? Because I am a tall guy (over 190cm and over weight ;) ) and in the train I have more space in all directions. I also have no weight limits and can keep some stuff with me that in a plane would go into the cargo hold. So even if it takes longer - I take the train if I do not need mobility at the target place and the car if I do
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@mbr5742 in the USA, Canada and Australia (USA is not the only developed and free country that doesn't use HSR), it's simply not practical. To get across the country -- which is about the same width as Europe, a little more -- would take 14 hours on a Train a Petite Vitesse. On a jet aircraft it takes about 5-6 hours. With the coming return of supersonic over land, 3 hours (NASA/Lockheed have developed a way to go supersonic without the loud sonic boom, it would be barely audible). Here's the problem, we're talking about tax dollars. For example the boondoggle here in California, the Low Speed Rail from SF to LA.....management of the project wants 100 billion to complete it, because of all their stupid decisions. Now if we are talking about private companies spending their own money, absolutely I approve. They can spend their own money however they want. I just don't support spending a dime of public money trying to "replace aircraft" because it's not practical here...it's more about trying to make everybody's lives equally shitty because they're against someone being able to pay to get a better deal than someone else. The other thing I do approve of is "higher speed rail", upgrading existing public transit trains to higher speeds, without building a lot of new track, not buying ANY right of way, and not hanging wires (unless the last part can be done a lot cheaper than how much it usually costs).
@ronaldweir712
@ronaldweir712 2 года назад
Look at all that soon to be Co2 travelling at speed.
@irgski
@irgski 2 года назад
I think all freight trains have priority over passenger trains....
@raymondpaller6475
@raymondpaller6475 2 года назад
You are touting your self-interest; perhaps the utility customer waiting for the coal doesn't consider it unfortunate.
@engineersdash7564
@engineersdash7564 2 года назад
I take it that Amtrak don't have priority.
@michaelXXLF
@michaelXXLF 2 года назад
Only in America … 🙄
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
yes but in America when we want to go at high speed...WE FLY. No wheel on rail train can compete with 528 MPH (849 km/hr). In fact the 787's maximum speed is Mach 0.9 or 666 mph (1071 km/hr). Compare that to French TGV, 173 mph. Problem is typical distance between population centers is too great. New York City to Chicago, 800 miles or 1287 km. Should be obvious why Americans, Australians and Canadians use jets instead of HSR. Europe can have HSR, they're still 80% car just like us, and we'll take the truly HIGH SPEED vehicles for when we need to cross the greater distances over here.
@michaelXXLF
@michaelXXLF 2 года назад
@@neutrino78x Sure. Now let's factor in getting to and from the airport, TSA, checking in and energy consumption per capita.
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@michaelXXLF At 800 miles?? Fuck off dude at 800 miles those things are not factors. Airplane 1 hr 49 minutes, Train 4.6 hours at 173 average speed (average speed of TGV). Sorry but in this case that other crap is irrelevant, it's just you making bullshit excuses. btw a modern 737 or 787 outputs less CO2 than a compact car like a VW bug or Ford Focus to transport any given person for those 800 miles. So yeah, fuck off with your "flight shaming", in North America and Australia HSR would be shit. Over here with the greater distances involved, we need a vehicle that actually travels at HIGH SPEED. Not that 173 mph shit. HIGH SPEED.
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
No. Also in germany. Where rail transport for pasengers is far more common. Even on "long ranges" The french did the right thing and gave their TGV an independent set of rails. The german state railroad wanted the same but we had greenies protesting it...
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@mbr5742 aren't you a greenie? I thought you wanted to ban domestic flight.
@jimmeade2976
@jimmeade2976 2 года назад
A freight passing a passenger train? That's wrong in so many ways. I wouldn't be surprised if the passenger train, which can move faster, would run up the back end of the freight and have to deal with red signals.
@Zephyr1949
@Zephyr1949 2 года назад
They were going in opposite directions.
@jimmeade2976
@jimmeade2976 2 года назад
@@Zephyr1949 The video must have confused me. It looked like the freight and passenger both passed the siding end heading towards the water.
@kneemeister
@kneemeister 2 года назад
@@jimmeade2976 the passenger train was backing out of the siding. That was the view over the conductors shoulder, from a superliner coach as she talked the engineer through the move.
@jimmeade2976
@jimmeade2976 2 года назад
@@kneemeister That makes sense. Just curious ... do you know why the passenger train backed out of the siding rather than pulling out forward at the other end? FYI, I did some software on meets and passes for the SLSF before it was bought by BN (now BNSF) and backing a passenger train out of siding was not one of the things the software (which facilitated rail operations by automatically moving switches and calling signals for the meet or pass) considered.
@kneemeister
@kneemeister 2 года назад
@@jimmeade2976 maybe there was a freight train also in the siding and the Amtrak backed out to run around it.
@DanMeyer80
@DanMeyer80 3 года назад
Coal train makes money passenger trains do not. Therefor freight will always be priority. We should be thankful that railroads allow Amtrak on its rails
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@Timothy O'Mara don't matter. even when they're not waiting behind a freight train they still go slow as fuck. but even THAT doesn't matter because 173 MPH, the average speed of the French TGV, is simply too slow out here. We couldn't have a nationwide HSR public transit network like they do. Well, we COULD, but there's little point, because at best you would have five or six little bubbles where relatively big cities are less than 200 miles apart, and you'd have to fly to get from one bubble to the other at reasonable speed. Texas Triangle is 1500 miles away from the NEC (2414 km). There are lots of trains in the NEC and a private company is building HSR in the texas triangle but to get between in any reasonable time frame you need to fly. TGV would take eight hours to go 1500 miles, a jet aircraft three to four hours. That WIllie Nelson song about the City of New Orleans train goes "I'll be gone 500 miles when the day is done", but a jet is "gone 500 miles when the hour is done", one is transportation between Chicago and New Orleans, the other is a way to see the scenery in between. :)
@lemontiepyle2421
@lemontiepyle2421 2 года назад
It's also a possibility that the crew of the coal load was low on hours and the dispatcher needed to run them. Extremely rare to hold up Amtrak like that. Class Ones get fined from the Fed if they hold up Amtrak too long.
@user-fm2ib8wz8b
@user-fm2ib8wz8b 2 года назад
@@neutrino78x can you make a comment without ANY foul language?
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 2 года назад
@@neutrino78x There is an easy way around that - make in-country flights illegal
@neutrino78x
@neutrino78x 2 года назад
@@mbr5742 "here is an easy way around that - make in-country flights illegal" Why the fuck would we want to do that. It would grind our economy to a halt. Imagine if we could only distribute covid vaccines using the Train a Petite Vitesse, jackass.
@hypeandjive
@hypeandjive 2 года назад
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Далее
ПРОЖАРКА ХАРЛАМОВА
00:15
Просмотров 44 тыс.
КРУТОЙ ФОКУС С ШАРАМИ
00:35
Просмотров 174 тыс.
Which Is Easier To Pull? (Railcars vs. Road Cars)
18:11
SBB Altbau loks 1989
6:34
Просмотров 24 тыс.
A Day on Amtrak's 110 MPH Michigan Line: All 8 Trains
11:45
Walschaerts Valve Gear Explained
4:11
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Why 2024 Is a BIG Year for Amtrak
15:41
Просмотров 318 тыс.
Amtrak's Unique Turnaround At Tampa
13:56
Просмотров 491 тыс.
Why Are Rails Shaped Like That?
14:53
Просмотров 2,5 млн