Тёмный

An-225 As A Passenger Plane - Does It Work? 

Found And Explained
Подписаться 711 тыс.
Просмотров 937 тыс.
50% 1

What would the Antonov AN-225 be like if it was a passenger plane? As in, we take the existing aircraft, slap in some seats, and start flying revenue flights? How many passengers could it fly and would it be a good experience? Let us get our hands dirty and get to work!
The Antonov AN-225 Myria is the world's most powerful cargo plane (well, one that can carry cargo inside the aircraft), and a feat of pure incredible, engineering. It was originally designed to carry the Soviet equivalent of the space shuttle, however, when that space plane program was shut down, all that remained was the plane.
Its features include an incredible carrying capacity of around 200 tonnes, more than any other aircraft, powered by six engines that make the Boeing 747 look like a small regional jet. The other aircraft lies incomplete and there is little justification to get it back to operational condition.
The AN-225 has a length of 84m or 275 feet. However, the cabin doesn't go the length of the plane, with instead the cabin only reaching 43.35 meters, or 142 feet.
Starting with an economy cabin, we know that the average economy seat is 18 inches wide, and 31 inches deep in pitch. If the cabin is 21 feet wide, or 252 inches, then we can fit in 14 seats across. But we know that the A380, with the same cabin, can only fit maximum 11 seats across due to the asiles and other features. As its the same width, we will assume the same restrictions with a configuration of 3-5-3.
So how many can we fit in the cabin? At 31 inches of seat pitch, and the cabin itself measuring 1704 inches long, thats 55 rows. But of course, we need doors, stairs, bathrooms, and more. pushing it down to around an abartariy 45 rows. That gives us a total economy capacity on the An-225 lower deck of around 495 passengers. Cosy.
Now lets have a look at the upper deck. As the plane actually curves inwards, there is not enough room for the same width of seats, reducing our cabin to around 9 seats across in a 3-3-3 configuration. Assuming the same length and rows, that would be an additional 405 passengers. For a total of 900 passengers onboard in all economy.
But lets add in some buisness class passengers so we can actually have some higher paying customers. An impressive business class seat of 80 inches deep, and 20 inches wide, would set us back to a row configuration of 2-2-2. At 80 inches deep, and the same length of the cabin, thats 21 seats. For a total of 84 passengers.
Combine that together and we have around 490 passengers, just under 500.
In an eariler exercise, I went as far as to use the ratio of passenger per cubic meter as with the A380, and had a lower answer of 255 people on the lower deck, and a further 189 on the upper deck. This gives a total of 444 total passengers across a three-class configuration.
The An-225 has an empty range of 15,400 km (9,600 mi, 8,300 nmi) with maximum fuel; or a range with 200 tonnes payload of 4,000 km (2,154 nautical miles).
As we know that the distance between two popular destinations, such as London to New York is 5571.55 km / 3008.39 nautical miles, and the distance between London and Dubai is 5471.77 km / 2954.52 nautical miles. So this plane will need to have a range of at least 3-4,000 nautical miles to be practical or a carrying capacity of 100 tonnes.
If the average passenger weighs 75kg, or 85kg if they are American, then we will have a total weight of 41,000 kg for 490 passengers. Plus luggage, which would be 20kg at least per passenger, so another 9,000 tonnes. that gets us up to 50 tonnes. We still have another 50 tonnes leftover, which would go to the seats, interior, deck, entertainment system, food, and more. We might be able to get even more out of the plane if we replaced its six engines with the latest GE9X engines from the 777X.
You might notice something else missing from our earlier cross-section... where does the baggage go? These designs don't accommodate any luggage at all, there is no cargo deck and no room to place any items outside of the cabin at all.
Also, we have to mention that the cargo cabin of the plane is utterly decompressed during flight so not only will the passengers be freezing cold, but they will also struggle to breathe. There also are no windows.
Lastly, this plane as a commercial carrier is essentially a total overdesign. The An-225 has a stronger structure to carry heavy items like a tank or a space shuttle. Passengers are far lighter and spread over a bigger area and thus its a different weight layout entirely. There is an arguement that the lower deck of our design could be cargo, and the upper deck passengers, but likely we would have seen an A380 converted before we do this to the AN-225.
But this plane would be a heck of a ride, and I think if you had the only commercial carrier in the world you might sell out every flight simply because of all the plane geeks willing to pay to flying on an ex-soviet space shutter carrier!

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1 тыс.   
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Yes I'm aware another channel that does planes in 3d did this plane in 3d less than a week ago. Yes I'm also aware that both our videos have the EXACT SAME runtime. But I like to think that if you see this video you will see theirs and vice versa. :)
@IDKsomethingamazingIG
@IDKsomethingamazingIG 3 года назад
Almost like great minds think alike or something 😉 ❤️ Love your content! Thank you ❤️
@iitzUpis
@iitzUpis 3 года назад
Yes, and it's Mustard!
@Deathexia00
@Deathexia00 3 года назад
To be fair, your video focuses on the passenger plan while Mustard's focuses on the lifting capability of the aircraft for the Soviet Space Program. They're complementary goods, one isn't meant to take views from the other, rather just serve as two bits of information on the same aircraft.
@VelocityZap
@VelocityZap 3 года назад
You and Mustard and WendoverProductions need to collab.
@michaelphilipp6074
@michaelphilipp6074 3 года назад
@@VelocityZap that would be awesome
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs 3 года назад
When you say it's too warm so the captain opens the front bay doors for some "Fresh air".
@callmeshirley8178
@callmeshirley8178 3 года назад
Love u daddy haigs
@mechtechpotato4249
@mechtechpotato4249 3 года назад
@Gimli Glider Only the ones who aren’t strapped in.
@huleus272
@huleus272 3 года назад
How are you everwhere
@tomtrotta8709
@tomtrotta8709 3 года назад
WhT about all the people in the nose ahhh
@tlshortyshorty5810
@tlshortyshorty5810 3 года назад
Lmao American T-34 premium video when
@jim2lane
@jim2lane 3 года назад
Having rode on the C-5 myself while in the military you could be assured that earplugs would be a necessary item while flying on this plane as well 😉
@superskullmaster
@superskullmaster 3 года назад
If you are talking about the A or B model yes, but the M is very quiet by comparison so assuming these engines are about the same as the RB211(which it looks like they basically copied) you shouldn’t need hearing protection.
@jim2lane
@jim2lane 3 года назад
@@superskullmaster - indeed it was the B model, back in the 80's. Glad to hear they've tamed the roar with the new engines. That must mean you can actually talk to someone in flight now - other than sign language 😊
@user-dj1hy6zc6q
@user-dj1hy6zc6q 3 года назад
I got a MILAIR waiver and flew to the other side of the world in an AN-124 instead. It was not a great experience either.
@willatom
@willatom 11 месяцев назад
i swear some kid will see this comment and say: "cap". jokes aside.
@erikziak1249
@erikziak1249 3 года назад
You totally omitted the existing upper deck of the A-225. It can carry another 85 or so passengers. And is pressurized.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
First class!
@XxMrsalsatenangoxX
@XxMrsalsatenangoxX 11 месяцев назад
"where is the windows!?" -passenger probably
@ChrisZoomER
@ChrisZoomER 3 года назад
The thought of having a passenger plane as big as the AN-225 gives me chills. Airbus planned on releasing the A380-900 which would result in a 6.4 meter stretch over the current(soon to be retired) A380-800 and would've been able to carry up to 1,000 passengers if fitted with all economy seats as opposed to 853 seats. I waited so long for the release of the A380-900(originally planned for 2020) and I wanted to fly on it so badly when it did come out but it never did. Sure I'd like to fly in an AN-225 to get to know what it's like but it's considerably slower than the A380 so I'm not sure which plane I'd rather fly in more.
@1mol831
@1mol831 2 года назад
I wonder what will airbus name their future planes when they want a completely new design after A390, perhaps A400?
@ChrisZoomER
@ChrisZoomER 2 года назад
@@1mol831 The A400 already exists, it's a four engine military transport turboprop. They should use the A360 and A370 instead.
@noldo3837
@noldo3837 Год назад
Yeah, but unfortunatelly, in our dystopian reality, 20 cocaine sniffing criminal-billionaires would create higher profit then remaining 980 peasants combined...
@senecanero3874
@senecanero3874 3 года назад
I think the best case against turning it into a passenger plane is the case that there is a genuine need for it in the cargo world, but none in the passenger world.
@AdmiralTails
@AdmiralTails 3 года назад
And even the need in the cargo world is limited. After all, ALL of that need is covered for with a single aircraft, essentially used only when there is NO other option.
@GermanTopGameTV
@GermanTopGameTV 3 года назад
@@AdmiralTails It is not used because there is no other option, it is used because it's the cheapest option. The alternative of railway transport and shipping via sea always exists for all the cargo that plane has ever delivered, but those options are usually more costly then flying it in the cargo bay. The advantage is that you can carry a fully assembled, superheavy industrial machine in that aircraft to a destination in about a day worth of time. Using rail or shipping via sea means disassembling the units, packing everything into shipping containers and reassembling it onsite for delivery. For some industries that is much more expensive then chartering this aircraft. I don't know what the actual numbers and customers are for the aircraft, but I'd bet it's main purpose is in delivering high tech equipement from point a to point b from aerospace, semiconductor machinery to defense.
@devvydoesstuff
@devvydoesstuff 3 года назад
@@GermanTopGameTV you don’t have to put it in containers when on rail, Boeing 737 were transported on rail and no containers were there
@GermanTopGameTV
@GermanTopGameTV 3 года назад
@@devvydoesstuff still takes weeks to get where it needs to be and that alone costs lots of money.
@Legion849
@Legion849 Год назад
@@AdmiralTails Cargo transport by air is faster than other methods. Because a cargo plane is designed to carry super heavy equipment like tanks. Chartering a flight to carry goods that are heavy is cheaper and saves time. You don't know what you're talking about
@radosbarner1734
@radosbarner1734 2 года назад
R.I.P An-225, gone too soon. I must once again ask the age old question posed by one Edwin Starr many years ago: "War, what is it good for?"
@andmos1001
@andmos1001 2 года назад
The only thing war is good for is innovation… that’s about it
@mafiousbj
@mafiousbj 2 года назад
Also it makes tons of money for certain power groups (and sacking is still a thing, many banks have gold bars, museums have priceless items, etc)
@barnykirashi
@barnykirashi 2 года назад
Ladies and Gentleman. I am here to mourn, as the Russians have destroyed the AN-225.
@odst2247
@odst2247 2 года назад
@@Своихнебросаем-й5р it was bombed by Russia, but it doesn’t matter. Russia started the war
@proff__1814
@proff__1814 2 года назад
@@Своихнебросаем-й5р Поменьше смотри российские сми, жертва пропаганды. Войну начала Россия 8 лет назад.
@proff__1814
@proff__1814 2 года назад
@@Своихнебросаем-й5р АХАХАХАХАХХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХААХ Еще один, накой украине бомбить донбасс, пустая трата ресурсов, а вот для россии это золотая жила ибо можно отвлечь население от внутренних проблем и показать как в другой стране "фашизм" процветает. Выключи телевизор я тебя прошу....
@proff__1814
@proff__1814 2 года назад
@@Своихнебросаем-й5р где такой бред вычитал? С русиського сайта?
@nicknamenick9448
@nicknamenick9448 2 года назад
It was bombed by ukrainian artillery during russian gostomel deployment
@thokim84
@thokim84 3 года назад
You can still fly on a plane that carried an actually used in space space shuttle. The 747.
@oscar_bru8455
@oscar_bru8455 3 года назад
true
@hamburgerhamburger4064
@hamburgerhamburger4064 3 года назад
Not specifically the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft one
@lukemarchetti4426
@lukemarchetti4426 3 года назад
I want to give the airplane a big hug
@duartevilelas9688
@duartevilelas9688 3 года назад
It would take a lot of modifications, to make the Mriya a proper commercial plane but, DAMN would it be awesome to fly in such a plane. The video quality is on point 👌, as per usual, and that song in the ending... That's how you make an ending.
@zvast
@zvast 11 месяцев назад
Looks like the airlines are not interested in too many extremely large aircraft. Two engined 777 is just right. New version of Mria could work with modern 4 engines.
@troutwarrior6735
@troutwarrior6735 2 года назад
RIP Mirya 😭
@Jajrawson
@Jajrawson 11 месяцев назад
This is the first video I’ve been by you, good to see another aussie
@loganrossignol
@loganrossignol 2 года назад
Nice to know there's another airframe. Hopefully the other airframe can be used to replace the destroyed Mriya
@NikitaWolf1776
@NikitaWolf1776 2 года назад
There were actually plans for this. It was once on the drawing board to configure it as a massive triple-deck airliner
@alexanderdeburdegala4609
@alexanderdeburdegala4609 3 года назад
What kind of efficiency would you get flying 6 engines at lower load vs 4 at higher load?
@ACPushkin
@ACPushkin 3 года назад
Haha, I can't believe you incorporated that square cube joke into your video. nice one! :D
@rehaanmohammed4209
@rehaanmohammed4209 2 года назад
RU-vid is being extra cruel recommending this to us after the only one was destroyed in an airstrike.
@arthurf1fanoficial460
@arthurf1fanoficial460 2 года назад
Now we got a reason to end the another one
@fertileplanet7756
@fertileplanet7756 Год назад
You can't forget that the positions of the engines would make this a very loud flight, especially for the upper deck.
@utalomAlibbantakat
@utalomAlibbantakat 2 года назад
poor an 225..RIP 😞 only 1 build not 2
@K1ddkanuck
@K1ddkanuck 3 года назад
So happy I've found your channel recently. What do you think about doing videos like these for ships, trains and other vehicles? Or even other things like buildings, infrastructure or cities? You have a real talent for presenting these sorts of topics, and the animations are fantastic! Very glad to be a new subscriber!
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Thanks for the idea! I really do want to do more away from planes! going to do a rocket one shortly and a boat one next month :)
@emaheiwa8174
@emaheiwa8174 3 года назад
RyanAir taking notes 📝
@UNSF
@UNSF 3 года назад
Can you make a similar video calculating the internal space of B-1B and B-2 bomber after removing all weapons, to see if it can be convert into a presidential aircraft (i.e. Air Force One), with accommodations for staff and guests? Reason: B-1B: although not as fast as the original B-1A, can still fly supersonic and has superior very low altitude handling to potentially escape tricky situations if intercepted during war. B-2: Using stealth to avoid threats in the first place during war. Also act as mobile aerial command center. Ridiculous I know. But definitely a fun video I think!
@ezgaming8286
@ezgaming8286 2 года назад
That would be nice, for me as a plane lover. Wish a Antonov 22 exists as passenger Version.
@HANKSANDY69420
@HANKSANDY69420 2 года назад
How HARD and SPACE CONSUMING could punching windows into the fusealoge be?!
@hipeoples3828
@hipeoples3828 2 года назад
Welp that’s not happening
@sarasperikavin5555
@sarasperikavin5555 9 месяцев назад
It doesn't meet the market demand. So, it's not possible. It's same as Airbus A380. Whatever it's, Antonov AN 225 is an Engineering Marvelous.
@htfkid2000
@htfkid2000 2 года назад
"as we take the existing aircraft" I got some bad news for you chief.
@enjoy8568
@enjoy8568 3 года назад
you should make a video on the most profitable plane realistically. Like look at the best root, then pick a cheap plane that just does that, then figure out if u could do all business class etc
@hanabangirawan3291
@hanabangirawan3291 Год назад
that is a special job for any creator design ,. this plane wiil become the beautiful passenger plane , awesome .
@rfvtgbzhn
@rfvtgbzhn Год назад
7:23 I am not an airplane cabin designer or something like that but around 100kg per passenger just to convert the freight cabin to a passenger cabin and add a few kg of food and water per passenger seems a lot. For example an economy class airplane seat just weights between 8kg and 15kg according to google.
@Lavadog11
@Lavadog11 2 года назад
Good news is that we now have a reason to complete the unfinished an225
@bwc1976
@bwc1976 Год назад
This would be amazing!
@AussieGunzel
@AussieGunzel 11 месяцев назад
I heard Emirates is interested in ordering 500+ passenger AN-225s after this video
@Thelivewire64
@Thelivewire64 3 года назад
Another bug bear might be; since most airlines make their money with additional cargo from imports, thus lowering passenger fares, how much would the passenger luggage impinge on the airline's ability to fulfill this desirable capability?
@Thelivewire64
@Thelivewire64 3 года назад
LOL! No ability at all to carry any luggage. I guess it was ever designed for non mi tasks.
@_Ekaros
@_Ekaros Год назад
Just imagine how effective the loading and unloading could be. Just open the nose and let people in. Or even make them leave from the back. Allowing both loading and unloading passengers at one time.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 3 года назад
3-4-3 layout would make more sense on lower deck, save internal weight, make entry/exit more easy, save luggage weight. Maybe so it can reach Sydney from London.You already save a good few tons by leaving the Flipnose/freight ramp. Additional fuel makes it reach every suitable airport on the planet
@Deamon93IT
@Deamon93IT 3 года назад
I would pay to see one in the flesh (I've seen its "baby" version once) but surely I wouldn't want to fly in one as passenger. It is a masterpiece as far as cargo planes are concerned but not as passenger. On this note I wonder whether the An-225 will ever have a replacement worthy of its crown
@xmeda
@xmeda 3 года назад
You can slap another fuselage with people on top instead of Buran and put another 200ppl there :D
@conorclarke5545
@conorclarke5545 2 года назад
RIP AN-225
@markzuiderduin852
@markzuiderduin852 Год назад
I was thinking about that plane as a passenger plane
@pianomanhere
@pianomanhere 8 месяцев назад
Now that it's been destroyed, I suppose a replacement can be built for the original purposes, but not necessarily passengers, although I'd love to see an attempt at that.
@robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376
@robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376 3 года назад
Hmmm 4 engines 4 the long range. 6 engines for the 6 continents! Lol
@funchannel2026
@funchannel2026 3 года назад
Hmmm lets see this video. Cause I know it gonna be good.
@cu3771
@cu3771 3 года назад
Let’s go, y’all should join the discord, Nick announced the video there first
@ar007r
@ar007r Год назад
It can take 250kg of cargo. Some say 200 but the sign in the tour of the plane said 250. So even if yo fill it with passengers and luggage you are way under the max weight which should extend range.
@HYDRAdude
@HYDRAdude 3 года назад
If you put a small plane on top where the Buran was supposed to go then you could carry even more passengers.
@olumideiluyomade7613
@olumideiluyomade7613 2 года назад
There is so much that was overlooked in this analysis. There was the fact that the entire nose cone would not be openable if the plane was intended for passengers. That is a lot of space right there! Secondly, the rear end of fuselage that was ignored exceeds 50ft! This space is considered a ramp area, however in a passenger plane, the rear fuselage would be redesign to allow this place to accommodate passengers. This is a lot of space to ignore! Finally, there is the upper deck - this is the area behind the pilot cabin. It is large and extensive. In the cargo plane, it is used as crew rest area. In a passenger plane, it would probably serve first class passengers. Also, I can't help but to wonder what kind of logic places business class on the main deck - it is illogical. Business class and Premium economy will be more suite for the second level. It is however all academic, as we all know that this plane was recently destroyed by the malicious Russian invasion. The world will never forgive Putin. I certainly wouldn't.
@Samiuddin98
@Samiuddin98 2 года назад
Well, It don't work no more.
@Thelivewire64
@Thelivewire64 3 года назад
I almost got to fly home from a deployment on an IL76. LOL! But came home on 7 oh! Gods Chariot!
@Minecrafter14321
@Minecrafter14321 2 года назад
The cargo version no longer exists
@XIndependent77
@XIndependent77 2 года назад
Rip 🙁 but now the other fuselage will be used to make a new an225!
@ZhivacAli
@ZhivacAli 11 месяцев назад
BRO SAID THE AVERAGE PASSENGER WEIGHT IS 75 BUT 85 IF YOUR AMERICAN💀💀💀💀
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 11 месяцев назад
It’s true
@benedictjason8973
@benedictjason8973 11 месяцев назад
💀
@ImTheSylas
@ImTheSylas 11 месяцев назад
Man I'm dead💀☠️
@gibbybtw280
@gibbybtw280 11 месяцев назад
💀💀💀💀
@mist6539
@mist6539 2 года назад
Oh, It's already had passengers in a game called Saints Row The Third, You can see the plane in the second mission. The mission is I'm Free - Free Falling.
@odeonarsenal6597
@odeonarsenal6597 2 года назад
THIS VID AGED WELL !!!!!!
@matthiasm.official331
@matthiasm.official331 3 года назад
What is with the third deck...because there is a ,,passenger deck" for around 70 passengers under/behind the wings also behind the cockpit there is even more space!
@romania0019
@romania0019 2 года назад
You mean a non existant plane🥺
@romania0019
@romania0019 2 года назад
R.I.P Antonov An 225
@RobloxianX
@RobloxianX Год назад
If a third deck was created since that would occupy the space past the cockpit, i'm sure the AN225 could sit exactly 1000 passangers in an all economy configuration, just like a can of sardines.
@mattelder1971
@mattelder1971 3 года назад
What is currently in the large tail area that is outside the cargo area? If some of that area could be converted to luggage storage, and space for other systems, it would free up a very large portion of the cargo area for other things.
@jiroup7390
@jiroup7390 2 года назад
"I have a feeling I know which airline will choose the latter" *shows ryanair* I almost burst laughing
@adityaprabhakar-ek5lk
@adityaprabhakar-ek5lk 9 месяцев назад
It won’t actually have a problem if it was a passenger jet. Just raise the lower deck seats from where the cargo hold starts
@scottwatrous
@scottwatrous Год назад
Would be neat to think about how a new one of these, after the first one was destroyed, could be turned into some kind of flying mansion. What kind of cool stuff would fit inside? Swimming pool? Bowling alley? 3 car garage?
@robotnikkkk001
@robotnikkkk001 Год назад
.........JUST SWAPPING FROM 1ST ONE TO SECOND ONE =STILL ONLY 1 WILL BE OPERATIONAL,BUT WITHOUT ANY PARTS TO SPARE AT THIS TIME
@shoora813
@shoora813 3 года назад
The AN-225 is modified for single purpose enlarged version of AN-124 Antei. Are Guppie have potential for passengers?
@pureracekarting6164
@pureracekarting6164 2 года назад
Well looks like that second plane is about to come into play lol
@smainebelhadi1193
@smainebelhadi1193 2 года назад
The movie 2012 when Alexis said " it's Russian ". Love it.
@aviaford6771
@aviaford6771 2 года назад
RIP Antonov
@BattleshipAgincourt
@BattleshipAgincourt 8 месяцев назад
It could very definitely work, but this plane's greatest value was its ability to transport oversized cargo. Equipping it for passengers would go completely against its intended mission. Better off with two 777's than one An-225 passenger plane for hauling people.
@xuaf
@xuaf 2 года назад
I think this plane would be great at carrying passengers... In hibernation. Just think about it... Each passenger gets a standard storage container with room for luggage. No need for flight attendants, food or pressurisation.
@conan670431
@conan670431 3 года назад
You are forgeting one thing.... it was designed with the shuttle on his back in mind ...... so all the luggage can be stored in a massive roof box on top of the plane and not inside..... the volume if well designed would be immense !!! Plus as in can kneel and open its mouth you dont need rams and lifts for the passengers .
@GamerProBro
@GamerProBro 11 месяцев назад
‘Take the existing aircraft’ famous last words😂
@InternationalAviatorsRBLX
@InternationalAviatorsRBLX 7 месяцев назад
I should be taking notes
@lord_scrubington
@lord_scrubington 3 года назад
there is an upper practical limit to how big a passenger aircraft can be simply because of how many people will be wanting to use it, GL trying to fill all the seats on something bigger than an A380 or 777
@altaccount3251
@altaccount3251 3 года назад
i was waiting for this vid
@powerbongo922
@powerbongo922 2 года назад
We need one, because. Wellllllll Kaboom
@tariqsyed445
@tariqsyed445 Год назад
Yes, I really would like to fly on the passenger version of the 225, if it is ever built !!
@Justwannatrysomevids
@Justwannatrysomevids Год назад
"Would you want to fly on i..." OF COURSE BISH!!
@Konoctirepublic
@Konoctirepublic 9 месяцев назад
i would absolutely fly on this! where can i go? can it take me from New York to Berlin? how much do i need to pay in order to upgrade to business class? i have so many questions!
@reyarcmedia
@reyarcmedia 9 месяцев назад
Hell yeah
@mr.bbalexchannel6126
@mr.bbalexchannel6126 Год назад
An 225 myra is getting built again
@Racemuiss
@Racemuiss 2 года назад
i would love to fly that thing but its destroyed sadly :(
@souriguess
@souriguess 11 месяцев назад
8:39 i think you mean spirit…
@koshiladilhara1941
@koshiladilhara1941 9 месяцев назад
Next try the antonov225with 122 engines
@joshwoodward3171
@joshwoodward3171 3 года назад
"Or 85 kg if you're American" actually laughed out loud...
@bodyno3158
@bodyno3158 3 года назад
Idea: Cruise liner, but in the AIR, for the super-riches. Get her 4 GE90 though.
@forgenemours8110
@forgenemours8110 3 года назад
wow so very wonderful
@lanlanji
@lanlanji 5 месяцев назад
maybe it is cool!
@MuhZayFrost
@MuhZayFrost 3 года назад
But what if we make the antonov as a gunship? or airborne aircraft carrier like the 747 concept?
@erridkforname
@erridkforname 3 года назад
Hmmm 5 jets on the top and a catapult + elevator on the bottom deck. Or just let them plop out and hopefully not stall. Hmmmmmmmmm
@szennyvizcsatorna2483
@szennyvizcsatorna2483 Год назад
Why not completing the "desinging"? I've been watched the 2nd of your cargo-to-passenger conversations, AND I see, you know how to made it possibly reliable, but seens always choose making extreme desingn flaws directly. Fill with almost all economy seats, just a few first class for compatibility, and cargo compartment on lower deck, and we get a Russian "Jumbo Jet", a hard competitor of 747...
@Titanempirey12345
@Titanempirey12345 11 месяцев назад
That "Ryanair" got me🗿🍷
@pascalcoole2725
@pascalcoole2725 2 года назад
Before you started your story, you should have noticed that the AN225 like the AN124 had an cargobay that can't be presurized ! So pax only can be transported when flying up to max Fl100 which makes this a useless passengerjet. The crew compartiment behind the cockpit however is huge (pretty airline size).
@colgatetoothpaste4865
@colgatetoothpaste4865 3 года назад
It can be posibble with ultralight materials
@eddieschwab864
@eddieschwab864 3 года назад
Does it have the range? Scuse me we're talking about a plane that can carry a couple of Tanks or even spacecraft components from all over Russia to Baikonur in Kazakhstan. So yeah I think it would do the job nicely.
@helenroberts1019
@helenroberts1019 3 года назад
The top deck could be used for suites.
@rasmussward1791
@rasmussward1791 2 года назад
Rip the antonov 225
@erridkforname
@erridkforname 3 года назад
I think designing a plane the same size like the AN 225 But with stuff needed for passengers and more efficient engines.
@Rittna
@Rittna 2 месяца назад
I WAS LITTERALY THINKING OF THIS BEFORE YOOOOO
@davianjanvierto4679
@davianjanvierto4679 3 года назад
This will work because it carries more passengers at the same times, cargos, baggages, import/export products, and (passenger) vehicles.
@Handle1884
@Handle1884 Год назад
Maybe body modifications to a passenger version would fit
@randomrazr
@randomrazr Год назад
will they rebuikd the second an-225 they apaprently have aprts for?
@robotnikkkk001
@robotnikkkk001 Год назад
=OF COURSE THEY'LL DO =AS IT'S THE ONLY ONE,IN FACT
@modellingtoday3799
@modellingtoday3799 2 года назад
So cool
Далее
Avaz Oxun - Yangisidan bor
14:29
Просмотров 446 тыс.
The World's Largest Plane Wasn't What You Think
9:53
Can Antonov Rebuild the AN-225?
10:16
Просмотров 604 тыс.
Biggest Plane - The Future An-225 Concept!
10:18
Просмотров 574 тыс.
The Better Boarding Method Airlines Won't Use
8:28
Просмотров 28 млн