Don't these so-called atheists realize how futile their approach is? If you're an atheist you come up with the idea that life has no meaning everything is worthless and meaningless how on earth do you come up with the idea of arguing about it when ultimately everything is worthless and meaningless in your worldview? What is behind your intention, dear atheist?
@@uthman2281 there is no afterlife with Muhammad’s alter ego Allah 😂😂🤡. And I’m sure my life on this earth is 100 times better and more meaningful than yours 😂
Why is it pointless? It clearly showed at the end a very important point in which they are all agree, that there cannot be a state that only contingent things exist, therefore there needs to be a necessary existence that is independent (not depended on any other thing) that gives rise to all dependent things.
@@Era-lk1lo Faith requires reasons to believe, we don't blindly believe God's existence. We can easily believe it though, due to the miraculous beings that we are, and the insanely calculated universe we live in. + There are 0 atheists on a failing plane, because it's innate to believe in God.
@@Itsadamen Words have meanings and I suggest you look at the definitions rather than making your own faith /feɪθ/ noun Similar: trust belief confidence conviction credence hopefulness hope 2. strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof. "bereaved people who have shown supreme faith"
@@Itsadamen You may have your own personal reasons, but those reasons are not universally accepted. For example, astrophysicists are experts in the calculations of the cosmos but do not conclude an "insanely calculated" universe. Biologists are experts in life, but also do not conclude life as "miraculous". It's much more likely your beliefs are derived from your upbringing. The beliefs of your family and environment are the highest predictors of belief.
May Allah SWT bless brother Hijab for his patience. AMEEN. Really wish people would allow a person to speak, then answer an answer, then speak lol. 😅. May Allah SWT make that easier for us all. AMEEN.
@@musaimaan I'm agnostic but I enjoy debates, probably one of my biggest past time is just watching all kinds of debates, it's nothing person with Hijab he is just bad faith when he argues, but he's often against people who are also bad faith.
Al-Qadr is the belief in predestination. This means that Allah already knows everything that will happen, and nothing happens unless it is Allah's will and command…However, this does not mean that the choices people make are not free choices. Instead, it means that Allah knows what people will chose to do. Allah is an eternal being and one day he decided that He will create other eternal being who He already knows will sin, He already knows He will punish them for eternity (he creates eternal being so he can punish them for eternity)… He already knows before He creates these souls that He will burn their skin off and grow it back just so He can burn their skin again, He will feed them poisonous foods and crush their skulls, the only drink He will give them is boiling water because He already knows they won’t obey his commands even before creating them… He will put this eternal soul in a finite body called a human… He will put the human through tests and if it fails the test (which he already knows they’ll fail) they have to face eternal punishment… So now that the soul failed the test Allah will punish the soul for an eternity… As long as Allah exist (which is forever) he will make sure every second of his own creation is spent in the most horrible, embarrassing and degrading way…
The argument postulation was consistent, and the counter argument of modal collapse was never going to hold because it had theistic presuppositions to it, honestly the young man was pushing it as it's main event but it was obvious all along because there is no way of disproving a dependency or contingency argument, the young man was trying to dodge it that's all.
Elhamdulillah for Islam...i don't need any of this to believe without any doubts, ..after watching everything the conclusion is that sophistry derails discussion even though they say the same thing...the christian guy didn't want to accept bro Hijabs arguments because the trinity becomes obsolete and the atheist guy is a contrarian and maybe an undercover christian (they are allowed to use deception according to Paul)
This is why philosophy is nonsense. All three were arguing with each other but didn't know why although they were basically arguing the same thing lol. Is this dawah?
Allaahul musta3aan... Basic Summary (according to 26:35 when the man says "God is His Attributes", which is a deviant, kufri, Jahmi lie, and Hijab immediately says "this is exactly my position" but then a few seconds after realizing what he just said corrects himself and says "but not in that sense", which shows he's confused about what "exactly is his position"): Mohammed Hijab can't properly refute a Christian because Mohammed Hijab can't properly refute a Jahmi. Christianity inherited the Greek Philosophy of Negative Theology (i.e. "Divine Simplicity") which forces Christians to negate the Attributes of Allaah. The Jahmiyyah did the exact same thing, and the Salaf called them kuffaar. Mohammed Hijab doesn't understand how to refute this because he's more interested in philosophy than the aqeedah of the Salaf, which affirms Allaah's Attributes as real, true attributes but without kayfiyyah (howness). Ahl as-Sunnah believes "ليس كمثله شيء وهو السميع البصير" (there is nothing like unto Him (Allaah) and He is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing). Jahmis/Mutazilah/Asharis/Maaturidis *and* knowledgable Christians and Hellenized Jews *stop* at "ليس كمثله شيء" (there is nothing like unto Him) so they negate the Attributes of Allaah like Speech and Actions because their sick hearts are telling them that affirmation = kayfiyyah (howness). Mohammed Hijab's struggle is that he either refuses to study or has yet to understand properly the aqeedah of the Salaf. His obsession with Ibn Sina and al-Ghazaali (deviant philosophers) has him stuck in a corner where he "defends" Islaam by implicitly denying the Attributes of Allaah. He hasn't said that out loud yet, but every time he talks to a Jahmi, or a knowledgeable Christian, or a philosopher, he gives them either exactly what they want (refusal to affirm Allaah's Attributes) or he waffles and acts like he doesn't understand what they're saying. The Jahmis, philosophers, knowledgeable Christians and Hellenized Jews are braver than him: they negate Allaah's Attributes outright. They're wrong, they're kuffaar, but they don't hide it. Hijab loves to debate them and study Islaam from their false Greek principles, but he pretends to be "Athari" and fails to defend the aqeedah of the Salaf literally *all the time* . This is why he hates the Salafis who teach that "Allaah has Hands", even though he claims to believe that Allaah has Hands! He doesn't like *affirming* Attributes out-loud because if he does, the philosophers and Jahmis he respects who negate Attributes will make takfeer of him. Mohammed Hijab cannot refute a Christian, because Sufis and Christians have the same usool of aqeedah: Greek Philosophy, Negative Theology, Aql over Naql. Baatil.
Also, at 28:35, Hijab translates "God is just existence itself" as "waajib al-wujood". This is blatanty incorrect, and because of his history of attacking Salafia and defending Jahmis/using their arguments, I can't tell if he misspoke or if he genuinely tried to mislead people away from the true translation which is "wahdat al-wujood", which is the deviant creed of his friends and scholars, the Jahmis/Ash'aris/Maaturidis (Allaah is the only existence, Unity of Existence, Allaah is everything).
@DubSalvation the Salaf were against debates, unless forced or absolutely necessary to dispel doubts. Better and safer to study the deen from authentic sources and clarify the deviant beliefs of the kuffaar and the deviant sects. Once Allaah grants you understanding of these principles, you can easily catch and clarify nonsense like this being presented as "da'wah".
Guys anywhere decent in London to hang out for at 9pm onwards for tourists. Bunch of guys just want to chill but in a halal environment. Apart from the mosque
Al-Qadr is the belief in predestination. This means that Allah already knows everything that will happen, and nothing happens unless it is Allah's will and command…However, this does not mean that the choices people make are not free choices. Instead, it means that Allah knows what people will chose to do. Allah is an eternal being and one day he decided that He will create other eternal being who He already knows will sin, He already knows He will punish them for eternity (he creates eternal being so he can punish them for eternity)… He already knows before He creates these souls that He will burn their skin off and grow it back just so He can burn their skin again, He will feed them poisonous foods and crush their skulls, the only drink He will give them is boiling water because He already knows they won’t obey his commands even before creating them… He will put this eternal soul in a finite body called a human… He will put the human through tests and if it fails the test (which he already knows they’ll fail) they have to face eternal punishment… So now that the soul failed the test Allah will punish the soul for an eternity… As long as Allah exist (which is forever) he will make sure every second of his own creation is spent in the most horrible, embarrassing and degrading way…
Hijab got so utterly obliterated he ended up taking a position which one wasn’t originally his 2 out of desperation and 3 that doesn’t he doesn’t even agree with because he’s unaware of the subject matter. Embarrassing.
@@yourfavoritedrawer7680 well the full debate is 2 hours long so u don’t have a full understanding and u also probably don’t understand the topic either so that doesn’t help
@@unapologeticallychristian. Can you link me the 2 hour debate than? I'd gladly watch it. I also don't understand what you'd think is so unfathomably difficult to understand most of what theyre saying is easily Googleable.
Hijab literally stated (as he has in the past) that he agrees with Ibn Sina's version of the contingency argument which Aquinas has shamelessly plagiarized as his Third Way. In what universe did he agree to a different position in this debate? You clearly struggle with tracking the conversation.
