@@mlbbbrothers4960 wow, you call yourself a freethinker, but immediately jump to conclusion "false religion" the atheist guy discuss with open mind. shame on you... hahaha
@@mlbbbrothers4960 bhai we laugh at these silly threats of hell fire ,paradise etc…can you give us the location of your jannat or jahanum,we can send space probe to confirm if it really exists..till then we laugh and consider it as a figment of imagination of an illiterate mind…peace bhai
Love to see it. This is true piousness. This is what wins the hearts and minds. I see so many street preachers using Islam to boost their own egos. The likes of Mo Hijab and such
anybody Wanna see me destroy Islam. Well here I go the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the words of the creator of the universe an all powerful being. So that means the Quran can't have any errors if it does it can't be the word of the creator. Even the Quran acknowledges this (quran:4:82) . Even if the Quran has one error one single error someone can easily discard it as a false religion. That was the premise And here's the error It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security with her. And when he covers her, she carries a light burden and continues therein. And when it becomes heavy, they both invoke Allah, their Lord, "If You should give us a good [child], we will surely be among the grateful." Quran 7:189 The Qur'an takes what is perhaps best described as the creationist view of the origins and history of life on earth. This diverges sharply from the overwhelming scientific evidence like overwhelming DNA evidence and the numerous fossils of pre-Homo sapiens species that lived on earth for millions of years prior to the evolution modern humans . All this evidence undeniably states that humans have evolved from prior life forms, over the course of millions of years and through natural selection. The Qur'an not only makes a gross scientific mistake but more noteworthy is that it just repeated the creation myth of former cultures . If the Qur'an was man made and not divinely inspired this is exactly what we expect to find and this exectly we do find. Some poor modern Muslim scholars argue that the notion of two ancestral “parents” is consistent with recent scientific findings that show a common female and male ancestor of all modern humans. This results, however, from a confusion with the nicknames (Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam) by which scientists have referred to human's earliest genetic ancestors. These two individuals, however, are distinct from the Quranic characters as they are simply the last common male and female ancestors of everyone alive today and not of all humans in history. More importantly, whereas the Qur'an describes Eve as Adam's wife (who, notably, was created after him), Mitochondrial Eve lived some 50,000 to 80,000 years earlier than Y-chromosomal Adam So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!
anybody Wanna see me destroy Islam. Well here I go the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the words of the creator of the universe an all powerful being. So that means the Quran can't have any errors if it does it can't be the word of the creator. Even the Quran acknowledges this (quran:4:82) . Even if the Quran has one error one single error someone can easily discard it as a false religion. That was the premise And here's the error It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security with her. And when he covers her, she carries a light burden and continues therein. And when it becomes heavy, they both invoke Allah, their Lord, "If You should give us a good [child], we will surely be among the grateful." Quran 7:189 The Qur'an takes what is perhaps best described as the creationist view of the origins and history of life on earth. This diverges sharply from the overwhelming scientific evidence like overwhelming DNA evidence and the numerous fossils of pre-Homo sapiens species that lived on earth for millions of years prior to the evolution modern humans . All this evidence undeniably states that humans have evolved from prior life forms, over the course of millions of years and through natural selection. The Qur'an not only makes a gross scientific mistake but more noteworthy is that it just repeated the creation myth of former cultures . If the Qur'an was man made and not divinely inspired this is exactly what we expect to find and this exectly we do find. Some poor modern Muslim scholars argue that the notion of two ancestral “parents” is consistent with recent scientific findings that show a common female and male ancestor of all modern humans. This results, however, from a confusion with the nicknames (Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam) by which scientists have referred to human's earliest genetic ancestors. These two individuals, however, are distinct from the Quranic characters as they are simply the last common male and female ancestors of everyone alive today and not of all humans in history. More importantly, whereas the Qur'an describes Eve as Adam's wife (who, notably, was created after him), Mitochondrial Eve lived some 50,000 to 80,000 years earlier than Y-chromosomal Adam So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!
Subhan’Allah whilst one is trying to find his way in faith the other one is already on the straight path Subhan’Allah proof that Allah swt is the turner of hearts Subhan’Allah
but how great is allah tho, not only has he made himself super easy to find for the willing and pure of heart, but also once you find him it's super easy to become one of his worshipers and be guaranteed jannah inshallah.
anybody Wanna see me destroy Islam. Well here I go the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the words of the creator of the universe an all powerful being. So that means the Quran can't have any errors if it does it can't be the word of the creator. Even the Quran acknowledges this (quran:4:82) . Even if the Quran has one error one single error someone can easily discard it as a false religion. That was the premise And here's the error It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security with her. And when he covers her, she carries a light burden and continues therein. And when it becomes heavy, they both invoke Allah, their Lord, "If You should give us a good [child], we will surely be among the grateful." Quran 7:189 The Qur'an takes what is perhaps best described as the creationist view of the origins and history of life on earth. This diverges sharply from the overwhelming scientific evidence like overwhelming DNA evidence and the numerous fossils of pre-Homo sapiens species that lived on earth for millions of years prior to the evolution modern humans . All this evidence undeniably states that humans have evolved from prior life forms, over the course of millions of years and through natural selection. The Qur'an not only makes a gross scientific mistake but more noteworthy is that it just repeated the creation myth of former cultures . If the Qur'an was man made and not divinely inspired this is exactly what we expect to find and this exectly we do find. Some poor modern Muslim scholars argue that the notion of two ancestral “parents” is consistent with recent scientific findings that show a common female and male ancestor of all modern humans. This results, however, from a confusion with the nicknames (Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam) by which scientists have referred to human's earliest genetic ancestors. These two individuals, however, are distinct from the Quranic characters as they are simply the last common male and female ancestors of everyone alive today and not of all humans in history. More importantly, whereas the Qur'an describes Eve as Adam's wife (who, notably, was created after him), Mitochondrial Eve lived some 50,000 to 80,000 years earlier than Y-chromosomal Adam So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!
MASALLAH how grown men talk with no disrespect or shouting arguing That's how we all should be no matter what faith u are May Allah guide that brother and us all Ameen
anybody Wanna see me destroy Islam. Well here I go the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the words of the creator of the universe an all powerful being. So that means the Quran can't have any errors if it does it can't be the word of the creator. Even the Quran acknowledges this (quran:4:82) . Even if the Quran has one error one single error someone can easily discard it as a false religion. That was the premise And here's the error It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security with her. And when he covers her, she carries a light burden and continues therein. And when it becomes heavy, they both invoke Allah, their Lord, "If You should give us a good [child], we will surely be among the grateful." Quran 7:189 The Qur'an takes what is perhaps best described as the creationist view of the origins and history of life on earth. This diverges sharply from the overwhelming scientific evidence like overwhelming DNA evidence and the numerous fossils of pre-Homo sapiens species that lived on earth for millions of years prior to the evolution modern humans . All this evidence undeniably states that humans have evolved from prior life forms, over the course of millions of years and through natural selection. The Qur'an not only makes a gross scientific mistake but more noteworthy is that it just repeated the creation myth of former cultures . If the Qur'an was man made and not divinely inspired this is exactly what we expect to find and this exectly we do find. Some poor modern Muslim scholars argue that the notion of two ancestral “parents” is consistent with recent scientific findings that show a common female and male ancestor of all modern humans. This results, however, from a confusion with the nicknames (Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam) by which scientists have referred to human's earliest genetic ancestors. These two individuals, however, are distinct from the Quranic characters as they are simply the last common male and female ancestors of everyone alive today and not of all humans in history. More importantly, whereas the Qur'an describes Eve as Adam's wife (who, notably, was created after him), Mitochondrial Eve lived some 50,000 to 80,000 years earlier than Y-chromosomal Adam So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!
@@byteme9718 the only ones lying are you! Keep lying to yourself! What are the lies he spews if he is lying!? And what is the truth then!? You'll pay for your disbelief in the ahkirah!!
To be fair, most Christians don't even understand their own faith very well. I used to be one and the lack of knowledge from most of my fellow Christians was disturbing.
yes but we put a full stop after affirming the prophet hood and messiahship of Jesus Christ but the so called Christians go further and make a mess out of it.
He's half Muslim already 😊😊😊 May Allah Almighty guide him to the truth... Congratulations to the new revert brother, may Allah swt bless his life , ameen ya rabbul alamin
@@glocksky5607 1. Basic ... Quran is something came from allah. Nothing justifing. 2. Women have half brain 🥲 . As it is written in quran... She is having half waitage in any sharia law. 😃 3. Kafir should be killed... As it written in quran how can any person will live in islamic areas or countries? But the Muslims lives freely in other beliefs countries. Isn't it stupidity? Many more... Just answer this then will proceed. If the religion is such an extrimist... Better to leave it.... N be free like birds, like other religious person.
anybody Wanna see me destroy Islam. Well here I go the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the word of Allah isn't it ? meaning the Quran is the words of the creator of the universe an all powerful being. So that means the Quran can't have any errors if it does it can't be the word of the creator. Even the Quran acknowledges this (quran:4:82) . Even if the Quran has one error one single error someone can easily discard it as a false religion. That was the premise And here's the error It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security with her. And when he covers her, she carries a light burden and continues therein. And when it becomes heavy, they both invoke Allah, their Lord, "If You should give us a good [child], we will surely be among the grateful." Quran 7:189 The Qur'an takes what is perhaps best described as the creationist view of the origins and history of life on earth. This diverges sharply from the overwhelming scientific evidence like overwhelming DNA evidence and the numerous fossils of pre-Homo sapiens species that lived on earth for millions of years prior to the evolution modern humans . All this evidence undeniably states that humans have evolved from prior life forms, over the course of millions of years and through natural selection. The Qur'an not only makes a gross scientific mistake but more noteworthy is that it just repeated the creation myth of former cultures . If the Qur'an was man made and not divinely inspired this is exactly what we expect to find and this exectly we do find. Some poor modern Muslim scholars argue that the notion of two ancestral “parents” is consistent with recent scientific findings that show a common female and male ancestor of all modern humans. This results, however, from a confusion with the nicknames (Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam) by which scientists have referred to human's earliest genetic ancestors. These two individuals, however, are distinct from the Quranic characters as they are simply the last common male and female ancestors of everyone alive today and not of all humans in history. More importantly, whereas the Qur'an describes Eve as Adam's wife (who, notably, was created after him), Mitochondrial Eve lived some 50,000 to 80,000 years earlier than Y-chromosomal Adam So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!
@@amitpatil4764you hindus are just obsessed with Islam... 😅 you know its the truth... that's why you never miss a chance to come on muslim platforms to spew venom... jealousy is killing you!
King James was Scottish and not Anglo Saxon. He was against Catholicism, and when he became King of England, he ordered the Bible be rewritten to convey what he wanted as a Protestant. There is a whole documentary about this. I believe it was done by History channel or Discovery. It might be on RU-vid as well.
Not a historian, but when I look it up both his mother and father have direct relations to both Scottish and English nobles, so I guess it goes either way. While his family was nominally Catholic, him being raised as a child king left him precariously disposed towards not upsetting his noble base, and the nobles of Scotland were largely protestant and so he was raised to be Protestant by his Scottish regents and tutors. However, interestingly, when he took the English throne he never again returned to Scotland and styled himself simply as King of Great Britain and Ireland.
Mashallah, the brother, is sharing what is, in general, a common level of understanding of the comparative religious histories...Alhamdulillah, Allah has given to us the belief in all of the prophets and messengers; it is proof of the universal nature of Islam; for that reason our faith respects the knowledge emitting from other cultures, so, we study and learn. I see no sign of wisdom in the so-called scientist, let that behavior be attributed to his youthful exuberance...when someone brings a subject for which one is not aware if trained as a scientist, the first order of business is to listen, to listen, to listen...
A nice conversation to see listen to. Both respectful and calmly discussing their points. I read somewhere that historically the journey of an atheist ends in believing in one God. May Allah guide the atheist to the straight path.
@@larrycarter3765 OK I challenge you and your army many have tried learn your history boy read the quraan if u have the interlect that is the question 🧒🧒🧒
Xin zhao :D how strange it is indeed, that non-Christians tend to know more about the contents of the Bible than Christians themselves. Seriously, so many Christians only get programmed to parrot a few select verses and stories related to love, turning the cheek etc. (and even these can be debunked using violent and bloody verses from within the Bible), but nothing substantial to hold a decent debate.
@@joman388 It's really the other way around, with the Christian getting emotional and giving more of a sermon than anything else to his Muslim, Jew or Agnost/Atheist counterpart. You just haven't watched enough debates.
@@DragovianMythiX Then you havent watched Muslims act like animals at speakers corner,Pardon the slander to animals,more like I would imagine demons to act.thanks
Peoples who find something to Believe and happy with it will not do a bad things in thiere life. (No threat) I am non muslim but I respect what you try to share for others and happy for those who agree with you.
I really want to know how apes are formed and how those cells which formed the apes are also created, these geniuses know them right why nobody explains them thoroughly??
Yes, people back then knew of the two waters not mixing, because ships had been there and seen it and reported it to others. Islam is a horrible abuse. It is not a source of wisdom or truth.
You dumb ignorant pagan pig, how do u explain waves within waves? How do u explain sun's orbit? How do u explain mountian with stakes? There are hundreds of examples but u disgusting pigs are filled with shit in your empty dull minds. Avg pagan pigs
I left my pastor dad's church in Dallas in 2002 for islam. no way god is trinity. who was farted out a birth canal. wore a diaper sucked a pacifier. my dad understood
Mashallah love this Sheikh from the hood😂 may allah swt grand u place in the highest jannah. And for the cousin just take the sahada and may Allah swt grand u more insight
The truth will be revealed eventually... You can think what ever you want you can say whatever you want...islam is not a creature not a living thing...it is a religion the only true religion from Allah...we muslim dont afraid of your deception or incitement.. but what we afraid is that we dont have a chance to put you in the right direction... InsyaAllah Allah will help us..
Here is the challenge for uthman or any muslim 1)explain why did islam say earth was spread out this suggests earth is flat 2) mountains have been kept in place by nails 3) why does islam say 2 people populated earth 4)why not mention any prehistoric animals i will add many more
@@zainulabideeniqbal4350 you just cant answer logical question and then just say allah knows the best Just give me answer and if you dont have say that you are just following it without thinking
See videos of muhammad hijab and daniel haqiqatjou , his debates with world class liberals and exmuslims. There you can get much more questions and facts
Title is wrong, and video in the end is from another discussion from other people with wrond sound. Thanks M. Othman for all your efforts and may Allah reward you
On this subject one cannot use language as a score settler, one has to go beyond words. Science cannot prove the existence of god, and paradoxically it cannot be disproved. The closest one can come to a revelation, is the moment (TRUTH), and the transition to this consciousness can be liberating to the point of a choice-less observer where neither exists.
Uthman is a good man, a very humble man, worthy of representing Muslims. In contrast, there is a couple of British (Pakistani of origin) people, one of them M. Hijaab who is a dangerous person to follow and I would encourage people not to listen to M Hijaab. He has turned himself into a politician and he is so wrong in a lot of his explanations and assumptions. He is a very arrogant person and this is what I despise the most. In the words of the late A Deedat "humble yourself and win the hearts of people"
The term "unlettered" should only be used for prophet Muhammad صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم... "Illiterate" should not be used for prophet Muhammad Peace be upon him... it also means someone is uneducated and ignorant...
Maurice Bucaille... Who is Maurice Bucaille? Maurice Bucaille was born of two French parents, he was brought up like the other members of his family in the Christian religion, after obtaining his baccalaureate he enrolled to study medicine at a French university, he was in the best and ends up getting his medical degree. After obtaining the latter, he continued to progress in this field to the point of becoming one of the best known and most experienced French surgeons of the 20th century. It is important to point out that an extraordinary story happened to him during his practice of surgery, this event turned his life upside down and changed his being in depth.
The story of Doctor Bucaille's conversion to Islam: France is known to be one of the countries most interested in archaeological remains and historical heritage; thus, the former President of the French Republic François Mitterrand, who led France from 1981 to 1995, lived up to this reputation when, at the end of the 1980s, he requested authorization from Egypt to welcome the mummy of a great pharaoh in order to analyze it for scientific purposes but also to restore it. This is how the body of one of the greatest tyrants that Egypt has ever known was transported to France, and it is President Mitterrand in person, accompanied by an assembly of ministers and high personalities, who greeted the mummy on the airport tarmac with the same deference due to a king, the French political elite then behaved as if he were still alive! When this sumptuous welcoming ceremony for the pharaoh's body ended, the latter was taken away by a procession no less "warm" than his welcome, then he was placed in a special wing of the French Archaeological Center so that the greatest Egyptologists as well as the best doctors, surgeons and pathologists in the country analyze the mummy in depth to extract all its secrets. Note that the head of the surgeons and responsible for the study of this pharaonic mummy was none other than the great professor Maurice Bucaille.
While the various teams of scientists were very concerned about the restoration of the mummy, their leader Maurice Bucaille, meanwhile, had a very different objective from theirs; 'cause he was trying to find out how that pharaoh died. After hours and hours of work, at a late hour of the night, he reached his goal and finally got the answer to his question. However, there was still one strange thing that puzzled him: how could this body have been preserved in better condition than most of the other embalmed pharaohs' bodies, despite having stayed in the sea? ?! Maurice Bucaille was in the process of writing his final report on what he considered to be an unprecedented discovery, that is to say the recovery of the body of this pharaoh from the sea and its direct embalming after his drowning, when one of his colleagues whispered in his ear the following thing: "Don't rush to write this report, because you must know that the Muslims are talking about the drowning of this mummy". However, Maurice Bucaille absolutely refused to believe this assertion, let's say that it surprised him greatly, because he was convinced that this type of discovery was only possible thanks to the help of the progress of modern science and in particular of computer equipment. ultra-precise. His colleague further increased his astonishment when he told him that the sacred text in which Muslims believe, that is to say the Koran, relates the story of the drowning of this pharaoh, but also the fact that his body would have been preserved in good condition after this drowning. Bucaille became even more amazed and therefore wondered how this was possible when this mummy had only been discovered in 1898, that is to say a century ago, and the Koran has existed for more than 1400 years. ?! He therefore also wondered how reason can reconcile these two elements, since humanity as a whole - and not just Muslims - knew nothing until a short time ago, that is to say a few decades, in About the embalming of the bodies of the pharaohs in Ancient Egypt.
After this revelation, Maurice Bucaille spent the night near the pharaoh's body, staring at him, his mind focused on what his colleague had whispered in his ear about the Qur'an's evocation of Muslims of the "rescue" of this body after his drowning, while the sacred texts of the Christians, and in particular the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, say on this subject that the pharaoh did indeed drown when he was pursuing Mûsâ ( ), but without ever mentioning what became his body. Doctor Bucaille therefore wondered in his heart of hearts the following thing: "Is it possible to believe that this mummy in front of me is indeed the Pharaoh of Egypt who had chased Mûsâ and that their Mohammed ( ) knew about it more than 1400 years when I have just discovered it?! ". That night Maurice Bucaille could not sleep, he asked that the Torah be brought to him and began to read the Book of Exodus, a passage of which says in substance: "The water returned and covered all the chariots and riders of the Pharaoh's army who had followed him, and no one escaped", upon reading these words, Maurice Bucaille was perplexed. Thus, even the Torah did not speak of the "rescue" of this pharaoh's body and its preservation intact after he was carefully embalmed.
France therefore sent the pharaoh's mummy back to Egypt in a sumptuous glass sarcophagus; However, Maurice Bucaille did not have peace of mind, and this, since he had been shaken by learning that the Muslims had known for a long time thanks to their Koran that the body of this pharaoh had been preserved intact after his violent death, he therefore decided to pack his bags and leave for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to attend a medical congress where most of the great Muslim autopsy specialists were going to be present. It was there that Maurice Bucaille was able to share for the first time his discovery on the preservation of the pharaoh's body after his drowning to Muslim scientists, and it was therefore during their conversations that one of them They got up, opened a copy of the Noble Qur'an and began to read aloud the following verse to it: " We are going to spare your body today, so that you may become a sign to your successors." However, many people pay no heed to Our (warning) signs ” (Quran 10/92). Hearing this verse was a great shock for Maurice Bucaille, his soul was so shaken that he stood up in front of the assembly and began to shout as loudly as possible the following thing: "Today I embrace Islam and I believe in this Quran! ".
Muslims and non-Muslims alike: The nature of Islam is so clear that little about it could be arguable. Only three essential elements of it need be considered: founder Muhammad, Islam’s texts, and Muslim history. At age 39 Muhammad is said to have received the Qur'ān from an angel with no witness to verify the transfer. His subsequent preaching having failed to impress Meccans, though, he gathered supporters and in 622 fled north to Yathrib, which he renamed Medina after the Battle of the Trench. From Medina, he embarked upon many battles from 622 to 632, largely against his own tribe, the Quraysh. Following the nearly bloodless Battle of the Trench in 627, and blaming the Jews of Medina’s Banu Qurayza tribe for not supporting him, he personally beheaded at least 600 of its males and one female. Around then, Khalid ibn al-Walid, a convert, was reported to be offering Christians the prototypical “Qur’ān, the tribute [jizyz], or the sword!” That is: conversion to Islam, payment of a protection-racket tax, or death. The first Byzantine-Muslim confrontation was on Byzantine territory, September 629’s Battle of Mu’tah. Heading an army, Muhammad returned to Mecca unopposed early in 630. He died in 632. In 632-633, to prevent fellow Muslims from leaving Islam, Muslims fought the Ridda Wars, during which Abu Bakr, Islam’s first caliph, wrote “Call [apostates] to reëmbrace Islam; if they refuse...burn them with fire and kill them with force.” In 633, Muslims began assaulting Persia. During that campaign, Islam’s second caliph, Umar, demanded Yazdgird III’s “acceptance of my terms and your submission to me....Submission is your only option. Allāhu akbar.” In November 636, Muslims began a siege of Jerusalem, to which they had no historical claim. The city fell the following April. The First Fitna and Second Fitna, civil wars between 656 and 692, saw scores of Muslims killing Muslims. After Muslims fought across Africa’s Maghreb, Tariq ibn Ziyad crossed the Strait of Gibraltar in 711. Landing in Spain, he is said to have burned his ships and told his army “Behind you is the sea; before you, the enemy,” thus beginning an assault upon Europe that lasted at least until 1683. The Muslim assault upon India lasted into the 16th century, at least, and cost an estimated 80 million Indian lives. Historian Will Durant later wrote “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.” Islam is, then, nothing like a “religion of peace.” Qur'ān 2:216 tells Muslims that “fighting is enjoined on you.” In 712, Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef cited Qur'ān 47:4’s “O True believers, when you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads” to justify a Muslim slaughter of thousands in Brahmanabad. And in 1984 the Ayatollah Khomeini wrote that “the Qur'an says ‘War, war until victory.’ A religion without war is an incomplete religion.” So “religion of peace” is the major falsehood in a religion of lies, which works while we in the West have become a civilization of complacent ignoramuses. Brahmanabad is in the Indus River valley. Muslims invaded India, not the reverse; Persia, not the reverse; the Byzantine Empire (including Syria and Egypt), not the reverse; Africa’s Maghreb, not the reverse; Europe, not the reverse; and fought the Chinese on the Talas River, far from Arabia. Moreover, to this very hour, no one but Muslims themselves has ever invaded Arabia’s Hijaz, home to both Mecca and Medina. Have Muslim jihādis misunderstood Islam? Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a Muslim sociologist admired in the West, once summarized Muslims’ obligations this way: “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a duty because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everyone to Islam either by persuasion or by force....The other groups [at least Jews, Christians, and Hindus] did not have a universal mission, so the holy war was not a religious duty to them, save only for purposes of defense....All of them are unbelief. This is clearly stated in the noble Qur'an. [To] discuss or argue those things with them is not up to us. It is [for them to choose among] conversion to Islam, payment of the poll tax [jizya], or death.” No introspection there, only a demand. In the 20th century, a major Muslim theorist, Abul A'la Maududi, (1903-1979) wrote “The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy....The believers [are] under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.” And in 2015, Abu Bakar Bashir said “If the West wants to have peace, they must accept Islamic rule.” Where is the introspection, ambivalence, equivocation, or rumination in any of that? Do Muslims fear to doubt? Well, apostasy from Islam is punishable by death. Surely it’s best to be safe from fellow Muslims’ certitudes. But where is the evidence that so many Westerners seem to hope indicates that their civilization would be spared? Well, Muslims regularly point out that Qur'ān 5:32 says “We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption in the land, it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one, it is as if he had saved mankind entirely.” That’s often their entire case. But that’s simply a dictate to Jews, a double standard! Double standard? Qur'ān 48:29 says “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves.” That is Muslims’ merchandise, as it were. But Muslims instead sell their advertising-“of peace”-and a very great many in the West and elsewhere buy it. Muslims, obligated to stand against disbelievers, have, given our fear, maneuvered many of us into dismissing or even sanctioning the threat they pose. We are, then, already living under Islam’s shari'a.
"All exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. When a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in infering that he is an inexact man."
That doesn’t make any sense because if you get your science from God and God is the one who created everything including science then you are calling God inexact, how can God be inexact? Do you know that if one of the constants of our universe changed even slightly our universe would have collapsed or would have evolved in a way that didn’t allow life to happen at all? Calling God inexact shows your blind faith in science and biased human arguments
@@TheJoker-qr1rx You turned my statement about inexact man into an inexact God's, so it is you who perceive God as an inexact being, not me. Or is your perception of God was made by a man who is inexact?
@@Question465 no your statement just doesn’t make sense because I believe that science is the way to understand how God makes things work therefore I believe it is a creation of God so you saying “when a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in inferring that he is an inexact man” You are denying the prophethood of every prophet and the simple belief that they 100% knew was true that 1 God exists and he created everything. Ironically that makes you an inexact man because you claimed to know that if someone tells you he knows the truth 100% it is safe to assume that he is 100% an inexact man. It doesn’t make sense to me that a statement just destroys itself like that
@@TheJoker-qr1rx Read again, "safe to infer as inexact", does not mean "absolutely 100% inexact", it's a fluid statement since it allows itself to acknowledge our ignorance . What it primarily means is that Muhammad may have met Allah, Vikings may have met Odin and Thor, Greeks may have met Zeus; I don't completely deny any of them and neither confirm, but it is visibly biased to blindly say "this is the only truth", don't you think? I don't think science can give me all the answers either, but if history is any truthful, absolute certainty of any beliefs is bound to be broken apart, and even science is no exception.
@@Question465 ok cool makes a bit more sense to me now. actually I think Greek mythology has some form of truth to it, I don’t believe that these people were Gods but I believe that they were prophets or pious people that were mistaken for Gods just like Jesus was mistaken for a God by Christians, because in islam we believe that all the prophets came with the same message(belief in one God), I came to this conclusion because when the Quran talks about the people of Noah who worshipped the statues of pious people, this idol worship didn’t happen straight away but at the start they built these statues just to honour these people and over time people started to deviate from worshipping the one God these pious people worshipped and started worshipping them instead with the excuse that they are worshipping God through them this deviation may have happened over decades or centuries, this is also why it’s forbidden for people in Islam to make statues that have facial features and paintings that also have humans/animals with facial features. I don’t believe that this is what happened with every single religion because some of them are completely made up, but any religion that came through a prophet and today we see people of that religion do the complete opposite of what their prophet told them e.g Christianity has only happened over time because of deviations. Islam is the only religion left with no such deviations and we can prove this because we have very old copies of the Quran that are word for word and letter for letter with todays copy, furthermore no one has found any contradictions within the Quran, people will always claim they found a contradiction or error but they have been debunked several times. I end this by saying there is really no other true religion remaining except Islam, liberal modernity is their true religion, it just comes in hindu, buddhist, jewish and christian flavours. deep down they know their religion sold out to liberal secularism, but islam didn't, and that burns them up inside.
The oldest Bible is the Ethiopian Coptic Bible written in Ge’ez and consisting of 81 - 88 books! Check it out as it matches the Dead Sea Scrolls-The Old Testament or the Torah or the Septuagint is first declared in the Ethiopian Bible! In relation to truth, it seems closer to the Islam that is practiced in Canada 🍁! I could be wrong of course!
@@calmingcrist4515 universe expanding. bog bang of creation. blastocyst[alaqah]. man created in stages from the earth [evolution]. earth spherical moves in orbit. just some of science in quran. I left church ' earth a flat circle does not move. sun orbits the earth ' in 2002
The sun setting in a muddy pool is always a scientific principle,as well as despite all evidence and all historic scholars Muhammad tells us Jesus did not die on the cross. thanks
Salam can someone help me with my question please. Growing up in my culture, I was told that every time I need to do an istikhara, I should do my wudu and then after reciting some Surah I should open the Quran and the first verse from the right side would be my answer. So it could be a yes or a no. Is this the right way or is this even Islamic and halal ?
Assalam aleykom i never heard about this. Sometimes the signs come with how you feel after or if it facilitates what you are doing after. It could take hours, days, months
