Check out this video from Volume 3 of the 3 volume vook, Mind in the Making - The Essential Life Skills Every Child Needs, by Ellen Galinsky. To see more, visit vook.com!
Thanks for this clear and informative video. I run an online guide for parents about how babies learn skilled movement. I teach parents the importance of their facial expressions and am happy to have this video for them to learn from. I was familiar with this research and now I have shared it with others. Thank you!
No, not necessarily. In the 1950s version, the mothers were on the safe side, and they were encouraging them away from the visual cliff. However, in this experiment, the mothers are on the plexiglass side, letting their emotions speak to the baby. I think that Campos' point is that nonverbal communication plays an important role in behavior of infants; while the 1950s version truly deals with death perception
@@avery.a5948It really worries me two things... 1. The people that gets cranky at those who give an opinion related to something that was posted X amount of time ago. 2. The people that notices how old a comment is. I mean, why does it matter?
@@carmen_sandiego35 Poor little Albert died at the age of 6. But his contribution to behavioral psychology would always be remembered, and with it the ethics of what not to do.
More recent evidence suggests that Little Albert was David Albert Barger and that he lived to be 87. ahp.apps01.yorku.ca/2014/06/who-was-little-albert-the-story-continues/
A lot of People grow up being completely mistrusting of life, and other people. Finding it particularly difficult to trust those closest to them. Thats why it's bad to abuse the trust of infants.
So funny to watch my 1 y.o. niece in her human development stage one, she is so careful, smart and very observant. I joke and say she's nosey. She will find her way up the steps but will not come down, she looks like no way, anybody around to help me, please? 🤣
My dog does the same thing 😂 I mean not at plexiglass but like. If she sees something unusual her first instinct is usually to look at me and see how I’m reacting.
Nice experiment. What about the rebellious babies? Like the one's when told not to touch the fire, goes "ohh I'm definitely touching it now". Does facial expression of parent matters here while at the edge of the cliff?
Facial expression of parent matters when a baby is unsure how to proceed and needs some clues. When a baby is sure what she wants, she'll try to do it no matter what :) And if parents put too many restrictions, i.e. say "no" too often, a baby becomes less sensitive to prohibitions. "ohh I'm definitely touching it now" is typical behaviour for a three year old crisis, and here in the video they talk about younger age, 9-12 month.
دور التواصل العاطفي الغير صوتي مع الطفل الصغير، حيث أن الإبتسامة هي علامة رضا تشجعه على الإقدام إكتشاف الأشياء الغامضة بالنسبة له، في حين تعبير عدم الرضا أو التخويف الذي يبدو واضحا على وجه مرافقيه يدفع به غالبا على التراجع وعدم الإقدام على خطوة مغامرته الصغيرة. أي أن التواصل العاطفي حتى ولو كان دون اللغة الصوتية مفيد لبناء شخصية الرضيع او الطفل الصغير
Haha, how ironic. I stumbled upon this video because someone who supports the idea that humans have instincts referenced this experiment, yet the video demonstrates the opposite. The baby relies on communication with its parents and makes decisions after gathering all the information it can, rather than being controlled by a fixed action pattern.
Babies and young children learn by imitating their adults around them. This is why baby talk should not be practised. Similarly, any anti-social behaviour should not be witnessed by the young, lest they pick them up.
Hunt around for some other videos on this subject. There are ones that use real cliffs, with the experimenter ready to grab the baby when they fall. The interesting aspect is, a baby lying, sitting, crawling, walking -- these are four distinct stages, and apparently the lessons learned from one stage don't transfer to the next. A baby who knows how far they can lean without falling over will not reach for a toy too far away -- but once they're crawling, they'll cheerfully crawl off a cliff with that much give, because they haven't yet learned that it's a problem.
That's one argument. The other argument is the nurture side. Which would argue it wouldn't know about recognizing and adapting to perceived danger without environment cue influence.
@@christophergreen4616 It will be exceptionnal. the link between a baby and a mother is naturally stronger, its something that cant be immitated. Thats nature
This was likely just a snippet of a longer video. How do you know the original video that contains this snippet did not mention Gibson and Walk? With that said, I get your point. The person who posted this snippet could had put in it's caption a mention to Gibson and Walk.
