An F1.8 FF ZOOM That's SHARPER Than Sigma's PRIMES!

Подписаться 217 тыс.

Просмотров 70 тыс.

50% 1

In this video I check out the new Sigma 28-45mm F1.8 DG DN ART lens for Full Frame Sony E Mount. You can read more about it and check prices here: geni.us/fastestFFzoom
-------------------
Gear That I Use & Recommend:
CAMERAS:
For Photo & Video
▸ Sony A6700 (My Favorite) - geni.us/A6700
▸ Sony A6100 (Budget Option) - geni.us/MyFavorite
▸ Sony A7C (Full Frame) - geni.us/FullFrameA7C
For Video
▸ Sony ZV-E10 (Good) - geni.us/ZVE-10
▸ Sony FX30 (My Favorite) - geni.us/BeastASPC
APS-C LENSES:
▸ Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 (My Favorite) - geni.us/BestZoom
▸ Sony 11mm F1.8 (Best Ultrawide) - geni.us/BestUltraWide
▸ Sigma 16mm F1.4 (Best Wide Angle) - geni.us/Popular
▸ Sigma 30mm F1.4 (Affordable Street Lens) - geni.us/Street
▸ Sigma 56mm F1.4 (Best Portrait Lens) - geni.us/Portrait
FULL FRAME LENSES:
▸ Sigma 20mm F2 (My Favorite) - geni.us/FFSigma20mm
▸ Rokinon AF 14mm F2.8 (Best Ultrawide) - geni.us/Rokinon
▸ Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 G2 (Best Do-Everything Lens) - geni.us/TamronV2
▸ Sigma 85mm F1.4 ART (AMAZING Portrait Lens) - geni.us/SHARP85
▸ Sony 50mm Macro (The Only Macro I Own) - geni.us/SonyMacro
AUDIO:
▸ Zoom F3 (Love this Recorder) - geni.us/zoomf
▸ Audio-Technica AT875R Mic (What I Use) - geni.us/at875rmic
▸ DJI Mic (Best On-The-Go) - geni.us/djimice
▸ Acoustimac Sound Panels (Must-have) - geni.us/soundpanels
LIGHTING:
▸ SmallRig RC220D (Great Value) - geni.us/rc220dlight
▸ SmallRig RC220B (My Key Light) - geni.us/rc220
▸ Sofirn SP33 V3 (Best Mini Flashlight) - geni.us/bestflashlight
NICE-TO-HAVE ACCESSORIES:
▸ Feiyu Scorp Pro (Big Gimbal) - geni.us/scorppro
▸ Zyihun Crane M2S (Travel Gimbal) - geni.us/cranem2s
▸ Atomos Ninja V (Recording Monitor) - geni.us/ninja5
▸ SanDisk SD Cards - geni.us/sandisksd
▸ Sony ECM-B10 (Camera Mic) - geni.us/ecmb10mic
Complete Gear List:
▸ kit.co/ArthurR
-------------------
Disclosure:
Most of the links above are affiliate links, which means at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a qualifying purchase. If you want to buy something else, you can also use this link to Amazon:
🛒 Amazon - geni.us/shoparound
-------------------
MUSIC:
Sappheiros - Floating
On RU-vid: • Sappheiros - Floating
-------------------
Supporting The Channel:
▸ If you wish to support the channel with a donation, you can donate via PayPal here: paypal.me/arthur213
▸ Buy me a coffee here: www.buymeacoffee.com/arthurr
▸ Follow me on Instagram: / arthur213
-------------------
Professional & Sponsorship Inquiries:
For professional and sponsorship inquiries, please email me at arthur2@live.com

Опубликовано:

2 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 185

@banditalley9592 Месяц назад

An APSC 16-45mm f/1.8 would be a proper 24-70mm for us crop sensor users. I wonder if that will ever be possible without weighing the same as a fire extinguisher.

@sunnynaguri Месяц назад

That lens would be so popular if they made it and at a small-ish size.

@nicuchitineac1950 Месяц назад

If there was one like this, many other lenses would not be sold. I don't think this is intended!

@studioshagrasyiid Месяц назад

it can be done but only F2 onwards

@XDario91 Месяц назад

would be too big. if you want an apsc zoom take the 18-50 already available 2.8 is more than enough

@HagaishiSama Месяц назад

Tamron 17-70mm would be a better fit. But this would be cool on a apsc body

@brianb6603 Месяц назад

Excellent as usual!!!

@moonshine7374 Месяц назад

My neck and my back needs them

@georgetarasenko6081 Месяц назад

Thx for the review, it's really unique lens! I'd like to see the comparison with prime lenses to see if the difference is dramatic.

@jefferson.castillo Месяц назад

This lens is on my radar!

@sunnyschramm9650 Месяц назад

28-45 is really a weird choice. Still love my Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN which is also kind of an abnormal focal length - but it is so crisp and lets me keep a little more distance while shooting streetart at night. Together with the Sony 20mm F1.8 for architecture and more interesting perspectives they are a perfect match for my A7III. I feel no need for a zoom-lens right now and also love how little to no distortion prime lenses have ❤

@studioshagrasyiid Месяц назад

they cant do 24-70... they have to preserved longevity for 24mm 50mm etc

@USGrant21st Месяц назад

Between this Sigma 28-45 and Sony 35/1.4 I would take Sony on any day. There isn't even any question about it.

@timothysteenwyk2978 Месяц назад

+1 for that lens combo… those (along with the Samyang 135 1.8) are some of the best value primes on the market. And the size is perfectly paired to a mirrorless body

@ozhazemtube Месяц назад

I just got the viltrox 27mm f1.2 and I wonder how it will compare to the 28mm focal length in this sigma he’s using. In terms of sharpness.

@baselhijjazi8604 29 дней назад

am going to buy it for sure and i think its perfect

@oddtechman Месяц назад

I have the Sony a9ii camera and do use it for a lot of my day to day stuff including static high speed photos and birds in flight etc. This lens i think would be a good match for the a9ii, especially given what the a9ii was made for!! Thanks for reviewing Arthur and greetings from the south coast uk

@fredlar9421 Месяц назад

Do front and rear elements move when focusing? Thanks.

@onnie1968 Месяц назад

Thank you Arthur

@lewisoninc 8 дней назад

does this lens balance on the rs3 mini gimbal?

@the_rat_run Месяц назад

That is a chunky lens! Not on the radar for me (APS-C only) but impressive, including the weight! Another enjoyable video, nonetheless, thanks, Arthur.

@davect01 Месяц назад

Impressive option

@myblujl7503 Месяц назад

Awesome review. I will be keeping my Tamron G2 through. =) It works so well on my A6700. So much better than the 17-70.

@johnjohansson 16 дней назад

Does the af make lots of noise in video?

@aminnoyan3718 16 дней назад

Hey Arthur r❤❤❤ I’m from Bangladesh I have a question Sony a7cii camera for bird and wildlife photography please please make a video for this camera

@JazzKnight15 25 дней назад

"Big company with big bokeh balls". 😆 nice one there @arthur. Great review as always. Loved it.

@warpspeed9877 Месяц назад

A 20-45/2.0 and a 45-135/2.0 would be a dream combo. I could take the weight and expense happily.

@USGrant21st Месяц назад

Sigma need to revive their old 24-135mm lens. I would be perfectly happy if it were f/2.8 all the way.

@Deruzejaku Месяц назад

Best we got is 35-150 F2-2.8 so actually 16-35 F2 zoom would be perfect to complement that xDDD Then for wildlife some 150-600, and you good xD

@philipzaylaa8628 17 дней назад

so considering an apsc camera this lens would be equivalent to a 44.8-72 mm if I'm not mistaken ?

@frontstandard1488 18 дней назад

I have the Sigma 28mm 1.4 and 40mm 1.4. They are based on their cinema lenses for dslr and upgraded to L mount for mirrorless. They are both exceptional quality optics. So the new lens appeals as it's two in one and the 40mm is large as it is anyway. These focal lengths are very favoured by me and perhaps the new lens is aimed more at videography due to the short range. Sigma just do mad and weird things occasionally and sometimes utterly brilliant too. The image quality I get for the low cost is phenomenal to me. I come from medium format film mostly and before that 4x5, but these digital cameras today are now superb imaging tools and I am very happy to switch. More madness is good in my book.

@mofotose Месяц назад

Sigma also released a 24-35 f/2.0 for full frame soon after the 18-35 f/1.8

@tubedave100 6 дней назад

How is the sharpness compared to the Sony 35 1.4 gm or maybe the sigma 50 1.2?

@HeroShotz Месяц назад

This reminds me of the Sigma 24-35 f2 and I LOVE that lens. This one is a winner.

@frankfeng2701 Месяц назад

Neither is a winner, depending on how much you pay for it. Sigma 24-35 cost me $400 used. This 28-45 would drop below $950 soon.

@gabedamien 28 дней назад

A small quibble: "floating element" does not usually refer to an element that can clunk around. That element is like that because of image stabilization. It does kind if "float" in the way you are thinking; but the term "floating element" is historically something completely different: an element that shifts forwards or backwards at different rates than the other elements during focusing. Such elements have to be _extremely precisely distanced_ and don't wobble or clunk.

@georgkilianbraunig5877 Месяц назад

i am convinced...

@sleepless51 Месяц назад

I was hoping for something in the 35-85mm range with maybe f/1.8 or variable up to f/2 f/2.8 for example.

@good_morning504 Месяц назад

There are two lenses from Tamron and Samyang, both 35-150mm f/2-2.8

@sleepless51 Месяц назад

I know

@joseacarrasm Месяц назад

You are right this is the full frame version of the 18-35 f1.8 , I hope to get one used in two years 😢😅

@mofotose Месяц назад

There is also a 24-35 f/2.0 for full frame that was released soon after the 18-35 f/1.8

@phoenixvette 14 дней назад

This on the A7CR can be 28-45 at 61mp or 42-68 at 26mp in crop mode. What a true ART setup.

@officialtl96 Месяц назад

They should make an 18-50 f1.8

@sambroom4680 Месяц назад

That would be incredible. I could replace 3 lenses with that one.

@Strideo1 Месяц назад

It be HUGE.

@zaiENT1 Месяц назад

nah why don't they make 10- 300 f1.8...

@user-nx9px1ov1v Месяц назад

Would save you the money for your gym contract as well.

@Strideo1 Месяц назад

@@zaiENT1 But then why not just make an 8mm-500mm F1.2? 🤣

@user-wv4gc5ls3z Месяц назад

Would love a 35mm-85mm f/1.8 for portraits. Would be more compact too.

@stevenwaldstein2249 Месяц назад

Thank you. I recommend trying this with a modern Sony body that has the most advanced auto focus like an A7CII or A7RV or even a A9iII to see if it can keep up with the AF speed of those systems. The A7C is no its target market IMHO. That is what I want to know that I did not learn in this review. Everything else was great. Take care.

@YT-Scott Месяц назад

This is why i love sigma

@pcoussa Месяц назад

Hey Arthur, What are those two lights behind you?

@ArthurR Месяц назад

I found these on amazon and so far so good! amzn.to/3VqWba3

@Digi20 Месяц назад

I am actually tempted to buy a sony camera just for this lens.

@TheKimNeeper Месяц назад

It comes in L Mount too if you would like a proper camera ;-)

@TheOneMonk 7 дней назад

Don‘t. Talking from experience…Sony‘s camera support - or better lack there of - is a let down. And they continue to exclude third party lenses from features, e.g breathing compensation, high speed frame rate shooting etc..

@ulyssessait Месяц назад

this can be a good combo with 85mm (replacing 35 in 35/85).. I have 35/85 combo, but sometimes I have problem with 35 that not enough wide to capture group in small space, cramped space. this 28-45 will solve that.

@luismoracmyk Месяц назад

18-35mm 1.8 makes much more sense

@ulyssessait Месяц назад

@@luismoracmyk but but 45mm reach is as closer to 50mm feel. This combo is like carrying primes of 28, 35, 50ish, & 85….

@ulyssessait Месяц назад

@@luismoracmyk but the internal zoom is what really I love. It feels more robust compared to extended barrel zoom. I wish this 28-45 has no dust issue like 24-70 DGDN v1

@morecarstuff 19 дней назад

til this day some of my best pics were with a sigma art canon lens mounted to my a7sii. i cant tell you why. but man it was perfect. with a canon body my pics were good to. but that combo was just different

@ZioComposite Месяц назад

The spider then the wife’s expression lol nicely curated 😂 Sigma really is something else. Interesting option for some

@Mraz75 Месяц назад

Great sigma lens.. Sigma always leads the lens frontier.. 😊

@ImadogGarcia Месяц назад

I thought it would be aps-c but FF is huge

@sam9482 Месяц назад

I liked seeing Arthur’s pet spider

@DRMadeIt Месяц назад

aren’t DG lenses full frame and DC APSC?

@mofotose Месяц назад

Yes.

@Bobbylilacaviation Месяц назад

I'm like the spider. Always on the web(hehe)

@knucklesandwich6117 Месяц назад

15-60mm F/2 would be glorious

@stevenjohnson4283 28 дней назад

Renders very nicely with dimensionality, but it needs more CA's to really make the 3D effect. Very sharp for the next generation 90mp sensors probably.

@chicojuanito2 Месяц назад

Wait did Sigma make you all sign NDAs that ended today (cus everyone posted their video on this lens at midnight)?

@olegvorkunov5400 Месяц назад

What you cannot do with 35mm 1.8 prime that you can do with this one?

@Eikenhorst Месяц назад

Zoom ;)

@olegvorkunov5400 Месяц назад

@@Eikenhorst Right.. 2 steps forward and 2 step back. Here is your zoom with this lens.

@Eikenhorst Месяц назад

@@olegvorkunov5400 Yea, I get that the reach is more that a little underwhelming, but you asked ;)

@mcthemsholders 22 дня назад

0:01 sigma sigma sigma!!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE SIGMA 🗿🗿🗿🗿

@fantasytrip Месяц назад

sigma can you make 35-70 ?

@Reviews4fun1 Месяц назад

I think this is a wedding photographer lens. Better than the tam 35-150

@timothysteenwyk2978 Месяц назад

For events it’s nearly perfect. And would complement a 70-200 2.8 nicely

@jsparrowau 24 дня назад

Not really. 28mm is usually not quite wide enough from hotel rooms, suites for bridal prep shots, there's no real need for f1.8 as the light is sufficient when opening up blinds/windows. Hardly any zoom or compression for that lens. I don't see the value at all.

@dominiclester3232 8 дней назад

To answer your question: anyone who wants a setup which is half this size...ie normal. The Nikon Z 28-400mm isn’t much bigger! This clearly shows what is possible with lens design, either a short focal length range with a large aperture or visa-versa, but not both.

@georgecharpentier6043 9 дней назад

I am still waiting for Sigma to start making Nikon Z Mount lenses. I have several F-Mount, and they are all VERY good.

@obscurelines Месяц назад

I'm mixed on this, the throw is short. But at weddings probably 28 gives enough-ish width (certainly when you have to photograph like 4 people who suddenly want their group shot taken), while 45mm gives you a tight enough crop for run and gun and portraits. Probably they really quickly should put out a 45-85mm partner for this. Still, apart from being MFT, the Lumix Leica 10-25 1.7 is a much more versatile lens (it's just that you are then stuck working on a G9).

@Eikenhorst Месяц назад

That is a M4/3 lens! That is in no way giving you similar results to this. The M4/3 crop factor is 2, so really that is equivalent to a 20-50mm f/3.4 on full frame.

@obscurelines Месяц назад

@@Eikenhorst yes, understood, I've used it. And a FF 20-50 would be preferable. And the lens is f1.7 with a DOF equivalent to f3.4, it is still an F1.7. I am simply making a comparison of useful focal lengths and in this case 28-45mm is a weird one.

@HoomanBhr Месяц назад

Need a 24_105 mm F2.8_F4 variable. Small and compact

@EIY_Kumar Месяц назад

what is the filter diameter ?

@TheStereoSage Месяц назад

Looks like 82mm (saw it printed on the side)

@UltimateN. Месяц назад

This or Sigma 30mm 1.4 for APSC?

@m4rcin847 Месяц назад

You know it costs 1350$ right? Now check 30. Its laughably expensive for such a limited range.

@HagaishiSama Месяц назад

The Sony 35mm F/1.4 is only 1000 and a much better choice

@tonygunz21 15 дней назад

18-35 would have been a better focal range. With that and something like a Tamron 35-150 in your bag, you have a whole lot covered.

@studiomangordon2933 Месяц назад

woah!!! looks like they used the same glass that they made the 18-35 with "chefs kiss" perfection ... there's good reason the 18-35 is the best zoom ever made ... this lens is now on my fathers day wishlist lol .. GREAT REVIEW AS ALWAYS

@dami4944 Месяц назад

I love Camera Conspiracies lmao

@ronjenkins4257 8 дней назад

Sigma! Get this on the Canon RF mount!

@CaptRohmer Месяц назад

Impressive build but that’s got to be one of the least appealing focal ranges I can think of. Looking forward to a wider version

@swishpan 24 дня назад

Not wide enough for landscape, not long enough for portraits. What’s it supposed to do?

@tuf1385 22 дня назад

Big balls the way you say it its hilarious 😂😂

@drchtct Месяц назад

Just way too big. I use primes to carry a light setup. Rather take a 28 and 35 or 50 and switch once in a while than carry this beast. Nice for professionals though

@shirakawanaoya Месяц назад

Amazing Lens but dang it's huge.

@shadostorm8375 Месяц назад

18-35 1.8 and 50-80 1.8 would be the best combo.

@USGrant21st Месяц назад

An alternative to 35/1.8 prime. And it's heavy and expensive. I wonder which would I choose? 😂

@NAM3L3555 Месяц назад

I prefer a new version of the apsc 18-35 1.8 but E mount 🎉

@gigihanmandarin 17 дней назад

3:46 A big company with big bokeh balls.

@ninofabia6088 Месяц назад

Wow

@photographerjonathan Месяц назад

17mm zoom range isn't much. I'm not sure what the advantage is over a prime. I would rather have two small and light primes. but a 35 to 85 f1.8 portrait zoom would be cool.

@bobd7384 Месяц назад

I have Canon lens that is 28-105 f2.8, lighter weight. Why can't they duplicate the original lenses that were made previously.

@martinausterfield8597 Месяц назад

Geometry is different.

@WasionKey Месяц назад

lol Camera Conspiracies Kasey is definitly most likely probably, sure, not a fan of the Sigma 18-35. Not enough 3D Pop for the cinema master!

@nethbt Месяц назад

There's a much much cheaper non native SIGMA ART 24-35 f/2.0 The difference in bokeh between f1.8 vs f2.0 is very negligible, I mean VERY NEGLIGIBLE.... f1. 4 is where it's at.... Been comparing a 1.8 vs 2.0 for a while now and yeah... If I'm going to buy this lens, it's because it's Sharper, not because it has creamier bokeh

@Thunderbird1337 Месяц назад

Very special purpose lens. Not really wide angle and not really great for portraits either, something in the middle with very high aperture. Maybe good for some indoor things (indoor architecture with few light) or some outdoor things at night.

@jsparrowau 24 дня назад

Yeah it's weird. Barely any zoom or compression, and not wide enough for a lot of applications.

@Re-InCarNation Месяц назад

What-the-Sigma?

@TheTensecondz Месяц назад

I wonder if a prime 35mm 1.4 can be used instead of this heavy 28-45mm 1.8. I understand 35mm is not 28mm and not 45mm but I think 35mm 1.4 prime with few steps back and forth can do pretty much what this lens can do in lighter and brighter body. I think if Sigma made 20-50mm or 20-60mm 2.8 kind of like Tamron with longer end, I would be all over it.

@timothysteenwyk2978 Месяц назад

My theory is that intended for use in events where sometimes the crowd limits your ability to move forward or back easily

@JamesArthurHurley 26 дней назад

I bought my 18-35mm sigma for $600 in 2017. If this is the "spiritual successor" to that, why in the ever loving crap is its more than TWICE that price now?!?! Holy frick.

@frontstandard1488 18 дней назад

It's called money printing. Inflation. Theft by government of your work

@gigihanmandarin 17 дней назад

FF lenses are typical double or even triple the price of APSC lenses. Cost aside, I think the manufacturers understand that FF shooters are more willing to fork out a bigger chunk of cash for lenses hence they jack up their profit margins within that niche.

@g_rant_ Месяц назад

"a big company with big bokeh balls..." LMAO. This wins all the reviews.

@edowijaya8603 Месяц назад

Sharper than sigma 40mm f1.4 ?

@zenphotocraftmedia8326 Месяц назад

Wish it was a 24 50 f1.8

@zenphotocraftmedia8326 Месяц назад

Or a 16 to 55 f1.8

@Roy88772 Месяц назад

Interesting lens, but 28-45 is a strange range. 18-35 has more sens for me in that kind of lens.

@okaro6595 9 дней назад

This is a full frame lens.

@juarezjosendedocanto2442 Месяц назад

I prefer a prime lens to one with less than 2 times zoom.

@Riskbreaker2009 Месяц назад

16-35mm f1.8 or a 50-85mm f1.8

@firpofutbol 24 дня назад

Make it a 20-45mm for FF and now we're talking.

@christydaniel4140 Месяц назад

Bro, Sony a7 3 or Sony a6700 Which is better, currently these 2 are available in same Price in my country

@ivantanzh17 Месяц назад

Full frame

@anticlutch Месяц назад

It would be helpful to include what you're primarily going to be shooting/doing when you ask a question like this. There isn't one camera that does everything perfectly so there will always be tradeoffs.

@christydaniel4140 29 дней назад

@@anticlutch if i say Travel & Street photography Which one you choose !

@cameraprepper7938 Месяц назад

I only use prime Lenses !

@georgkilianbraunig5877 Месяц назад

with sonys breathing comp, this is roughly a 50...

@DoubleTheDom Месяц назад

That's only for Sony lenses...

@gigihanmandarin 17 дней назад

Yup, breathing compensation only for native Sony lenses.

@balboa0621 Месяц назад

Panasonic has a 20-50 equivalent 1.7, but it is m43

@Eikenhorst Месяц назад

That is a M4/3 lens! That is in no way giving you similar results to this. The M4/3 crop factor is 2, so really that is equivalent to a 20-50mm f/3.4 on full frame.

@balboa0621 Месяц назад

@@Eikenhorst the discussion was about fast zooms, regardless of format, which is why the 18-35 apsc lens was brought up. That lens isn't giving you the same results as this lens, either.

@Eikenhorst Месяц назад

@@balboa0621 I get this, but I feel that the whole 'fast zooms' talk is more than a little misleading. And I say this as an APS-C user. Actually this f/1.7 M4/3 isn't that 'fast' if you run the numbers, simply because of the small sensor size (26% of the area of a FF). If they made a FF 20-50mm f/3.4 lens, you could shoot with the exact same shutter speed and actually capture more light and thus less noise after you bump up the exposure in post.

@DannysHauntedJourney 23 дня назад

Geez, 2.1 pounds!? That's a heavy lens. While it's pretty neat, it's probably not a gimbal friendly lens, since it's likely front heavy. I'm sure it's possible on certain gimbals.. the big boy heavy gimbals.

@carboncarbonx43 Месяц назад

DROOL DROOL DROOL

@sonny01red 25 дней назад

"here are the pictures" bro starts flexxing on us with his gf

@gigihanmandarin 17 дней назад

That's his wife. Has been his default model for a decade already.

@johnnynighthawk156 Месяц назад

man, this lens is too sharp for my taste.

@m4rcin847 Месяц назад

Anyone who didnt want pretty expensive fire extinguisher mountend on their small body.

@brugj03 15 дней назад

If sharpness is all you care about, you can use this instead of a prime. But a prime of this quality is much lighter, way smaller. much much cheaper and will most likely have a more pleasing natural rendering, instead of flat as pancake pictures. High end fast primes will be no contest, they are way better than this.

@vytautasslenderis2702 Месяц назад

Hey, its a shame its so small and lightweight! Should have been bigger. Echh...

@chicojuanito2 Месяц назад

Did you buy this with your own money, or did they send you this?

@ArthurR Месяц назад

Its a loaner lens, so i had it for two weeks and had to send it back.

@quatrical 7 дней назад

will still opt for a prime. this thing is too bulky and heavy 🤣🤣

@TechnikMeister2 Месяц назад

That large means lazy design. Sigma lenses are flawed...terminally...for photographers who shoot people. They are too sharp at the expense of what's actually important with people. That's focus transitions, colours, micro contrast and smooth rendering. The focus falls off at large apertures too sharply. If you are doing a headshot you want the nose and the eyes in focus so you focus on the forehead and you want the focus to drip off the hair gradually. With Sony and Sigma where lenses are made by robots, not people, its very obvious. In a fashion shoot, you are at F5.6 or f8 as you must have all the dress in focus, and for a fuller dress, that means at least a half metre DOF. To do this, fashion photographers always focus on the waist at f5.6 and them what you need is in focus. Australia's top photographer explians that Sony are great colour photocopiers with no soul. What does he use in fromt of his Panasonic S1 and Leica SL/2s? A Leica M Summicron 75mm f1.4, shot at f5.6.

@sawgrass7477 Месяц назад

Instead of making a 70-200mm f/2.8 equivalent for apsc, they’re just making these random lenses that don’t need to be made. Nobody was asking for this, although it is kinda cool