Hi Everyone! I'm truly honoured that you have given my video a shot, and you've left good feedback and many constructive comments for me to work on. I originally started creating these videos because I recognized the significance of using animations to teach the visual language of Art. I understand that learning about art analysis or art theory through reading alone can be challenging, which is why I decided to make these videos, especially for my students. I'm currently working on the next video, and I've taken careful note of some recurring suggestions: - I'll be significantly reducing the background music volume. - I'll pay closer attention to the correct pronunciation of names. - I'll slightly slow down the pace of the video. - I'll make sure to proofread my script thoroughly (I'm sincerely sorry for the "she" at 0:09 - Hopper is indeed a guy ). I also want to clarify that the content of this video is not generated solely by AI. I've been teaching Art for 8 years, and I've gathered a wealth of information from various sources, such as books, videos, websites, and art critics. I've distilled this knowledge into concise methods for art analysis, which I share with my middle and high school students. This video explores one of these methods. To speed up my video production process, I use an AI voice and Grammarly to ensure accurate sentence structures. I use ChatGPT for some paragraphs to explore different ways of communicating an idea with different phrases or sentence structures. However, the content of the script, the selection of artworks, and the animation are all created entirely by me. I rely on Keynote and Clipchamp to put the whole video together (special thanks to @polymatter for inspiring me to create educational videos). I hope that you will continue to find these videos to be beneficial to you as you learn more about Art. Ever since I was a kid, Art has been a gateway to understanding history, philosophy, geography, politics, and so much more. I hope that Art can offer you the same enriching experience. 😊
I have taught painting on and off for years, one to one only, I usually take students to some major Art/Gallery, museum to see what they like, I tell them to work primarily on composition and to work to their strengths and let their weaknesses take care of themselves, it's never really worked though, it depends on what they're after I suppose
Thanks for the clarification. I think that content like this is far more engaging when delivered by a human voice (your own perhaps?) than the unnatural sentiment AI currently delivers. Look forward to your next video and love that you’ve taken the feedback onboard! Good luck.
I am prepared to do 'voice overs' and provide import for you if you want, nice to see you're getting so much support, you must be doing something right
ai is inauthentic and soulless, and that shows clearly in your videos keep contributing to carbon emissions, wastewater, and the downfall of humanity by continuing your usage of ai, fully abandon your humanity, conform only to efficiency 🙂
Brilliant, jammed-packed video. I love how well it is constructed and how succinctly the information is conveyed. It did feel a little rushed, an 8 minute video, might have allowed a little more breathing room for understanding than the 6:37 running time. Bravo. I subscribed!
@@LearnAboutArtI would add to this that the music track was too loud and competed too heavily with the narration. Those, as well as the abovementioned speed left no space to enjoy what was being presented.
Try this one for photographers and get back to me. Much more in depth (and much longer) but well worth the time. It completely changed my photography and it could be applied to any art form. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mC8ol2-V7Ck.html&ab_channel=JoannaKustra
Wow This vidoe showed how much complexity their is in colour and level of skill needed to exacute such feats of desig is resounding. This is likely the level of skill that high end art institutions like look for when selecting student.
Thank you so much for making this video. You are a great teacher. When I heard the voice, I did guess it was AI, and I didn't like that because it sounded artificial. The video was fast for me, but I just paused it from time to time. The content and examples were excellent.
Just my two cents, I think you’ve chosen very good, AI voice overs. They’re in and see ation is very clear and concise and you’ve mixed it up with male and female. I appreciate what you’ve done. I am a watercolor artist, but it’s always nice to hear and review basics. Good job.
from 2:56 to 5:05 where the explanation of colour temperature begin the background music is upbeat and also consist more instruments which makes hard to listen to the voice and difficult to comprehend the information, apart form the information is raw and good keep posting.
A great video in its content! Unfortunately, the AI voices killed it for me. I found it far too mechanical and it was rushing the information. AI voices can be a huge risk and it didn't pay off this time in my opinion. I'll give you my sub because I like what you're trying to do, but I really hope the voices can be improved, significantly.
Very informational, but I agree with the comments saying the AI voice isn't pleasing to the ear. Videos like this are better when slow-paced, narrated by soft, calm, and relaxing voice. Videos by Jill Poyern Fine Art is a great reference.
Many thanks for this incredible video!! Very well done and I feel like I learned a lot. Deeply appreciate this and will go look at others on your channel, please keep up the great work!
The Ugly & the Good (no Bad) - at 3:45 I hear the name Jean (a French name)… it is not pronounced (as in the video) as JEE-n (long E, rhymes with machine)… it IS pronounced Jean… rhymes with SHAWN. Other than that (cause we don’t want to “dumb-down”… do we know what “dumb-down” means???) our precious fine arts) this is a wonderful & instructive video.
I agree fantastic information! But the speakers are going a bit too fast to absorb the information. I had to stop the video, look at the text to completely understand the information. Thanks, KEEP Your ideas flowing.
I struggle with this topic nit having any formal training. I am trying to create a scene in the Ardennes forrest during WW2. I know I should use a cool combination as it is during winter, uniforms could be white, brown and green with the tanks in Green or darken. The trees will recede into the musty background and would be lighter as they disappear. Not really sure if this is correct
New subscriber here. I agree with a comment below that you speak too fast. Also, another suggestion is to tone down the background music. It is too loud and jumpy, thereby distracting from the interesting content.
Curious that the different colors we think match are the colors we see together in nature. When we see colors that we think don’t match they’re not together in nature.
Dommage que ce ne soit pas expliqué en français ... je n’ai compris qu’une petite partie ! Aquarelliste du dimanche (et pas tous), je sais qu’une petite erreur de couleur peut ruiner une réalisation ... et, à l’aquarelle, il est très difficile de corriger !
I love you rvideos. great explanation. too bad the background music interfered too much with this one , it would be great to mute it to 50 percent more at least.
Good except for the annoying and overly loud music in the background or foreground. Also, you use the English pronounciation of Jean (Fragonard). I'm not sure if that is right. It sounds like an girl's name when given the English pronounciation.
I came to read the comments because I wanted to find out if anyone else than myself was thinking that this is AI-generated content. Not many comments indicate such a thing but I still think it is. Furthermore, Edvard Munch was the pronunciation I reacted most to. Munching Munch lol. Nevertheless, AI-generated or not, the videos contain valuable information for many to learn from.
@@lowe_h_seger I wondered whether it was AI-generated too. There are numerous errors in simple subject-verb agreement, and the text sounds mechanically written. It really put me off.
@@lowe_h_seger Thank you for your feedback! I did use AI for the voice, grammar and some sentence structures to ensure that my content is delivered in a clear manner. But the content and flow of the video and the animation are definitely from me. I've left a pinned comment to explain further. Cheers!
I wanted to reiterate what others have said about having AI do the voices. There are other solutions as I’m sure you’re aware and no content will hold an audience if the delivery is flat and inauthentic like AI is. Otherwise I enjoyed the content :)
Its arbitrary. Pretty random to be honest. Limiting the numbers of colors is usually a good idea tho. Most people blow out their painting with crazy colors
Your video looks informative and well done, however I can't bring myself to watch. AI voice overs are all over the internet and make me very uncomfortable due to sensory issues. I also worry that people will lose the ability to differentiate between a human voice and AI voice. This is a mechanism that is almost essential in the modern day, and the more we listen to AI voices like they are human ones, the more dangerous I think this trend will become.
The content is interesting and helpful in understanding art as well as providing options for artists to play with. Unfortunately the voices are mechanical and the speaking rate is too fast for me, but since the content is good, I will keep on learning!
That was going to be my comment, I am glad someone else said it first. It felt really weird to have an AI voice explain to me how to understand the meaning and emotion of color.
When I do a painting I use the colors I want. Sometimes the colors have a lot to do with memories and how they play against each other. There are many reasons why colors are used by the artists. My mother used colors in her paintings that she felt were right for the picture. Sometimes the colors are not symbolic. They are just the colors that were right.
That’s literally what they mean ,if you use a color to recall a memory ,they are symbols of that memory ,there’s always a reason why something fits right in
Lol...instructed by an AI voice...so we can teach them how to create...art? While Ai should actually become the artist, we teach them to copy...and claim it to be their art...hmmmmm....
Hey, there’s a lot of nagging about the AI voice in comments 😆 but the information was concise and well presented, funny how many focus so much in what they dislike instead of appreciating and being grateful, well I don’t want to be like that, your effort and willingness to teach is much appreciated by me Thanks! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
What could have been a good presentation, thoroughly spoilt by the female narration , way too fast , rigid to the point of annoyance. Wrong pronunciation of a world renowned artist Edvard Munch (should be enunciated Moonk). Sorry ,will not be watching other videos , too much choice on offer to suffer through with this site.
As a content creator I can say your video was edited pretty much good but AI voiceover ruins a bit. I got good infromation from your video so I decided to give mine. Thank you for the video.
Talking about the Analogous colour scheme, I understand that the background is White and since White is not there in the colour wheel, the White background is ignored. Is background generally ignored in the colour scheme or is it because White is absent in the colour wheel?
The colour wheel is a system created to understand how different colour wavelengths interact with each other in light. White can be found in more complicated colour wheels that show the tints and shades of the hues. have a look: www.stitchclinic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/BasicColorWheelwithTintsTints.jpg White is veeery important honestly. Do check out how colours are used in eastern art :)
I promise its worth the fiver for a rando to do the voice over. Please just pay a voice actor. Or do it yourself. This is a very archaic voice synth that sucks to listen to
Very clear and insightful. And very condensed. One should study this many times over. But what caught my ear was the "violation" of the name of Edvard Munch. Pronounced as "munch". So, a chewy thing? 😁😁 Better try "Moonk". Or, better yet, "Moongh". European vowels always trip up Americans (and others). 😁😁😁 But, very good video.
*EVERYONE* there are other channels with real artists/people to teach you about color. Support them. Our complaints means the operator of this channel will TRAIN THIS A.I. voice to sound more "human". SUPPORT REAL ARTISTS and not A.I. cash grabs.