Andrew Marr explains why critics are wrong about Reform UK | LBC 

Exactly this. Reform haven't dislodged the Tories through their policies or their charismatic MPs. They'll get votes simply because a lot of people who would normally support the Tories will feel like there's no-one else to vote for.

Exactly, ​@@elmhurstenglish5938

Now that IS true for sure

@@Fellow557-my9pr you're joking right? The Tories have been a disaster as long as I've been alive (almost 50 years). From selling off the country's infrastructure and privatisation to austerity... it's been a big fu to the ordinary people of this country.

@@elmhurstenglish5938 you may have done, but the number of votes wouldn't have made an impact. Reform are just another version of UKIP and they never got the votes previously. The only reason Reform will this time around is due to a Tory Implosion.

I work in a hospital in West Midlands,. I know a lot of people in my work from doctors to nurses, consultants to porters and I don’t know one person voting anything other than reform….and a lot of these people are from minority groups. Back to my family and social life again all but one person I know are voting reform. So if everyone is saying the same what exactly happens with reform votes? For the sake of everyone I hope labour get fewer seats than predicted.

?

The tinhats continue to predict the future, while being ridiculed and laughed at.....

EXCESS deaths from what ? the endless lockdowns of yesteryear ?

​@@unitysprings3631 Tinhats? The excess deaths are real and accepted by all parties. None of them will discuss what is causing it though.

​@@rafd3593MPs refusing to listen to evidence regarding excess deaths.

Reform is worse than both. They're just popular because they're blaming foreigners.

don't worry, Reform would be an even bigger let down...

Yeah lets get rid of the NHS and any other crumbs working class folk get.

@@robmc3338based on nothing. Labour and the tories however have 30 years of terrible track records we can critique 😊

@@robmc3338wake up and weep on the 5th July🤡

You are on the right track Tony. It would lift 10's of thousands of families out of fuel poverty for 8 months of the year and allow them to earn credit for the winter months. It will reduce stress of families and will help massively with child protection through energy security.

That may or may not make sense. Solar panels can be MUCH larger if they’re not on roofs. They’ll also be cheaper to install and maintain. And you can pick a location that’s actually sunny and faces the Sun regularly, rather than being forced into a predetermined location and angle.

@@SimonFrack Except the coverage of solar panels, if fitted to all houses, instead of the odd field dotted around the countryside, would be far greater and have a bigger effect on energy consumption. Something else to consider is, why is it not mandated that ALL new house builds are fitted with solar panels? That would make a huge difference.

@@SimonFrack In terms of overall efficiency (both energy and cost), having a large number of PV modules in one dollop ie 'a solar farm' is better... but, everyone having some (typically 4kW) on the roof of their house (which equates to an area of merely 20m2, these days) AND an average size battery to store the energy so it can be used in the peak evenings allows the owners - ordinary people - to take control of a large portion of our nation's electricity generation AND earn money doing so. Wether or not 'the powers that be' will be happy to let all that profit go and let us do it is another matter!

I've got solar panels and you wont draw eight months power. 4.5 maybe. ​@@binmanblog

That's what the yanks did with Trump and look what they have ended up with ! Be careful before you give your vote to people like Farage.

Which aspect of that paper appealed to you? The dismantling of protection for women/ disabled/ minorities? Privatising the health service for an American system? Pretending climate breakdown is not happening?

​@@karenrock3864They are sheep. Just following blindly.

Same as that. In fact I was trying to convince every one I know to withhold their votes in protest at having no effective, sympathetic or even patriotic party to choose. But now we have. Lets hope that Nigel hasn't left it too late...

@@strandedstarfish i see that you read The Guardian, and are thus a leftie (where you got that biased information from). You do know that by "slashing public expenditure", Milei was referring to reducing money given to such as parasitic politicians & greedy state-owned companies, right?

fighting for the working classes whilst led by entitled millionaires? pull the other one

Why do these bots always use caps in every word

@@waltflanniganzdogas are all the others so what’s the difference?

@@waltflanniganzdog like the tories and labour?

exactly and Marr doesn't seem to mind that either!

who//

Amsterdam did👍🏼

@@jamieford9391 What about the 2000 private flights to Davos to discuss it. Laughable.

The thing about climate change is... The straws....

😂😂😂😂

He denies the facts of reality. He's as thick as mince.

Did we watch the same video? Is the "extremely valid point" in the room with us? What point did he make?

@@tomtative The point that net zero is going to impoverish us all and bankrupt the country while having no impact on the environment at all? I think that's a valid point don't you?

@@tomtative The fact that we're being taxed in order to make a big impact on CO2 emissions. Do you think we need to be taxed more to solve the issue? Do you think we need to keep building electric cars to solve the issue and keep mining cobalt which is a huge CO2 driver? Do you think the government are fully acting, behaving and taxing with our best interest top of mind? Come off it. Even Andrew Marr knows this but is refusing to have an actual conversation!

It would be the same as brevit support which the elite said would not happen ..so starmer would be scared to give it over to us

Brexit

@@clarevoyant6322 Well they work in Sweden ! as they regularly hold referendums on issues that effect everyone, and it works really well ! The Champagne Socialists over here don’t like them as they are not interested in true democracy, they just want to be elected and then do as THEY LIKE !!!

@@clarevoyant6322 No. 1 referendum that HAS to happen in the next 5 years, is Proportional Representation. You have to have referendums to affect any real change within the Parliament.

The utilities bills shouldn’t be as high, it’s stealth taxation, charge the companies more tax and in turn we the people pay that back to these corporations.

Just had a vote on that .. and it was rejected.. so by reform own logic..that means no 2nd vote for 20 years

Media (mainstream) are no longer unbiased and don't even try to be. That is the problem. Proportional representation could indirectly change that.

You act like Labour have sent this country down economic decline when it has always been the Tories

@@Objectiveansthensomewe had a vote on AV not PR, which no one asked for and was just a way to shut people up.

I understand the FPTP system and it’s worked for 100s of years., the problem right now is that the 2 parties don’t offer any real choice and that’s undemocratic.

we recycle

That's just an example of how poorly we're adjusting to the reality of the climate crisis, it doesn't make it any less important.

@@alanhat5252 No we don't. It's a complete disorganised sham.

Recycling, net zero, carbon footprints, beggest scam of the 21st century and us brits are mugs :-)

@@alanhat5252 What do we recycle successfully, glass?

Found out today that I have a candidate in my area in Scotland ❤

Only if you get out there and encourage family and friends to vote Reform!

because we're not suckered by conspiracy theories! 😂😂😂

The ignorant tend to agree with nonsense.

​@@drcommonsense1Yes this is true. Most don't read the Manifesto. The rest believe he will acomplish things which he will then just walk away from if he does. Like he did Brexit.

What part of what he said was logical? His climate change approach is completely illogical and he told some lies which he should have been picked up on.

@@environm3ntalist549 Its illogical to think we can make the slightest difference to an ever changing climate we dont fully understand when other countries are pumping out far more and increasing far more than we could ever save anyway, even if it did make a difference, which it wont. So how is not wasting money on that illogical?

@@sonofsomerset1695 it’s not wasted money. We need to generate our own energy for energy security even leaving aside climate concerns. We have an energy gap in this country looming. How do you propose to stop blackouts without new energy coming online quickly? Do you want to rely on foreign energy imports which will be more expensive in the long run and pollute our atmosphere and environment?

@@environm3ntalist549 OMG, do you not understand that renewable energy is not reliable , the wind doesnt always blow or blows too hard and the sun isnt out at night, plus its far more expensive, unless we build nuclear which will take 20 odd years there is no reliable green energy on the scale we need. The best way to get energy security until then is by getting our own oil fields and fracking our own gas reserves.

@@sonofsomerset1695Almost every country in the world is taking big actions to reduce their CO2 emissions. That includes large polluters like the US and China.

Definitely part of the problem. Companies addicted to cheap imports in more ways than one.

Sponsored By Remitly.

We pay for fuel in jet planes, ships and trucks to deliver one little parcel to our door. We are funding workers and factories in other countries whilst our jobs and industry has gone overseas.

And uber, deliveroo, just eat. ( can add E scooters) Should all be banned as creates unregistered workers that are not needed that will take more than pay in when they use it a primary income to fund a family of 5. The money will eventually run out or have to be raised unfairly and the odd fat cat keeps milking it!

Its a green and pleasant land, but your point is otherwise correct.

❤👍agree

it wont

Well said mate

it wont

Reform will not make it better, just like the Nazis didn't?! Be under no illusion!?

Gullible much.

Vote Green then

Yeah, because only the rich fly Ryan Air.

Planes only make up 2 per cent of emissions but there's no reason why they should have private planes.

Cows farts cause multiple times the damage

With first passed the post thats pointless ​@@stevemillington3849

If you think that Farage and co care about the British people you are deluded.

​@@rogerphelps9939 interesting, who are you voting for then because I don't see anything great labour or Tories want to change.

@@rogerphelps9939 I was thinking more of Richard Tice who is a very nice man and has a big heart for the British people , we should at least give them a chance rather than the same old thing we get year in year out, And we can always vote them out if they fail .

@@thedegoose Exactly :)

@@SUBWAYSWITCHwhy does he bank off shore in the Caymans then ?

Green energy is literally CHEAPER than fossil fuels already. Plastic is MADE from fossil fuels. We will RUN OUT of fossil fuels in the next 40 years or so. It might seem like it's "no where near as big of an issue in Asian countries", but that's not saying a lot since loads of Asian countries - China, for example - STILL USE leaded paint and asbestos in their ceilings. What part of Asia are you living in? I assume you're more likely in Indonesia if you're talking about rainforests, but other Asian countries like China produce 80 percent of the world's solar panels - compared with the United States' 2 percent - and makes about two-thirds of the world's electric vehicles, wind turbines and lithium-ion batteries. They are also using a lot of coal DURING their transition to a sustainable future BECAUSE they know it's cheaper and will stand the test of time, unlike fossil fuels. When we cut carbon emissions, we also breathe cleaner air, reducing Alzheimers risk and premature death. It's not JUST about the global reductions of greenhouse gases. It's about personal responsibility. I see from your 'favourites' on RU-vid, you listen to Ben Shapiro, so I assume you're also familiar with Jordan Peterson, who is all about personal responsibility. CLEAN UP YOUR ROOM before you criticise the world. That's what we're doing by being world leaders in the transition to green energy. When we have fully clean energy grids and the rest of the world is needing to transition to it because the fossil fuels are running out, who do you think will have the expertise in it? Us. The UK, USA and all the European countries that have made the transition already, leaving the Asian countries behind. Japan, China and maybe Singapore or something will be among those that actually invest in the infrastructure early and reap the benefits. It's simply nonsensical to say switching early will hurt working class citizens more than no action to reduce energy dependence on Russia etc... for gas or whatever.

England is SO tiny compared to Thailand, SE Asia, China etc.. just ridiculous and has nothing to do with helping the environment- all about investment and returns on new ‘green’ net-zero companies..

It also is a pretty compelling argument. If the rich don't do their part. Why should we?

@@AerrySerlat-dk1lj Plus in reality the slight amount that rich people produce is nothing at all compared to how much India and China are wrecking the planet.

We don't even need to go to Taylor Swift levels. We're told that energy shouldn't be wasted. But I can drive around local business parks at night where there are over 500 lights illuminating a large car park, with no cars, and large buildings with lights on, on every floor, and no people.

Whilst I get this style of argument, it is pretty flawed. Whilst this may be the case, though it is a bit overstated here, the 1000 people contribute much less than 0.1% of Taylor Swifts impact on the economics of whichever society she flies to. This money could then be funnelled into green projects, or just offsetting that carbon use to create a net 0 sum. I think (not 100% sure) that this is what Gates does, flies a lot but then invests in carbon negative projects to provide an overall benefit. Whilst it is less of a people rouser, they should probably put some sort of extra tax / charge on private flights that is then used elsewhere

And true.

Ans a party run by Tory rejects and ex bankers - multi-millionaires - do?

Meaning what

I think quite the opposite. People just following like sheep.

It'll be a quick way of finding all the bootlickers

Wasted votes

​@davidhatton6858 No not voting reform is a wasted vote, We have to change the way this country is run

I agree loads will vote reform Not many of them will really attempt to think 😅

​@@laviniasey Change yes, but not by voting in a hard right dictatorship.

forget any food growing then as we wont have enough Co2 in the enviroment to grow anything let alone breathe properly if we want to go for a run. oh and all your beer will be flat in the future

I’m in industry 1 & 2 ok. 3 you’ll need to stick to advanced manufacturing (satellites etc)and services. (The city) we are an advanced economy and you can not make toasters & compete unless you drive wages and the cost of property into the ground. To make all the advanced tech & run the data centers you going to need lots of energy.

@@oojimmyflip I'm not sure if your reply is a joke or not. If not, I'd like to point out, I didn't advocate for the removal of ALL carbon from the air, lool.

@@oojimmyflip @oojimmyflip Youve been listening to too many scientist with hidden agendas and big bank account.

It's not 'their pollution' though. It's your pollution because they are making products for you.

I think his head's still hurting.

Why would you want to listen to what Richard Tice says, he has no idea what he is talking about. Net zero creates business and jobs for the country. Whether you believe it makes a difference or not, the UK has an opportunity to sell green energy to the rest of the world and make a lot of money. But Richard Tice would rather complain about Drax making money while promoting oil companies to make money. He makes zero sense, he is contradicting his own arguments. He wants to give this country's future opportunities away to China because he think's saving a few quid in tax is more important. He is a simpleton.

@@Xerus35 Don't talk NONSENSE

Then this conman of a 'politician' should try answering some questions.

@@bugsygoo I'm pretty sure he's answering questions here, you must be deaf

The tragedy of the commons.

Some plastics such as water bottles can be beneficial to seas and oceans as they provide a small biosphere for smaller ocean life, most people are totally unaware that the biggest plastic pollution of the oceans is discarded fishing nets that roll across the seas continually killing all sea life, for perhaps more than one or two hundred years, so governments ban plastic straws.

We put all our plastic bottles in the recycling bins here in the UK. I have seen very few plastic bottles dropped. If any are dropped responsible people like me pick them up and put them in the recycling bins.

@@oldplucker1 1) That’s objectively not true. Of course people still litter, and put plastic bottles in non-recycling bins too. 2) Plastics can’t be recycled indefinitely. Recycling help mitigate the issue but doesn’t really solve it.

@@SimonFrack I appreciate that. Our local council lost all its recycling contracts so everything went to landfill. In the past we used glass bottles and we were given money for returning them. Not many escaped recycling because kids made a few bob from collecting any left lying around.

Can we come and live in your country then? Cos we're suffering in the same way. At least your country has nicer weather.

@@hunchanchoc8418 just responding to the statement that climate change is causing emigration from the tropics to the temperate regions. 99.9% of emigration is other causes not climate change

depends on the country

Maybe not for your country, for some the predictions are 10-30 years time

Tell that to the flooded Bangladeshis and the Pacific islanders whose land is disappearing. I also think you'll find a few near equatorial countries in severe prolonged drought. Not that I'm arguing that corrupt and incompetent leaders aren't a problem.

And who is going to lead that technology.. The west or the Chinese.......

@@petertappin9568 All the more reason we should be going all in on that don't you think? Because China certainly isn't, or if they are they aren't forcing it on their population before its ready.

@@adam7802”China certainly isn’t” You’re going off a vibe rather than actual facts. China is THE world leader in renewable energy production and installation. They make more solar power than any other country. They make more wind power than any other country. It’s not even close. And their capacity for both solar and wind is increasing faster than any other country. Think how much energy the UK makes from wind. China adds the entire UK wind output to its capacity every 6 months. For solar, it’s more like 3 months. They also produce solar and wind power for other countries, seizing on the economic opportunities. Yes, there’s more they can do. Yes, they’re still using coal. But they’re planning the fastest decarbonisation in history, despite still being a middle income country.

@@SimonFrack And is China forcing it on their population before they are ready? I am going to guess no since you ignored that part of my comment to try get your little internet donk. Also imagine comparing China, a gigantic country with an abundance of resources to the UK. And just to drive my point home a bit more - we're about to have labour coming in with absolutely no money, tying both arms behind their back with fiscal rules promising carbon neutral by 2030.

Proper Correction!: For the sake of reducing the effects of climate change!!!! 🙄

@@pedrapioan4201 And how will taxation achieve that?

Cry harder and sell some more tar sand oil.

That's the main purpose of it - along with extreme control of the citizenry.

@@andrewsarchus6036 Yep!

Stop the rot - by voting in the rot makers! Get the Tories out by voting in ex-Tories! Get the Working Man's Party in by voting for multi-millionaires with offshore banking arrangements! Get the honesty back in politics by voting for failed politicians, sacked politicians, con men! Vote reform and privatise the NHS - as privatisation has been such a winner for the Working Man! Vote reform and move back to ever increasing cost of fossil fuels and reliance on the Middle East and Russia, over increasingly reducing cost and cheaper renewable and green energies - cos Nigel has shares and owes a few Ruskies some favs! etc etc etc

They also have plenty of oil, gas & uranium

Yes, but have you been to Mongolia recently? They are not going to stop burning coal, which produces smog so thick in Ulaanbaatar you cannot see your hand in front of your face - and that's indoors! As Tice said recently, the British Isles could sink below the waves tomorrow and it will make no difference to the effects of man-made climate change (if it even exists).

Kazakhstan Co2 emissions: 221 million tons Mongolia Co2 emissions: 21 million tons UK Co2 emissions: 308 million tons

@@alanmichael5619 I see ulez is working well, the need to offer it to the Kazakhs

China still builds coal fired power stations. Enough said.

That's exactly why the UK's weather has become so unpredictable over the last few decades. The heating effect caused by emissions is releasing greater amounts of fresh water into the ocean which is altering the flows of the Atlantic tropical ocean currents. Our climate in the UK is dictated by these oceanic flows of warmer tropical waters which also influence the flow of the jet stream. The jet stream has been steadily moving further south which is what leaves us with this situation we're in now where our June weather is drawn from the North rather than south. This is the problem with many people in the UK... if its not warm in the UK then global heating MUST be BS. Except the majority of the world is consistently experiencing year on year record breaking heatwaves, fires and droughts.

​@benghiskahn3673no its not. We live in England. We had seven years without a summer in the 1700s. Its because we live in England where Eastern winds meet northern winds

​@@benghiskahn3673uk weather has been unpredictable for as long as I can remember and I am 60 ,as a kid I can remember it snowing and freezing one day in July then a hour later the sun was beating down, then that night thunder and rain 😂

Most places are. Climate is not weather.

Very true I remember seeing all 4 seasons in one day. Went to bed one summers night and woke up next morning to about 1 foot of snow but oddly when I went back to where I lived later that evening, they had no snow fall and we were only a couple of miles apart.

It's easier than listening.

Or possibly because he was getting different answers to the questions asked! Like the Man-Made Climate Change, Tice went on and on about natural cycles, which actually if he read up he would know we are in a cool down point in the cycle and yet are heating up - so we are moving against the cycle - but still, rather than address the question "Do you not believe in MAN MADE climate change?".

​@@wolf5370 Um ... possibly. But having listened to the bullcrap from the evangelists for years - they ALWAYS conflate "climate change (per se) with "man made (or more importantly - with all the restrictions, laws, and TAXES that the cult enables to be instigated. CO2 is simply a "cash cow" to fund the "Environmental Research" bodies that were set up to (RIGHTLY) fight releases of real pollutants - and there were plenty of them. Lead in petrol (real), acid rain (real), SO2 (real) NOx (real) etc etc etc. Sadly (for their bottom line) they were victims of their own success - and we have clean air. The scientific truth of "man made" CO2 is that it's a tiny fraction of the ambient natural CO2 - and while it can surely have "some" effect it's no more than a drop in the ocean. But all that said - a move to electricity where appropriate is welcome - to conserve natural resources for applications where it is not.

Turned !!! It's always been a left wing joke

Utter drivel.

always have been

Because disagreeing with bigots, populists and liars makes you a left wing joke? What about this video didn't you like?

I kid you not. I only discovered LBC a few years back and I genuinely thought it was Labour Broadcasting Corporation. I just assumed it was a lefty radio station in the same way the GB News is a right leaning news channel. I was staggered when I found out it was meant to be impartial.

Unfortunately he has his,own mouth

Green energy creates jobs. Tyce needs to visit Pittsburg someday.

And do you think having the whole panet with that attitude is going to solve any problem ever?

@@stephenhill545 and completely kills others

His point was that why should we seriously impact our country and living standards when other countries aren't changing at all and are causing far more damage.

You obviously haven't read the Reform contract. Lifting the basic tax threshold to 20k is a game-changing policy for about 7.5million people in the UK. The cost of nutjob zero is stratospheric. The figures are in the trillions, and the thick end of 50b every year for the next 20 years (that the Treasury has bothered to cost). Energy bills have been through the roof for years (now amongst the most expensive in the entire world) due to (not) green subsidies for the rich. The malignant globalist assault on the finances and freedoms of the working classes needs to end. Reform is the only game in town for doing that. Your claim that this is a party for the rich is patently false.

Well all political parties are the same. Name one that won’t do this. Personally I’m just sick of the swing from Labour to Conservative and back again it’s pointless. I just know I’m not voting for either of those.

Well put you would think after reform👍diasterous brexit its hard to believe they still want to vote for them

"server pressure"!

I know I can’t spell

@@douglaswinton826 You have bad taste in politicians as well!.

I can’t be perfect all the time.but from my position in life at the moment their policies and contract best suit me.

@@douglaswinton826That's a fair enough position I suppose but it does not make you on the side of the right thing to do.

I think it’s not an ‘or’. We are not advanced enough with renewables so it makes sense to fill the gap with nuclear. Ideally, this would be done in areas that rely on gas and oil production so as not to repeat the mine closures situation.

@@jonmoore873 I'm really unconvinced by the nuclear argument. Not because of the normal reasons but because of how slow nuclear projects are to get off the ground. Like Hornsea Wind Plant was approved 6 years after Hinkley Point C and has been generating for 5 years. Hinkley Point C is now £20 billion over budget and expected to be finished in the 2030s - it was originally meant to come online in 2017! By the time Hinkley Point C is online Hornsea will have been generating for 12 years and Hornsea will have three times the nameplate capacity of Hinkley. And this isn't a UK only issue, two-thirds of Nuclear Power projects worldwide are billions over budget and years behind schedule. Even China have been revising down nuclear targets.

Electricity cant replace most fuels and processes, unless there's been some breakthroughs in every field that im not aware of

60 PERCENT OF OUR ELECTRICITY IS GREEN BUT HOW HAVE WE SAVED NOTHING P K WHT HOUR SAME PRICE AS GAS OIL WHO GAINS THE GLOBAL BRIGADE ,,FREE FOR THEN TOP WHACK PRICE FOR US AND WE GO ALL ELECTRIC WOW BILLIONS AND BILLIONS TO THE WEALTHIEST AND WE PAY SAME AS GAS COAL OIL,,WAKE UP TIME,,

​@yn7751 You can create fuel from green Hydrogen. And that's made from renewable electricity. So yes that breakthrough has already been made.

Studies show investment in green energy, home insulation etc. will save people more money than tax cuts. And the recent massive inflation was primarily due to our dependency on imported fossil fuel prices.

@@monty6491 What green energy though? Wind farms? Far as I'm aware we'd be very far away from things like this being enough to sustain us... and the cost for all of that would be massive.

But loads of countries are cutting emissions. It's a global effort. Beyond this China and India are way down on the list in terms of pollution per capita. Countries like Qatar, the US , Australia have populations whose everyday behaviour causes more pollution than larger, or more populated countries.

@@monty6491 i doubt spending 5-10k Insulating your home and getting a new boiler will save people more money than tax cuts , that's just going to make those that can't afford to invest in such "insulation" much worse off , what the majority of people need is tax cuts so they can save money to invest into such things.

Lead by example. Don't just stand at the back and whinge.

And Reform leaders are sooo poor. Lol.😂

@@janetmalcolm6191 At least they don’t work for the globalists elites police state

Andrew Marr is a stooge who nothing about climate change … even though a ten year old child could work it out … (numbers from Google) … A … How much CO2 does UK emit per year?” (400 million tons a year). B … How much CO2 would increase global temperature by one degree C?” (1 million million tons) Divide A by B to get the reduction in global temperature if UK achieved Net Zero. Answer; 0.0004 degrees Centigrade per year. That’s four ten-thousandths of one degree C per year. Now you can decide if it's worth it.

That's a safety issue!

😂😂😂😂

Wrong. They are talking nonsense, especially about global warming.

So you're happy for Reform to destroy the concept of Universal health care , destroy the welfare state, do nothing to address child poverty ?

This is why not every person deserves a vote

I cannot insist more that you read their vile manifesto before voting for them

Which ones, the pagans that lived here originally, the vikings, the romans, the French…

Look at policies.

Three unrelated opinions rolled into one yummy word soup

Have you looked at graph of the rate of average temperatures? It starts rising very quickly around the industrial revolution and just keeps getting faster.

@@drummingtildeath What a coincidence , it was omly at the time of the indusrtrial revolution we had the means to record the temperature. The temperature began to rise quickly 12,000 yars ago. and began to get colder for a while beginning around 1350..

@@drummingtildeath better off looking at Artic Ice capture data and spread temperature graph to a million years , it'll be nothing but a blip.

@@xenosscape8573 I like the way you recommend doing something, then guess what the result would be rather than actually doing the thing you recommend.

No doubt after the Election Reform will rename themselves again.

How did the Labour party replace the Liberal party as the opposition to the Conservative party?

Reform will be the next big party. They will get many more votes than UKIP did, but you’re right, that doesn’t necessarily mean seats. They have a five year plan. When the socialists get in, destroy the economy, more woke, more tax, and more identity politics, the right will take over. The pendulum is still swinging left, but it’s coming to an end.

That's because the price of energy is tied to the price of gas. Scotland makes almost all of its energy from renewables but because of that, the Scots too had to pay huge inreases. Increases that weren't even warranted. The power companies made insane profits

​@@glennjanot8128hmm and who sold our previously owned water and energy supplies off to other countries? Oh torys!

The renewable energy market is hugely subsidised by us, the tax payer.. the companies then only sell their energy back to the grid at peak prices…

I would have believed that if BP didn't increase their profits in the 2022-23 from £75mil to 750mil over the same time period. The winter fuel crisis was nothing more than a wealth transfer from us peasants to the elite overlords from our own banks accounts and the tax money that funded the subsidies.

@@rahulg5403 Yep. And the reasoning was that the private money would modernize the old, victorian infrastructure. And after making billions over the years, they now complain about the old, victorian infrastructure and say they have to raise prices by up to 90% to afford modernizing the old, victorian infrastructure. If I was Labour, I'd nationalize them again and say that with the billions they made without any investments, they can consider themselves bought out

What tripe! They do not want to privatise the NHS ..they will offer tax incentives to wealthier incomes people to encourage them to pay for private health insurance, thereby freeing up spaces for the less wealthy and ensuring all are covered, meantime reducing the excess management tiers to reinvest in boots on the ground doctors and nurses...not privatising at all

The poor might be better off paying Health Insurance instead of National Insurance- at least they might actually get timely treatment.

Yep, Marr is a Labour cheerleader and mouthpiece.

And also a remainer.

Hi Adam, I’m interested in which points you don’t agree with?

"Build the wall" "Stop the boats"

@@BibTheBoulderTheOriginalOnewish we had a wall

140 countries including China, USA and India is working towards Net Zero.

​@larsbjrnson3101 there not doing very are they.

@@larsbjrnson3101Net Zero is nonsense. Without CO2 there would no life on earth. How do you propose achieving Net Zero?

@@bottleneck4593 By cutting down on co2 usage. Norway is fading out our oil industry and will change over to reneables. 87% of new car sales here is electric as all our new ferries etc so it's exciting times.

@@kennethmaley2443 Kina is the largest in solar energi in the world 5 times Germany, with USA second. Kina is our outsourced manufacturer after all because they make "everything".

It was supposed to be the hottest May in history 🤔

What, because he's doing the lying?

It's all a conspiracy perhaps...NOT!