Andrew Sachs' Granddaughter Georgina Baillie Reacts To Russell Brand Allegations 

It's so transparent at this point. Call out big pharma and the corporations working with government and they'll go after you. Fortunately they only have 3 yools in that tool box, "pound metoo", "you're a nazi" or " you did the illegal thing we've been doing". I'll never believe another thing mainstream media says that includes cuckservitives like this twat and Faux News.

Well that's obvious...some of Epsteins clients and friends are powerful people who fund and contribute to corporate media

spot on

Jeffrey Epstein was dead when this show began and Harvey Weinstein was in prison…

Lol they did once there were allegations. For both

🤣🤣🤣 Underrated comment...

🤣Not a bad way to promote your music. Get Ai to make unique ones.

Best comment EVER

I'm seeing this same comment everywhere.

😐

@mind5403 so you call her a liar and not the other one accusing him? What double standard haha! I'm all for locking up a rapist. But Jesus, at least make sure he is before you destroy their life.

@mind5403 I disagree completely - she showd that situations are complex and not always black and white or easy to navigate and she NEVER said " he must be innocent then." she dais "I believe the women"

How can I get a FWB girl like her?

@mind5403 We should treat him as an innocent man. In the eyes of the law, you're innocent until proven guilty!

@@piccalillipit9211 mind5403 didn't say she said he was innocent. Didn't you see the quotes? But she did say Russell apologised to her for the stupidity with Ross. And she did actually have a relationship with him so it wasn't a one off thing as many are implying.

The psychopaths want to discredit him due to what you say its obvious isnt it

Exactly Russell is getting to controversial he is spot on with his views against Big pharma Biden administration He is a humanitarian So they pay so called alleged victims to come out of the wood work to destroy him. I am confused the BBC Nd channel 4 were the ones that sent a taxi to pick up the 16 yrold escort her back to Russell's apartment yet now allege he "groomed" her 😮. BBC and channel 4 should be ones on trial here not RB

And yet you will be called a cult follower for saying this. Gaslighting at its most sinister

It looks obvious to us but unfortunately the majority will just believe the allegations.

& what a pattern it is: sex, race, or both.. the list goes on and on: I call it the Assange attack

If he didn't sleep with 16 year old girl, he would have nothing to be afraid of. If you're a public figure and do shady stuff don't expect them to forgive you. If you're gonna take the morally higher ground than liberals, then you better behave better than liberals. Otherwise you're just a hypocrite.

No...they're against him because he raped women....

When he was their face on TV they covered up for him like they do all big celebs. Once he left then and went solo he doesnt have that protection. Just because he speaks out on some good things doesnt mean its a set up. Could he not also have realised when metoo happened sooner or later they would come for him and by going down the conspiracy hole he could blame it all on a conspiracy? People who support many conspiracy celebs (Lots I agree with too) are always calling out Hollywood/Film?tv as being RIFE with absusers and Peados. Thats until one of their own is called out...in this case someonw who was in that scene for many years...then its all a 'Witch hunt'. Its cherry picking.

This thing says there are 4 replies. Where are they all at? Censorship much?

Exactly. He was lionised for his lecherousness, it was his shtick, he modelled it in plain sight on stage and on television chat shows, he wrote a book about his excesses and proclivities. He now uses his intellect to rail against systemic corruption. Folly to idolise the guy in either incarnation, but such an irony that the very sector that endorsed him is orchestrating to bring him down. Sexual assault allegations are a matter for police prosecution and the courts, public allegations only jeopardise due process of the law. No doubt civil suits will ensue. By then the real objective of destroying a dissident public figures reputation will have been achieved.

I thought that. It wasnt even him that said it but jonathan Ross

So really Ross should have been outcast from the BBC too.@@janeslater8004

It was a tape, not a live show so why did the BBC not edit that part out??? What better way than to fire someone than to let them do it to themselves maybe???

Ross was as bad as Brand, both immature bullies, both should have been sacked.

Johnathan Ross has always been a vile person

You shallow sheeple. Shame on you.

Guess we have russell to thank for that. Seen as though he saved her life with rehabs...

​@ladyj7085 having been in a very similar position to her. I can say the cognitive dissonance is completely understandable. I don't think that ultimately the interview is very helpful in determining the legitimacy of the claims against him because she clearly doesn't believe in her heart of hearts that he intended for his actions to have been received in the way that they seem to have been.

Fuck the victims it’s obviously a lie, I struggle to believe anyone who comes out publicly

How anyone can listen to this segment and think it was anything but asinine is beyond me! It ain’t a square peg and a round hole! And don’t even get me started with women fetishizing rough sex and then acting like moral arbiters the next day!

So basically she is covering her ass both directions.

RB should consider himself a very lucky man. What he and that other cad did on air - to a young woman and a grandfather for heaven's sake ? - was abhorent. Talk about toxic masculinity. I don't care if Brand was 'in another place' at the time; those two knew exactly what they were doing.

Assuming they are victims, Russell is automatically guilty. They appear in a TV program saying that once upon a time there were mountains behind the forests, but they didn't go to the police because they were ashamed, waiting for the right moment to make a film about it that the whole world would see.

I wouldn't go that far, the things I've seen her take would make your eyes water.

Classy ..A reformed drug addict ..Yes really classy ..

@@nowgrownupso because of mistakes she made when she was young she can’t e considered classy now ?

Spot on .

@@chriscope7292 My thoughts exactly. Reformed is self explanatory but I'd argue there's no intrinsic link between class or sophistication and addiction anyway. She's quite possibly classier than me and half the people I know who have never touched drugs.

They are desperate

So victims of rape or SA should face a populist tribunal? The “people” are morons.

Nobody’s desperate except Brand 😂

@@milDelux what is Brand desperate for? To get this over and done with maybe but there is literally no case or evidence against him. Pure smear attack like has been done with so many.

MSM are desperate.

but not one of them believes tara reade or juanita broddrick.

There's more women coming forward calling him a predator now. Some women didn't come forward until Rolf Harris was arrested so let's wait and see.

Is that your truth? Can your 'truth' also distinguish between accusers and victims?

Then you'll never hear the real message of what somebody is saying because these are throwaway statements. "My truth" just means "what I know and feel to be true", and she didn't say "always believe victims", she said people should be believed and taken seriously when making an allegation so that there's an investigation and nobody falls through the net... it doesn't mean believe the accusation, just that you take it seriously.

There is no my truth, there’s just the truth

Agree ! Wish her all the best, comes across like a woman who has some class, even though she had a bad past .

Photographs of soldiers perhaps ?

Phone hacking scandal....

I really hope one day Morgan gets trapped, and then we can have people on and almost waterboard them to get them to say fake claims. He really twisted every last screw in the hope she would say that Russell attacked her , you could literally see him getting more and more desperate when the only thing bad was a radio show where Jonathan Ross actually said the worst thing. That of course doesn't fit Morgans sleazy little brain , he pushes for more , in the end all he got was her to say he treated her well and made up for the radio show , which actually shows he has a very decent heart , Morgan then had to end it with how bad the radio show was despite her saying he had made up for it. So another debunking of these claims.

It would never happen because he's very much a shill. They love guys like him. Don't forget what he said during the lockdowns

​@@steve10he will oh yes, he will.

I mean Tate was arrested , Brand accused , Paul Joseph Watson accused , Alex Bellfield jailed , Dan Woolton attacked , and Owen Shroyer going to jail , all critical of the global elite , you must be dumb if you can't see they have hit a raw nerve and want them out the way .

It should never be in court so many years later. A wise society understands the reasons behind statutes of limitation.

He could take Chanel 4 to court for defamation. But it’s highly unlikely.

It is

🎯🎯🎯

the fear is here, already

It*

Don’t fear! Just put your trust into Jesus Christ! It’s good against evil, you can see it more than ever these days. The demonic realm is very real and Jesus is coming back soon for REAL judgement

@mydearhuman He's certainly taking his time.🙄

@@ianstrange5674 good things take time! 🙏🏻

For what because there's four women so far and one of them had a rape test done that is still on file and there's also text messages of him apologizing for some of this so I don't think you're seeing the evidence so far but he is innocent until proven guilty

For reporting what multiple women have claimed? It's not the media's fault for reporting these things. If he did those things the blame lies with him. If he didn't the blame lies with his accusers.

He will ever sue !

@@Chromedome-ss6mg Why haven’t they pressed charges? They came forward or were sought out!

@@peterd788 If they sought it out to fbbd these people because they read his book, they’d s huge problem. That’s against the law in the U.S. .

True..I just always found him extremely irritating mainly the sound of his voice and of course he was a sexual predator but plenty of willing victims takes to to tango etc …let the law decide if it went further than that and if he actually raped anyone.

He causes yeast infections?

True, I was never a fan. I could never relate to his personality. Left or right, I found him annoying.

Not true. I was "meh" about him. But that investigative report was made with caution and he's definitely guilty.Not everyone assesses evidence on whether they like someone or not.

or conversely, not guilty. I just hope he tells the truth and wanting an honest investigation because no matter what (guilty or not guilty) this is being brought to the fore for political reasons.

Agree it’s wicked. He has a wife and young children. Police or nothing. These sorts of things should not be in the media unless a crime has been committed - Schofield, Edwards, Richards….the list goes on. No prosecution but lives ruined.

He's in for tens of millions of pounds if he's innocent but do you think the Times and C4 would've outed him without being sure they would win a liable case?

That’s right. I read the Times and Chan 4 spent four years following up these allegations. You think they didn’t dot every I and cross every T.

Gc3847. How fuck do you know what she like. Just because she on a show.

Some people dont fear to speak the TRUTH and she is one of them, but majority lie for self gain.

Yea in the west, everyone looks like a grandma at 40

She's not relationship material. Still, if I was the grandfather, I would have given Brand a physical beating.

It’s called face paint aka make up

Here we go again. “she looks good for 40”…as if it’s 80. Most everyone “still looks good for 40.”😮

Yes a post truth society, it's very distructive.

What are you talking about. Like Saville the media have been covering for Brand for years. Sucking his d*ck because he hated Brexit etc. Glad to see the truth is finally out and what has been known behind closed doors for decades is finally out. Unlike Saville I hope these women get their day in court.

What makes you think it's only a few?

@@julieholdcroftbetty8520, what makes you think it's a lot?

Not awaiting the results of the police investigation, and assuming a side is right is moronic and immoral.

No addict is recovered. they will always be recovering ... Let's get that straight

​@@winner3924says who? Some shrink?

@@winner3924 Ok that's a fair point. Let me put it this way, I am as 'recovered' as I ever will be. I have no urge whatsoever to touch drugs, smoke anything or even drink alcohol again and haven't for over 15 years now, I find the very idea repulsive. I am recovered from the physical and mental addiction itself. I am as annoying as an ex smoker who can't stand the smell of smoke in that regard.

Once an addict, always an addict, all you can do is arrest it one day at a time ....sorry@@joeschmoe8320

​@joeschmoe8320 Same! I walk down the beer and wine aisle at the grocery store and just chuckle to myself. I closed that chapter and now I'm writing a new one

She threw him under the bus with the 'believe the accusers'! She could have just said, 'lets wait and see the evidence' and left at at that. This believe all women is BS!

Very beautiful too.

No she wasn't, she was forgetful and sounded off her head still...

Agreed. She seems like a decent human being, and for what it's worth, beautiful imo 👍

Sadly for Piers he didn't get his grubby hands on some hard evidence , despite constantly trying to get her to say how bad he treated her. Then he brings up the radio show , which has nothing to do with the claims , then you could see he got fed up when she said Russell made up for that by paying for her to go to rehab. Morgan goes away empty handed and we get the truth about how Brand can be. Still zero proof

Hell, at this point, if you've ever even associated with a woman, you'd better be searching for a real good TEAM of lawyers. Women don't need evidence. If they say you're guilty, you're screwed.

if thered been even one tiny shred of physical evidence in DM case thatd be one thing but to find out there wasnt AND to find out the victims hung out with him for yrs afterward and one even continued to date him for 3 yrs afterward turns it into literally a hearkening back to witchcraft trial days when no one from any strata was safe.

There's a "man" who killed his girlfriend and stuffed her body into her trunk of her car and denied everything through the trial and beyond..." M.O.TrueCrime' "Lies that Tie" (or "Ties that Lie?" not sure) they found his fingerprints on her shoelaces! GOT SIXTEEN YEARS and he's out enjoying his X wife and daughter and his wonderful life.....THIRTY IS OUTRAGEOUS! Russell should take this "opportunity" to work on a new NOVEL...title it " Who's the Victim Here?" BINGO; and let me expand on that; I'm in a good mood tonight. DUH, Our present administration is THREATENED BY A COMEDIAN?!!! The Fake Administration of Gangsters in conjunction with the Global Elite, have their own Agenda: Deleted anyone who disagrees....They call that justice; WE know it's "Just----Us." I wish the BBC could teach an on line course on VOCABULARY; "Alleged " and "Indicted" MEAN LITTLE MORE than the words " Gee, we suspect this but have to gather the evidence before we make fools of ourselves!!" All this video shows ME, is that SOMEONE has it in for this guy! (Being outspoken has its repercussions?) Piers needs a panel made up of women who have dated COMEDIANS. Most of the comedians who are sexually explicit when they're "on stage", are not that vibrant when they're off stage! I think what Miley Cyrus was when she was "on stage', was quite vulgar and only appealed to males looking to see what they wanted to see. Dolly said " try to understand her, she's a devout Christian." Ha-and "actress'" t'boot; GIVE HIM A BREAK---HE'S A COMEDIAN! What's good for the goose, SHOULD be good for the gander, shouldn't it ? And FEMALES ? when you say "no" or "stop" MEAN it .and stop placing yourself in "compromising positions.!" It's appearing s though we've got another Stormy Daniels Fantasy here-a girl raped several times at the age of nine, to "grow up" to not be able to distinguish the difference between rape and consensual sex ("Sixty Minutes Interview") By the way , isn't it time lie detector tests become accepted as evidence in a courtroom? "You're the Reason I'm not Married" by the way LyndaFayeProductions.

The media don't like that brand has more subscribers than MSM

Ross & Brand are both colossal bell ends!!!

He got money on false pretences, does that count? never found one of his jokes funny or seen him as anything but a nasty piece of work I wouldn't do the proverbial P if on fire....

If he didn't sleep with 16 year old girl, he would have nothing to be afraid of. If you're a public figure and do shady stuff don't expect them to forgive you. If you're gonna take the morally higher ground than liberals, then you better behave better than liberals. Otherwise you're just a hypocrite.

@@philipseymore3498 The law cares much.

He has become significantly less than a bell end in the last few years

If they're lying he's going to earn tens of millions of pounds in compo but do you think the Times and C4 would've outed him if they weren't sure they would win a liable case?

Bang on the money! MSM have to silence people like Mr Brand.

Dan Wooton

The " Stormy Daniels Syndrome?" Russell should take this "opportunity" to work on a new NOVEL...title it " Who's the Victim Here?" BINGO; and let me expand on that; I'm in a good mood tonight. DUH, Our present administration is THREATENED BY A COMEDIAN?!!! The Fake Administration of Gangsters in conjunction with the Global Elite, have their own Agenda: Deleted anyone who disagrees....They call that justice; WE know it's "Just----Us." I wish the BBC could teach an on line course on VOCABULARY; "Alleged " and "Indicted" MEAN LITTLE MORE than the words " Gee, we suspect this but have to gather the evidence before we make fools of ourselves!!" All this video shows ME, is that SOMEONE has it in for this guy! (Being outspoken has its repercussions?) Piers needs a panel made up of women who have dated COMEDIANS. Most of the comedians who are sexually explicit when they're "on stage", are not that vibrant when they're off stage! I think what Miley Cyrus was when she was "on stage', was quite vulgar and only appealed to males looking to see what they wanted to see. Dolly said " try to understand her, she's a devout Christian." Ha-and "actress'" t'boot; GIVE HIM A BREAK---HE'S A COMEDIAN! What's good for the goose, SHOULD be good for the gander, shouldn't it ? And FEMALES ? when you say "no" or "stop" MEAN it .and stop placing yourself in "compromising positions.!" It's appearing s though we've got another Stormy Daniels Fantasy here-a girl raped several times at the age of nine, to "grow up" to not be able to distinguish the difference between rape and consensual sex ("Sixty Minutes Interview") By the way , isn't it time lie detector tests become accepted as evidence in a courtroom? "You're the Reason I'm not Married" by the way LyndaFayeProductions.

Wow

Why are you sure? How can one be sure without knowing anything?

I think it is stupid to say: I believe the victims. You can first of all nobody believe no matter if men or woman!

​@margretalbrecht95 We know he's dated many woman. The victims should be believed but that doesn't mean you can condemn without proof, especially when 10y old celebrity allegations come out.

Oh, my heart was broken more than once. The fact of the matter is that's not a crime.

wow, Piers is such a sleaze

Good point. Lauding his bad behaviour. Encouraging him to push boundaries even further

Well said.

It's all just a performance,

Guilty until proven innocent nowadays

People did complain

Yes only after the media trumped it up

@@Random-xw1fg 40,000 complained Piers said.....

@hvidhavn1 I am not sure this number is correct but maybe it is.

100 percent Ross was more culpable and Russell as a grimy drug addled sap at the time was never gonna wind it back and hang up the call or tell Ross it was enough

​@@etherspinRoss was an older comedian who was chasing clout with brand and could have advised against the silly phone call.

He's the one under suspicion for rape - not Ross. He was like a silly giggling kid, on the Sachs-destroying episode - he didn't have the sense nor decency expected of an adult because, as said , his brain was in little-boy mode.

This is what annoyed me about it , I quite like Ross , but he was out of order , he shouted the main comment that was the worst one , and got away with it. Ross should have owned up and said he was the most controversial one , instead he let Brand take all the blame.

​@@boshirahmedthat's the shameful thing, Ross does interviews with other celebs, what made him think he would sound cool by shouting what he did , feels like he was desperate to be down with the kids. Yet I don't remember him apologising and taking the blame. Russell was stupid for actually thinking playing it on his show was going to be a good thing , it's like if you got drunk and did something bad, you wouldn't then show everyone the footage , so why he put it on I dont know. The radio show isn't part of the claim either yet its always brought up.

He didn’t do anything to her , but have a consensual sexual relationship without abuse!

Is she fck! She just threw him under the bus by saying you have to believe the accusers! She could have said, 'wait til the evidence is provided" but she didn't.

She said friends with benefits.

@@user-ro2vb8by7u the thing he did that was reprehensible was to her grandfather as mentioned in the interview. What he did with her was perfectly fine.

Nothing happened , despite Piers being sleazy , the guy is a c*** , phishing for more and more sleaze that isn't there FFS SHAME ON MORGAN

Nothing like a bit of shameless self promotion to harden and empower even the most delicate of souls. Especially one claiming victimhood after a p.o.r.n career.

LOL How else will she be famous? That's the whole obvious plan. Never fuck a crazy woman.

THEY didn't arrange it! Get your facts right. The BBC had been planning an exposé for ages but it wasn't getting past their lawyers and the two women journalists (from the Sunday Times and C4) were investigating too (I believe one of them had heard personal testimony of SA by Brand in the past). Hence, THEY (the journalists) approached the women. It's not like it happened 100 years ago. It was relatively recently and although YES, we can blame his TV employers for turning a blind eye, we cannot blame the women OR the journalists for the "timing". It takes a LONG time these days for reporters from established publications to gather and verify accusations. Newspapers and TV news companies have lawyers who check every report so that it's safe from the charge of defamation.

@@leenieledejo6849 whatever. If it had been me, I would be screaming 'I was ASSAULTED' by this man, at the top of my lungs for 20 YEARS! I'd hire a lawyer after I went to the police, buy space in all newspapers...keeping quiet and waiting for all the red tape to unroll is not an option. However, you say tomato...

@@Jacksonthecollie You’re a dog! Keep your silly opinions to yourself. My dog hasn’t put his oar in so shut it!

If he didn't sleep with 16 year old girl, he would have nothing to be afraid of.

Shes creepy

wtf would she call him? What a ridiculous thing to say.

@@iamamoghalfmanhalfdog5325 Women scare you then?

@@1inchPunchBowl creepy people creep me out yes

@@iamamoghalfmanhalfdog5325 There's no common sense at all in your comment. This is an erudite woman who has had her own troubles and she couldn't have been any more honest. I would suggest to you that leaving comments calling people creepy who you have never met (I presume) is what is truly creepy.

Sounds as if someone experienced IMMEDIATE SPIRITUAL KARMA ?? Russell should take this "opportunity" to work on a new NOVEL...title it " Who's the Victim Here?" BINGO; and let me expand on that; I'm in a good mood tonight. DUH, Our present administration is THREATENED BY A COMEDIAN?!!! The Fake Administration of Gangsters in conjunction with the Global Elite, have their own Agenda: Deleted anyone who disagrees....They call that justice; WE know it's "Just----Us." I wish the BBC could teach an on line course on VOCABULARY; "Alleged " and "Indicted" MEAN LITTLE MORE than the words " Gee, we suspect this but have to gather the evidence before we make fools of ourselves!!" All this video shows ME, is that SOMEONE has it in for this guy! (Being outspoken has its repercussions?) Piers needs a panel made up of women who have dated COMEDIANS. Most of the comedians who are sexually explicit when they're "on stage", are not that vibrant when they're off stage! I think what Miley Cyrus was when she was "on stage', was quite vulgar and only appealed to males looking to see what they wanted to see. Dolly said " try to understand her, she's a devout Christian." Ha-and "actress'" t'boot; GIVE HIM A BREAK---HE'S A COMEDIAN! What's good for the goose, SHOULD be good for the gander, shouldn't it ? And FEMALES ? when you say "no" or "stop" MEAN it .and stop placing yourself in "compromising positions.!" It's appearing s though we've got another Stormy Daniels Fantasy here-a girl raped several times at the age of nine, to "grow up" to not be able to distinguish the difference between rape and consensual sex ("Sixty Minutes Interview") By the way , isn't it time lie detector tests become accepted as evidence in a courtroom? "You're the Reason I'm not Married" by the way LyndaFayeProductions.

Brand named her.

So - it was OK to mentally destroy Sachs - as long as nobody knew about it??????? You are sick!

People mature at different times. In the west 23 is still young.

You're an expert in political science so that means you can judge someone's character correctly? LOL.

There is a pattern on how these people that bring light to things end up being attacked. It's becoming too predictable. People were calling it over a year ago and warning him to be careful. This is just how long it took them to find some women willing to be involved.

You're a fantasist...😂

I do support your freedom to remain naive & gullible.@@zidesce7961

This case aside, the left have clearly weaponised the legal system across the Western world. Canada and the USA in particular, but more and more in the U.K.

Being violently raped against a wall is not "having your feelings hurt" 🤦🏻‍♀️ Do you know what that kind of sudden, violent attack does to a woman's body? Do you know why by definition it's very painful? Do you understand why it might be traumatic? My goodness. People idolizing this man are defending SA. Saying "innocent till proven guilty" is one thing - and it's fair - but implying that rape and sexual assault are no big deal is horrendous.

​@@leenieledejo6849You don't know that he ever did any such thing. People can make any accusation, that doesn't make it true.

@@anaromello If you read the testimony, it sounds convincing (especially with his texts from what has been proved to be his phone). SA happens a LOT more often than most people are aware of and liars putting themselves through the stress of interviews and the spotlight (even if they're "anonymous", there's inevitable speculation) are actually very rare. The majority of people who suffered SA, including myself, also suffer trauma and a lot of conflicting emotions (the main one being fear regarding bumping into the person again - since SAs are by definition violent - and fear regarding confronting them, followed by shame and also anger at oneself for either naivety or for no proper reason). The last one - anger at oneself - is the hardest to explain but is very common and is actually a major reason for not reporting SAs: not wanting to bring back these negative and depression-inducing feelings...

@@leenieledejo6849 We can all use words to sound "convincing". We don't know the context of those text messages or if they've been edited or forged. We don't know. We just know they made a documentary to take him down and out of all the thousands of women they slept with, they found a few that could provide a few accusations that were performed by actresses in shadows to the tune of sinister music. The whole thing is designed to manipulate us into believing him guilty. If they wanted to tell the truth, the women would have spoken for themselves without any manipulation and that would have stood on the basis of whether they appeared to be honest and credible. The only complaints he got at that time and the only complaints that people working with him were hearing were his one night stands calling his workplace to complain that he never called them back. Do you really think that all these women who can call his work to complain that he didn't call them back wouldn't have the ability to go to the police or media back then? Nonsense.

@@anaromello Why are you diminishing the accusations?? I am talking about more than the documentary. (And Brand uses manipulation too: most of his fans are totally hoodwinked. The genuine truth speakers during the last 3 years were banned from RU-vid within months. He has been allowed to stay cos he's controlled opposition). The testimonies are compelling. You cannot get 14 women (the number - at least - who spoke to the Times) lying and all the runners who, in their own words acted "as pimps" for him lying too! And I know a bit about journalism (having been a journalist). These days especially in the UK, you need to have a very tight case. The Times have been working on it for years, and the last four years especially. I also know that it's easy to sue for defamation if claims are made publicly which aren't true. He hasn't done so and that alone speaks volumes, I can tell you. PS No man can sleep with hundreds, never mind thousands of women without there being some kind of manipulation, coercion or SA among these "conquests". That's just a fact. His misogynistic language over YEARS (anyone who isn't blinded by bias and who paid any serious attention will have noticed) has also been a huge red flag. It's been an "open secret" in the entertainment business for years. How can you possibly suggest that Katherine Ryan and the other female comedians (who had a WhatsApp group had him among their "ones to avoid being alone with" list) are liars too?? How can you suggest that the claim that TV shows ended up having male only staff when he was appearing is a "false rumour" too?? Only those blinded by idolatry (the worship of people) or who are bitterly misogynistic with a very low view of women could possibly be defending the indefensible and maintaining that hundreds of people are lying while Mr Demon Eyes - who isn't suing anyone - is a sweet and innocent victim and a pilar of truth...

That's because the definition of a sex offender in 2023 is so pathetic that by 2030 you'd be sent down for ever looking at a woman

​@@LiverPools-ib5fvSo is it cool with you for a 30 year old to pursue and sleep with a 16 year old? Regardless of consent laws, how does that sit with you. Brand has pretty much admitted this.

@@LiverPools-ib5fv Really? So compelling a woman to have sex is OK with you?

First paragraph of the sex offenders handbook? It was consensual your honour.

You live your life in the public domain and out spoken like Brand them you take on the scathing public when you fall ...

Unfortunately the courts in the western world have been so corrupted thwy would convict a ham sandwich of being a turkey.

@@nowgrownup So that's the rule is it? You're a celebrity so you get justice served to you in a different fashion to how the rest of the population receive it? That's just silly; the law may be an ass but it's all we have and if the law is not applied evenly to all then what is the point in having it? It should be the police and the courts who decide who is guilty, not the papers, hacks or TV and RU-vid pundits.

This was definitely not wrote by a white liberal woman

Well said. Women have gone too far. I would never have gone to a hotel room with a celebrity. Why did these women put themselves in awkward positions they need to take responsibility for themselves.🇬🇧

@@susansweeney1069 defiantly blame the victims

Cope hard for the sex addict. 😂😂

I love Russell.

Not young, not clear minded.

Not alone has she recovered but she has has developed into a beautiful and assertive woman........

You sound unwell.

Path is correct, sociopath.

No hes not. He is a creep and a criminal

- Prince Andrew: globalist paedophile cabal, jail him - Pizzagate: Elite Democrat paedophile conspiracy, jail them - Epstein: Democrat conspiracy, jail them - Biden: Creepy paedophile, lock him up - Bill Gates: globalist paedophile, jail him - Russell Brand: oh thats too far its the mainstream media. All lies. Government globalists. blah blah blah so predictable

is it a cult?

Exactly my sentiments.

Well, his publisher has seen more than is and they have said that Russell deceived them and have dropped him like a sack of shit...

But Piers jumped in and made the distinction between ‘victims’ and ‘accusers’

Saw a photo of Woss the Toss and his wife and three daughters......The daughters were all incredibly plain

Yeah me too forget the rape and sexual assault that he did let it go

@@Chromedome-ss6mg yawns! The media are so trustworthy it must be true right?

"A good lad". Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear!!! Good job that you have no power, nor influence but a pity you have no intelligence.

I hope you don't work with kids or women... even goats better tread carefully.

weird....because more women have come forward....

So? Brand was sticking his junk in anything with a pulse back then. What’s good for the goose.

That is simply untrue. Harvey Weinstein is arguably the most prominent and powerful person who was accused and convicted. He was a very well known lefty and contributed a lot of money to the left wing establishment. There are other examples of people on the left who have been accused. Al Franken was a comedian who became a left wing US senator. Can’t get more “establishment” than that. He lost his job over it and because of a joke photograph…not sexual assault. Kevin spacey is left leaning democrat and worked on Jimmy Carters presidential campaign in the 70s and is a friend of Bill Clintons…again, can’t get more establishment. Your assertion that “EVERY SINGLE public figure who isn’t…” is demonstrably false.

That's not true is it?

A lot do cos it attracts the power hungry ego maniacs, who thinknyhey can take, take, take

Yes, every single person ..... lol.... yeah, that makes lots of sense. So that means if accusations are made, they shouldn't be investigated, dependent on who the accused is.

@seanmcmichael2551 look at what they did to Trump. Years of fake allegations.

Also was part of a music / dance troupe called the satanic sluts.

I agree. It's a complete stitch up because he's speaking out on issues that they want censored. He has over 6 million followers, not for his comedic ability, but because he's a truth seeker. This scandal is just all too convenient, no coincidence.

I was also thinking that this would be like the rock groupies of the 70's and 80's trying to convince us that they were the victims.

Russell should take this "opportunity" to work on a new NOVEL...title it " Who's the Victim Here?" BINGO; and let me expand on that; I'm in a good mood tonight. DUH, Our present administration is THREATENED BY A COMEDIAN?!!! The Fake Administration of Gangsters in conjunction with the Global Elite, have their own Agenda: Deleted anyone who disagrees....They call that justice; WE know it's "Just----Us." I wish the BBC could teach an on line course on VOCABULARY; "Alleged " and "Indicted" MEAN LITTLE MORE than the words " Gee, we suspect this but have to gather the evidence before we make fools of ourselves!!" All this video shows ME, is that SOMEONE has it in for this guy! (Being outspoken has its repercussions?) Piers needs a panel made up of women who have dated COMEDIANS. Most of the comedians who are sexually explicit when they're "on stage", are not that vibrant when they're off stage! I think what Miley Cyrus was when she was "on stage', was quite vulgar and only appealed to males looking to see what they wanted to see. Dolly said " try to understand her, she's a devout Christian." Ha-and "actress'" t'boot; GIVE HIM A BREAK---HE'S A COMEDIAN! What's good for the goose, SHOULD be good for the gander, shouldn't it ? And FEMALES ? when you say "no" or "stop" MEAN it .and stop placing yourself in "compromising positions.!" It's appearing s though we've got another Stormy Daniels Fantasy here-a girl raped several times at the age of nine, to "grow up" to not be able to distinguish the difference between rape and consensual sex ("Sixty Minutes Interview") By the way , isn't it time lie detector tests become accepted as evidence in a courtroom? "You're the Reason I'm not Married" by the way LyndaFayeProductions.

Why did they run to Channel instead of the police?

Rape is about power and control, not every famous man like Brand can get any women! We dnt all fancy the same one

No, it wasn't manufactured. There was a lot of genuine outrage and huge numbers of complaints because he did go out of his way to be abusive and nasty to Sachs and to Baillie. That Sachs was supposed to do an interview does not excuse what happened. They left a series of messages about Brand having sex with her. They could have stopped at the first and apologized and their producer could have edited it out before broadcasting. It was bullying, misogynistic, and a massive invasion of privacy. It was appalling behaviour and it was right that they all had consequences for it.

@@xyzzdoe3674 The majority of complaints came from sanctimonious bandwagon jumpers who hadn't even heard it. Much of it was borne out of an already existing bias and envy towards both presenters, particularly towards Ross, due to his well-publicised wage packet at the time. As I said, while it wasn't particularly smart of them, it was a trivial matter, overblown to sell papers etc. The level of coverage it received was ludicrous. While those with nothing better to do may well have been outraged, those who hadn't had easy lives were either indifferent to it, or too busy at work to care. It also invites the question as to what sort of family set-up results in a granddaughter ending up as a prostitute and in rehab for drug addiction. Also, it was not her family, but Brand himself who acted responsibly and paid for her to receive treatment for her addiction, something that was not publicised.

Because making these accusations is as damaging to the women as it is to the accused. It isn't a course taken lightly and in the vast majority of cases it isn't taken to Police at all. The abuse that accusers suffer in social media and in the court frightens many women off proceeding especially against a celebrity. There are a small number of false allegations, at times, but these are readily exposed.

@@GinaSeay-kn7xr so you believe tara reade and juanita broaddrick?

@@GinaSeay-kn7xr It's not as damaging to the women when no one knows who they are. Right now they're just a bunch of question marks, and it looks like it'll stay that way. We can't just believe all women when they suddenly decide, donkey's years later, that so-and-so famous person SA'd them. If they really wanted to put these men away, then they'd go straight to the police after it happened so that they can collect forensic evidence to use against the person in court. Not run to the *media* a decade later saying 'he did this, he did that.' Pointless. You're never going to get anywhere with that method because the window to provide any proof will have long passed, and all you're left with is a bunch of hearsay. And I don't know where you got the idea that there are a 'small number of false allegations ' and that these are 'readily exposed'? The number of false allegations towards men is actually large, and growing all the time. There are a large amount of men behind bars having their lives taken away as we speak because some women have been believed with no evidence. So as hard as it may be for *actual* victims to come forward soon after the SA has taken place, it's what they need to do to be taken seriously. There are far too many false allegations these days which is why evidence is everything in these situations now. If we were to just take every last women at her word, the number of falsely accused men behind bars would be astronomical, and it's already high enough as it is.

​@@GinaSeay-kn7xryou're a day dream believer