Тёмный
No video :(

ANSYS Structural Buckling Analysis 

Endeavos Innovations
Подписаться 378
Просмотров 18 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, I'll show how to carry out a non-linear structural buckling analysis using ANSYS finite element analysis package.
00:00 Intro
07:07 Non Linear Buckling Analysis Steps
10:30 Rod Example 1
27:01 Rod Example 2
32:22 Corner Frame Example
42:44 Shear Buckling
47:07 Flexural Buckling

Опубликовано:

 

8 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@rayhansaiafbin8898
@rayhansaiafbin8898 Год назад
The way you have presented multiple buckling types in one single video is awesome. Hats off.
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@piotrwieckowski9401
@piotrwieckowski9401 19 дней назад
Amazing video! Thank you very much! You have helped me to solve a design problem in my work ❤
@yatzilfajardo8612
@yatzilfajardo8612 2 месяца назад
Wonderful Endeavos! Thats what i needed to finish my analysis of a wing spar👏🏾👌🏾
@rezasadeghi2520
@rezasadeghi2520 4 месяца назад
thank you so much for sharing your knowledge, it was a great video, I really enjoyed it.
@naderzamani5752
@naderzamani5752 8 месяцев назад
Thank you Endeavos Innovations. A great presentation.
@TheMonkyfunny
@TheMonkyfunny 4 месяца назад
Awesome sauce
@gokulrajendran7111
@gokulrajendran7111 6 месяцев назад
nice explanation
@Arseniy_Afanasyev
@Arseniy_Afanasyev 5 месяцев назад
Thank you very much for this clear explanation! Could you be so kind as to share the link with models' geometry?
@ihbriones
@ihbriones 10 месяцев назад
Great video! Thanks!
@endeavos
@endeavos 10 месяцев назад
Glad you liked it!
@Arseniy_Afanasyev
@Arseniy_Afanasyev 5 месяцев назад
​​@@endeavosThank you very much for this clear explanation! Could you be so kind as to share the link with models' geometry or the final ansys file ?
@IoldxmanI
@IoldxmanI 3 месяца назад
Go on, please!
@malikfaizan4638
@malikfaizan4638 Год назад
How do i scale it i didn't understood and i am getting the normal deformation not at center but at top how shall i change it
@user-zv4hg8me5r
@user-zv4hg8me5r Год назад
Dear sir, thanks for a brilliant video. I'm wondering if it can couple two buckling mode shapes?
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
In some cases two buckling loads can happen successively as the buckling load is increased. Is that what you mean?
@vjx385
@vjx385 Месяц назад
The results I calculated are very different from those in your video. I hope to find the issue from your model.
@thymeteller6837
@thymeteller6837 Год назад
Dear sir, thank you so much for a very comprehensive video, I was wondering which statement in DNV-RP-C208 implied that the capacity is "200 ish" kN, as you mentioned at 37:50 mins. of the video.
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
Thanks for watching. The ~200+ KN is the estimated capacity based on DNV's chart. it is marked right there on Fig B-17.
@mikeb1097
@mikeb1097 5 месяцев назад
@@endeavosThe ~210 kN is not the 'allowable limit' based on the non-linear buckling. The 210 kN is the unfactored capacity from the previous example which was based on LBA and empirical buckling curves. The design capacity from NLA is the max value on the chart divided by all relevant safety factors (load and resistance) based on whatever code you are working to.
@hamza_ME_
@hamza_ME_ 6 месяцев назад
Are there any specific guidelines on defining the number of steps/substeps (initial, minimum, and maximum), plus Step End Time?
@drury2d8
@drury2d8 Год назад
16:16 I think the scale factor is not 15 mm, rather is 15 times the deformation of the linearized eigenmode shape. Please correct me if im wrong here.
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
The linear buckling load is normalized to unit deformation. So I can use scale factor = deformation.
@gunner4238
@gunner4238 Год назад
Hi, I am confused how you came up with the scale factor at 16:16, and does this work on all geometry like corrugated walls?
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
Hi Benjamin. The scale factor is based on the manufacturing tolerance and as structural designer, it is basically your choice. If you want to be conservative, you can use the max tolerance. In this video, I followed the DNV's recommendation. Please see the document DNV-RP-C208. Thanks!
@gunner4238
@gunner4238 Год назад
@@endeavos Thanks for the information! Can I also know which section did you get the value from? And another question I would like to ask is: In my project, I need to apply both hydrostatic and constant pressure onto a corrugated wall. When I get my eigenvalue, do I multiply the eigenvalue to both pressure or just the constant pressure? Thanks in advance!
@fatimahseba6930
@fatimahseba6930 13 дней назад
How did you create the chart? 18:39
@balar1804
@balar1804 Год назад
For Non linear thermal buckling , how to find the critical buckling temperature
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
Temperature can impact young's modulus if you have defined it as function of temperature. Buckling can happen at any temperature. There is no set "buckling temperature". If you want to find how buckling load varies with increasing temperature, you may have to run this simulation at different temperatures by inserting temperature as a load. You can use the temperature as a parameter and run this simulation at different temperatures to determine buckling load as a function of temperature.
@balar1804
@balar1804 Год назад
@@endeavos i assumed temperature is constant, only temperature varies across the thickness.
@nuraisyahsamsul2831
@nuraisyahsamsul2831 Год назад
why i cannot change the material properties from linear to non linear?
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
I didn't get your question. Can you elaborate it?
@nuraisyahsamsul2831
@nuraisyahsamsul2831 Год назад
@@endeavos sorry, i get it now, i want to change my question, what is the different between force based and displacement based analysis, and why both of analysis we get the similar result? Another question, why i cannot get the graph like you did? I m getting straight line. 😣
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
@@nuraisyahsamsul2831 In the force based analysis, we apply a force to initiate buckling which results in displacement whereas in the displacement based analysis, we apply displacement to initiate buckling. Both methods will give you the same buckling load, however, force based methods run into convergence problems. Displacement based loading is preferred because it will also show you post buckled behavior of the structure.
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
@@nuraisyahsamsul2831 Regarding the second question, can you tell me what example or problem you are referring to?
@nuraisyahsamsul2831
@nuraisyahsamsul2831 Год назад
Hi, can i have your email, i want to ask about my problem regarding my project
@endeavos
@endeavos Год назад
Sure, its zaeem@endeavos.com
Далее
Linear vs nonlinear buckling
9:25
Просмотров 33 тыс.
ANSYS 17 - Linear Buckling I-Beam Tutorial
10:25
Просмотров 124 тыс.