This guy is so sadistic and psychotic. I feel so bad for the victims and what they went through during the torturing. I can't even imagine the pain they went through. May they rest in peace.
Bass D#min. Hello from The Island of Sicily. Good Morning. It just goes to show what kind of People The Brits really are. They are just like them Savage Third World Refugees who have taken over The U.K.
This is probably going to be a sad insane case to listen to. Thanks for putting this out. I’ve been doing my own true crime content on my channel and you guys are a great inspiration. Thank you
Anyone who'd torture a handicapped human being like this is just a VILE monster 💀 and this is definitely one of the worst of the WORST! It's heartbreaking to imagine what he sent through, along with the teacher. Sick!!!!! 😡 I hope you and me never have a neighbor such as this dude.
It is very hard to believe that a human being can be like this to another human being. Just so hard to wrap your head around. I've hated someone so hard before that I thought my own eyeballs were gonna pop out of my own head but I could never do something even remotely close to this. I just hurt myself by letting that hatred eat me up but this guy wasn't even driven by hatred (or at least it don't portray it that way) so I just can't imagine how it happens.
@@shellydesormier4646 yeah, that all happened when I was young but that person still exists and she's still in the position she was in when I felt that way, I've just gotten more used to it.
It's not about hating the victim. He did not hate his grandma but he killed her anyway. As the video says he vented his frustrations on those around him.
I am from America and we have so crazy crazy people who grotesque things, but this guy is terrifying! I am a true crime buff and never heard of this one before!
There is sources saying that the dude was stabbed 540 times I wish i was joking But some sources say 250 Still pretty brutal regardless One of the most horrific cases i have heard that
I don't get it... I grew up with just as much (if not more) trauma than this guy... & although I grew thru my teens quite angst-ridden, I'm the furthest thing from a serial killer.
5:00 defensiveness, can't depend on people, it's just me: great, so what? That's exactly how I feel, but that never negated my empathy. I was bullied too, and not just a little. I hate it when someone tries to find a psychological/upbringing factor involved in these monsters. There is nothing to figure out, they are born predisposed to this bc they lack empathy, then some of them develop a taste for violence. Plus or minus a head injury. Nothing more to understand!
@Raphaella Victoria except it's not that simple. What you've done is give the documentary explanation of psychological conditions that are far more complex than such explanations can explain. So much for RU-vid university....
I often find the title of this show ("World's Most Evil Killers") to be a bit hyperbolic, but in this case, it's almost an understatement. Good Lord...
Again this criminologist with the farfetched "explanations". His neighbour reported the burglary to the police "and in doing so he'd taken the power away from Arkwright and he wanted that power back"... How about he wanted revenge for being caught by the police? It's like she's purposefully makes everything more complicated because she otherwise would have nothing to add to the show.
"They are still counting the stab wounds." 😬 That's not something you hear pathologists say very often, I guess! Jinkies. The sheer overkill of this guy. I certainly wouldn't have liked to be the one stuck in a police interview room with someone who was 6'5" and had just put over 250 stab wounds into someone's body.
Childhood trauma and abuse can be a factor in cases like this, but it is by no means the normal reaction to it. I am fascinated by the forensics and crime psychology, but we really need to stop making it sound like anyone traumatized/abused is going to turn out like this. It is not the sole or even main cause. Even children exposed to the same environment will not turn out the same as each other.
Maybe not letting offenders read books about other offenders would be a good start. What institution has books about killers available to their inmates? lol
Yes because book banning isn't an arse backwards way to solve problems. Are you then going to eliminate television as well? Good luck with that as you'd have riots at every institution in the nation. Books are not the problem...
An horrific story. One of the worst I have listened to. I am bound to say however, that regretably there are many more children who are abused, but grow up to be successful and valued members of society, so one might ask if is it a question of choice, or is some 'bad wiring' at birth responsible. If the experts don't know, then I certainly don't. We are all so grateful to these 'experts' for their insight into the past and present of these monsters; but tell me.... After all their deliberations, is there any chance they might actually PREVENT a crime, instead of waffling on after the fait accompli ? If not, then they aren't much use are they?
@babavee100 and how do you propose to do that? Perhaps keeping millions of people desperate and on the verge of losing everything living paycheck to paycheck isn't the best way to create a healthy well adjusted population. What you've suggested is arresting people for crimes they have yet to commit... Would you like to be arrested for something someone else claims you will do eventually? If not how can you suggest doing it to others?
@@bruggeman672 No didn't..! In fact I am an avocat for NOT arresting people for what they MIGHT do,.. My point was, that these 'experts' do not contribute to preventing crimes.. and only there to analyse affer the fact. Once the judicial procedure deems someone guilty, then it is rather easy to pontificate about why they did it, rather than prevent them from doing it, which is a useless attribute and doesn't need the prefix of professor or doctor, or psychologist. It is the painstaking work of the forensic scientists and the police, and the courts who bring these folks to justice. Little help if these experts explain why they did it, because AS I SAID .;you can't arrest someone for what they MIGHT do and thank goodness for that ! Dear God... ! Read the comments carefully before you offer a gobbledegook reaction. MY gripe was against the 'experts' and their paid, useless performance for the telly, in telling us something we already know, once the perpertrator has been found guilty. Idiot !!!!
I enjoy this show, but it is not well researched. According to the textbook definition, Arkwright was not a serial killer, as his crimes were committed in the span of a few days. A serial killer is defined as a person who kills three or more people with a cooling off period between kills. As Arkwright had no cooling off period, he was not a serial killer, and is not listed as such in anything that I have read. I am surprised that trained Criminologists would refer to him as a serial killer.
@Jester a serial killer is someone who kills two or more people no cooling off period needed. Definitions get updated now and then. If people want to play expert perhaps they should stay on top of their subjects of choice...
He does favor Clint Eastwoods son, a lot (except that nappy hair doo). I had to turn on Closed Captions because I couldn't understand some of these British accents and the Captions couldn't even translate the words LOL
Just another young guy who didn't have that guidance or love that a kid need's growing up! He had parent's & a system that failed him and this is the result of that. True monters are sometime's made not always born!
Oh bullshit! Someone does that. It’s all them. The past. Can never ever be another’s fault. No matter how ones been treated. Everyone is born innocent. Trauma does matter. It’s still. No excuse.
Believe or not I feel visa application to visit UK to see my daughter 8 and half years old but the rude immigration refused me I was there in England the wrong country for 12 years but I found that country is filed country
con man)- tortured and mutilated. yazid was a con man. hossein was the son of one of the first qualifies of Islam Muhammad successor Ali. - Ali was also Muhammad's first cousin the very first man who accept the fate of Islam in the history of Muslims. however Hossein was tortured and mutilated by one of the yazid's generals named Shemmr (Chemmr) a warrior of karbela's battle.
What?! I'm American I love them so much. So much more enjoyable to have a mix-up. Either way you didn't have to make that comment, that's just rude. You're saying you can't watch because they're British and have British accents. Kind of ridiculous 😂
All evil doers out there, will have their day of reckoning under GOD. They will be nebuchadnezzarized. Meaning , they will be crushed and corrected by almighty God's corrective judgment. Not unlike how King Nebuchadnezzar was, and will be.
Reckoning under who? Is this more Christian fairy tails? How can you say stupid crap like this and expect people to take you seriously? You can't have it both ways. Either you truly believe that bull$shit or you want to have a serious conversation. You can't have both.
@@chndlr18 _Reckoning under who?_ I hold the position that classical theism is true. That an ultimate creator God exists, and we know this in virtue of natural and special revelation. God's self disclosure. In nature, facts generally, are indirect evidence of God. _Is this more Christian fairy tails?_ I argue for the existence of God on classical theism. I don't agree with mainstream Christianity to a significant extent. For example, I think the trinity is false, and I don't believe there is a hell or eternal punishment. I'm a universalist. _How can you say stupid crap like this_ I can understand why you made that comment. You thought I was coming with mainstream Christian nonsense. Such as "turn or burn" teachings. _You can't have it both ways._ You haven't established that I asserted anything that is wrong. _Either you truly believe that bull$shit_ First you're going to have to show that the proposition of the existence of God on classical theism is a problem. Otherwise your criticism is vacuous. Right? _want to have a serious conversation._ I do quite often with skeptics. _You can't have both._ You haven't shown that there is a problem on my end.
@@chndlr18 Again, I'm not apart of the Christian religion. I don't agree with far too much of it. I also have some bad news for you. Since your comments implied that you hold to an atheistic worldview. Here it is. In the theism/atheism dichotomy, its the theistic worldview that is internally coherent. Not the atheistic worldview. The atheistic model of reality has no very first principle of any ultimacy. NO metaphysical primary category. That means a skeptic will not be able to account for that their model of reality has intelligibility. Due to how the skeptic has no ultimate source of dependent facts to appeal to. Whereas a theist doesn't have that problem. God basically defined on classical theism, means that a theist has a very first principle, of a divine ultimacy of reality for grounding the viability and intelligibility of all the general facts that we know. That's why I'm not an atheist.
It's insane that they arrested him for burglary, then let him go with a court date after he murdered 3 people so he could go on to murder one more. The police seriously dropped the ball on this one.
Are British cops homicide cops just stupid or what. So the guy was in custody and they find a dead neighbor and automatically oh it has to be another killer out then and not well he could have easily killed the guy and no one immediately missed the dead guy snd Arkwright then gets picked up and put in jail ,so what's so hard about killing someone then getting thrown in jail after killing the guy only to find him days later dead,, and the yorkshire ripper, Sutcliffe should have been picked up and charged about after his 9th murder but the silly cops couldn't get their shit together and didn't follow through with any leads like the tires like the photo fit pictures the Gap in the tooth bite mark the damn boots had they looked around Sutcliffe house n picked up his boots took a picture of his Gap teeth and compared his frighjn face to the photo fits and they had their man even the 5 bucks led back to the guy, like what did the cops need ffs to catch Sutcliffe slicing one of them open or smashing the women In the head with the hammer right in front of them in order for them to arrest the guy, I mean look at him it's the poster of like 20 photo fit pictures of Sutcliffe for God Sake ,I mean the Head guy Oldfield stopping all lines of investigation to go solely after a Jordie guy all over a hoax tape and letters. Like ok go thst route to but don't cut off all other leads and suspects I was freaking out watching one documentary because the old guy Oldfield totally fucked investigation right up by taking it way too personal I would have demanded he step down if I were Lapteau I think it's spelled because he had the ripper in his sights and knew Sutcliffe was their man but was humiliate by Oldfield for what for doing a great investigation and zeroing in on the right guy only to be told he didn't sound lkke a jordie so right there Oldfield should have Been told ok your getting way too out of hand and cost 3 women's lives ,,becsuse of his actions and attitude plain and simple
