Antigravity Machine (Part 3) Sandy Kidd Gyro Gyroscopes 

This man spent his entire life working on this and had several different machines to get to This one I certainly do applaud him for his efforts

holy shit it's the dude from that old movie and he's still in his garage!

Gravity didn’t seem remotely offended

Well, it is excellently balanced. But still fully on the table.

One simple way to verify that it works... Turn it on it side and place it on a cart or skateboard. It's not just the upward force that counts, it the longitudinal forces as well.

Definitely needs some LEDs on there.

I'd buy Sandy a beer in a heartbeat, you have to love his drive!

Good evening everyone, It seem that my demonstration has not been understood. Can I correct that statement? It has not been understood by a small percentage of visitors to this site. Let me try to make the intention of the demonstration a bit more obvious. I will not attempt to explain my intentions in building my previous devices other than state that they all work. However when I was at school and technical college I was informed that a mass rotated on a fixed radius and at a fixed rotation speed would always provide the same result, whether it be in angular momentum or as many prefer in their understanding of centrifugal force. They are different animals but as I have previously said are both generated by the same acceleration. Howsoever I designed a device which would at first sight generate inertial thrust, a lot of inertial thrust, the success of this device depending very much on the fact that any increase in rotation speed would increase the angular momentum or as I have said the centrifugal force. Nobody anywhere at any time told me that if the rotated mass was itself rotated that the angular momentum generated would diminish. I found that all angular momentum and centrifugal force would diminish to zero if the mass was itself rotated fast enough. If however the rotation speed of the mass was reduced the total mass of the rotated system would eventually return . I am pretty sure that my device demonstrates that fact. The result is one which was incidentally at odds with the limited understanding of the academics who condemned my device in the local university. . That said I discovered that if I mounted a pair of gyroscopes at a fair angle of vertical offset (say an included angle of 90 degrees or thereabouts) as my standard machines, and with a suitable mechanism (admittedly not easily made) alternate the speeds of the opposing gyroscopes by increasing the speed of one and decreasing the speed of the other continuously. This should be done sufficiently fast to create an oscillation of the system due to alternating changes in the mass of the gyroscopes. I am saving you all about 20 years of development, but from here you can go the rest of the way there yourselves. Best of luck. Sandy Kidd PS Everything you thought you knew about mechanics is reversed in just such a system, and the result is almost unbelievable at its conclusion.

Cool imitation of the sound of a Chrysler starter motor.

Trilogy conclusion.. we meet at last.

I like how the whole thing sits on a scale to demonstrate the gravity part.

Excellent engineering! Well done top Man! 🌟✨🤛

Bravo, Sandy!This demo is short and sweet - to the point.It will be encouragement for those who follow their dreams and challenge what is "known".Tinkering around with ideas ( like Thomas Edison did ) allows you to discover things you weren't even looking for.

So, as the whole apparatus spins about the vertical axle it sort of “sits” down as the outer flywheels are pulled out. Then as the flywheels on the horizontal axles begins to spin (in opposite directions?) the whole apparatus lifts up the vertical shaft? Is that why the spacing of the two red discs at the top changes?

Good evening all, Initially this demonstration was made in several separate pieces. . The device was rotated as demonstrated without flywheel rotation. . It was then rotated with flywheel rotation but without the return spring. (There was no lifting of the flywheels during this mode) . I did not at the time think that this was necessary and also did not wish to insult anyone’s intelligence, so I removed several pieces from the video, this part being one of them. . However it seems that I was mistaken. Because the rotating flywheel is itself being rotated does not mean that this mystical precession is taking place. It appears that there is a belief that any spinning disc is precessing as soon as it is moved. . My aim was to show that centrifugal force or angular momentum if you want it that way is generated inversely proportion to the flywheel rotation speed or inversely proportional to the system rotation speed. (The latter is demonstrated in Laithwaite’s large gyro lift, no magic just a gyroscopic fact of life) . This device was never ever designed to produce vertical thrust. It was designed to show simply one way of generating an angular momentum differential which can with a fair bit of cunning be converted into inertial thrust, although this next part is not so easy. Regards, Sandy. PS There are better methods but this will do for the present.

Nice experiment. Congratulations, you are very close to discovery.

Hi Sandy!, it's good to see you are still pursuing your dream! Pursuing dreams is so very difficult in life. As you know it can stress family and your self as well. Also, you have outside forces telling you, "No"... Keep going! Some of us also have passions for bringing our thoughts, imaginations to reality. You are already successful in that you have brought your thoughts into our 3 dimensional realm! I for one Salute you! There were and are many many other people in man's history working on ideas that they had attempted to build or at the least record in 2 dimensions. One of the great inventors was Leonardo Da Vinci his work is examined studied and interpreted and even built to test if it would work. A group of people even took a scribble he made of what looked like a parachute and built it and actually floated the square pointed top canopy and it did slow down the user and it worked! it was built from a tiny scribble! Your work may ultimately may not be for this time but for those in the future to discover and build and implement...You are an inspiration, God Bless †

Thank you Sandy. I believe you represent so much in regaurd to how hard work, precious time coupled with true passion and determination can be manifest . The gift we are all given by our creator "life" sadly for most , is waisted toiling away, like a rats on a tred mill in order to pay for the basic nessisties of life, which belong rightfully to each and everyone of us the day we were born. We are so much more than we know and are being lied to about EVERYTHING. We are all voluntary slaves for a tiny group of truly evil people who have manipulated Gods children . Off topic a bit I know, but you are one man who has accomplished amazing things. The time spent slaving away to get by should be spent by everyone , in their own amazing way, accomplishing millions and millions of amazing things, because we are all miracles waiting to happen. Thank you Sandy and god bless you.

You can add more wheels, and speed them up more and more. I think it will be a good thing if two mouvement (rotation of the wheel arount itself and around the axis) where not linked or attached

So if we sped up the gyros to the point when whole device could be lifted and maintain the speed of the gyros , while the whole device is spinning , would the device llft itself to infinity or would it loose the force and come back down eventually?

Add 4 gyros as apose to 2 might get double lift and then put it in a vacuumed box for air resistance

Centrifugal force from each gyro mass when they are each at zero angular velocity with the main rotor assembly exhibiting angular velocity, changes into an inertial force couple (torque) from each gyro, as each gyro gains their angular velocity, therefore making it seemingly disappear, but still is present, or in other words, redistributed, or this centrifugal force cancelling out to become torque instead, so to speak. In a little more detail, this force couple of each gyro torque compose of opposed force vectors from the gyros pointing normal to the main rotor assembly axis and also lie in a vertical plane parallel to the main rotor assembly axis, having developed because of the precessional rotation of the main rotor. These force vectors are in summation with the forces of the torque lying within a horizontal plane that drive the main rotor assembly. This torque summation results in a precession that is neither purely in the horizontal plane or in the vertical plane, but is a resultant precession 90 degrees to the summation of torques within this assembly as described, that cause this resultant precession to be observed as a 'skewed corkscrew' path that each offset gyro takes in the demonstration of this machine, or in other words, a little of the precession is of the upward swing of the gyro arms, and the rest of the precession is of the main rotor rotation. The opposing reaction to the summation of these torques can be seen in the compression of the top magnet, and by the slight rotational load on the main rotor motor that can be heard. The centrifugal force is not gone, but is repackaged to create a resultant precession through the centrifugal force's 'metamorphosis' into gyro torque.

Dear Sandy, sorry for my english, but i want to say thank you for your work and the energy spent to develop your machine, which in any case will leave something to next generations to work on in the hope for a cleaner future. I was watching previous videos from 70/80 and i was thinking: Imagine what this man could achieve with modern technology! There are a lot of really good explanations on internet about why a gyroscope start the precession motion rather than falling under gravity force, all of them are really clear but still there's something that doesnt convince me. First because actually, gyros feel gravity just as a disturbing force, so their reaction it's independent if this force applied is on earth (gravity) or in the space (any external force). Stating that gyros create an anti-gravity effect is not correct. They do create a force (huge) that can be oriented in the direction you want by design. Of course if the vector of this force is in opposition to gravity it might appear as anti-gravity force, but i do think gyroscopic forces belong to another "plane". So the first big question is: What is the reference frame of a gyroscope? I prepared an excel spreadsheet with all the equations on bodies motion and gyroscopes physic. This is a simple rotating disc, mounted on one edge of an arm, the arm is connected on the opposite edge to a fixed center center of rotation. The classic gyroscope. I've noticed that if such gyroscopic system is designed within certain mathematichal range values the amount of work [J] executed by the reactive forces of the gyroscope is (in my case) 8 times more than the amount of work externally applied to induce such reactions. This 8 times depend from the inertial values and dimensions, I choosed such values to make it "constructable". The impossible results were analyzed using: A- controlled precession angular speed: Using conservation of mechanichal energy (Kinetic and potential), the work made by an impulsive force to accelerate the precession speed (kinetic energy after-kinetic energy before) is far less than the amount of work executed by the gyro reactive force to lift itself (potential energy after-potential force before). B- controlled spin angular speed: supposing that you can control the spin velocity (Ws) by an electric motor, and you calculate such speed to keep the gyro arm horizontal (tilt angle 90 degrees). The gyroscope arm will start rotating at its maximum natural precessional speed (Wp), being the arm horizontal you have the maximum torque induced by gravity. The amount of Precessional Kinetic energy calculated on such gyroscope mass rotating at that natural precessional speed at that given distance from center (arm lenght) is far more than the Spin Kinetic energy spent to sustain such precessional conditions. Note: to calculate the precessional Kinetic energy you can consider the inertial parameters of the disc using Huygens-Steiner theorem -OR- ignoring the shape dimensions, and considering only the mass of the spinning disc (which is more simple and gives anyway very close values) by using Ke = 0.5*mass [kg] *angular speed [rad]*distance from center [m]. SO: Where is this energy coming from? how is it amplifying the force ? It looks to me like if somehow the gyroscopic reactions can exploit the external force applied (even gravity) by redirecting it toward an efficient direction.. The dimensions and design of the gyroscopic system amplify this force in the same way an archimede's lever would do. But differently from the lever, all these happen in a 1:1 ratio of time, if we analyze it from the Power [J/sec] point of view, clearly the gyroscope is converting some kind of energy [J] being the time [sec] constant. Note that If i change the dimensional and inertial values i used in the equations, everything still work but in an inefficient way. I dont know if it is mechanically possible to extract such forces without disrupting the equilibrium of the system, but certainly - absolutly certainly - it is a mathematical curiousity.

i built that thing 1974 i was high school useing old electric 6 volt fan motor from dodge desoto set up to drive triple gyros. the battery sat on the carryer of my push bike,then the gyroscopic propulsion drive i designed and built sat neatly on the head light clip .my brother and i would have turns ,battery lasted all week end you know those great big 6 volt batterys.gyroscopic propulsion works

Sandy's earlier videos show one of his devices suspended against an equal counter-weight; the device was not pushing against the ground or any other external thing. Torque was converted to linear, vertical, acceleration. And the device, clearly, moved upward!

Mr Kidd, would your gyro invention create the same amount of lift if it was placed inside a vacuum chamber?

The gyroscopes resist changing angle toward the x axis, the spinning of the x-axis creates a force trying to push the gyros axis parallel with the x-axis. The combination of these creates a force along the y-axis, similar to how a sailboat can move forward by the combination of keel and sail. The spinning flywheels create resistance to angular change without having to be anchored, and centripetal force creates a force on the angle without having to be anchored, so the device doesn't need to push against anything to move.

On 19 century, french scientists started to study spiritual phenomena, and discovered the presence of spirits between us. Then, developed an science, that currently is known as "French Spiritsm". French Spiritsm isn't so popular in France but very popular in Brazil, with 5 millions followers, from high and mid class mainly. That religion is a very serious religion, and the communication with spirits is very much practiced. Several books were made. There's another spiritualist similar serious religion called "Ramatiz", who created a book called "Life in mars planet", where they say to have written that book through psychograph with a spirit of a martian man. That book can be found in internet, but I didn't find it in english, but you have it in portuguese, in PDF to download or the paper book. I'm not here to discuss religion or making someone to believe in such religion and so on. But, in this book, whose I've read, there's a chapter which talks about the flying saucers. They say that, the earth doesn't know still the " magnetic etherical energy", the universal fluid, the creator energy. That energy is at space (ether) and in a no material dimension. All universe matter, is the "magnetic etherical energy" coagulated", I mean, all matter in the material dimension is formed from that magnetic energy. Alien ships use this powerfull energy to travel through universe. The flying saucers has 2, 3, 4, untill 7 rings which spin at very high speed, around the ship vertical center axis. As consequence of high spin, the ship creates an own gravitational field, that cancels the interference of earth magnetic field. That explains that 90 degrees movements who people observe when they visit us. How these ships don't use magnetics jets coming out of propellers, a flying saucer can't move in places where there's no a strong magnetic field. What I mean is that they use the planet magnetic field to move. Three simple controll levers create a instability in the ship field, so that the ship is attracted (dredged) by earth field by any direction at high speed. A flying saucer can travel throughout the solar system because the sun magnetic field, but can't fly in open space, being necessary a jet propeller. When I watched the video and listenned the author theory, I immediately realize the similarity with what is written in the book. I think he is at the correct way. What lacks, I think, is the powerful magnetic energy to spin the device. Nice work, from a visionary man.

One more thing- I'm not sure if many people get what is being shown here. First the assembly is spun with the gyros not spinning. The centrifugal force forces them outward and downward to repel the spring force, and the wheels are almost now fully outward or parallel to vertical. Then the wheels are turned on to rotate fast, and they then raise up again, because of the reduction in centrifugal force somehow. This is obviously counter intuitive. The mass is the same. The apparatus is still spinning at the same rpm. Why do the wheels raise up if spinning? They should not, spinning or not. It appears the mass of the wheels is reduced. If so the weight of the entire device should show less on a scale. Does it? And does it matter the direction of rotation of the wheels? Or if you reverse one of them? Keep in mind Michael Faraday, told he was stupid because of a speech impediment, was then homeschooled. He accidentally discovered electromagnetism when he had a magnet and it was swept past a coil attached to a current meter. He noticed a pulse. The rest is history.

Thanks for the videos and for you dedication, ignore the haters if no for people like you the world would still be so boring.

A few observations and questions: Could this device be powered "internally" meaning could it be engineered to work with out the power source in the box? It seems or appears that it would require some other attributes to complete the full vision in a self contained "craft", "vessel" that could be used to move man from one point to another..? Have you considered magnets, coils, etc..? What could the power source be?

Sandy I believe in your work and admire your dedication over the years. In this age of 3d printing is it possible for you to make available some schematics of your designs so some of us can follow in your footsteps? After all this is your legacy. Much respect sir. Gary Bate

wat about spooling it up to an absolute max speed

What happens if only a single gyro arm were attached? What if the weights were heavier metal? What happens if you spin it at 10x the speed?

If you were to sit that whole unit on a scale then run it. would the scale actually show any weight loss once the gyro hits the top?

Sandy's part 2 video shows the gyro's rise as the counter balance lowers . This shows that the gyro's are communicating with the counter balance and visa versa , like earth to sun or earth to moon. Ether is a wonderful thing!

Attach some solid rocket engines to it and see if it will defy gravity.

Did this experiment back when I was 11 ( 1974 ) using similar bits from tape recorders toy trains etc, but used one supply not multiple. Concept works but no practical AntiGrav application due to materials available at the time . Our current building materials will only produce a short life model with limited abilities. Sandy Kid will know me as the one whom spoke to a relative of his regarding the subject. in a TANDY in Yorkshire back around late 70's. I would like to converse before it is too late as it were (AGE) !

The spinning energy force is from another place based from outer sphere and cant involve the gravitational uplift. This device takes more energy for spinning than just lift the device regularly

Anti Gravity Machine (Part Three) 30 and a bit years ago when a device of mine {(the one shown in “Anti Gravity Machine (Part One & Part Two”)} was being evaluated at the local university I decided to demonstrate to the faculty members present something I knew was contrary to accepted principles.. I claimed that I could alter at will, the amount of angular momentum generated in a system of fixed rotation speed. I was informed very curtly that what I claimed was impossible. I subsequently set about demonstrating the impossible I had claimed that I could alter the amount of angular momentum developed in a system of fixed rotation speed by altering the rotation speed of the gyroscope(s) That device was not very different from the one I am demonstrating here. This is a very simple device comprising a pair of oppositely mounted gyroscopes (a balanced system is required in the interests of safety) The gyroscopes are mounted on vertically swiveling supporting arms and are driven through a common gearbox. My original intention was to allow each of the gyroscopes and supporting arms to create an angle of 45 degrees with the horizontal, when held at that angle by a pair of links and a central bias spring. It was hoped that the increase in system rotation speed would be sufficient to pull the gyroscopes most of the way down into the horizontal position. The rest is self explanatory. The successful demonstration when carried out in the university was met by absolute silence, as they turned their backs and walked swiftly out of the laboratory, as they do. Nothing was ever said, recorded, or reported, and never subsequently mentioned to me, at reviews or otherwise. This demonstration relates to a simple case in which moderate rotation speeds are utilised within an optimal elevation range. However this is just the first in many, of hitherto unknown facts, relating to the effect on a rotating system of gyroscope rotation speed alteration. It can be seen that many variations of such a device can be made and tested. When taken to extremes, the results of such experiments, appear to defy reality. We can get around to them. Sandy Kidd.

Great was turning but not lifting, so what is here to see?

This would be a good experiment to try in a weightless environment, like the IIS, to see if the rotary gyroscopic force really can produce linear motion in a straight line.

Hi Sandy...just discovered you through prof Laithwaite.... in this machine demonstration, when you rotate the bottom motor the arms move down....centrifugal force...and when you spin the giro on the arms it returns to its starting night....is this not...just conservation of energy? With opposing spinning forces reaching a status or resting state? Your work process is fascinating and as a science film maker...bbc horizon pbs nova etc...I would like to talk to you about the process of inventing...to inspire others. Best wishes Simon Holland.

a lot of you commenters seem to compare this to a helicopter rotor, but its generating vertical lift without the manipulation of air or an atmosphere, gyros are also proven to still work in a vacuum they basically produce their own gravity. so it could be a perfect way of continuously producing momentum for a ship to move through space using only electric power absorbed using solar panels instead of fuel. if the weight of the gyros was increased as well as the speed of the spin it could exponentially scale up the effect. Everyone calling this an egg beater or new cake mixer is so ignorant of what has been shown in this video and shaming someone for coming up with new ideas is only being an obstacle to human progress.

I would have been impressed, had the box flown away ...

i studied over gyroscope at its phenomenon. and now i seemed to understood what this experiment is about. he might have got the idea from 90 angled gyroscope turning itself under gravity. i guess this experiment won't get what he expected but i believe answer could be somewhere around this principle

Dear Sandy , in the late eighties i discovered your book in water-stones argylle street Glasgow i was totally skint at the time but could not put it down i returned to the shop over a couple of times and read it all just standing in the shop i looked out from time to hear of follow up work but saw nothing so glad you have these vids up on you tube i also missed the show from the time .sure i remember mention at the end of the book of further possibilities for Research and development Nasa ? Australia ? what was the outcome there ?

Mr Kidd, Amazing work, I love every bit of it! Question, if one was to send a fairly large, powerful gyroscope system - such to say, a supposed 'scaled up', perfected version of your invention, with it's own power supply - into space, would the effect of the gyroscope bend spacetime? I can imagine the interfering gravitational pattern spiralling outward from the gyroscope mass as visually similar to a tunnel through a simulation grid, or how a trampoline looks when you put a bowling ball in the middle of it. The metric of 'spacetime' would be sunk in a similar fashion. I reason this with the statement of the fact that the gravity created by the system would have to resolve itself in some way in the vacuum, and everything that creates it's own gravity in space creates some very large sinkhole in what we view as spacetime. If this is correct, might it also be possible that upon creating the interference, or void, in the spacetime, that the gyroscopic system might then relocate itself to another 'point in spacetime,' as a side effect of the spinning nature gyroscope?

Put some rc motors on and take it outside for a spin👌

this seems to demonstrate that since a rotating object undergoes increase in inertia it is really almost the same or the same as in increase in mass

Have you made any progress since the last machine you made?

Has Sandy Kidd taken his machine any further? I have been working with Magnetic levitation for the past 3 years. Your demonstration has helped me take mine to the next level. I was wondering if Sandy Kidd has patents on any part of his machine?

Well after years of avoiding the wife at least you can say you reinvented the eggbeater

how much weightlessness this mechanics can create cause it seems at this moment that it balances the centrifugal force completely.

I want to see it work upside down to see if it can pick it self up from the spring top

I understand what's happening except I think the design is inefficient...you need more speed and less moving parts

so why isn't this rig put on the scale?

Nice work Sandy, you have got half of the concept right, it is going to take me a while too, but hoping no longer than 2yr, you are missing three other vital components tho for it to work at its true potential, but the general idea is there, well done once again I will mention you when I achieve what I'm hopeing for for, It will achieve something that I'm sure of, but what I've got planned out of this world, everybody is on the simlar tracks but not understanding what needs to done in conjunction with each other as far as I can see so I'm going to try it myself. Just wanted to praise you on your work and let you know

I suspect what Sandy has made, is a mechanical appropriation of a wave generator, that is able to produce a wave in 3 different planes, simultaneously. Think of it as constructive interference of momentum(eg. A spinning cone with a marble spun around it will climb upwards), in that the lift produced is the effect of the interference. Great to see Sandy is ok, as his documentary inspired me as a youngster - and I've been tinkering ever since.

Your on the right path but need a better set up. There is a better way of doing it. The lagforce of inertia outwards on gyros as well as orbital motion needs recalibration about 3000 rpm's on the gyro's and 1000 rpm's on orbit. I know I've done this experiment in 1959. It'll work. I used 5 gyro's for the same orbit and more mass and it lifted a 1952 Chevy off the ground. The basic math for earths gravity is: (Vo÷(Vr×2))="g"constant. Vo=Velocity of orbit. Vr=velocity of rotation. "g"=32.17405ft/s^2 So: (18.545÷(.288198×2))=9.80665m/s^2 I've always known what gravity is even when I was 5yrs old. To prove a point the free fall on Mars is 26.5264ft/s^2 so a 10lb weight on Earth would weigh 8 1/3 lbs on Mars. You could have NASA check I am right. I also have 7 laws of inertia and can calculate the free falls of the planet's. The missing constant of earth is: 2.000003382s^/ft. The rate "d" constant Sun's pull is diverted towards the center of earth to create the inertial implosion field the cause of g constant acceleration.

The way gyro's work is like stirring a flask of water with a spoon, notice the center stoop down as it diverts earths gravitational pull to the point of least resistance the center. The outer molecules become lighter as the center molecules take up the slack and become heavier, Showing that circular motion and gravity are inertial force's. Circular motion generates outwards lagforce lagging behind the rate of change of angle in degrees per second. There is a math equations here. lfi lb=(M lbs × (¤ angle°/s))÷r,yards ¤=rate of change The lagforce never lets up in circular motion even at a fixed velocity. So 1 revolution/s=360°/s ((1lb×360°/s)÷1yrd)=360poundals/s Centripital and Centrifugal so called forces are non fundamental without action or reaction. So its really outwards lagforce of Inertial force behind the rate of change of angle..

I wonder any weight changes on all of entire system when it was spining?

I used to love the way that my front bicycle wheel could spin with one side of the axle resting on my finger as a kid. Then I got down to the business of fixing the puncture so I could focus on 'wheelies' or 'monos'. Was nearly a genius for a minute.

wow, my computer floated right off the table.

what am i looking at here?

One element of gyroscopic precession is that a rotating mass, when accelerated across it's axis of rotation, will precess 90 degrees to the direction of acceleration, in the direction of the leading edge. A good example of this is a motorcycle stuntman doing a ramp jump. Sometimes they talk about how the stuntman has to be sure he's not accelerating when his front wheel comes off the ramp or the front wheel will pull him down. I've seen it happen, where a motorcycle did a nose dive off a jump ramp, because the rider didn't know about the precession effect. The same sort of thing happens when one or more gyroscopes is rotated around another rotating axis which is gaining speed, as in the experiment above. There are some other vectors involved but the temporary _lift,_ during acceleration of the main axis is similar. After the acceleration ceases, the party's over. You will find formulas for the precession forces involved, for straight-line acceleration, in any Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers.

Yes! Just heard of him recently. I love this! I wish I could donate to @sandykidd

How do I get back this 3.5 minutes I just lost watching this bs?

Im not exactly sure what this video proves. All I saw were wheels spinning in a circle with no lift against gravity. 🤔

True antigravity would alter the gravitational field and I'm not sure if this does. It might re-direct the change in angular momentum so that the torque results in an upward force against the gravitational force.

Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing with demonstration of thermocouple / thermopile that slightly loses weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. Heat must be released away from mass so as not expanding air pressure under unit in test pushing upward . (upside down) The word "correlation" describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of properties. See 1800's work of John W. Keely with his "transmitters" as in series junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermopiles as tested for gravity control with his array of tuning forks vibrators. He also lifted 1 ton platform with triple air pressure sirens at ratio frequency tones. The wire type nodes junctions multiplied the frequencies even higher causing dissonance to normal orderly gravity waves. A french scientist also lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..

Get it to lift the power supply off the table, then you have something. Until then you have nothing

I'm sorry but it will never work, the force that tends to raise the gyroscope is balanced and canceled by the reaction on the axis of the gyroscope. In short, it is an isolated system, as if one put a big fan on a boat to inflate the sails and make it move.

I think these type of gyroscopes in pairs rotated in opposite directions at offset angle of about 90 degrees with regulated speed of each one are already used in the space probes to point antenna to the Earth or to main communication satellite. They use only electrical energy obtained by solar panels to drive motors of gyroscopes and do not use micro engines of orientation with expensive Xenon. To point telescope on any point on sky you need to rotate telescope just around 2 axes of rotation, the same with probes. In the last mission to asteroid Japanese used auxiliary probes without micro engines of orientations, they controlled their orientation just by gyroscopes and even used inertial trust to move probes back and forth.

That was the most awesome, high spec, and reasonably dangerous piece of machinery with absolutely no purpose, that I've ever seen.

Put some rotors on there, and it will fly ;)

Regardless of how the gyros spin it is still connected to the ground All this does it orientate the axis of the gyros. SO MUCH BS.

YES: this entire device does lift up- as you can see from at the top.

Nice job 👍👌

Back to the drawing board..

For those who'll believe anything.

What happens when u turn it on in a vacuum?

I seen drawings of simlar setups although with four gyros.

That didn’t do a thing!!!

Maybe pooping on it might help.

Nice to it works i tought about it some Year's ago...

If you change the axis wouldn't it work different?

Stop calling this antigravity, that's not what it is

What about thurst and direction. Hard to imagine with this. I think repulsive magnetic resonance is the key. Any applications designer please connect.

A Question..... What happens with three very large exactly the same powerful gyroscopes all rotating the same extremely fast speed and physicaly connected and at exactly right angles to each other on three planes.?

I don't think you're actually changing the centrifugal force except in so far as the diameter of the precession ring decreases as the gyros elevate themselves. They would still fly away if you disconnected them from the central shaft. I think the lift is actually due to the torque, which is induced by forced precessional motion. The opposite of precession induced by an applied torque (e.g. due to gravity.) Also, I wonder how much weight you could actually lift with that thing. Quite a bit I would think. However, I've seen your other videos showing that the entire apparatus loses weight when it is spun up. I'm stumped on that one, but I read somewhere that Eric Laithwaite claimed to have "cracked" it without violating Newton's laws. Can you confirm?

Just wondering what would happen if there were more than 2 Gyros attached, for example: 4, 8 or even 16 around the circumference and all this placed in a vacuum enclosure, I wonder if this could be done and what would the results be? Very fascinating subject ;-)

I wonder what would happen if you used a surrounding case made out of hollow tubes with mercury flowing within those tubes at the same time.. Then use strong magnets at the ends of those gyroscopes.

The component you are missing, helium(the gas 2 container have to be vibrating where you have the small wheels), voltage running thru it, & high frequency sound

Gyroscope effects are related to torques, so it is rather improbable to get any linear effects.

How do you will you deal with opposite rotation of the base if all device is lifted into the air?

could use it to bring subs up in an emergency, build one half the size of a room and have it waterproof so the room can be flooded on purpose to dampen its sound

Speed Material and shape is the key have you tried other constelations with more Gyros? A smaller spring there fore losing less force?

For my looks like the eccentric force created with the first spinning was delete with the second remote control spinning what is actually interesting because you could make device what can kill G force.

The change in acceleration (the spinning of the horizontal gyroscopes) is what causes the upward motion. If there is no change in acceleration, then there will be no upward force.