It's great to see that there are people that are thinking so far outside the box. Approximately 100 years ago people explored semi conductors, and just see how it has changed our lives today.
This is just incredible. As a child we had three television channels. And here we are with live broadcasts from the international space station to our own individual cell phones. We are still making fire with flint and steel.
You really don't believe anything this guy has said do you?? They never went to the moon! So telling you that he was making antimatter but there is no way to keep it contained!!! All I heard was bla,bla,bla!!!
This is just pie in the sky nonsense, it isn't worth thinking about. We can't get antimatter in any quantity to do anything with. Yes it does work in theory.
@@Withnail1969 larger reactor Isn't most efficient , use a SMALLER Net, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Frequency harmonic is a Specific Number of atomic mass " mass = energy all matter is Infinite. All Energy IS Entropy IS Information.
Bear in mind whatever speed you achieve on your trip out to Proxima, you'll have to bleed off nearly all of it to even stay in the Proxima system in orbit around the primary. Which means you'll have to turn the craft around at the mid-point and start accelerating in the opposite direction (which we will refer to as "deceleration" for the purpose of this discussion). Looks like antimater propulsion gives you 6.3 trillion miles per year, or 17.2 million miles per day, or 716, 700mph. That's 40 years acceleration and rouhgly 40 years "deceleration" -- that is unless you just want to wave at the Proxima system on your way through.
@@bryan3dguitar the basics... it didn’t take half the trip to reach the maximum speed, Like the guy above wants you to think. 200 mph reverse thrust per second at 716,700 mph will get you to zero in an hour... if anti matter thrust is as good as they say, (10x) this shouldn’t be a problem. Falcon heavy rocket 🚀 acceleration in orbit was roughly 61mph mph per second. Deceleration/acceleration in space should be the same if not better.
@@bryan3dguitar Moscow Aviation Institute - MAI - International Student's Page has given the following the thumbs up. It's all clearly correct. The Institute of Physics, Patna has now given the following writing the thumbs up. Excellent.♥️ THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IN A BALANCED FASHION IS SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED: "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!!!!!!!!! By Frank DiMeglio
@@dreadone6894 Moscow Aviation Institute - MAI - International Student's Page has given the following the thumbs up. It's all clearly correct. The Institute of Physics, Patna has now given the following writing the thumbs up. Excellent.♥️ THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IN A BALANCED FASHION IS SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED: "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!!!!!!!!! By Frank DiMeglio
@@jakehobrath7721 Your grandchildren, assuming you ever manage to get laid, will be bigger idiots than you are and obviously you know that since only idiots would be amazed that "stone" is older than living ancestors. But at least you won't have to buy many graduation gifts.
@@paulden3158 I like weed too but cmon man. Most epic topic? Nah. Doesn’t take much to sit around and get stoned. But to change the course of human history and to assist in paradigm shifting knowledge and technology? Priceless.
I might not understand all of it but it certainly gives food for thought in a mind devoid of certain 'particles.' Thanks for sharing. I am most honoured to be receiving such info. 🎑😍😇
So the landlord found out they were doing nuclear rocket engine experiments in his office building and kicked them out. I would love to have heard that phone call.
It’s important to get started. If it’s a failure then we know. If it’s a success, in 60 years, we know more about the universe, than all previous space science learned us combined.
To my understanding the engine seems more like a ion reactor than anit-matter, eventually what you are throwing out is a charged particle. the anti-mater is what you are using to generate enough energy through gama rays to charge the particle. and that part you can do any which ways as you have a radioactive material on board. instead of anti-matter you may also use a standard nuclear reactor for the purpose. My knowledge in this area is limited but that's what it seems to me.
I've been thinking about a way to counteract a fission reaction, the solution to counteracting an anihilation event that is caused by matter and antimatter colliding might also be the solution for counteracting a fission event. Fission may also be used as the seed for hot fusion for energy production or propulsion
Nice "concept talk", but the meaningful information is missing. What's the efficiency of the new positron moderator? Is it twice as efficient (meaning 0,2%)? Ten times? Also, what's the "energy density" of using an isotope for positron creation? Because taking an isotope to create a positron means you get fractions of a percent of the weight as actual antimatter. Coupled with the losses of the blackbox positron moderator, what are your calculations in terms of efficiency? Also, how do you deal with the logarithmically declining thrust from the isotope decay during flight? Will you create isotopes on the spaceship itself? If so, how much energy would that take and would it still be economical? Show us some data, or at least some maths...
I had the same thought with respect to energy density. He completely ignored the fact that the "fuel" one must carry is the radio-isotope; not pure antimatter.
KeyserX Is it normal for someone to treat a seminar as the submission of a research paper? That's a lot of details to drop on a venue full of laymen. Also I'm pretty sure that this guy is a CEO, that means this is a business seminar. If he gave out that much detail his competitors would be able to replicate it. You could always wait and look up the patents, later.
Mephilis 78 But there isn't necessarily even anything here. He could say, "we aim to have a kilo of antimatter and plans for a ship capable of containing it within 15 years" or whatever. That would be the business pitch with no complicated science. Just hearing facts about the theoretical energy density and production of antimatter is very dubious. Not to say they won't achieve something in the future, but I think if they had a more significant technical breakthrough at this point they probably would have mentioned it.
I'd agree except the point of his talk was to demonstrate the feasibility of their approach, otherwise why should anybody care? And that's precisely where the talk failed. Right now he's just saying "Look at this cool idea we have". And that's simply very underwhelming to me... the talk didn't need to be a scientific presentation, but at least show me SOME data so that I know you're on to something and not just pissing away venture capital on buzz-word projects.
It’s only 4 lightyears away, which means, if they can receive broadcasts, they’d be hearing stuff from 4 years ago. So if they’re familiar with humanity, I’m sure we’ve already scared the hell out of them.
What if there was some way to use quantum entanglement for communication over vast distances which travels a 10,000X faster than the speed of light or more. If we could do that we might have essentially sub space communications capabilities
Then they capture your aircraft and hire a smart young alien to investigate it. He then ends up telling other aliens about it and gets fired. Spends the rest of his life telling the story over and over.
Contrary to what most folks seem to be saying about this clip, the presentation deliniates a feasible method for using the energy released in a nuclear fission reaction to generate a propulsive force that does not require the craft to use additional propellant. To be clear, a high intensity, source of low velocity positrons is described. This is used to induce fission of a suitable nucleotide generating highly energetic charged particles. The fission is carried out in physical congiguration that allows the charged particles to be captured and directed away from vessle using an electromagnetic field at 10% the speed of light... an extraordinary and very specific claim. In this talk, the individual does not quantify the specific positron production capacity, or the yield of fission products per unit of positron generation. But this talk is not the place for that. It would be lost on an audience of laypeople, and in all likelyhood it is currently uncalculatable with a high degree of confidence by any known approach. That's why this is exciting. He is saying we have invented this positron moderation device that we believe might make the concept viable. But we don't know for sure. Fund us in order to develop the science and mathematics and experimental data that we need in order to make that determination. It is bold. It is risky, it may not work. But there are many reasons why we should find out. Even if it dorsn't work what we learn from the failure moves us closer to the civilization changing prize of pseudo-propellantless thrust and space travel at high fractions of lightspeed. SJF
I was thinking along similar lines. Thus far, this is not actually contained antimatter propulsion. It's a component of anti matter to do something else we already know, but more efficiently. I am actually doing research for a book where I actually tackle many of these problems with plausible applications. Not a lot of true experts in antimatter though but I remembered this guy. Hit me up if you wanna discuss some stuff.
@@jumpieva Moscow Aviation Institute - MAI - International Student's Page has given the following the thumbs up. It's all clearly correct. The Institute of Physics, Patna has now given the following writing the thumbs up. Excellent.♥️ THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IN A BALANCED FASHION IS SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED: "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!!!!!!!!! By Frank DiMeglio
With a positron/electron "collision" there are two 511Kev gamma rays emitted at 180 degrees from each other. Do the directions of these gammas correlate to the spin axes of the particles? Has anyone tried to figure this out? It is critical because I believe we are capable of controlling the orientation of the spin axes and thus we should be able to aim the gammas. EDIT 11/30/21: Well, I guess nobody knows. Dang it.
@@alchemist3724 I really doubt if Wikipedia has anything like this in it. Being a Nuclear Reactor Operator and a Radiation Protection Technician we're just the start of my education.
You are overthinking it. The gammas can be crudely redirected using ordinary Compton scattering, so that they emerge mostly on one side of the satellite and not the other, thus generating thrust.
Antimatter has been around since 1932 - I almost chocked on that one! You really should say something like it was first discovered or theorized then. Its kinda been around for a LOT longer! lol.
In the 40 yrs it would take to travel to that Star, we would probably invent another NEWER more efficient and faster form of space travel and beat them there !!
Hitchikers Guide. The first lot set off to to war, the second lot overtook them, and sorted it out first which left the first lot mad, and the third lot went back in time and changed everything. Or something like that.'''
It’s super easy to travel to a distant star. You just have to bombard a stable version of element 115 and transmute it to 116 to create antimatter. That will give you all the electricity to power your ship, it will also allow you to access the gravity A wave which will allow you to bend space-time. We have this technology on earth.. it negates all inertia and time dilation due to being inside your own gravitational envelope.
Before you can develop your antimatter propulsion you need to test it in space, but as you pointed out rocket technology is becoming antiquated. The space elevator first so we can move man and material into space safely, on a continuous schedule and in mass. NO WALL YES SPACE ELEVATOR
Problem is they are speakers. They like a comfortable life, they raise funds, they consume funds, raise more funds.... Even if they know they are in a dead end, they still consume funds. This is the main problem of science today.
@@bobwarfield3621 115 was meant to combined with a single proton to actually make e116, decaying anti matter, I assume positron. So the intent is still ultimately harnessing this reaction. If you listen to the design details it's completely plausible
Is he really trying to sell Radioisotope rockets as "anti-matter" rockets. His rocket will work and is not a scam and does technically uses anti-matter but it's not what most people think it is.
4 hydrogen atoms, 2 neutrinos, 0 carbon emissions! Welcome the future with 420 antimatter reactor! Fuse your dreams into reality now! Available at these (Wal-Mart, Best Buy, CVS, Dollar General) and other fine retailers> Just in time for the Holidays! void where prohibited by law. appropriate licensing responsibility of buyer. manufacturer not liable for misuse resulting in mass genocide, forming of singularity, time paradoxes, or any other sci-fi type scenario. This unit was developed for the sole purpose of powering too large television screens for watching sporting events, any other use ( such as freeing the human race from energy bondage) is strictly prohibited by large multi-national corporate interests.
There seems to be a lot of symmetry and super symmetry in the universe right down into quantum levels. If we can learn to make anti matter in large quantities we will have solved the need for energy. We need to learn to trap anti matter efficiently using electromagnetism safely
Unfortunately this will not happen. Any great breakthroughs we have made have always been suppressed by our governments as they do not want us to have free energy, as this will destroy all the major oil/fuel companies. The government will not want that to happen as there is too much money to be made from fossil fuels. This is why are technology hasn't moved in the last 100 years. Because the governments want to control everything, and that is why are home planet earth is dying.
@@chrismooney71 that sounds like a conspiracy theory so basically you are under the control of computer algorithms from google and Facebook and Twitter and Fox News . This can be caused by only getting information from limited sources
What if we get to our Closest star and don't have the Galactic Toll Fee? Do we get thrown in a Pit with Thor and Hulk to fight our way out? Things like this, I need answered.
I think by the time we work out how to utilise antimatter we will have worked out a more effective way of moving which does not use a propulsion method.
@Afghanistan Bananastand Yes I agree. We also need to understand our own human organism and it's capabilities, mentally and physically. The way our culture works I feel as if this is a long way off from being a way of life, academia treats topics like this as fantasy....or do 'they' know more than 'they' want us to?!
This is the type of thing humanity should be focused on. If something major happens to Earth, that is game over for the human species rich, poor, evil, and good alike. More over, its not a matter of if something will happen versus when it will happen. We need to really focus on colonizing space if our species has any chance of surviving deep into the future.
Nice thing about Gene Roddenberry, he always used actual science on his Star Trek. Yes, some were futuristic in applications but the base and principles were rooted in what was known at the time. This is similar, trying to find a viable application for real world usage. Wish them luck.
Gene Roddenberry had contact with people involved in the Secret Space Program ("SSP"). Star Trek is mostly a documentary, not a fiction, and the details of the truth behind it are coming out today.
The problem would be how we get something large enough off the planet to start with. The ISS was suppose to be a building block, to add to, to make larger as needed. Yet, I haven’t heard of enlarging it. We need to look at building a permanent facility (conquering the radiation issues on man) that will allow us to build large ships in space to utilize these power sources as to explore.
For a 100 tonne rocket you would need to eject a mass of 1 kg/sec at a speed of 1000 km/sec to achieve a 1 g acceleration, this would take you to 10% of light speed in 35 days, BUT you would have needed over 3,000 tonnes of particles to have been ejected (and if you plan a return trip it will be 4 times as much).
Jade Cox they could use my penis but they would need to rewrite the textbooks. The basic equation is The angle of the dangle = the heat of the beat * the throb of the knob
You didn't see the banana? I see it down at the bottom near the penny. What scientist would leave it out?? We are trying to have a serious conversation here come on man. No banana...........
Actually this is a good point (I bet that surprised the poster!) - most people have never seen the Eiffel tower or a Saturn V, so using those objects to establish scale is ridiculous. Better to show a stack of 2-storey houses, or a bunch of people standing on each others' shoulders. Or a stegosaurus rearing up on its back legs, who's never seen one of those?
Your equation is close but headed in the right direction. Your referring to Einstein's Theory of Sexual Relation: The angle of the dangle is proportional to the bootie of the cutie and the heat of the meat.
there is an object that sticks almost straight up with a angle cut on top, perhaps open. It is visible in several shots and based on shadows and lighting it is obviously a pipe sticking up to nothing...between 7-9 min range it is repeatedly shown nexxt to another strange shape, a geared roller or some such thing.
Here is the Original Semitic Text. HERE is The TRUE Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
Or putting positive electric wire into tubing, thus creating a circle of electromagnetics condensing electrons at center of tubing warping it to next segment, w=3c^2?, Then are the condensed electrons gravitons or antimatter?
@@USRenewable I realize that having to actually scroll along the video to the indicated time is oh so much harder than just clicking a timestamp link. So I will not hold that comment against you...
Alexander Kale well let's just be glad that I'm not in charge of the containment and transport of antimatter.. because if I don't know how to fast forward a playhead to a specific time stamp or marker then we are in trouble. Probably as much trouble as if you were also in charge of antimatter. Don't drop it!!! Tie your shoes, and don't trip... because if you do, you might have a lotta explaining to do when you cancel a bunch of matter and create a huge hole in our planet!!! Since your in charge of antimatter shit I got a dumb question? How long and how big would the battery be for the containment vessel to safely store and transport antimatter in a magnetic field & vacuum stasis tube? Would you have to carry a portable reactor(fission/fusion/zero-point) on your back just to keep it in a tube???
Antimatter propulsion would be a good power source for Antigravity, I have seen it twice live and in person while in the service of our county. I am so floored at the current thought processes.
I think I’ve seen us using the tech as well. A silent, perfectly still floating black triangle that was unlike anything I’d ever seen. I could make out detail on the bottom even. Then it accelerated off smoothly, quickly, and silently
@@USRenewable CERN has been producing anti protons for several years ..used in their experiments. not sure who makes the isotopes that emit positrons, but it's used in PET scanners.. AS in Positron Emission Tomography.... goggle "Pet scanners" to get a ton of info about anti-electrons...in spite of this common knowledge..there are still people that say anti-matter is not real!! (Flat-earthers)
How does this compare to existing ion drive technology that also propels charged particles? Is the mass and velocity different between your system and existing ion drive systems?
I am sorry, are you saying you can create usable amounts of positrons without using solar-equater scaled particle accelerators and actually get a usable thrust out of it that would top out even direct-exhaust fusion rockets? I highly doubt that.
Technically, hahaha there are no stars or planets. But a great way to take our minds off raising our collective conscious. SMH decades of theory after theory of space NASA superhero BS ppl don't realize it's all for weapons... Control. It's like watching a news story where the initial idea is misinformation! Quack quack
Exactly!! When the big bang happened life had galactic fist fights with antimatter ultimately beating antimatter by 1 in 1billion particles close call!! God knows his math
@@paytonmoore221 UNDERSTANDING HOW AND WHY E=MC2 IS CLEARLY PROVEN TO CONSTITUTE F=MA ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: C2 can represent a dimension, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE. (E=MC2 IS F=ma.) Consider what is THE EYE. LOOK at what is the black space of THE EYE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. The Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. OVERLAY what is the EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH !!!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE EARTH (A PLANET). Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Consider c. Great !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
When it is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that AT NO TIME did the CEO ever sit down with an engineer to do a "black box model" on paper to determine whether the physics and economics work out from end to end EVEN ON PAPER... then you know the whole thing is an investment scam.
Horrible half-assed sales pitch from an excited teenager brain who threw this together the morning before the "presentation" of his Thesis paper. Just awful. I've seen high schoolers give better presentations! Only wants you to give him money for someone else's idea that also figured out its not practical. Notice he purposefully compliments the other obviously out of touch proposals so considering his seems logical. Lame.
What about the Element 115 that Bob Lazar claims have seen in synthesized quantities while doing reverse engineering on extraterrestrial crafts and that could be used to create space time distortions ? I d love to see more research on that too. Great explanation here on anti mater but both are related!
The few atoms of isotopes of element 115 that have been created have a half-life of milliseconds. Couldn't have been Bob's 115. Also, wasn't Bob's 115 supposed to be a positron emitter? Lab 115 decayed by alpha.
The intro to this talk is weak. There is no need to start off a talk about _why_ we should have better rocket technology. Everyone in the room already agrees with that. Just get on with the antimatter portion of the talk. By the way, I love how he tried to hype up the audience with the possibility of traveling to the nearest "habitable" planet. The planet he's talking about (it's name is "Proxima b") is most definitely *not* habitable, despite being in the _habitable zone._ The habitable zone just means that a planet is located inside a region where temperatures would permit water to exist in its liquid form. However, the star ("Proxima Centauri") is a red dwarf. That means it's very small and cool, compared to the Sun. That means that its habitable zone is *much closer* to the star. The planet orbits its star at just 5% of the distance that earth orbits. In fact it orbits much closer than even Mercury, our closest planet. Whereas earth takes 1 year to orbit the sun, Proxima b whips around Proxima Centauri in just 11 days. In other words it's VERY close to its star. The problem is that being so close makes it much more susceptible to solar activity. Proxima Centauri (and many red dwarfs) are considered flare stars. They go through a very long period of being unstable. Earlier this year, the star just had a solar flare that increased it's light emission in the visible spectrum by a factor of 38. Could you imagine walking outside at noon and all of a sudden the sun gets *38 times brighter* ? You would die instantly. Your body would be engulfed in flames. There would be nothing left. Additionally, orbiting so close to its star means that it receives over 2000 times the solar wind that Earth receives. This wind has long ago blown off the planet's atmosphere (similar to Mercury). Additionally, the emission in the UV spectrum is far higher and having no atmosphere to block it means the surface facing the sun is absolutely sterile. I forgot to mention that being in such a close orbit means that the planet will be tidally locked to the star. That means one side _always_ faces the star, and the other side _always_ faces away. It does not spin. There is no day/night. In summary, it's not a good planet to visit and not a good introduction to a talk about antimatter.
"The intro to this talk is weak. There is no need to start off a talk about why we should have better rocket technology. Everyone in the room already agrees with that. Just get on with the antimatter portion of the talk." Worth repeating. Well said. Agreed
...unless it is that the reason the video was produced was not for science and technology people but for financial people i.e. potential funding sources, who always need what is called a prospectus, which normally are self-contained. A prospectus can circulate beyond the original audience and have occasionally come to the attention of someone with the inclination to invest or donate, which is the ultimate goal of this presentation IMHO.
PlanetXV Area 51 Tours Las Vegas Alpha Centauri is kind of like a trinary system, with dim little Proxima Centauri the third sun. Proximal I'd about .22 light years away from the other two, so it depends on the magnitude of the events. Btw, .22 ly is a lot larger than our solar system.
Matthew, reasonable comments but i think you took Proxima B talk to specifically, if there is one thing we have seen from the discovery of extra solar planets they are very rarely seen in ones. Its very fair to say where there is one there is two and maybe more. you are right though its a long way to go to have to turn around cos there was no one home!
@@chosen_ones777 Yes for someone who claims his field of expertise is anti matter he certainly made a big boo boo. But to cut him some slack he probably meant the discovery of anti matter rather than the existence of anti matter maybe?
Here is the Original Semitic Text. HERE is Our Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
If the mass of a black hole puts enough force on a particle, does Physics support the idea that once it is crushed enough it would move out of our space time dimension and be forced back in time? I don't have the math....
Where a hall effect thruster delivers 10 to100mN thrust you surely can divide this thrust by 1,000,000,000,000,000. The problem is, there definitely is no such radioisotope with the specified requirements. It has to produce beta(+) radiation (these particles have an energy 4000 smaller than protons or neutron) in "grain" dose size in minutes... Such thing would instantly explode with a giga bang! If you want to "create" such giga radiator it would take several mulitples of 1000 of nuclear power stations... And this material would be not stable. Its physical half-life must be in the sub-nano-seconds range. You cannot stabilize such a "beast" of a giga-rdiator.
The thrust to weight isn't so important when you're in space. The exhaust velocity is more important. I've seen a paper that postulates an engine with an exhaust velocity of 0.7 c and a thrust of 0.01 g. Both of these values are way higher than what ion/electrostatic drives are capable of. Higher thrust with lower efficiency would be possible by pumping in more matter in an 'afterburner' manner.
Been there done that. Ronnie Raygun had a star wars plan, where Eddie Teller claimed he could make a device the size of Ronnie's desk that would shoot down hundreds of Russian ICBMs. Based on X ray lasers charged by nukes. Never worked, as far as we know.
What about not storing or even filtering antimatter at all, find a way to generate it and shoot it out directly with magnets in a spaceship once it's up in space? It would probably also reduce risk of containment failure if magnets fail... engines could still fail - but be much less likely to explode:: all around: a safer design?
Don't forget to give Bob Lazar credit since he revealed this same information 35 years ago #Element115 ... btw, When we were in high school, junior high school, grammar school (elementary school) or even college, does anyone remember anything about learning about 2 FORMS OF GRAVITY? Gravity A ... and Gravity B? Shhhhhhh They lied to us and didn't want us to know #Element115 Keys to hyperspace
The only problem is that Lazar has been scientifically proven to be a complete fraud... but... that doesn't matter does it. You still belive him, and that's what matters!
It turns out that most matter anti matter reactions output a lot of gamma rays, which don't do much for propulsion. While theoretically combining matter and anti-matter sounds good, it really is not very useful
I love how people are just getting around to this, when Lazar already talked about this and how it's fueled element 115 which was recently created "Moscovium". He explained the tech, and said the only thing holding us back was that element which we now have.
And somehow we don't even talk about it anymore. We know it exists. We know it HAD to exists in equal quantity as matter in the first Planck instant of the universe. So, where is it? No trace of it having interacted with matter was ever found in the entire universe. Physicists almost gave up, they don't even mention it anymore. Anyway, I think antimatter and matter formed a whole from first instant of time and are connected at the 0, the virtual singularity. It formed like a pair of a matter-antimatter universes.
For a dude giving a TED presentation on Antimater Propulsion, it wasn't very meaty on the engineering details. I've seen high school students present material better than Ryan Weed.
beanoldboy you sir are an idiot....which part was "balony"? typical "I don't understand ANY of what was said in this video, so it's all BS" next you'll be saying the planet Earth is flat and the moon landings are a hoax
i think in the very near future, we're going to laugh at the idea of propulsion itself. anti-gravitic technology is what will allow us to travel to the stars!
Hi~ My Italian dear friend. AMES WEBB, There three monthly left. The power space since is amazing. It is possible to accurately land a spacecraft on the distant. Moon and Mars without even the slightest error? Thanks for sharing.
THANKS,that's sound like the most coolest thing and most sensible thing I heard in a long time,well actually a short while but very cool,I am a positive thinking person fourth generation and u never get anywhere thinking negative,as a matter of fact,not a pun...good luck...
