Tonight it will be 40 years from this moment. Thanks for posting. Guys, just feel sorry for the folks who believe this was a hoax. Some of them will have a chance to change their minds over time.
@@kennethkeen4988 No. There are millions that believe. They just all don't feel the need to come onto RU-vid to argue with in-bred, attention-seeking trolls .
Yes clearly a hoax to say they landed on the moon. Few believe 'the moon landing' today as no evidence has been produced except nasty films of 'rockets' popping off the surface made by 'radio-controlled' remote (super high power transmission) cameras stationed on the moon, which despite the transmission time lag managed to send images showing how they tracked the 'ascent' all the way to the mother ship. Awesome eh? 2023 01 19 05:26
Wow! perfect video and audio in realtime from 230,000 miles away In 1969, here it is 50 years later and we can't even get constant cell phone service coverage when talking to someone 20 miles away.. Communications were so much better back then. Boy I can't wait , another 30 years we"'ll be using a telegraph.
The average daytime temperature of the moon is 224.6 degrees Fahrenheit (107° C). Keep in mind that water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100° C). The average temperature of the far/dark side of the moon is -243.4 degrees Fahrenheit (-153° C). Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Such an obvious lie. Really? They can't even keep A/C working properly in our automobiles! LMAO
@@Tmhen NO ONE, let me repeat "NO ONE" on earth uses the antiquated system of measure TEMPERATURE , except "Americans". Now why it is they cling to this forgotten method of expressing temperature is simply due to the FACT that Americans are to be KEPT BLIND AND DUMB, regarding ANYTHING SCIENTIFIC, because if they were to understand SCIENCE they would very quickly come to the conclusion that they have been CONNED by an establishment, which keeps them fed with nonsense to this very day. But dream on - as George CARLIN said ""The American dream" - you have to be asleep to believe it" !
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) pay close attention to prior to 0:45 starting at 0:31 seconds.. he is transparent there too..I searched the comments to see if anyone else noticed that as well!
+Francesco Rizzo (Soft Musix) Good observation friend the reason that is well because the camera they used during the filming of the landing is called a Video camera tube(vidicon tube) which holds an image for seconds after and gives off a transparent look.
Sadly @@nickyn4076 is right. Bluntly speaking, it was all a fake but many people believed the film at the time. It was not clearly explained that this was a PR necessity at the time.
1. the flag is waving because he had to twist the two pieces of the pole together. 2. if the were filming this in a CLOSED filming studio how could there be wind to make the flag wave.
@@andrewkozintsev6823 Who said that the studio had all the doors closed? Who said that some scenes were not to be filmed outside? Who believes this crap from nasa, when they don't have the evidence? This is just an amusing stunt pulled off risking no lives, costing very little money and achieving lots of public respect "if it is believed", but unfortunately - people across the globe are educated and don't work with fahrenheits and horses and feet and pounds and yanky wanky trash movies that could be outdone by a ten year old with a half decent Macbook and two days of free time from TV!
If they landed on the moon surface! Which is not, how on earth they managed to come back to earth?!! If they went in 1969 why they didn’t manage to get back to the moon again after all these years and advanced technology.?
@@hypefogg9790 Weird how Neil is so transparent. I can see right through him the whole time almost as good as I can see through this "moon landing" nonsense.
There could be many reasons why Neil Armstrong had issues with being a "people person." But, the lack of eye contact HAD to be because he was lying about walking on the Moon... The conspiracy theories are entertaining, if nothing else.
Even if you're joking. To those that (still may) not know... the flag along the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted. The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for a while. Try Google... instead of playing your video games doubting accomplishments that are way beyond you awaiting the release of a new iPhone. Moron.
Sure @@vincef.5378 you know what happened, the wind was magnetic. FORCING a pole into ROCK is what Americans try. The cameraman who was there for the arrival was not named, was he later paid at all?
@@kennethkeen4988 there’s no cameraman you nut job there’s a camera that came out of the side of the lunar lander to film neils first steps. Quick google search away
@@jjonahjameson8934 Sorry, but everything I found looked like some teenagers had been given a large mechano set and were told it could be painted grey when finished, but they only had green paint in the end. All the mechanical parts perform absolutely no function, except to fool the viewer into thinking this was a technically advanced ding dong. How the metal parts fit together! It really looks like they could on ly buy the parts in a cheap extinct DIY outlet in Colerado and thought no one would notice! Just cheap and shoddy. 2021 01 22 20:29
@@hypefogg9790 There's no risk, not these days. We have computers - technology and dedication - something that they didn't have in the 1960s. They don't even have a rover - yanks are lost and can't even offer a defence to why they are the biggest losers on the planet.
@@kennethkeen1234 I am guessing you might be Serbian. You salty, I am sorry baby boy? I am sorry that we effortlessly destroyed your pathetic asses to stop your genocide. Oh, not Serbian. Huh, you should be grateful, y'all would be freezing to death without our LNG. Can my big strong boy say thank you?
@@boydrobertson2362 Save your country from obliteration boyd, forget about a 'moon landing' the 31 trillion dollars are to be repaid. PAY UP NOW!!!! 2023 01 19 06:27
Best is when Americans are trying to appear serious, and then talk about 'a foot and six eights of an inch', just 'awesome' that 330 million suckers can be persuaded to watch this crap!
Stop being critical. If we agree Americans didn't land on the moon, then what else is there for them to be proud of? The Vietnam War? The Afghani War? The Iraqi War? No, they are fake experts, well they used to be until people got computers and are able at last to replay the cheap images.
@@jona_archi And Americans will risk their life to defend what they call "the truth" having watched 6 hours of bullshit propaganda every day in their meaningless lives on the TV. Not a lot we can do to disentangle that confusion.
Where'd you come up with that? The radiation you speak of is in the Van Allen radiation belts above earth's atmosphere. The moon is about 10x higher than that. The amount of ionizing radiation on the Moon's surface is not excessive and would not fog film. Heat on the daytime moon surface would have been a bigger problem, except for no atmosphere, so the heat is not transferred to the film unless the camera is in direct physical contact with the lunar surface, which it never was.
Sunshine without atmosphere creates a temperature of 150˚C on any surface such as a camera, but Mr Harris thinks that 150˚C would not fry his skin nor a celluloid film, he is exceptional - an American education. Whao..... Americans are clearly lost using their 'feet' and 'pounds' and 'Fahrenheits' and "horsepowers' etc Give them a break, decimal is the next stage they will have to deal with if they are to reach the rest of us in the 21st century. Not a chance.
@@kennethkeen4988 Yeah and the Van Allen Belt is what protects us on earth from that very radiation from the sun yet astronauts walk in granny stitched space suits exposed to solar radiation.
@@hypefogg9790 What space shuttle? We are talking about the first so-called trip to the moon. There was no space shuttle with radiation tiles. The space shuttle travels in space it does NOT go to OUTER space. Michio Kaku tells you HIMSELF they have no OUTER SPACE TRAVEL ABILITY. So they NEVER went to the moon (aka outer space) Michio Kaku Tells Us We HAve No Outer Space Travel Ability ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-G3cNBXXsVrE.html Catch a wake up NASA in Hebrew sounds the same as "deception"
Pretty good phone reception from 200,000 plus miles away in 1969. I want to see more of this footage? Why only two minutes of incredible history of landing on the moon? My uncles wedding was like 9 hours plus worth of footage. But I hate it when Nasa only shot a few minutes of video. sad.
They shot a lot of video. This is a montage. I remember watching the landing and every second of them on TV (yes, I'm old). There are literally hours of footage. You could find out more by a simple google search, but I'm sure you're happy in your ignorance.
@@bbofun is twisted from day one. NASA don't make the "hours of footage" available - since they managed to "lose" the originals and no one made a copy - typical YANKY conn-men tricks like a travelling salesman selling snake oil!
Nasa are not able to explain so don't embarrass the poor men - they are all retired and tired of trying to explain why they were paid so much to tell lies.
Next-generation cameras provided by Stanley Kubrick were installed on the lander and there were a few handhelds for photos. The footage was automatically taken The camera was retrieved before returning to earth.
could anybody please explain me how is it possible that without atmosphere - where gravity acceleration should apply equally to objects of any size and mass - sand from the astronauts' boots falls back on the ground faster than the astronauts themselves? ...I also don't understand where the fill-light is coming from since the astronauts are standing in the shadow of the Sun? ....and what are those 3 light sources reflecting on the helmets? thank you!
Also where is the lunar lander rocket blast ? If a landing craft were to land on the moon with all that fine dust and rocks you should have one heck of a blown out crater. Another thing "Where are tall the stars"? We don't see stars while standing on the moon. There is no atmosphere to block them out. The whole thing stinks of one massive cover-up. You know what NASA stands for..... Never A Straight Answer
+D. Hansel - All landing Crafts start the landing burn several meter above the ground, the thruster force would was not able to make a significant impact. And all stars are there, we just can't see it due to the exposure. On the Moon, due to no shadow from mountans or light filtering by a atmosphere the whole Surface is basically a huge lightbulb, the reason the astronauts can see is because they have a secondary visor on their helmets that is tinted (like sunglasses) and for us to not see a huge White glow throught the recording the exposure limit was increased. Basically the video is a few times darker than what it is on the Moon, this covered up all the stars - if you increase the exposure limit on a normal pcicture from the Moon landing the stars return but the Moon and the Astronauts are covered in a Bright light. You know what Google is meant for?Toallowidiotslikeyoutoquicklyfind this information, if you only had looked thorougly.
1. You're an idiot. Try Google. Try learning. Jesus! The Moon is a fucking ROCK! WHY would there be a crater? You're expecting 'top soil' to be blown away? It's.. ROCK! Blow out crater... moron! Another thing... where are all the stars? DUMMY! WATCH a Space Shuttle EVA (walk)... guess what... NO STARS! In that case light reflected from the Earth washes out (over-exposes) the star fields... they wash out. On the Moon... the light reflecting up from the Moon's surface, from the Sun and reflected light from the Lunar Lander WASH OUT the star fields. Take a fucking photography course. What stinks of a cover-up is your complete ignorance of anything you talk about. Go read a book, go play in traffic... make yourself useful.
And dipshit... before you go on about the waving flag on the Moon (so there had to be wind, so they had to be in a studio)... the flag along the top was hung by a ROD... and the bottom of the flag was weighted. The waving was KINETIC ENERGY from the Astronauts having to FORCE the pole into the Moon (it's ROCK, remember?) and it 'waved in the wind' for a while. Do you think (rhetorical... of course you don't) that if they wanted to FAKE the Moon landing they would have intentionally forgot to put up star lights in the sky? Do you think they'd be blowing a flag around? Oh... and there are SEVERAL light sources on the Moon (in case you ask about shadows going in different directions). There's the SUN, the EARTH and reflections of light from the Lunar Lander. Go... run your car in the garage or something. After 50 years with the internet and the sum of human knowledge at your fingertips, if you're too fucking lazy to learn anything... you best go eat a bullet.
It would be too difficult to try to fool people in this day and age. People are no longer as gullible as then and are all keen to spot all the signals of fakery going on. It would really have to happen and NASA explains that today it is impossible as they no longer have the technical ability.
@@realmoonknight No. You can't see stars at any time in cities because of light pollution. The light of street lights, house lights, car headlights, etc, bounce off the ground, and into the air. These light waves overpower the light of stars. You can't see stars on the moon because there is 100% reflection of light waves from the sun off the moon surface. The ultimate source of light. These far outpower the starlight. You can see stars during the day, but it is extremely difficult. The difference is that the atmosphere blocks most of the suns light before it reflects off of the earths surface, not allowing an overpowering of similar degrees.
My only concern is that right before he jumps off latter you can see the edge or horizon of the moon through his leg/knee and when he jumps the line/edge/horizon goes through his body almost like it was filmed in front of green screen like a news/weather screen 😂
@@kennethkeen1234 Speed of light determines the exact amount. If you don't believe in basic science, you are probably a part of the population that would be better of darwined of the face of earth.
@@big4330 And that could handle 230,000 miles away in realtime 720p high-quality refresh, video, and sound FROM 1969. Where would the radio dishes connect. If we had that kind of technology, we could always call with perfect, smooth, crisp video calling and sound.
One does not "believe" science unless they are living in a brain washed cult. The Bible understands the scientific method more than you: "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
The problem is - scientists, do NOT work with NASA - no scientist on earth works with fahrenheit, no scientist uses "inches" to describe distance, no scientist uses "horses" to indicate power. In fact NOTHING that NASA claims has any basis in scientific fact. Sorry to be so up front with my statement.
@@kennethkeen1234 MP4 files do the exact same thing to reduce data usage. I presume NASA wanted to make the signal to earth as data efficient as possible. It sometimes leads to distortion/artefacts on MP4s, so it's not surprising when it lead to the same thing here.
It's been so long that we'll need archaeologist to come along on the next lunar landing mission... #MoonwalksInMyLifetime (damn if anything that is worth living for!) Go Nasa! :)
I want to moonwalk(michael jacson moonwalk - not that actually boncing thing) on the moon... SOOOOOO bad!!!! you know when ever traveling to the moon becomes commen that joke's gonna be soo outdated and over done.. but imagine how funny it is the first time anybody does that... ps. the moon landing was technologically too soon. any agree?
The US flag unfurled on the Moon was a specially crafted banner designed to stand upright in the low gravity lunar environment. One pole shaft was firmly planted into the ground and held the flag upright. Another pole extended perpendicularly from the top and made sure the flag was fully extended and stretched out. :)
the sky? they had to decrease the bright because the sun was too strong cuz no atmosphere, but it happened to "delete" the stars also, the camera is old
😎🤘👍🌟☮️❤️🔥🌐🫡🇺🇸✨️🚀 awesome! Preserve all cultures, ways of doing, expressing, learning, living & all walks of life. #WorldMagicMusicMakers #Maker #Independent #MusicLoversBlockchain it's more than music. Much more. Congrats to all connected. #SpreadTruth #Love be #Grateful #Joyful #Peaceful 😊 #NASA
***** Because they were twisting it back and forth to get it to stay in the ground and since there's no air resistance in space it takes longer than normal for the flag to stop moving from the twisting motion
***** because the astronaut was moving its stick. there is no air on the moon so the flag has to overcome less resistance. "Myth busters" made an experiment about it.
The flagpole has a rod at the top, holding the flag straight out. When the astronauts twist and move the flagpole, they're moving the rod relative to the flag and the flag will lag behind the rod, even without an atmosphere.
@@random3857 dreams -the American dream. You have to be asleep to appreciate it. The robot was in the cabin, another on the outer leg and a third in the rocks as the spaceship took off for earth, sure buddy, they stopped making those robots as they were often mistaken for humans and that was not cool.
@@USCFlash I don't go to the place they used to call USA these days. I stay in civilised countries where people don't get shot. You must be a mug, or actually BORN there to still be stuck in the greatest cess pit on earth.
hahah I love how people from european countries say that the moon landings are fake because they are so jealous that there shitty countries have never landed on the moon ^_^ I'm proud to be american !!
We love people like you in Europe. It rescues us from making jokes about others who are simply less fortunate. You had the chance and squandered it, so we laugh at your arrogance. " proud to be american"
And the wanker hadn't even the sense to write in English as Americans just can't manage to get their grammar right - no, that would be too much for their little narrow minds. "we is the bestest" = sure phuck head - you is the greatest 😉
Part of it is that it was too expensive and since no other country had even a tiny chance of doing it, it was always pushed back. The other issues that helped hurt the continued exploration are presidents not keeping with programs, notably Bush Jr's constellation program being canceled by President Obama. Another issue is the extreme focus on near orbit activity like ISS and Hubble and their carrier the shuttle, as well the private space flight and James Webb, all things that were great, but not moon related. However, now it is cheaper but far more importantly, China will likely land on it in the 2030s and we need to make sure the world knows or remembers we landed first. When you add national pride to the mix, we can do just about anything lol.
@@kennethkeen1234 We didn't buy that much from Russia dipshit, unlike you European tards. Only 8% were from Russia. Easily replaced. If you are going to be an idiot, be a believable idiot.
