Are Ashkenazic Jews the Real Khazars? 

"Those who claim to be Jews, but are not." Yep.

So we are just going to forget about Ethiopian jews? Hate to break it to you but this video seems quite biased. It is widely accepted that the Khazar elite converted to Judaism and at later stages other members of the kingdom. To assume these people just disappeared after being taken over by Kievan Rus is ignorant. Its a sensitive topic which is quite heavily censored and hidden from the public. There are many academic studies for people to view and I urge people to not makeup your mind over a skewed 12 minute video that reeks of propaganda.

How ironic is it the DNA tests are illegal in Israel!! Ponder that and think about why? If they test as strictly European and Khazars, they are not originally from Canaan and have absolutely no claim to the land

Just take a Look at them!Do they Look middle eastern,No! They Look Slavic ,Russian,Polish,they did not come from middle east

Slice the cake however you wish, but the jew-ish people are not the Israelites of the Bible/Torah. They are converts from European descent. They are not Semites so the idea of calling people who appose them anti-semites is foolish. Their claim to the land of Palestine, now called Israel is rooted in false hoods and trickery.

There are Jewish Professors in Jerusalem that have written many books about not being really Hebrews.

Khazaria is geographically the region of Gog and Magog in Holy Scripture. This topic is a Pandora’s Box..literally

The Khan (King) of Khazars was under the political and military pressure from both Constantinople representing the Eastern Roman Empire, thus Christianity (ie. 'Byazantium') and from Baghdad Khalifate, representing the Islam. Both were looking over Khazars as they do not have a so-called 'monoteistic religion' and the Khan decided to send envoys to both capitals to obtain further information related with their religions. After listening multiple delegations, they understood that if any of these religions are adopted by the state, Khazars would get under the political influence of either Christianity, or conversely of Islam, where either case comes with its own issues, obligations, alliance structures, taxation, etc., and Khazars could only be extensions of these capitals from that point onward. Judaism was the only religion at that time without any political power, also was a monoteistic belief; in addition the ancester of the other two. Khazars decided that by adopting Judaism they could refute any religious or politiical pressures from these powerful capitals, and could retain their independence, also staf away from the never-ending middle-east conflicts. This is a high-level decision given by the 'nomenklatura' (in Russian, this term refers to staff members working at any level of the state structure; while in English it has a different meaning). Its effects cascading down to people's level could be observed in subsequent decades, even in centuries. Please note that names of the dynasty in final times of Seljuki Empire (which is the successor of Khazars) have Jewish names, which contradicts with the information you are presenting in this video. Prof. Şahin Uçar have videos as a historian on this matter in Turkish language (ie. "Hazar Kağanı Bulan Hanın Unutulmuş Rüyalarına Çağdaş Yorumlar"). Regards...

Ironic they can’t track the history but can for everything else

They done a study of DNA samples from Ashkenazi Jew's and found a large number of them have ancestry that goes back to Europe not Israel.

Funny how the Yiddish language is used to refute the theory of Khazar origin but not the middle eastern origin,

Your mention of the cousin and the vocal chords in the first sentence showed that you had nothing substantial to say on this very important topic. Arthur Koestler has settled this question using documentary evidence going back 1000 years. Khazars were converted in the 7th century and had nothing to do with the Middle East. Are you up to date with the archeological findings conducted by Russian experts in recent years? I would like to hear your take on the financiers behind the trans-atlantic slave trade. Will you try to obfuscate that historical truth as well?

I've learned many things and one of those things is there is a whole lot of things someone doesn't want certain knowledge to become common knowledge.

I took a DNA test and it told me where I come from why don't they just take the same test

Im Christian and I have zero ties to the holy land. I do not believe that you have to be Israeli to be jewish..That being said ive read many articles stating that the Khazars were followers of Baal and due to the evil deeds they committed ( road bandits, child sacrifice, etc.) they were made to adopt an Abramic religion by the Russian kings. But they didnt really adopt those religions they merely mingled it with their own satanic religion....The ones that stayed true to their satanic beliefs are sitting in the Vatican, at the head of the banking industry, our federal Reserve, and also planted themselves in the political structure of most countries....Not all are of Khazarian origin. Many are just greedy, lust for power or are being blackmailed....This makes more sense considering the goings on in our world today.

We all know how evidence can be hidden or destroyed and to say none exists is simply an understatement.

The Sister Is An Agent -

Notice she mentioned nothing of the Bible or actual Israelites… abecause that would totally dismantle this whole raggedy video 🤷🏽‍♂️

Israel is the only country in the world where it is illegal for people in that country to do a DNA test, unless it is court ordered. Hmmm, I wonder why. There are a number of YT videos of people of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, living outside of Israel who have taken a DNA test. Shockingly, many have found that they have no or very minimal genetic connection to the Middle East. So, they are not of Hebrew (Semitic) descent. Can one say that the vast number of Ashkenazi Jews in Israel do not have ethnic historical claim to Israel lands?!? Are they just White settlers (or Khazars) of the Jewish faith? Is that why it is illegal to do a DNA test there? Ethiopian Jews do not have any genetic connection to Israel.

The Khazar theory does not help. However, most recent genetic studies show that Ashkenazis are mostly European and not Jews from the Levante. The study also proves that Palestinians are truly from Palestine. I am about 20% Norwegian. Does that give me the right to go claim my land in Norway and take someone's house just cause I feel more Nowregian?

Joseph Reinach, a French Jewish member of parliament who was opposed to Zionism, dismissed the idea, arguing that Jews descended from Israelites were a tiny minority. In his view, conversion had played a major role in the expansion of the Jewish people, and, in addition, he claimed, the majority of "Russian, Polish and Galician Jews descend from the Khazars, a Turkish people. who converted to Judaism en masse at the time of Charlemagne.

Are they descendants of Isaac and Jacob? In Islam, the definition of Israelites is the people descended from children of Jacob who is the son of Isaac. The term Jews or Yahud in Arabic is specific to the descendants of Yehuda, 3rd son of Jacob's 1st wife. But today the term Yahud or Jew is used for everyone claiming to practice Judaism and supposedly come from the lineage of Jacob. I didn't imagine anyone can be Jew unless they're descended from that tree, so yes if the theory were true that Khazarias made up of all Ashkenazis, they are not Jews at all. Not one bit.

Very well presented. Thank you

Great video

You guys make this to hard. They are Ashkenazi Jews, descendants of Ashkenaz who is from Gomer, who is from Japeth. They are not Israelites and have no biblical claim to the current land they occupy.

Well, the Bible says that Azkenazi is not of the line of Shem. They are from the line of Japheth. Therefore, being negative to them wouldn’t be anti-Semite.

The Khazars were Turkic Eurasian Steppe Nomadic Horse Archers who settled and lived in Eastern Europe to tge North of the Caucasus who converted to Judaism but were wiped out by the Cumans, Kipchaks and eventually the Mongols. I'm a Hungarian and we were under the Khazars for a while and some Hungarians comverted to Judaism until we packed up and moved to rhe Xarpathian Basin at the end of the 9th Century.

fascinating video!!!

I found this after a debate Noam Chomsky was in. He was certain that Khazar theory is not antisemitic

There are some Italians living in Australia therefore all Italians come from Australia

I read in some comment somewhere that the warrior class of khzars converted for convenience so that during the crusades they didn't have to pick sides. Any way to research this? The crusades were very disruptive even to Jews where they ever they were. But being able to claim neutrality for a couple of hundred years might have given any converts enough time to like the change enough to stick with it and then as generations followed it remained as " the way we are"

If the Khazar story has been bebunked as you say and there is no credibility to it, then why did someone go to such lengths to completely remove the Khazarian Empire from our history books. It was a very large empire, so why would that be hidden? I never learned about it in school and I don't know of anyone that has. I ask again, if the Khazar story is a nothing berger, why such suspicious behavior. Actions speak louder than words.

They’re definitely not Hebrew Israelites, the true chosen of THE MOST HIGH who covenanted with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Thank you for this video

great video.. thanks...great orator

This women is a gate keeper

Lady you just said one of the facts they speak Yiddish !! Not hebrew, they aren’t Semitic

“You will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black and came back white” Gamal Abdel(1952) 2nd President of Egypt Gamal Nasser

Thanks for the info

Read Genome Biology and Evolution by Dr Eran Elhaik, a geneticist at the John Hopkins School of public health. Accoring to him present European Jews are Turkish people which strongly support the Khazarian hypothesis. Also read the 13 tribes by Arthur Koestler. Koestler calculated that jews could not be 8 million in eastern europe without the Khazar.

The meaning of the term “Ashkenaz” and the geographical origins of AJs and Yiddish are some of the longest standing questions in history, genetics, and linguistics. In our previous work we have identified “ancient Ashkenaz,” a region in northeastern Turkey that harbors four primeval villages whose names resemble Ashkenaz. Here, we elaborate on the meaning of this term and argue that it acquired its modern meaning only after a critical mass of Ashkenazic Jews arrived in Germany. We show that all bio-localization analyses have localized AJs to Turkey and that the non-Levantine origins of AJs are supported by ancient genome analyses. Overall, these findings are compatible with the hypothesis of an Irano-Turko-Slavic origin for AJs and a Slavic origin for Yiddish and contradict the predictions of Rhineland hypothesis that lacks historical, genetic, and linguistic support (Table 1). One argument Eurocentric Christianity like to make is that Israelites look “Middle Eastern” or “olive”, but we know from the Bible that’s not True. Tacitus is one more nail in the coffin. “A few authorities hold that in the reign of Isis the surplus population of Egypt was evacuated to neighboring lands under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Judas. Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king. There are some who say that a motley collection of landless Assyrians occupied a part of Egypt, and then built cities of their own, inhabiting the lands of the Hebrews and the nearer parts of Syria…” - Tacitus, Histories 5.2-5 Tacitus described Hebrew origins as possibly Egyptian or Ethiopian. This is important because it puts perspective an Old Testament Bible verse: “Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?” - Amos 9:7 Tacitus words present a huge problem for those that teach a European / light / olive Egypt because we know for a fact that Ethiopians are not European. There’s no logical reason anyone would ever confuse a European with an Ethiopian. In addition to the Old Testament clarification, Tacitus also confirms an incident in the New Testament. The importance of the Testimony of Tacitus is that he was a European (Roman) historian, and he is often quoted by Europeans as a credible source of history. Tacitus lived from (55 A.D. - 117 A.D.), which overlaps the lifetime of the apostle Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D. “Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38 Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D. “Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38 have been mistaken for an Egyptian, nor would the guard have assumed he didn’t speak Greek, and the people in the time of Tacitus wouldn’t have mistaken them for Egyptians and Ethiopians. In his book ,The Great Roman-Jewish War: 66-70, the Roman historian, Flavius Josephus, stated over thousands of years ago, that the Israelites migrated into Africa. He writes: “Millions of Jews fled into Africa, among other places, fleeing from Roman persecution and starvation during the siege.” This is just one example of the migration. *Once the Israelites migrated to West Africa, they established communities all through-out Africa.* One of those communities was the Kingdom of Juda. As mentioned in the Bible and in history, there was a Kingdom in Israel, called the Kingdom of Judah. Jew comes from the name Judah. That being said, one of the largest slave ports in West Africa, where many of our ancestors were stolen from was labeled the Kingdom of Juda. Below is a 1747 map of Africa, created by an English cartographer named Edward Bowen(1693 or 1694-1767). This map, shows specifically where the ancestors of many African Americans come from. HOW ISAAC TOOK REBEKA TO WIFE. Flavius Josephus. The Works of Flavius Josephus. Translated by. William Whiston, A.M. Auburn and Buffalo. John E. Beardsley. 1895 238] ABRAHAM after this married Keturah, by whom six sons were born to him, men of courage, and of sagacious minds: Zambran, and Jazar, and Madan, and Madian, and Josabak, and Sous. Now the sons of Sous were Sabathan and Dadan. The sons of Dadan were Latusim, and Assur, and Luom. The sons of Madiau were Ephas, and Ophren, and Anoch, and Ebidas, and Eldas. Now, for all these sons and grandsons, Abraham contrived to settle them in colonies; and they took possession of Troglodytis, and the country of Arabia the Happy, as far as it reaches to the Red Sea. It is related of this Ophren, that he made war against Libya, and took it, and that his grandchildren, when they inhabited it, called it (from his name) Africa. And indeed Alexander Polyhistor gives his attestation to what I here say; who speaks thus: "Cleodemus the prophet, who was also called Malchus, who wrote a History of the Jews, in agreement with the History of Moses, their legislator, relates, that there were many sons born to Abraham by Keturah: nay, he names three of them, Apher, and Surim, and Japhran. That from Surim was the land of Assyria denominated; and that from the other two (Apher and Japbran) the country of Africa took its name, because these men were auxiliaries to Hercules, when he fought against Libya and Antaeus; and that Hercules married Aphra's daughter, and of her he begat a son, Diodorus; and that Sophon was his son, from whom that barbarous people called Sophacians were denominated."

The text below is copied from page three of the 1980 Jewish Almanac. Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew." They are European converts coming from their own mouths.

Who sponsored this video?

Seems like you're soft shilling for them

In revelations it talks about the synagogue of satan and those Jews who say they are Jews but are not! The ashkenazi name is interesting because if you look at the sons of Japheth in the book of Genesis it states that Ashkenaz was one of the sons of Japheth!

good work

In the end all of the DNA doesn’t matter because Jewish law doesn’t acknowledge it. We KNOW that the Ashkenazim aren’t the people who left Palestine in the 1st century. We know they converted and even when reading correspondence between Jews from centuries ago it is kinda evident and that is why there was such friction between them and the Sephardim. There was no “ middle eastern dna” in the 1st century. There is what they are calling “ middle eastern dna” there NOW , and those people originally came from the North like the Ashkenazim did in about the 7 th century. Which Id estimate is why there is any connection. But either way noting establishes one’s Jewishness but JEWISH LAW, Halakha . And no ethnicity is more “ Jewish” in status than the other. And I wish all Jews would understand and accept that .

I don't think it's correct to say it "can't" be proven whether or how many Khazars converted to Judaism. Archaelogy continues to uncover the past. This is a distinct question apart from whether such converts became the Ashkenazi. I took a deep dive into archaeology during covid. I was amazed how many of my boyhood questions about the ancient world have been answered during the course of my lifetime. That will continue.

Honestly Ashkenazi Jews look similar to Armenians and Georgians and other folks who come from the Caucasus. Some of their surnames are quite curious, Like "Kagan" and "Kaplan". These are Turkic surnames so why are they so common among Ashkenazi people? Also noteworthy is that they have very little middle eastern DNA. For a people whose ancestry is the levant then you'd expect much more significant middle eastern markers and should more closely resemble nearby populations yet we don't see that among them. In fact some of them don't even have middle eastern DNA. You can even look this up yourself.

This is so True.I know that as a Turkish woman.

Man you got so many conspiracy theories in your comments. It's so sad to me as an Ashkenazi how so many people insist despite all evidence and history of my family I don't exist or am a conspiracy.

Speaking of genetics, DNA studies have revealed that Yiddish, the Ashkenazi language, originated in north east Turkey (souther Khazaria). Strikingly, this very same area has four villages named Iskenaz, Eskenaz, Ashanaz, Ashkuz!!!

Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life!

Bless n thanks 🙏 my sister for the information I didn’t know that Jamaica 🇯🇲 Jamaica 🇯🇲

I will never forget the day my langauge teacher told us Yiddish was actually a modern langauge coming from German territory. Blew my mind!

Some of what is in this presentation is correct, about 70-75%; however, there is a plethora of research that will disprove some of your argument.

So are you gonna do a video like this for the "Out of Africa Theory"?

That's not what the Bible says bible says otherwise. The bible describes the jews Dark skin

Great video! Super interesting just subscribed, thanks for the videos!

So who is the Bible making reference to as though claiming to be Jews but are not?

“If in the nineteenth century scholars were doubtful about the conversion of the Khazar kingdom, today it is not in dispute.” -Shlomo Sand, Professor Emeritus of History, University of Tel Aviv.

I know one thing,,, "The Lie Nor The Liar Will Enter The Kingdom Of God".

All fascinating and mind boggling stuff

Noah's son, Jepheth is of the Eurpean lineage. His other son, Shem is of the Semitic lineage. Therefore, referring to European jews as Semitic or antsemetic make no sense. The lady that did this video was reading someones elses script for money.

Inference of Geographical Origins Deciphering the origin of human populations is not a new challenge for geneticists, yet only in the past decade high-throughput genetic data were harnessed to answer these questions. Here, we briefly discuss the differences between the available tools based on identity by distance. Existing PCA or PCA-like approaches (e.g., Novembre et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2012) can localize Europeans to countries (understood as the last place where major admixture event took place or the place where the four ancestors of “unmixed” individuals came from) with less than 50% accuracy (Yang et al., 2012). The limitations of PCA (discussed in Novembre and Stephens, 2008) appear to be inherent in the framework where continental populations plotted along the two primary PCs cluster in the vertices of a triangle-like shape and the remaining populations cluster along or within the edges (e.g., Elhaik et al., 2013). There is therefore reason to question the applicability of ambitious PCA-based methods (Yang et al., 2012, 2014) aiming to infer multiple ancestral locations outside of Europe. Overall, accurate localization of worldwide individuals remains a significant challenge (Elhaik et al., 2014). The GPS framework assumes that humans are mixed and that their genetic variation (admixture) can be modeled by the proportion of genotypes assigned to any number of fixed regional putative ancestral populations (Elhaik et al., 2014). GPS employs a supervised ADMIXTURE analysis where the admixture components are fixed, which allows evaluating both the test individuals and reference populations against the same putative ancestral populations. GPS infers the geographical coordinates of an individual by matching their admixture proportions with those of reference populations. Reference populations are populations known to reside in a certain geographical region for a substantial period of time in a time frame of hundreds to a thousand years and can be predicted to their geographical locations while absent from the reference population panel (Das et al., 2016). The final geographic location of a test individual is determined by converting the genetic distance of the individual to m reference populations into geographic distances (Elhaik et al., 2014). Intuitively, the reference populations can be thought of as “pulling” the individual in their direction with a strength proportional to their genetic similarity until a consensus is reached (Figure S1). Interpreting the results, particularly when the predicted location differs from the contemporary location of the studied population, demands cautious. Population structure is affected by biological and demographic processes like genetic drift, which can act rapidly on small, relatively isolated populations, as opposed to large non-isolated populations, and migration, which occurs more frequently (Jobling et al., 2013). Understanding the geography-admixture relationships necessitates knowing how relative isolation and migration history affected the allele frequencies of populations. Unfortunately, oftentimes we lack information about both processes. GPS addresses this problem by analyzing the relative proportions of admixture in a global network of reference populations that provide us with different “snapshots” of historical admixture events. These global admixture events occurred at different times through different biological and demographic processes, and their long-lasting effect is related to our ability to associate an individual with their matching admixture event. In relatively isolated populations the admixture event is likely old, and GPS would localize a test individual with their parental population more accurately. By contrast, if the admixture event was recent and the population did not maintain relative isolation, GPS prediction would be erroneous (Figure S2). This is the case of Caribbean populations, whose admixture proportions still reflect the massive Nineteenth and Twentieth centuries' mixture events involving Native Americans, West Europeans, and Africans (Elhaik et al., 2014). While the original level of isolation remains unknown, these two scenarios can be distinguished by comparing the admixture proportions of the test individual and adjacent populations. If this similarity is high, we can conclude that we have inferred the likely location of the admixture event that shaped the admixture proportion of the test individual. If the opposite is true, the individual is either mixed and thereby violates the assumptions of the GPS model or the parental populations do not exist either in GPS's reference panel or in reality. Most of the time (83%) GPS predicted unmixed individuals to their true locations with most of the remaining individuals predicted to neighboring countries (Elhaik et al., 2014). To understand how migration modifies the admixture proportions of the migratory and host populations, we can consider two simple cases of point or massive migration followed by assimilation and a third case of migration followed by isolation. Point migration events have little effect on the admixture proportions of the host population, particularly when it absorbs a paucity of migrants, in which case the migrants' admixture proportions would resemble those of the host population within a few generations and their resting place would represent that of the host population. Massive demographic movements, such as large-scale invasion or migration that affect a large part of the population are rare and create temporal shifts in the admixture proportions of the host population. The host population would temporarily appear as a two-way mixed population, reflecting the components of the host and invading populations (e.g., European and Native American, in the case of Puerto Ricans) until the admixture proportions would homogenize population-wise. If this process is completed, the admixture signature of this region may be altered and the geographical placement of the host population would represent again the last place where the admixture event took place for both the host and invading populations. GPS would, thereby, predict the host population's location for both populations. Populations that migrate from A to B and maintain genetic isolation would be predicted to point A in the leave-one-out population analysis. While human migrations are not uncommon, maintaining a perfect genetic isolation over a long period of time is very difficult (e.g., Veeramah et al., 2011; Behar et al., 2012; Elhaik, 2016; Hellenthal et al., 2016), and GPS predictions for the vast majority of worldwide populations indicate that these cases are indeed exceptional (Elhaik et al., 2014). Despite of its advantages, GPS has several limitations. First, it yields the most accurate predictions for unmixed individuals. Second, using migratory or highly mixed populations (both are detectable through the leave-one-out population analysis) as reference populations may bias the predictions. Further developments are necessary to overcome these limitations and make GPS applicable to mixed population groups (e.g., African Americans).

Ashkenazi are descendant and grandson of Japheth 95% of the jewish people have khazar dna dna test do not lie!

The problem is that the Ashkenazi Jews look totally different than the Sephardic ones. The former look Turkic, the latter look Middle Eastern.. They of course intermingled, so often there is a mixture of both features. The Jews had a tendency of infiltrate great powers for protection, so it's conceivable that they did so into the Khazar empire, which was a great power at the time. About the names: Kagan-Kaganovich, the name of a Khazar ruler, language: the Bulgars switched their language to Slavic in the 7th century, so being so sanguine in the arguments don't make it true.

DNA results. The Ashkenazi match the Lebanese, the Syrians and the Palestinians. Those are not Middle Eastern. Those populations came down when the Ottoman Empire evolved through the conquest of Turkey and Syria from the 'stans (Uzbekistan, Dagestan, Afganistan). If you want to compare to Middle Eastern populations, look at Iran, Iraq, and Arabia. Noah prophesied that Japeth (Ashkenaz) would dwell in the tents of Shem (Abraham) and is true. Gen9:27 In the Bible, Noah's firstborn is Japeth, Japeth's firstborn is Gomer, and Gomer's firstborn is Ashkenaz. The Ashenazi are the firstborn of all mankind, and they are Jewish. Ashenazi are Jews, even if they are not from Abraham. Israel has always been of mixed race.

You know most times a king converts to a religion they make no attempt to convert any of there populace Yiddish is obviously not etymological based in hebrew It's German which just adopt words

the flag of Israel is copy of the Karamanids Turks

She’s just repeating someone else’s research. You can tell this is not something she put any time into. It’s sad they use us for their lies.

Great vid. Keep up the good work.

I am Karachay (post-khazar) Turkic who live in modern day Turkey, i can literally say Ashkenazi Jews are not Turkic. They have never related to old Turkic traditions and languages. But if you want to find modern day Khazars, you may look at the Crimean Karais or Karaites. They are judaists but not Jewish. They are speaking Turkic language and following some common Turkic traditions too.

It's funny...because, the Biblical description of the Hebrew Israelites says they were Black🤔

Russia, southern Ukraine, Crimea, and Kazakhstan. Why didn't she mention any of these places. Who paid this woman 🤣🤣🤣

DNA disagrees with you.

I have no dog in the fight, but find the topic interesting due to recent events. P.S. have seen these graphics in several other videos…. Did you make them? Just curious.

I think we all agree on counting the years from year zero, which should be enough to understand who was where

The term "Jews' is the slang used that referred to the Tribe of Judah. There are 12 Hebrew Israelite Tribes and only one tribe is "Jewish.". However, all of the Israelites are Hebrews.

Remember, Jewish is a religion, not a " Peoples "

Genesis 10:1-5 Ashkenaz are Gentiles

She doesn't even realize that she has a better chance of being an Israelite than the people in Israel today snh

The Askhenazeem are descendents of the Scythians.. every knows it.. they are not Turkic.. they are white and red haired... Google this qoute: Dr Elhaik, an Israeli-born geneticist who gained his doctorate in molecular evolution from the University of Houston, believes that three still-surviving Turkish villages - Iskenaz, Eskenaz and Ashanaz - on the western part of an ancient Silk Road route were part of the original Ashkenazic homeland. He believes that the word Ashkenaz originally comes from Ashguza - the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian name for the Iron Age Eurasian steppeland people, the Scythians

The damn Bible calls them out for who they are they are from magog and gog and togormah it is what it is

Thank you Dara... you speak truth Ashkenazi are from the khazarian Empire which was broken due to the tribe splitting .. After the split, *some also were part of the synagogue of satan. The word synagog is not Hebrew it mean two-nations (gog and magog). The lineage of Ashkanazi are not SHEM. Shem comes from Al-Sham which means Arab. So the original Jews are Arab but from the tribe of *Judah and the followers of Jesus were called Nazara tribe (from the place Nazareth) they are also from the Al-Sham nation. This lineage is GOG and they were not chosen people by God for revelation of the Torah. This tribe is discussed in the Quran as a tribe amongst the region which had an alien language which no-one understood. That is Yiddish. The Yiddish is a Germanic language and unable to replicate any orthodox words used. The Karaites tribe also altered the alphabet (A and E) and (S and SH) when they created the new hebrew alphabet-- This is why the name of God is corrupted in modern hebrew and the name of Jesus was corrupted. Take a look at the surnames of the Israelis they end with MANN, BURG, STEIN ....this is NOT a Semitic surnames but Germanic. Those Yiddish tribe knew the real Israelites are yet to return to Palestine . Those people of Palestine had forefathers who followed Jesus. Some stayed Christian and most became muslim... They lived in harmony till today. The word ISRAEL is split as Isra=believer in , EL=The ONE God... so this term was used to refer to Christians and Jews who believed in One God. The Israelites sent into slavery were both Christians and Jews , not just JEWS. The land is for Israelites (believers in the one God). The original Torah laws states patrilineal descent , which means a Jew will always carry the fathers Hebrew/Aramaic surname.... not GERMANIC! This law was changed by the Zionist leadership and they introduced matrilineal descent. Imran Sheikh released a series on this ; please watch on youtube, the hairs on your neck will stand up and the truth will flood before you.... 2600 Years Secret Of GOG AND MAGOG || Yajuj and Majuj - Part 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (yajuj and majuj=Gog and Magog) (banu israel=tribe of israel)

Imposters 😂😂😂😂 all of them

Disguising yourselves as "The promised People" when you have zero ties to the original Israelis who lived and were persecuted for 400+ years is using the God's name is vain on a whole new level.

Say a lie long enough and future generations will believe it as fact.

From the earliest days of the American republic, Jews were technically considered white, at least in a legal sense. Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they were considered among the “free white persons” who could become citizens. Later laws limited the number of immigrants from certain countries, restrictions which were in part targeted at Jews. But unlike Asian and African immigrants in the late 19th century, Jews retained a claim to being “Caucasian,” meaning they could win full citizenship status based on their putative race.

This video contains so many inaccuracies: Sephardim came to Spain with their cousins the Arabs and both either forced to convert or leave. The khazars actually origins in N Mongolia, who were kicked out due to their behaviour towards other Mongolians. In ukraine, it is openly taught that khazars converted in the 8th century.

Thank you, well done

The kazar lineage just disappeared huh?

This woman has absolutely no ideal what she is talking about!!! She’s a mouthpiece for the System!!! For the mere fact that she said in the beginning of her speech: ‘I have no intention of taking you through the complete history of the jewish people and that the goal here is not to get too bogged down with the details’!!! This is her main problem and the major mistake she makes of not wanting to go through the “DETAILED” history is the specific reason that she kept saying “There’s no proof” that the present day j’s are of Khazarian Origin!!! This individual in this specific video has absolutely no ideal what she is talking about!!!

Rev.2:9 and 3:9 Nazis

Good content glad to see it out here!👏

Clif_High speaks of this as well, but goes a bit deeper in the origins and focuses on the Khazarian mafia aspect. Excellent source of info! 👍

It's obvious you did not research this and are reading from prepared texts of people who wish to use a "non biased" person to dispel the "myth" of Khazarian origins, a theory which is well established by genetics and other research. All you have to do is look at Ashkenazi Jews who are very different from Sepharidic Jews to see they are of different origin, they do not look at all like one another and have many deep disimilarities.

How can this Kazaars story be theoretical if one of the requirements to being Jewish is conversion? If Kazaars converted to Judaism how is that any different from anyone anywhere presently converting to Judaism via declaration? What's the difference. If Judaism is an ethno-religion then that would stand to mean there's ethnic Jewishness ie genetic or hereditary & then there's religio Jewishness ie simply declaring oneself Jewish. So, shouldn't there be a distinction???

Does the word Nazi come from Ashkanazi and why ???

Bravo my sista you are very well informed.