@@Designalily It's funny, that Naval appreciate Peterson’s thoughts and you are so angry even to admit a possibility of their talk. Actually, it shows that you understand no one of them.
@@postoron1940 he merely just psychobabble and is full of inanities. He's essentially what an unsophisticated individual would consider intellect. Definitely up there with other Nincompoop Sam harris or as some people would call: Scam Harris
@@MayorSom This^ I highly doubt Naval "appreciates" Peterson as I have never heard him mention it. He never gets to this point, emphasizes that he has no opinion (yet still gives opinions with pseudoscience), and says people don't know what they think. Complete opposite of what Naval thinks.
I think that our inner experience of god so deeply personal, which scientists call qualia, that even IF you say you have a relationship with God that exists for you, nobody could ever really know whether that is true except for you. So materialists look outward and say that is true. Yogis point inwards and say, this is true. See, we can never really know another person's inner life, it's impossible. However, the only thing you can ever be sure of is your own inner experience. If you look at a plant, that plant could have never existed for YOU if you were not there. The fact that you experience something 'out there' is in fact an inner experience. So the truth of the matter is that experiencing god is an inner experience, not an outer one.
This discussion has been truly enlightening. However, it's disheartening to observe that participants seem to be strongly influenced by religious ideologies, to the extent that the quality of questions later in the conversation noticeably declined, with many appearing uninformed. Kudos to Naval for maintaining patience throughout.
