Are Your Macro Flower Photography Compositions Boring, Lets Fix It. 

Thank you Jack.

Thanks, glad you liked it.

Thanks

Thank you, Elisabeth, glad you liked it.

Thank you.

Hey Randy, go for it, that's what I'm trying to do is give people ideas on way to shoot.

You are welcome Bob, yes always check out the backside. Some are not interesting enough to shoot, but some are, so always a least take a look.

Thank you Declan.

I hope you do, it's so much fun. Good luck.

Thanks Mike in Oz.

Thanks

Thanks rlp

Thanks, glad you liked it.

Thank you KY, check out my website, www.tinylandscapes.com

You are welcome Carlos.

Thanks Peter for comment.

You’re welcome 😊

Thank you Julio, check out my website, www.tinylandscapes.com

You are so welcome!

Glad you like them.

Thank you Francisco.

Thanks Chris, i use a program called Smart Photo Editor, it has over 8,000 creative filters.

@@mgmoats Thank you for letting me know, I'll check it out 😃

Thank you

Why thank you P 71 4

Thanks Ragnar.

Thanks for watching!

Thanks Don.

Thanks Johnson.

You're very welcome!

Thanks Steve, glad it helped.

Thank you Lisa.

Thanks Sabine.

Thanks Mr Tanker.

Thank you

Welcome!

Thanks I will be doing a video in the next week or so on my equipment. my suggestion to you is that if you are serious about macro photography, join my Macro Photo Club, where there are over 200 instructional videos. Only one time payment of $99 for a lifetime membership. check it out at www.tinylandscapes.com

Anywhere from f/22 to f/32. If you are really interested in learning all about how to produce top quality macro images, consider joining my Macro Photo Club online. Over 230 instructional videos on how to do it right. www.tinylandscapes.com/macro-photo-club

@@mgmoats Thank you

@@mgmoats I have seen many videos that advise to avoid shooting at F22 or F32 because of diffraction caused by the small aperture. On the other hand, your pictures at these openings are quite excellent. What is your take on this?

@@cropperson5583 Yes shooting at high f/stop numbers will cause some slight softness in the details. All post processing programs have sharpening tools. Sharpening your images will correct the softness from the diffraction, as you see in my images they are all sharp. I'm sure you have heard of the most famous of all landscape photographers, Ansel Adams. Ansel and 7 other famous photographers started a camera club in California back in the 1930. That camera club was named Group f/64. All the photographers in this club owned lenses that went to f/64, and that is where they shot all their photos, as their style of shooting was to get everything in focus, so they shot at f/64 to get maximum depth of field. There is a book written about the club which was called, Group f/64, look for it on, Amazon.

@@mgmoats If it's good enough for Ansel Adams, its good enough for me :)

Yes it was about the Litra Torch Light.

Nathan, what camera phones do really well is get everything in focus, so find interesting subjects and fill the frame with that subject and the phone will do a great job getting all of the subject in focus. I'll do a post one day about shooting macro with point and shoot cameras, and phones. But you keep working at it.

For close-up photography, a waste of time, matter of fact, I did a blog post on it. Here is the link. www.tinylandscapes.com/blog/photo-stacking-waste-of-time

Just natural light, usually around 800 iso, never have any issue shooting outside at high f/stop numbers, plenty of natural light.

Thanks Donal

Tamron 90 macro lens and Tamron 18-400 lens.

Sure you can, it could be a little unique, or a lot of unique.

@@mgmoats Unique means 'one of a kind'. How can you have something that's a little bit one of a kind? or a lot of one of a kind?

@@glennmac9116 I disagree, there can be different degrees of unique.

Mike Moats I don’t think so. How can something be more unique than something else?

Sorry Charles.