NASA uses 70mm hi-speed film for these engineering films. While there are a large number of digital cameras around the site, film does not 'flare' and saturate the camera like digital does. That is one quality of film that it has over digital, the film is fast enough and density enough to use a frame by frame analysis. SpaceX also uses film for it's engineering videos of launches.
Yes, the breathtaking awesomeness of solid core boosters that are inherently more dangerous and should never be used in crewed missions according to many experts. The first ever fatal accident in US crewed missions was thanks to the solid booster of the Challenger and lack of proper oversight and too many people depending on the success of the space shuttle.
@@patrickd9551 The problem with SRBs was due to the inability to turn them off during the launch OF A SPACE SHUTTLE, which didn’t have an escape system. SLS does have an escape system, so this easy and cheap solid rocket motor integration is safe.
@@rabbitdyneWhether or not you have an escape system, doesn't negate the properties of the SRB and their ineffectiveness in this application. The dragon crew pod has an escape system and doesn't use SRB's to get the job done. The Saturn V rocket didn't have SRB's to get the job done, but it did have an escape system. Starship won't have SRBs to get even more payload into orbit. And it will feature some kind of escape system once it will be used for human transport. So no, SRBs are clearly a bad choice here, On all relevant areas of capacity, cost and safety.
@@patrickd9551 Its funny what you are saying because SRB performance and reliability right now is more than 98% meanwhile other engines like the raptor engine only have a success rate of less than 80% 😂 You see? You cant compare an SRB with a liquid fuel engine. Liquid fuel engines will always be better, but they are really expensive, complex and NASA can’t afford them.
@@peterfirside295 Also incorrect, we *can* do a lot more with current technology and resources, there just isn’t enough motivation to do it. It’s not even the pinnacle of what humans have done, since we’ve already been to the moon on Apollo but Artemis hasn’t gotten that far yet.
The purpose of the video is to have the visual and audio elements in sync… If you want to appreciate just the video you can just google it, its released for everyone.
Can you please make more of these? The “no time for caution” track from interstellar would be perfect I watch this video at least a few times per week. Triggers my American patriotism and I’m not even American
Of course!! I got the footage from nasa´s image and video library (images.nasa.gov/) and then I searched for "artemis engineering views". To get the film footage featured in this video you have to search "artemis high speed film footage". Just keep in mind some of this files are really heavy. I hope this helps!!!
Im sorry I don’t think I understand what you mean, but If you meant that safety is the number 1 priority, then you are totally correct. Artemis 1 mission was a success and both the launch vehicle and Orion capsule performed as expected 👍
@@rabbitdyne It wasn't the last of an escape system that failed the shuttle on that cold day, but failure of management who where too eggar to not wait until a warmer day so the o'rings didn't fail and burn a hole through the center booster. The same thing could again even now without warning as there is no way to shut down the solid rocket boosters on the pad or in mid flight if something was to go wrong. You don't have have facts straight, I think you need to work on that before your next reply. Thanks! :)
@@andrewenglish3810 Thats exactly what I said(?) Quoting myself: “challenger was a consequence of negligence”. And yes, maybe it could happen again (probably not since NASA learnt from its mistakes) but even if it happened, there is now the escape system which will save the astronauts in an emergency. I think that instead of me researching more, you need to work on reading better :))
Im sorry can I ask what money is being wasted? Because Im not sure if you knew but that money is going to engineers and workers who need it. And we get the bonus of space exploration!!
@@rabbitdyneNOTHING COMPARED TO THE VAST SUMS OF MONEY AND RESOURCES THAT ARE BEING WASTED ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS THAT WILL NEVER EVER BE USED ! ! ! NASA ONLY RECEIVES ANNUALLY A VERY SMALL PERCENTAGE OF WHAT IS SPENT ANNUALLY ON THE WHOLE OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX INCLUDING BLACK OP's PROJECTS ! ! !
The thing is, those billions aren’t burned, they are given to families that work in building this rocket all around USA. Thats the main reason why congress approved this kind of programs, because they give hundreds of thousands of jobs to people. And also its pretty cool lol
Trillions in welfare down the throat and out the butt or did it. Trillions in education, 1 + 1 = 4. Now that's real waste and not a damn thing to show for advancement of the Human Condition except obesity and sloth.
Im sorry if you disliked the music, but there isn’t a single good NASA sound recording from the engines, Tim Dodd (channel name: Everyday Astronaut) made some great recordings from this launch in his youtube channel!! You can check those out. 👍
@@rabbitdyne Thanks Warstaker. I am not. This is all about stopping others. Not about advancement of humanity for the benifit of humanity. NASA is old and stale and rigid, to my view. Same old game. The forward thinkers are in the private secter, funded by the DOD , which is bad news for all of us. These folks will take us the next step. The shots are great to watch.
