Тёмный

Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal  

Law Chakra
Подписаться 611 тыс.
Просмотров 413 тыс.
50% 1

Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal #SupremeCourtIndia #LawChakra
Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

Опубликовано:

 

10 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 837   
@chittaranjandas7140
@chittaranjandas7140 Год назад
Sibal feels he can create technical ambiguity and twist the case on his favour but Honble Judges are alao equal careful.
@suvarnanaik8261
@suvarnanaik8261 Год назад
😂👍
@Surihampi
@Surihampi Год назад
Honorable Judges are not only careful but they are brilliant and impartial. This is why when everything fails to do justice, we believe in Honorable Courts for justice. Hats off to them.
@ubaidarshad
@ubaidarshad Год назад
@@Surihampiwhat is justice according to you
@positive120
@positive120 Год назад
​@@ubaidarshadmake people to abide by laws framed by democratically elected Indian govt.
@cccc2740
@cccc2740 Год назад
@@ubaidarshad 70 year old not being able to 6 year old girl..first point of justice...
@ParikhTirth
@ParikhTirth Год назад
The fact is Amit Shah and team has done the job so flawlessly that no arguments are worthy enough to reverse the decision... Amit Shah in his reply confidently spoke that there is no way this can be reversed
@ritakaul99
@ritakaul99 Год назад
887
@Northby
@Northby 2 месяца назад
Park thirth, mind this great man sibal, who, ten yers ago, try arduosly to pour buckets of water, into the millions of "chulas " India's homes. Inlastcongress regime!
@asrajan2489
@asrajan2489 Год назад
Mr. Sibal confuses to the maximum. Honourable Judges should be very careful in dealing with him.
@bahdeng5588
@bahdeng5588 Год назад
No, Mr. Sibal is 100℅ right.
@dalinaik9996
@dalinaik9996 Год назад
Anti nation sibal
@deepakkumarjoshi
@deepakkumarjoshi Год назад
Subal said what's in the constitution, centre can't make Uttar Pradesh as union territory just because they don't like ppl there, same goes for jNk, ppl should decide.
@AnilSharma-vo8ok
@AnilSharma-vo8ok Год назад
​@@deepakkumarjoshi for you kind information J&k is not UT.
@NavjotSidhu-s6z
@NavjotSidhu-s6z 2 месяца назад
​@@AnilSharma-vo8okDo you lack even basic comprehension?
@Antharishk
@Antharishk Год назад
The 370 and Sheik abdulla a gone case. Why so much seriousness on this issue. Why sibal wants Kashmir burning again
@dhkw007
@dhkw007 Год назад
To make some money. He also knows the result
@Saqib_weqyq
@Saqib_weqyq Год назад
If it is injustice it will not happen, If its justice then it must happen without worrying about further consequences Truth must revealed
@ishiinghajput1230
@ishiinghajput1230 Год назад
@@Saqib_weqyq what injustice, injustice happens with kashmiri pandits did you admit and re habilate them no you wants to make kashmir apart of pakistans it will never happen and poi will back soon
@VijayKumar-76
@VijayKumar-76 Год назад
Who is fighting for what? Who is on whose side and what this is all for.... Pls someone could explain me .. ty
@Ashish-rf2eh
@Ashish-rf2eh Год назад
@@Saqib_weqyq original victims are kamiri pandit not muslim
@digvijaysingh2305
@digvijaysingh2305 Год назад
Sibal is down to the level of "Chahe mujhe pitt do, lekin gariyao mat". 😂😂😂
@MayankKumar-tl5rx
@MayankKumar-tl5rx Год назад
😂😂😂
@StephenHuntley-m6c
@StephenHuntley-m6c 4 месяца назад
😂😂😂
@gvija69
@gvija69 Год назад
These two lawyers Sibal and Singhvi are like Imran Khan. They are fighting cases for so many people and on other side making congress weak by weak day by day. Good work for BJP
@ismail3901
@ismail3901 Год назад
They r fighting in behalf of Pakistan
@UserBkj
@UserBkj Год назад
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@manoharshirsat2864
@manoharshirsat2864 Год назад
😂😂They earn Congress looses
@sagarviswanathan1956
@sagarviswanathan1956 Год назад
Sibal is fighting for money and nothing else. He knows that his argument is hollow and he will only face failure. For Sibal temporary provision can be permanent 😂. How much money he has taken to fight this case which he will lose without a doubt.
@rocketsingh4830
@rocketsingh4830 Год назад
What a waste of time by a senior sc lawyer once in congress, habits don't go easily 😂😂😂
@swapankantabosechowdhury677
Old habits die hard
@sidhainsan1
@sidhainsan1 Год назад
Sibal is stuck between temporary and permanent. Everyday he is changing his stand. For this he charges 25-30 lac per hearing. Kismet ho to Natthulal jaisi
@ads7506
@ads7506 Год назад
He has habit of getting stuck
@nagarampasulamogili3912
@nagarampasulamogili3912 Год назад
In view of non existence of constitutional assembly of J&K as of now the temporary status of Artcle 370 will become permanently temporary and it will continue to be applicable.
@suvarnanaik8261
@suvarnanaik8261 Год назад
😂👍
@damon5517
@damon5517 Год назад
😂😂😂😂 Congress ☕☕☕
@nikshrivastava5514
@nikshrivastava5514 Год назад
He thinks he can justify his fees by misleading judges.
@hanumanthrao3465
@hanumanthrao3465 Год назад
I feel like Sibbal is pleading the judges to give him a face saving from this embarrassment.....atleast once say "here you are right Sibbal" but...
@user-ci6vk8iy5f
@user-ci6vk8iy5f Год назад
Agreed. That is why .he keeps saying “ Milords “ after every sentence hoping that the esteemed judges will sympathise with him and rule in his favour. 😂
@nageshlali
@nageshlali Год назад
Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW
@esasidharan6573
@esasidharan6573 Год назад
😅
@suryavaliveti8355
@suryavaliveti8355 Год назад
He's testing their patience. They will strike down this petition soon.
@ranapartap1501
@ranapartap1501 Год назад
hopefully they send him to jail for 50 years for wasting time and Jhangerssi suer
@subramaniampanchacharam9438
Sibal's argument-- if you keep stolen items long enough, then it becomes your property. Humbug arguments. Fiction.
@madhusoodananunniyattil9421
If these guys comes to power, then imagine the situation of India : Let alone Kashmir and Ladakh
@deepakkumarjoshi
@deepakkumarjoshi Год назад
​@@madhusoodananunniyattil9421like the current situation in the china border 😂
@dhrdas
@dhrdas Год назад
Congress created the problem in Kashmir. Half of Kashmir was lost due to negligence of Neheru, Neheru went to UN and made it an international dispute, Neheru did not change Article 370 neither Indira Gandhi did although she almost changed the entire constitution. Now when the the temporary article is removed, Congress is again creating trouble to bring it back. What Congress really want?
@paapkishtwaer
@paapkishtwaer Год назад
modi came to power in2014. how much pok taken back ????
@AnkitSingh-zm9dg
@AnkitSingh-zm9dg Год назад
@@paapkishtwaerpappu jaisi bate mat kar bro… it cannot be taken back unless UN intervenes, bcz pappu k nehru ne apni marayi ja k UN me… muh ka kaur ni hai ki le lenge… Army can capture it anytime they want but cannot bcz we have not to attack first policy… understand the logics..
@raghavendravishwas5929
@raghavendravishwas5929 Год назад
​@@paapkishtwaer👌
@abhinavgoswami9574
@abhinavgoswami9574 Год назад
​@@paapkishtwaerHow to say I am immature without saying it...
@TheKrish1972
@TheKrish1972 Год назад
@@paapkishtwaer in my view, there is no need to get POK because we get 4m more peaceful in this process. As long as there is not killing in Kashmir and life is normal, I am happy. 😂
@chatrukripalani7671
@chatrukripalani7671 Год назад
Mr Sibal should clarify whether J&K is an integral part of India? If yes, then, how come, it can have its own constitution, national flag, and a prime minister. In that case Mr Sibal should explain why should India have the responsibility of protecting, feeding, and incurring financial expenditure in its development, yet have no authority to protect its own safety and security, and of Hindus living there?
@somashreechowdhury2382
@somashreechowdhury2382 Год назад
Exact"?"ly so that's exactly what the" messiah,of the santidoot international gang" have to answer,"". Also every
@kumark214
@kumark214 Год назад
Isn’t it obvious? Because it was given special status by India, just like Assam, Sikkim etc.
@somashreechowdhury2382
@somashreechowdhury2382 Год назад
Also every legislation and Articles ,Amendments,proviso,additions,to the Constitution are to be read with the appeasement scenario in which such proviso ,amendments additions,legislations were laid by & under the governance of a govt. as we gather from The history had been headed by Mr. Nehru who did not have a single of the 16 "VOTES" of the representatives representing the people of BHARAT and as such are imperatively questionable????And therefore such proviso, acts, Articles, legislations ,need neccessarily&imperatively be read with such history of appeasement & power sharing formulas that were the cause of such provisos , legislations, amendments , additions outrageous to the sanctity of the power of the government elected
@kumark214
@kumark214 Год назад
@@somashreechowdhury2382 complete nonsense. Regardless of who is in power, constitution is the same. Anything can be done if allowed by constitution, if not it’s illegal like this repeal.
@XPERTEDUCATOR
@XPERTEDUCATOR Год назад
Not integral part but temporary part
@divyasatheesh2529
@divyasatheesh2529 Год назад
Precious court time got wasted!!! CJI should not encourage this.still thousands of laymen are waiting for justice. But nowadays I feel that SC favours VIPs..they are ready to take political cases that too of opposition mostly even at midnight.
@nikshrivastava5514
@nikshrivastava5514 Год назад
After hearing all the arguments of CJI. It is clear that sibal is just wasting time of the court and acting like a stubborn child that keep on ranting without logic to prove his point.
@leelaaiyappa6277
@leelaaiyappa6277 Год назад
Well replied by CJI👍
@AnandSharma-qt3gi
@AnandSharma-qt3gi Год назад
Sibbal knows how to exploit loopholes of Constitution by intrepreting it so subjectively.. But judges should be ekadiken ( one step more)
@Saumil5
@Saumil5 Год назад
Shukracharya hay
@prakashnarasimha1044
@prakashnarasimha1044 Год назад
Sibal was heard suggesting Brexit like vote for the people of J & K. I wonder what kind of man is this and what kind of mentality is this ?
@subash32118
@subash32118 Год назад
HOW MUCH ANTI INDIAN LOBBY IS WORKING IN INDIA
@lasu596
@lasu596 Год назад
Sibal lost the case He dint hv anything to say except what Abdulla wanted
@RS-sx1lo
@RS-sx1lo Год назад
The logic is simple J&K is happier and more peaceful now ! 370 has to go !
@pandit-jee-bihar
@pandit-jee-bihar Год назад
Sibal wants 370 to stay not because it's abrogation he deem was unconstitutional but because there is no clarity on when and how a temporary provision became permanent. Looks like it became permanent on it's own without exercising 368 because no government said anything till date. I think such cases should be dismissed simply based on Article 1, 2 & 3 which gives centre enough power to parliament to reorganise or change the boundaries of any state without state's consent.
@susilkumarbarik8304
@susilkumarbarik8304 Год назад
Advocate like sibal not only confusing honorable SC but also betry indians and this is the true face of Congress....
@manjunathaks607
@manjunathaks607 Год назад
Sibal is famous for confusing Indian courts by doing China and Pakistani laws in India..😂
@VipinSingh-vg8iq
@VipinSingh-vg8iq Год назад
it feels so sad that we are hearing this kind cases being accepted in the courts of our country that challenges the authority of our country over our own state. Sibal is appearing for some anti-India client here, court shouldn't have accepted the Plea in the first place. It's a wastage of taxpayers hard earned money and resources. Moreover, it further raises question on the non-transparent model of working of the judiciary itself.
@user-ks1lj4uz2j
@user-ks1lj4uz2j Год назад
Sibal feels, J&K is part of Pakistan, he even feels India to be part of Pakistan too. but he wants Indian money, that too in crores per every day of his attendance in court/parliament.
@petergriffin6575
@petergriffin6575 Год назад
Have u ever read law?
@megacharizardx2276
@megacharizardx2276 Год назад
​@@petergriffin6575Plz explain what is a law I'm an law student. Sibbal comparing UK & India but he forgets in UK there is no Reservation system SC St Obc doesn't enjoy job food dress from tax payers money is there any equality between UK & India?
@petergriffin6575
@petergriffin6575 Год назад
@@megacharizardx2276 considering u r a law student let me give u a piece of advice that a lawyer should always see loopholes in the case and argue them and twist the facts to favour him. It's not necessary to provide only facts.
@user-ks1lj4uz2j
@user-ks1lj4uz2j Год назад
@@petergriffin6575 In general sense yes, articles from here and there, cannot say as expert, My comment is not about law, about a person. As a lawyer he may be doing good, his argument struck like Gramaphone needle at one place, he do not want the judges to even debate/venture into other relevant points. if this is what law is, then i do not subscribe to it, my understanding is law should be for greater good not for one or select few!
@karma5396
@karma5396 Год назад
​@@petergriffin6575does exploiting loophole strengthen our democracy? Asking as a lay man with zero understanding of Constitution.
@RajeevAnand
@RajeevAnand Год назад
Sibal needs to take english classes again if he doesn't understand the basic difference between temporary and permanent. This will be a good judgement to also remove caste based reservations which was also temporary.
@vinayakdhulap
@vinayakdhulap Год назад
The National Conference and the like think that they will always have the dine in and India will take care of the washing and kitchen.Then they were worried of their minority status and reservation. Whats wrong if we say let's all be at the dinner table and enjoy?All states are equal for last 76 years and prosperous.
@PC-tz6rw
@PC-tz6rw Год назад
You have a case there! Bravo!!
@sayand2706
@sayand2706 Год назад
Sibal is going round and round but CJI called out his bluff ..
@mazerrackham1280
@mazerrackham1280 Год назад
As a Kashmiri i have always rejoiced the 370 abrogation since it was nothing but a dead horse and most probably SC will uphold the abrogation as well. What i fail to understand is why is it irking so many people. The deliberations upon it in the highest court only reflects the true character of Indian democracy and the fact that arbitary legislations are liable to be struck down if passed in an illegitimate manner. If you ask me the proceedings itself is enhancing the democratic spirit of the country rather than doing any harm.
@miskangan986
@miskangan986 Год назад
Mal gudood
@malayaranjansahu7650
@malayaranjansahu7650 Год назад
same bro...i don't understand why...may be this gives us hint that what national prosperity & security means to these people who are represented by sibal.
@Aj.K.R
@Aj.K.R Год назад
We love constitution Democracy and Supreme court. We are not biased and court as well to hear any significant cases. Sibbal is trying his best argument. Law is important than your emotions. Law makes a country not an uneducated King.
@malayaranjansahu7650
@malayaranjansahu7650 Год назад
@@Aj.K.R but is it good to waste time on a sealed case which was needed for the security of India???
@ydgokhale1
@ydgokhale1 Год назад
Great point.
@nimmamithra-learning7647
@nimmamithra-learning7647 Год назад
Sibal's procrastination is at the height of his obedience to dynasty.
@vandemataram2506
@vandemataram2506 Год назад
After 100/200 years, people will remember Kapil as a Villain Advocate in History!!!
@ListenSilent121
@ListenSilent121 Год назад
🎯
@bahdeng5588
@bahdeng5588 Год назад
Ater 100/200 yrs people will remember kabil not as villain but as Hero (advocate)like kapil indian cricketer.
@nadieperumal5770
@nadieperumal5770 Год назад
\\One thing is for sure: No going Back
@ramalingamsadasivan2835
@ramalingamsadasivan2835 Год назад
How can a politician become a lwayer, conflict of interest.
@spikes1210
@spikes1210 Год назад
Sibal. One man who is always hand in hand with anti-India forces
@vasudevannagaswamy7068
@vasudevannagaswamy7068 Год назад
Akanda Bharat is following sanatana dharma. Every devoted hindu should wake up from slumber and hear what Kapil Sibal is arguing. Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and all states should follow what is practised from immemorial times. Vallabhai Patel and Ambedkar was not fir article 370. Article 370 has done so much harm to hindus and particularly Kashmiri pandits.
@raghavuchil2098
@raghavuchil2098 Год назад
Why we are still folowing British way of addressing judges as " My Lord" ? As per Indian tradition, we must call them at the best " Your Honor" Calling them My Lord makes no sense. Only Lord for us is our Gods and no one else...
@sigmamale3115
@sigmamale3115 Год назад
Judge k samne jra bolna ye baat....juban se pocha na lgwa dia th wo bhi judge ni
@deepakkumarjoshi
@deepakkumarjoshi Год назад
But do you want to use? Old caste based way of addressing?
@sarojjena9947
@sarojjena9947 Год назад
CHAPPAL IS CONFUSED OF HIS OWN EXISTENCE AS A BHARATIYA. . . . . .
@pawanballi
@pawanballi Год назад
No law supreme than country..... Always first nation...... Law should be changed according to the need and conditions of the country....
@truthexposed4403
@truthexposed4403 Год назад
Country is for the people who want to be governed by themselves by their choices,not by foreigners or any intruders who autocratically break their laws made for the govern.first human being then country then law it is the actual sequence.
@anandnairkollam
@anandnairkollam Год назад
How does the hon judge have so much time for such cases but not for common man's cases?
@sairamsairam9890
@sairamsairam9890 Год назад
I hope S C will DISMISS the Application...
@paapkishtwaer
@paapkishtwaer Год назад
what if they give verdict against the abrogation ?
@vikasgowda1391
@vikasgowda1391 Год назад
​@@paapkishtwaerhell no, just see the cross questions by CJI to sibal. And even CJI know if he restore 370 then central govt will pass the bill in both houses easily because if any opposition goes against it then it will be a death of their own in upcoming elections.
@jayaram8950
@jayaram8950 Год назад
Whatever may be the arguments J&K is one state among the other states of India. There were Maharajas in all other states also. Democracy is now the King of India. J&K must be treated at par with all other states. It needs no special status. Hyderabad Nizam did not wanted to join Union of India. What was done then? Same applies to J&K also. Article 370 must end. This is the opinion of more than 80% of the people of India.
@bhabanishankar3096
@bhabanishankar3096 Год назад
मैं दोहराता हूं कि कोई भी जम्मू-कश्मीर में धारा 370 को दोबारा वापस नहीं ला सकता
@rockyvillan562
@rockyvillan562 Год назад
If it's temporary it's temporary. What's the difference then if it's permanent ??
@drsubashn4025
@drsubashn4025 Год назад
SC has made it clear in its famous judgement that parliament has the power to amend the constitution or enact laws without affecting the basic structure of the constitution. Then why can Art 370 not amended or abrogated or deleted by the parliament? Removal of Art 370 does not affect the basic structure of the constitution !
@vishalbharti1139
@vishalbharti1139 Год назад
Due to the presence of the explicit process on the removal of Article 370
@drsubashn4025
@drsubashn4025 Год назад
@vishalbharti1139 can you please explain , sir ? That was an explicit process , otherwise, what other processes are available? Govt did not resort to the ordinance route. I am sorry I do not understand. .
@vishalbharti1139
@vishalbharti1139 Год назад
@@drsubashn4025 Sir,it was explicitly mentioned that the abrogation of article 370 can be held by the President but only on the advice of the Constituent Assembly of the J&K which Sibbal is arguing of.What the Union has done is through an implicit process,which is right in the sense and logic but a question on the process of abrogation of the article.
@aeonsleo2
@aeonsleo2 Год назад
The recommendation to remove 370 should come from constituent assembly because at that time jnk Constitution was not in place. Then Constitution came and elections and constiruent assembly was dissolved. So arguably the recommendation should come from legislative Assembly which wasn't there because of President rule. This isbthe argument.
@drsubashn4025
@drsubashn4025 Год назад
When J&K constituent assembly was dissolved and J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution , was the replacement not 100% ? How come some laws of Indian constitution were not accepted in to-to ? That's what one would expect. All provisions of Indian constitution were accepted and according to the same Indian constitution, govt of India and Indian parliament have the right and capacity amend any law without touching the basic tenets of the Indian constitution. I am not able to understand how some provisions were left out when J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution. . .
@grpublishers
@grpublishers 5 месяцев назад
Chief Justice should be the role model of our youngsters rather than some chapri influencers.... Look how humble je is and how convincingly he talks.....
@theexposer9483
@theexposer9483 Год назад
During British time many Indian lawyers use to appear against Indians and one of them was father of j l Nehru. They made lot of money by going against Indians, the same breed of people are still practising even today. No country in this world will have such type of people thriving.
@PC-tz6rw
@PC-tz6rw Год назад
In fact it is this batch of people who are now termed as liberaaaands!
@truthseeker327
@truthseeker327 Год назад
they are the lutyens gang or khan market gang. they are extremely intolerant towards those who do not belong to their ilk
@medasbabu
@medasbabu Год назад
Sad part even after 70 years, we see people like Sibal thriving and given so much importance, he is a national shame.
@deepakkumarjoshi
@deepakkumarjoshi Год назад
India is intact bcz of such great ppl not bcz of RSS rioter
@PC-tz6rw
@PC-tz6rw Год назад
@@deepakkumarjoshi I can bet you are the devil's advocate! Very unlikely that your ID is real. The new law which has been presented in parliament will definitely make life miserable for such a lot , which passes opinions as judgements and truth. Very soon, if you shoot off the hip, even in courts, you'll have to come up with evidence and hearsay will not make a dent on judgements. That goes for fake news and concocted news too!
@divyamrathi299
@divyamrathi299 Месяц назад
I Regret Wasting my 8 minutes and 46 seconds.
@swagbaba69
@swagbaba69 Год назад
I never saw this lawyer ever fighting for good of nation
@ranjnasandeep
@ranjnasandeep Год назад
Sibal feels that he can make fool any one
@suvarnanaik8261
@suvarnanaik8261 Год назад
😂👍
@yogendravasadia7922
@yogendravasadia7922 Год назад
Because he himself is fooled by Modi Govt 😂
@ranjnasandeep
@ranjnasandeep Год назад
👍😄
@arijitpyne3435
@arijitpyne3435 Год назад
He thinks anyone can be fooled but it is he who is actually a fool
@hemantmallapur
@hemantmallapur 4 месяца назад
If Sibal is Devil's advocate who is the Devil?
@kuldipsharma3119
@kuldipsharma3119 Год назад
Very good discussion.
@khemar-jl1tb
@khemar-jl1tb Год назад
The courts never considered the plight of Lakhs of Kashmiri Pundits (original inhabitants) subjected to genocide by Invaders.
@baroisamuel
@baroisamuel Год назад
Had any one brought the plight of Hindus before Supreme Court for justice? If yes, rise up and shoutout. Unless you cry even mother won't feed you.Muslims are fighting for their right but Hindus had backtracked as I have seen in East Bengal it had been made East Pakistan. Why not North Pakistan or South Pakistan. I was a little boy but the plight of Hindus made me sad. Fight for your rights why leave East Bengal in name of Pakistan. I have studied in a government school of the district named Zilla school with only two hindu students. There used to be long Puja vaccination, Sarwasati Puja holiday but no function because of absence of number. Hindus are timid and never fought for their rights.
@somashreechowdhury2382
@somashreechowdhury2382 Год назад
Particular Officer of the SUPREME COURT is of the FIRM CONVICTION that ..."I am the Supreme law , I am the Supreme court Department of Telecommunication, Governm
@vking4535
@vking4535 Год назад
I had read Article 370 long time back and if I remember correctly it has mentioned in the definition of Art.370 that it's temporary. That word is there. So Hon.Sibbal saying it's not mentioned there in Art.370 isn't right. Although I respect Sibbals arguments here, he has made 1-2 very good points. Debates are welcome in democracy. But Kashmir was part of Bharat since Rishi Kashyap and it will be forever. Jai Hind!
@Motherfuckerofmorons
@Motherfuckerofmorons Год назад
Please Stop saying Jai Hind: we should say Mera Bharat mahaan
@Motherfuckerofmorons
@Motherfuckerofmorons Год назад
Hind and Hindustan should stop.
@nadegenius6830
@nadegenius6830 Год назад
Sibbal is saying that 370 is temporary but only state assembly can provoke it. Centre can not abbrogate it without allowance from state assembly. This is the point.
@vaibhavpatel5326
@vaibhavpatel5326 Год назад
​@nadegenius6830 there is no such provision that centre can not remove it
@Motherfuckerofmorons
@Motherfuckerofmorons Год назад
@@nadegenius6830 Did you watch, Farooq Abdullah's speech in parliament. Then you would never allow that to happen. This is Bharat varsh and if you allow they will allow every state to merge with Pakistan. Did you forget what happened, when Nizam's were thrown out of the throne. They wanted Hyderabad should be a Pakistani state in central India.
@vipstervipster5002
@vipstervipster5002 Год назад
Stop wasting courts time, send Kapil Sibal to Pakistan. Let us close the matter of 370 and solve the evil intent of Kapil Sibal.
@surendr3645
@surendr3645 Год назад
Between 1956 and 1994, 47 Presidential Orders were passed without any Constituent Assembly but the Order removing 370 without such an Assembly is a problem
@shankarcg786
@shankarcg786 Год назад
When in 1976 the word secular was introduced when half the parliament was in jail that was not violation of constitution 😊
@bluesailengineering5003
@bluesailengineering5003 Год назад
CHAPPAL IS GOOD AT BAIL ONLY. HE HARDLY WINS ANY CASE.
@gauravnathan5701
@gauravnathan5701 Год назад
CJI DY chandrachund is so clear, he is the real protector,,, he is really a justice
@kamathmanoj
@kamathmanoj 4 месяца назад
How is CJI allowing Seeballs to interrupt his own speech 😮 contempt 😡
@nirmalk8861
@nirmalk8861 5 месяцев назад
If Sibal is fighting a case, then it must be the wrong side
@uppalurisrinivas583
@uppalurisrinivas583 Год назад
Kapil Sibal should be kept in mental asylum for his anti-national activities by misusing his legal profession
@peacekeeper9840
@peacekeeper9840 Год назад
Waste of taxpayers money. Some issues are above law and thats why wars are fought.
@kamathak
@kamathak Год назад
Sibbal is clueless.. He is just wasting court's time.
@satyarao452
@satyarao452 Месяц назад
Sibbal , you have proved time and agian , that you do not have any shame. Sibbal do not wear the unoform of a lawyer , it is disgrace to the law profession.
@mitron7588
@mitron7588 Год назад
4:47 really he is saying that temporary is not part of A370 😂😂😂
@thankcode
@thankcode Год назад
Kapil Sibal was our Law minister once, what a shame for the country.
@rameshchandrasahoo8872
@rameshchandrasahoo8872 Год назад
When khangress is out of power and no remote in its hand that time India is bad boy
@Lakshyam9
@Lakshyam9 Год назад
6.38 _ CJI nails it. The 370 was a temporary provision brought in- the Constituent Assembly of J&K could have made it permanent. They didn't , while agreeing to acede to India. Assembly dissolved. 370 remains a TEMPORARY providion, NEVER made permanent. Case closed. Bye Sibal. Sibal has no case.
@subratashome6393
@subratashome6393 Год назад
Sibal drowning trying to catch the straw. Even Lord will not help him.
@RakeshVerma-tv8wi
@RakeshVerma-tv8wi Год назад
Current government had cleaned the whole mess which was created by Chacha Nehru and Congress by abrogating article 370. Thank god they did that, what is the point of having 2 constitutions in a single country.
@phoneix_bicycle_garage
@phoneix_bicycle_garage Год назад
I really respect CJI who duely have opportunity to restarin and even with can make a joke using his power as CJI but still was in control to respect his senior as it was a court proceeding for the matter of fact...hats off to personality and emotional control of CJI... And I believe as citizen of India..that our constitution and judicial system may be attacked or poisoned by politics of the present situation but still it will stand for the conscience of Indian citizen his rights ...
@utsavgoel8254
@utsavgoel8254 Год назад
Who pays for sibbal's fees...is it the Congress party ?
@anshulthakre8987
@anshulthakre8987 Год назад
May be soros or Singham
@amitavadas7533
@amitavadas7533 Год назад
We have fullest faith in this Constitutional Bench headed by Hon'ble CJI
@anshulthakre8987
@anshulthakre8987 Год назад
Don't so easy bro Aapne hi dhoka diya karte hai
@haqeeqat256
@haqeeqat256 Год назад
Great discussion sibal
@umeshshukla8392
@umeshshukla8392 Год назад
ऐसे व्यक्ति को भारत में कांग्रेस मिनिस्टर बनाया गया घाटी हिंदू विहीन हो गई कश्मीर का इस्लामीकरण इसीलिए हुआ
@sundareshkrishna6457
@sundareshkrishna6457 4 месяца назад
CJI rocks……awesome sir…🙏🏿🙏🏿
@narsinhgujari3938
@narsinhgujari3938 Год назад
Sibal is really gone mad for getting publicity, each and every day we can see , this guy is standing for anti-nationals and sympathy with pak's propoganda.
@yogendravasadia7922
@yogendravasadia7922 Год назад
There are no merits and convincing Arguments on the part of Mr.Sibble. He is just wasting time and energy as the CJ is the brilliant judge. No need to argue by Govt.siide
@muralimohangr8396
@muralimohangr8396 Год назад
Kashmiries are not aware of Article 370 . Why this fellow is argueing and for whom
@PawanSharmaBaru
@PawanSharmaBaru Год назад
I am from Jammu,we only want Jammu as a dhogra state of India.
@kingjulien3511
@kingjulien3511 5 месяцев назад
CJI argument are way better then SG.😂... seems CJI took charge of SG
@rishavsingh2356
@rishavsingh2356 Год назад
Remember Sibil is mp of RS from SP which is part of I.N.D.I.A and he is in court for restoring Article 370.
@guptasameer84
@guptasameer84 Год назад
Congress still fighting to keep J&K in permanent state is despair.
@babukumaresh9492
@babukumaresh9492 Год назад
Parliment is final authority to amend Laws
@maheshnag944
@maheshnag944 Год назад
कृपया हिंदी में subtitile डालें ताकि हम हिंदीभाषी भी देश के जिम्मेदार लोगों के अनुच्छेद ३७० पर उनके विचार जाने
@vaghelas4719
@vaghelas4719 Год назад
Some body must challange "secualr word" Introduced in Constitution by Indira Gandhi during imergency on similar ground
@nageshlali
@nageshlali Год назад
Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW
@jagannathsutar2841
@jagannathsutar2841 Год назад
This party is going to free itself from the country.
@777-Movies
@777-Movies 5 месяцев назад
What the Hell , Congress want 370 ?
@paritoshpanigrahi455
@paritoshpanigrahi455 Год назад
The entire nation stands with Modi Ji in the issue of Article 370.
@jawaharlalkoul460
@jawaharlalkoul460 Год назад
Every second He is unfaithful to his masters who hired him ,he is king Of Chameleon Family,He Has Not Only Bored the Hon'ble Judges But Also Dried And Exhausted Their Bodies With Repeated Same Arguments That HAVE No Legality,Ley Him Allow To Speak Continuously For Months Together Without Countering Him And When Stops Ask Him When Fair Elections Were Held In Jammu And Kashmir And Have Kashmiri Hindus/Pandits Participated In These Elections Before And After Forced and Brutally Migration Then Whole Truth Will Come Out And Will Find Door To Escape. Sir I Promise All Truth Will Come Out About Constitutional Assemblies.
@manoranjandas2398
@manoranjandas2398 Год назад
There is so many cases pending at court but wasting time on unnecessary 370. These paid laywer can do anyting against country once payment is done in their account.please think about country
@muralilakka6161
@muralilakka6161 Год назад
This man called Kapil Sibal represents congress party although he is SP MP. He is wasting SC's valuable time for the past three days. CJI should not allow him and his lawyers to make further useless arguments and put fullstop to this.
@pankajshah9094
@pankajshah9094 Год назад
One can doubt the integrity and honesty of the Supreme Court of India. People will not have faith on such system.
@raghunandampathi538
@raghunandampathi538 6 месяцев назад
From beginning congress is the favor for Shaikh Abdullah they don't want to abrogated article 370 in J and K
@babaonline2918
@babaonline2918 Год назад
Sibbal is the Best Liar but the Worst Lawyer
@kamalakantamohanty7045
@kamalakantamohanty7045 Год назад
What 370 will end...370 is history. Can you reverse the creation of Pakistan...then try to reverse 370...
@n.s.karanth1381
@n.s.karanth1381 Год назад
It is a dilemma of both the parties, the hon judge and sibbal how best they can perpetuate the wishes of nehru irrespective of the wishes of constituent assembly and the larger wishes of the indian people
@HiralalDhanuka-yf6mj
@HiralalDhanuka-yf6mj Год назад
Accession was not subject to Art 370. It was unconditional n total accession. Sibal lying.
Далее
Пришёл к другу на ночёвку 😂
01:00
ДОКАЗАЛ ЧТО НЕ КАБЛУК #shorts
00:30
Новый уровень твоей сосиски
00:33
Пришёл к другу на ночёвку 😂
01:00