NOTE: You can view this video without advertisements on the following free speech video sharing platforms where we now have a presence, join us there: - Video on BitChute: www.bitchute.com/video/rGIuTH9uec9t/ - Video on Rumble: rumble.com/vgm4lz-asmr-math-division-by-zero-why-we-cant-travel-at-the-speed-of-light-einstei.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=6 - Video on Odysee: odysee.com/@chycho:6/einstien_25_6_2_3_chycho:b
0 ÷ 0 = ERROR or indeterminate or n ÷ 0 = ERROR or undefined however this is no longer the case meaning I have shown and proven formulae - without problem or paradox, domain expansion or analytic continuation on to the complex plane - thus 0 ÷ 0 = |, said NU or n ÷ 0 = 0n, said UN for instance ..... 4 : 3 : 2 : 1 : 0 : | : 0 : 1 : 2 : 3 : 4 .... or for example 1 × 0 = 01 or 1 ÷ 0 = 01 now 01 × 0 = 1 or 01 ÷ 0 = 1 d ÷ t = s Let: d = 0 or t = 0 Thus a = | Whereas: 0 ÷ 0 = | Inverse: d ÷ t = s Let: d = 1 or t = 0 Thus s = O1 Whereas: | ÷ 0 = 0| Inverse Let S = 0| | × 0 = 0| Inverse: Let: s = 0| 0| ÷ 0 = | ~ 'AIY said "I" 928-222-5090 ph. #
This might sound strange and it's certainly off-topic and maybe because I'm sleep-deprived but I just want to tell you that I admire you. And let me tell you why. You know what you love. You have found what you love and you have found a way to include it in your life. Listening to you is such a joyful experience. I actually understood Einstein's theory. And you know what, it blew my mind, too. And I can tell you enjoy doing this, and I get enjoyment from listening to your excitement in understanding a topic you're passionate about. I wish more people were passionate about something too. Anything. A room full of passionate people can change the world. Or at the very least, your own world. And if there's one thing I'm sure about is that those who love, and who love what they do, just make the world better. In every sense. They succeed. I love watching people succeed. You win at life, man. So when you apologized at 28:25 for the "long-winded" explanation, and later said it was very cool for you and enlightening, which is why you did it, it kind of bummed me out, man. Because I do that too, because when I'm on a roll and I start rambling about something I'm very interested in, sometimes I'm talking about it to the wrong person and I see their eyes just glaze over me, a universal sign of boredom. Or maybe they tell me to be quiet, lol. And so I quickly wrap it up and apologize for my rambling. And if that's happened to you, I'm sorry. But thanks again for your videos. I always try to be brief but end up writing paragraphs. I always get the feeling I annoy people when I do this. :P
Definitely not annoying, brother, and thank you for the kind words. I do love what I share and appreciate the feedback very much, so I will try and never again apologize for going off on tangents... thank you for pointing it out, frees up my rambling tendencies :) Peace and lots of love from Canada.
I feel smarter for just knowing you and this video helped to chill out so much. I completely agree that some copyright constraints are surprisingly rigid. This is for the greater good and a gift to humanity should be readily available to broaden new minds. I wont pretend to fully understand these concepts put forth, but seeing like minded people excited for such possibilities is a real rush. :) Ty!!
+MrRigamortis86 You're very welcome and I'm glad you enjoyed. It's definitely fun to talk about this, put it out there, and read the feedback. Peace :)
I finally found this channel again! after all these years! I remember finding the beard picking video years ago before I found ASMR, I'd go looking for videos that are otherwise unintentional.
I despised math in school. Straight C's the whole time. I had ONE good math teacher and I flourished during his short tenure as a substitute teacher. It's nice to find someone so passionate. Thank you for sharing the wealth with the RU-vid community.
To me, in watching this video, you weren't looking for 'reasons ', because the reasons you stated were perfectly practical reasons we can't travel at the speed of light (for me they are). I think you were looking for 'proof'. For you, it seems that Math is your belief and once you saw the restriction illustrated through mathematical reasoning it was more than enough for you to stop looking. Just my opinion. As an aside, I am always deep in thought about the same topics you are thinking of. It has always been my belief that 'imagination' is the key to understanding, and I think that is what Einstein held above everyone else, his ability to daydream and wander with his mind to construct realities we can only dream of and read about in his papers. I really think the key to progressing is to work on massaging our imagination, to take that train ride as Einstein would frequently do. His visuals really allowed him to 'see' his solutions. Love the video!
Love this perspective. Very possible that it was the proof I needed. Thank you for this :) ... and i couldn't agree more regarding human imagination being the driving force behind everything... one of the reasons I love science fiction and fantasy so much. I read a quote recently that said something along the lines that science is what science fiction was before the fiction became fact (something along these lines anyway - can't remember who it was though).
+chycho ...and just my opinion too, i respect your line of thinking, and everyone needs to discover what they need to in their own way. I think it's incredible (and i had this thought while watching your video) that you can go a lifetime, or a matter of years yourself, pondering a single queston and then one day you hear one word, see one thing, or have a simple eureka moment and all of a sudden you understand. It's crazy. That is a great quote. Haven't heard it before, but very fitting. I guess all things are just a matter of 'time' :) I enjoy your videos. Very stimulating and relaxing at the same time. Keep on your journey, friend!
The postulate that c is the same in every inertial reference frame has always seemed mysterious to me. It's demonstrated by experiment, but nonetheless difficult to wrap my head around.
I was never a good math. Once I understood its simplistic and formulaic continuum. I could work with it. I have a son who does math in in his head. He is ADD. ‘Inattentive type’. But he understands algorithms. Formulaic functions. And patterns in math intuitively. He does not need to write down formula. He solves formulas in his head. Without writing it down. It is amazing. I think there is a correlation between understanding and knowledge that can exceed some or our paradigms on what is intelligence.
+chycho If you ever become a prof, you should tell us. You will have a few extra students, me included! This is just an amazing ASMR video. just brilliant.
It's interesting that the mathematical reasoning behind the theory is the prime factor in your understanding, whereas for me the physical model is the more important. Of course the mathematics are the more fundamental explanation. But it's cool to see how different minds work and what differing perspectives on life they take.
If you'd been my professor at school, back in the days, I would have definitely been a better student! :) Another very interesting and relaxing video! Thank you!
This is the first asmr vid I saw of yours and I like asmr but I hate math a lot. But I think I'm going to like this channel because when ever I don't understand something in math I can always watch this. Btw I understood nothing in this video lol.
Hello Professor chycho :) , i really enjoy your channel because it's very relaxing and also fun to watch and listen to cool things i haven't seen before. It's not necessary to do these requests, but i would like it if you could do more games like the 10x10 pattern recognition, for example Sudoku / Chess / Crosswords if you're interested or any other activities you enjoy. Also, i enjoyed this video and found it interesting so maybe a video in the future on stuff like gravity or infinity. Keep up the good work!
Glad you enjoyed, FlameKing. I definitely love sharing what I've learned and it's nice to see that others like to hear about it. As for your requests, for sure I plan on doing a lot more on infinity and the next video in this set is about gravity and acceleration - it won't be out until the summer though, I need to get some prep work done for it, but I promise it will be worth the wait. It's very much related to what I learned during this period and how it relates to the prescription of Time. As for more gaming videos, for sure i'll get some more done. I have gone through periods of being a gamer, both board and video games, and the odds are that I will be creating a whole playlist to consolidate the videos once I get a few more out. I do have some amazing games that i have played over the years that I would love to share. In the meantime, if you like backgammon, I did put out some videos of me and my grandmother playing backgammon which you might like. Here is the playlist: ru-vid.com/group/PL9sfzC9bUPxmnpQCIWhkInx4SIk1craYM ...and I do have a video out showing the probability of dice which I plan to use for a series on Probability and Statistics as well as for dice gaming videos that I plan to make. You can find the video here (I love dice by the way): "The Beauty of Dice, Part 1: Probability Distribution for the Sum of Two 6-sided Die (Math Real Life)" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-c3bcbSyx_H0.html Hope you enjoy. Peace :)
Just discovered your channel. It's all truly fantastic work. I am currently studying GR for my own personal pleasure and this video could not be more perfect, thank you so much for making it! :D (Oh, and by the way, are you a fellow Vancouverite?)
+Francesca Crema You're very welcome, and let me know if you need any help finding stuff... and yup, Vancouver-Victoria it is for me. Small world indeed :))
I have something in mind Technically, the fact that at the speed of light, there is a division by 0, is still a consequence of travelling at the speed of light
+Albinomalen For now, I have one more lined up in the next couple of weeks, something I promised to do in a previous video. After that, probably get into another full on reading set in the Spring, I'm putting together the comics as we speak :)
Actually, and I don't know if you know this, but it's theorized(THEORIZED) we could travel FTL. You should look into the "Alcubierre drive". It's basically the warp drive; warp the universe instead of just pushing yourself faster
+grayson bright Cool! I know a little about the theories of folding space through Spring Theory, didn't know about Alcubierre drive though. Love the evolution of human knowledge and understanding, what use to be science-fiction slowly becomes science-fact. Thanks for the info, brother :)
You comment toward the end that quantum physics is easier to understand in Swahili... I have a Kenyan neighbor who explained a few weeks ago that Swahili was basically a combo of ancient Greek and ancient Arabic. So I wonder if quantum physics would be easier to understand in those languages too.
For sure there must be certain languages, possibly the root ones, that this applies. I speak three natural languages and from personal experience I know that certain topics/ideas are much harder to convey in English than the others.
If possible you should definitely do an episode on general relativity! I think it would be a cool way to celebrate LIGO's discovery of gravitational waves :)
+ASMRgebra That was an amazing piece of news we got, wasn't it? Gravitational waves, WOW! For sure at some point I will definitely do an intro to relativity, what I understand of it anyway. The odds are that i will probably do this in the summer in conjunction with the next video in this set which is going to be on time and gravity and matter and our perception of time. Fun :)
I've studied particle physics for five years and my best theory is that time is malleable, it can shape and move at different rates but always bends back.
Well, it would seem that all we need do, then, is travel at slightly greater than the speed of light to avoid these disastrous consequences! Assuming, of course, whatever effect having a negative velocity would inflict wouldn't be too bad...
I postulate that we can travel at twice the speed of light. If one spaceship is going light speed and another is going light speed what happens if they happen to collide in space? Hypothetically we have a collision speed of 2x light speed. Then again I could be wrong.
Probably a dumb question, but why can't velocity equal more than the speed of light, thereby nullifying the division by zero state? I understand the progressive nature of velocity and that it would seem to necessarily equal c at one point in order to go beyond it, but wouldn't it be mathematically possible? Thanks.
If I remember correctly, because then we would have a negative number, which is okay to deal with when squaring it but becomes an issue when taking the square root of it (even root of it).... and by the way, there is no such thing as a dumb question, seriously. The greatest ideas and inventions in the world have come from the simplest questions and concepts. Simple questions are the mortar that bind everything together.
Hey chycho, love your vids man. Have you done or can you do any videos about scatter plots and correlation, and Using Data and Graphs to Persuade? The substitute teacher in my class has done a horrible job of explaining it to my class. Thanks and keep up the great work!
+RealmsOfGaming Oh for sure, I do plan on doing a whole series on it, not sure when I will get to it though. It definitely wouldn't be before this school year is up though, I have a lot of prep videos to do before that. I actually love the topic: analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data... pattern recognition, and in many cases, what you choose to recognize. My apologies if it won't be done in time for you to make use of it, wish I had 48 hours in a day.
If I understand you correctly, then, we cannot travel at the speed of light because W (the amount of energy necessary for any amount of mass to be accelerated to the speed of light) grows infinite? I get that, but could you explain why the mass of an object traveling at the speed of light would become infinitely large as well? Do you have a formula that we can fill in the amount of energy necessitated that gives us the resulting mass? I really want to understand, what you are talking about is so interesting. ^^
That is correct regarding energy. As for the mass, it's for the same reason as for energy, we end up getting a division by zero hence infinity. As for the formulas, I believe the ones you want are in Einstein's paper(s) that I've linked in the description of the video, the one that i'm showing in the video. The information is a mind twist that's for sure and I don't fully understand all the aspects, I was just able to learn enough of it to satisfy my curiosity and allow me to move on to my next goal, to have a better grasp and understanding of time. Just so you know, I do have a follow-up video lined up to do about this, about time. I should be able to get it done some time during the summer, just have to dig up a few papers and read a couple of chapters for review, I want to make sure I cover all the basis.
I am a bit lost with this topic but LOVED it. What I think I learnt was, if v>c then you could write out that function. So you could travel faster then the speed of light or indeed slower than the speed of light? But just not at the exact speed? Um. and this made my brain hurt...... If it is impossible to travel at the speed of light, how is it possible for light to travel at the speed of light? (sorry if this is a stupid question...)
+thesavannalady It's not a stupid question, I've rarely come across any such types of questions. As for why light can travel at the speed of light, it's because light doesn't have mass.
+chycho Does anything else have no mass? And if something has infinitely small mass does that count as zero mass in the same was as 1 divided by infinity is zero? I guess my question is, apart from light is there anything else that can travel at the speed of light? Or is light just super special? Wait a minute. No mass? But it has energy. But no mass? I have to go for a bike ride to think about that....
Chycho, I remember you bringing it up a couple of times in other videos, but have you ever considered doing a video on something like Cowboy Bebop or animated shows? Would love to hear your breakdown/analysis on a show like that. :D
+Woodshatter OMG! I love Cowboy Bebop, I don't even know how many times I've watched it now. Love Samurai Champloo, Kids on the Slope, and wow what a treat Space Dandy was. For sure I plan on doing at least one video, most likely a set of videos on animation. The odds are that I'll probably do at least one on TV shows and one on Movies, and probably breakdown at least one of each. I consider animated works to be some of the greatest works of all time, some of the most intricate, and definitely in my world must watches. I'll share this for now, my favorite Cowboy Bebop episode, if I had to choose one, is 320, "Pierrot le Fou". Simply WOW! I my opinion it contains the greatest animated sequence of all time, the part where Jet tells us Mad Pierrot history. Wow! How about you? Favorite show, favorite movie, if you had to pick one? Or even top 5?
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe these equations were set up specifically so that there would be an asymptotic bound as v approaches c. Ergo, it's not really a reason WHY a massive body, since the equations were an attempt to explain observable phenomena. But enough from the peanut gallery; great video.
Then I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. ;)
Great and very informative video. Seeing how you have a love for mathematics and comics you should find a copy of Einstein for Beginners. Published 1978, text by Joe Schwartz and illustrated by Michael McGuinness. This book has about 170 pages and is awesome yet a little hard to grasp for me on a few levels. I bet you'd really enjoy it. Thanks for all the great videos.
Thanks for another wonderful ASMR video on math! What are your thoughts on string theory? I find it very fascinating. Is it something you believe exists? Has any experiments been done to prove that it exists or is it still "in the works" so to speak?
Question: if V is higher then C, u would be dividing by a negative value which is possible in maths. Would that mean u are going back in time in the equations, theoretically speaking? Suppose u dont cross that barrier but already started at higher then C speed.
It's an interesting thought experiment, but I believe in a previous step, if we have V higher than C, then we will be taking the square root of a negative number, which doesn't have a solution in the Real Number Set, so V can not be greater than C. That said, I would love to know what happens if we step outside of the Real Number Set, physically that is. Maybe that's when we travel back in time, possibly as an electromagnetic pulse?!? One can dream :)
What about traveling faster than the speed of light? Then you get a division by a negative number. Or is it just a threshold we can nearly reach, but not exceed? "The limit as c - v approaches zero, etc."?
I believe in one of the steps we have a square root, and in the Real Number Set, we can not take the square root of a negative number so it is a restriction from that end as well... someone correct me if i am wrong on this please... that said, the question remains open in my mind, is it possible to go beyond the speed of light if we allow for complex (imaginary) or other yet not understood number sets, are these the equivalent of wormholes?
I do plan on talking about Kepler's laws in Series IV of The Language of Mathematics/Math in Real Life videos, how it relates to Units and Ratios and their uses. Hope to get to that this summer.
im always curious why they have extra ones floating around or divide or multiply by 1. This is why i was never good at math. I always asked.. WHY do we do it this way... lol. i read a college physics book & understand what the variables mean. but i'm uncertain i would ever be able to solve or create an equation like that...
In a lot of cases, the 1 represents 100% of something. So for example, if you ate half the apple it would be equal to eating 50% of the apple which would mean that 1 - 0.5 = 0.5 of the apple is left. I like apples :)
well you can blame Disney for Einstein's works not entering the public domain. it used to be about 60 years after creation for works to enter public domain, but when it was almost time for mickey mouse to enter the PD Disney started lobbying to have the time extended and they've been doing it since
Sorry if I sound stupid, but isn't Einstein asuming that light speed is the fastest possible way to travel in this equation? What of v or c represents a speed greater then light speed. My head hurts😕
+bellaaneke It's not a stupid question. In the equations "c" represents the speed of light so that doesn't change. "v" is the speed of the object and that can change but if "v" equals "c" then in the equations we get a division by zero, and we can't do that in math so based on the math that we know we can not travel at the speed of light - or more than the speed of light - so far anyway :)
According to the math, I think that's one of the problems, the others being that we would need an infinite amount of energy, and the length of any object would shrink down to zero while it's mass would become infinite.
chycho So essentially, if we did move at the speed of light, we'd become massless (if that makes sense at all?) basically we'd have no mass at all? Sorry for all the questions, you had me interested when you mentioned infinite energy etc.
+Jonah Takalala Apology not necessary, love sharing what I think I know :) As for your question, it's the other way around. If we traveled at the speed of light our mass would become infinite (i.e. more than than mass of the universe). As far as the math is concerned, nothing that has mass can travel at the speed of light. Now if we were massless beings, made be just made up of energy, then we could travel at the speed of light.
chycho That's the most interesting part to me. Will we ever be able to travel at the speed of light? Science thinks otherwise but I'd love to know more. Could you also do a video on black holes etc? They really interest me as well.
+Jonah Takalala That's the gazillion dollar question, will we ever be able to break the speed of light limit? As for black holes, you and me both. I find them extremely fascinating that's why way back in 2009 I put out two videos about them, sharing what I knew back then. The video production is as best as I could do at the time so the sound is not very good and they aren't HD but if you are interested you can find them here: "Language of Mathematics III (62): Black holes and elementary particles (Part 1)" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YgXXO-DcZPQ.html "Language of Mathematics III (63): Black holes and elementary particles (Part 2)" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Xsm9O2MPOhQ.html
can u help me PLz I'm struggling with math can u explain what is a portion and ratio as well as how to find the missing number of a triangle when they only give you the numbers of 2 sides
hey, Noe. I've pretty much covered all of what you need. Here are some links to get you started: "Introduction to Ratios, and Their Relationship to Fractions (The Language of Mathematics IV #147)" - and work your way up from here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P5-ukVXofg8.html As for Triangles, start here and work your way up: "The Language of Mathematics (14): Introduction to Trigonometry" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eDGx3w98F1A.html and here is the Table of Contents where you can find everything (follow the numbers) chycho.blogspot.ca/2010/01/language-of-mathematics-table-of.html Good luck :)
Love the video, however, I'd just like to point out that equations are just ways for us to describe the mechanisms of the universe in terms (numbers) we can understand. So, it's not entirely accurate to say that the division by zero is the REASON that nothing can travel at the speed of light, it's just a way of describing the problem that arises. Equations and numbers DESCRIBE real world phenomena, they don't GOVERN it. So, it's more accurate to say that based on Einstein's theoretical model of relativity, superluminal speeds are impossible, but it's not "because" there's a 0 in the denominator.
+Fedoric The Hedgehog Guess you could say that reading the equations is the way that I make sense of what's taking place, more so than reading the descriptions in English. Once I saw it presented in this light, in math, it just all came together for me.
Hi Chycho. Very interesting about why we cannot reach the speed of light....but do you think its possible to reach absolute zero speed in the universe ?
I don't think we can really since everything in the universe is in motion. WE can freeze things to near absolute zero but that doesn't stop their motion, i.e. rotation around the earth, around the sun, around the galaxy, shooting across the universe. Also keep in mind that everything has a vibration.
Jack Silver - No, and the reason is that you are always still and moving relative to something else in the Universe at all times. There is no experiment you can perform in empty space to show whether your body is completely still or moving.
I think you should be able to, but you would need to either compress the space between particles, or move each particle individually at the same time to initiate the mechanic of kinetic energy without pushing the object. You can also emulate it by just moving the particles around the person instead of the person. Math is broken, so the whole "zero" thing is just Math's holes. I wouldn't rely on that as proof. Also, particles smaller than light should move faster than it, so I think Einstein was a bit lost.
we cannot travel at the speed of light because we would be crushed by our own bodies before we reached our destination. light weighs very little but a pin travelling at the speed of light would hit like a tank!!! I wonder what it's kinetic strength would be
It would hit with theoretically infinite force. Since Force=Mass*acceleration. And since Mass increases with speed, and approaches infinity as you near light speed. So that pin would hit with a number of newtons equal to infinity*c
+chycho Exactly! If the world were to be Impeccable, it would be too perfect thus making it a utopia. But if that's not the case then the world would be bland. So a little sin can be fun