Aspect ratios explained | How do aspect ratios work? | Why do some movies and shows have black bars

Подписаться 40 тыс.

Просмотров 79 тыс.

50% 1

Have you ever wondered why there are black bars at the top and bottom of movies? Or how about black bars on the side of some older TV shows? This happens because of the aspect ratio the director choose to record a show or movie in and something we go over in depth in this video.
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
1:21 There is No Standard
1:35 What is an Aspect Ratio
2:52 History of Widescreen
6:10 TV Measurements of Aspect Ratios
6:41 Where Did 16x9 Come From?
7:31 What Are The Black Bars At The Top and Bottom?
9:00 Story Uses of Aspect Ratio
🎞 Where to find real IMAX 70mm locations: lfexaminer.com/theaters/
Other videos from MU you might enjoy.
📼 History of Blockbuster • The Rise and Fall of B...
🎥 Is Dolby Cinema worth it? • What is Dolby Cinema |...
📼 History of home media: • History of Home Video ...
🎥 Why are movie tickets so expensive? • Why are Movie Tickets ...
👚 👕 👖 👔 Buy Movie University merch please! Use promo code MU2017 at checkout for 15% off teespring.com/stores/movie-un...
Subs: 8831
Tags: aspect ratios, movie aspect ratios, how to aspect ratios work, why do movies have black bars, why does the justice league have black bars, imax black bars explained, zack snyder imax justice league, why do old tv shows have black bars on the sides, history of widescreen, full screen vs widescreen, laserdisc widescreen. History of hdtv, evolution of tv, evolution of movies, history of the movies, why do tv shows fill up the entire screen but movies dont?, justice league aspect ratio, black bars on tv explained, why does my tv have black bars on it when i watch movies, aspect ratio bars, aspect ratio and resolution, aspect ratio explained, 16:9, 21:9, 4:3 why do some movies and shows have black bars, Zack Snyder justice league cut not widescreen, why isn’t Zack Snyder justice league not widescreen, 70mm, 70mm film, 70mm vs 35mm

Кино

Опубликовано:

27 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 174

@garybarham3992 2 года назад

This is by far the best explanation of aspect ratio by showing real examples and overlays. Great job, you have a new subscriber.

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Thank you!

@JacobGittes 10 месяцев назад

The video is actually somewhat misleading. It doesn’t demonstrate how much wider 2.39:1 actually is. Every side by side comparison shows two images of the same width. If a movie photographed in 2.39:1 is presented properly in a theater, it will be shown on a significantly wider screen than the more narrow formats.

@JacobGittes 10 месяцев назад

The difference is height is also exaggerated as well. The Nolan examples are a rare situation. The images shown in 2.39:1 from Dunkirk have been cropped from IMAX 1.43:1. They weren’t intended to be seen in 2.39:1. Which is why so much information is missing on the top and bottom. That wouldn’t be the case if a movie were specifically photographed in 2.39:1. You would be gaining information horizontally while only having a minimal loss on the top and bottom.

@madfinntech 2 года назад

As a moviebuff I want always to see as much of the original frame as possible. I don't care about aspect ratio, if it's "boxy" then it is. As long you don't crop anything out or at least the smallest amount possible.

@tony757 9 месяцев назад

I’d have thought as a movie buff you would want to see the movie exactly as the directors and the cinematographers framed the shots to be seen, even if that means they deliberately crop it.

@TheRealJohnHooper 4 месяца назад

@@tony757 Can you name one example?

@jeffreywoltz5547 Месяц назад

My sentiments exactly. I have the movie Heavy Metal on VHS and DVD. After viewing both formats, I definitely saw the difference. The DVD which is in 'widescreen' is just the VHS format with black bars over it. This was done with the 4K Blu ray as well.

@Lag22987 3 года назад

Give me my 1.43 format I want the original look instead of using the whole TV

@CrimsionVision 3 года назад

Let me tell you, being able to watch BVS in the Imax ratio is AMAZING.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

99.99% of viewers do not want it for the home. They want something closer to the tv set.

@lanijordan4250 3 года назад

It has been a while since Zack Snyder's Justice League's aspect ratio appeared on our screens, I have to say. And with Wonder Woman and WW84 being 'filmed', that's a problem, because the entertainment industry of today is really stubborn about showing movies the way they were supposed to be shown. Not to mention that IMAX Enhanced hasn't even made it to streaming services such as HBO Max

@georgezee5173 3 года назад

Nah, Snyder's lying about the format. It's just a gimmick to have people talking about his movie. Like the black and white version of the same film (funny how the first trailer for the Snyder Cut was realised in 1.33:1 and black and white... until it was deleted by WB themselves). His Snyder Cut is 1.33:1, which is not IMAX aspect ratio (the latter is a bit wider than that), and on top of that there're lots of shots that are basically the original 1.85:1 trimmed down from the sides.

@aamarrahman8631 2 года назад

@@georgezee5173 nah you're the liar here ... 90% of zsjl are intended 1.33 originaly. only few scene that reframed, and thats not like you say it crop from 1.85 to 1.33. It just zoomed in from original frame, the aspect still the same. Just like Charlie's Angels have, it manage to have 2 different aspect ratio from original frame, in 1.78 we get the taller frame, and 2.35 we get wider frame in exchange... it isn't 2.35 is croped from 1.78, but both aspect ratio is cropped from original 1.33, so it has different field of view.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

They are meant to be shown in a cinema. Your small Home Screen will not cut it.

@zperdek 3 года назад

I knew it! I remember time when on my old 4:3 crt tv, Lord of the rings looked way more detailed than on new 16:9 fhd tv. They cropped it too much for widescreen broadcasting.

@zperdek 2 года назад

@Rich Perez It's bigger chance that channel that is broadcasting it in my country, is using cropped version for 16:9 TVs from the original 4:3 release they bought after year 2000. I could watch some new release now of course but that TV version has so good dubbing in my language. And it's part of my childhood this way.

@BigShotCritic 2 года назад

Very good quality explanation of this. I'm forever sending my viewers here for a detailed explanation of aspect ratios.

@Luizanimado 2 года назад

Watching Better Call Saul, I realized how beautiful 16:9 can be, these days I get pretty excited about 16:9 movies, especially considering that I watch most movies in my house

@mastervang2058 Год назад

I have always preferred 16:9 movies. If you want to watch it at the theather them go ahead watch it in cinema scope but if ita a blu ray which will be watched at home where 99 percent of the people do not have a screen that size the studios should release it in 16:9. Why cater to the 1 percent when you can get a full screen with 99 percent of tvs and projectors. I remember when they use to remaster vhs tapes to fit a 4:3 screen . Why can't they do that now with 16:9.

@tabe8850 Год назад

Thanks for this video. I always understood why the black borders happened on my tv screen, but I never understood why it is not completely standardized today. I honestly assumed 4:3 was a limitation of old TVs and movie theaters wanted to fit more seats, which is why theater screens are wider. It seems the answer is marketing and/or the “director’s vision.” I’m waiting for the 1,000,000:1 ratio and having artsy people proclaim it as groundbreaking vision and a bold artistic statement. Meanwhile, the majority of us will complain. Actually, 1:1,000,000 would be even bolder. The movie would be called “Blind Cat in the Sun”

@bonoki3870 3 года назад

this is my whole reason why: 1, i love going to the cinemas. 2, iam not interested in streaming services. beyond the whole cinema experience, viewing, not only what the director intended, but how it needs to perceived while sitting in the auditorium. you can not get that same effect on a Tab or mobile device screen. no matter the telly size, 65 inches or bigger; or the type of audio equipment attached to it, your are still missing elements of the film... unless you saw that same feature in cinemas. i do understand that we have come a very long way in technology to over look these things, but because you have best audio/visual appliances & smart devices, doesn't mean you're getting the best viewing... but thats just me. this is also why i love your channel. you discuss segments that, not only interest me, but further proves my point on the choices i make. continue the great work.

@GorositoTV 3 года назад

great as always... congrats

@thewickedwanderer 3 года назад

Thanks man, really diggin your channel!

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Thank you!

@CBromfield 2 года назад

Thanks for this, recently I had noticed, Turner Classic Movie, has changed aspect ratio....and it is terrible. It looks like I'm looking at a classic film on Instagram. It seems they are trying to fill the screen with the film, but if you love classic movies, you are accustom to the black bars on top and bottom, the viewer was at least seeing the entire film without edges being cut off. Not sure why they have done this but it's a BAD idea. I didn't know the technical terminology (have to watch this a few 100xs). This is a good lesson and you have presented some other info that I didn't know. Thanks

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

My pleasure!

@vgmaster9 Год назад

How about an aspect ratio that combines the height of IMAX and the width of Polyvision (Napoleon's format)?

@HARI_PRAVEEN 3 года назад

Thanks for the video I got more information from this.....and keep going.heartfull ❤️thanks from INDIA....❤️❤️❤️

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

My pleasure 😊

@kuyedoluwamu1812 3 года назад

Beautiful video

@piusgyagenda Месяц назад

Great video

@lajollaseal 3 года назад

Well done Lambo- I knew you when 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@kanthimathimagesh6411 3 года назад

If I become a director I will shoot in the 2:1 aspect ratio.

@bloodstarkidlander9159 3 года назад

Minor correction: Zack shot Justice League on 1.33:1 stock, and intended to crop to 1.43:1 for IMAX before everything involving his departure and the movie famously changing in more drastic ways beyond the aspect ratio occured, after much strife and compromise with the studio over things such as the ratio. ZSJL was presented in the full 1.33:1 for its release, as I'm sure we're all aware by now. I love this video so much. Thank you for spreading this information. Easy to point to this whenever an ignoramus complains about "not wanting the sides chopped off."

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Great catch! Thank you.

@cheetahluv210 2 года назад

Maybe he should have filmed it in vista vision

@tmntvspr Год назад

Oppenheimer is the first fully IMAX film, and invented B&W 70mm film for that film

@MovieUniversity Год назад

Oppenheimer is NOT shot entirely in IMAX 65mm. All of the dialog heavy scenes are filmed with 65mm panavision cameras because current IMAX cameras are too loud to record dialog. However, you are correct that B&W IMAX film was created just for Oppenheimer. Note: IMAX film is 65mm. NOT 70mm. Cameras shoot in 65mm and the final product is blown up to 70mm for playback in theaters.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

@@MovieUniversity Surprised the do not develop a VistaVision at 1.66 to 1 to film those dialog scenes. As VistaVision would just be at the limits when on 15/70 theatre sized screen. Blowing it up to 15/70 would result in a more natural fit.

@b991228 11 месяцев назад

The difference in aspect ratio is not about just black lines and cropped edges. Aspect ratio totally changes the composition of how an audience sees fore-ground, middle-ground and background. What is the intention of the scene? Is it to illustrate Kane’s hand dropping the snow globe, the face of Deep Throat in the parking garage or the attacking helicopters in Apocalypse Now? You will have a whole different set of problems with composing these scenes depending on the aspect ratio.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

It only matters at the cinema at home the sets are 16:9.

@faisalbajwa1568 2 года назад

I have a Sony 75XG9505 and its got Imax Enhanced mode. Your video is should be watched by anyone before they buy a tv as its so useful and informative. I watch tv on a 65 inch but for films I watch on the 75 inch tv as it has no black bars which is better than going to the cinema.

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Thank you! Please share with everyone.

@Otokichi786 Год назад

I would see widescreen movies on TV start or finish in widescreen, with black bars top and bottom. This didn't bother me much until a WTBS broadcast of "Mister Roberts" (1955). An interior scene that used the complete 2.55:1 ratio, where three actors talk to each other. I could see two actors but hear a third as they "talked to empty air" under "pan & scan." That was enough to make me a Letterbox fanatic. Laserdiscs were in "fullscreen" or "letterbox" ratios, while VHS was only "fullscreen." When DVD came along, movies marketed to kids were "fullscreen" for the longest time. (A number of cable TV companies like IFC and FX also do "fullscreen" today, noting that "this film has been altered to fill the screen.")

@daliilars3350 Месяц назад

I didn't know this needed explaining...

@Robinem 2 года назад

Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol did the same aspect ratio change as Hunger Games catching fire for one of its action scenes. The all 2:39:1 aspect ratio version was the one that was released on home media but clips of it can still be found online. It was the scene used a lot in marketing and on the posters and dvd covers where he’s climbing the walls of that skyscraper. The image pulls out the same way as he’s walking to a broken window ledge.

@aleusgaming9482 2 года назад

This is actually the case with a lot of movies shot on imax film. Some movies, mainly Chris Nolan movies have their blu rays extend to 16:9 but Pretty much the Only movies to have their full frame 70mm imax film scenes released was The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises, and was only released to the collectors edition

@svenkamog2232 3 года назад

Only one to explain it probably 😁 well done...

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Thank you!

@TheFbiFilesRepeat 9 месяцев назад

Blackbars to me is part of the film, i love em

@raymondwalker2752 Год назад

An interesting compilation. Thanks. My constant irritation is seeing Academy Ratio made to fit the 16:9 tv screen. Not only is top and bottom frame information lost, but Composition is destroyed and 16mm film transmission has too much loss of resolution. Far better is the retention of side bars, that the mind can ignore and the picture look crisp.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

That is why movies intended for cinema simply will not work on a Home Screen.

@raymondwalker1358 3 года назад

There is an obsession with mainstream tv to have an academy ratio archive footage fill 16:9 rather than use side legs. This requires cropping of top and bottom of the frame and so a0 loses frame information, b) destroys composition, reduces image clarity, exaggerates movement on hand-held shots. In fact there is no benefit in using the full screen width. We need to educate tv directors.

@Jayu_Bro Год назад

This is also important for foreign movies with subtitles to be shot in all aspects ratio , because subtitles are partially hidden due to aspect ratio in theatre big screen...

@kalyanvejalla Год назад

I literally own that exact same interstellar film cell you showed at 2:46

@kevinsupreme_ph36yearsago59 2 года назад

2.0:1 or 18:9 aspect ratio is perfect.

@graced1338 2 года назад

Going back and watching 1.33 is a revelation. As long as it isn't pan and scan, the old 'full-screen' was way better than widescreen snobs give it credit for.

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Why do you say that?

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

1.33 is going backwards.

@chriscartoons32022 3 года назад

First, I know this is gonna be interesting.

@dmac5472 9 месяцев назад

Lol I was watching AirWolf on tubi tv, noticed the bars. Thought about all the other older tv shows that had a similar look and had to find the reason why. I noticed that TNA/Impact wrestling fills in that black bar space with their logo on Pluto TV.

@JackFrost--5 2 месяца назад

imo the two best ARs are: 1.38 academy & 2.0 univisium

@justbecause3187 22 дня назад

The stupid thing about this is that while we might view the world in wide screen, human bodies and human faces tend to be oriented in a more vertical direction. Most of the time it's fine when movies that are primarily intended to be viewed at the cinema are shown in a wider 2.35:1 ratio, but in my opinion it very rarely makes sense to go beyond that. TV shows on the other hand should be restricted to something closer to the aspect ratio of the standard TV screen, that being 16:9, but i suppose i can live with some very minor variations from that.

@neilmarktaylor4386 3 года назад

Well ben hur was filmed on 65mn film using the anamorpic lens giving the ultra wide format

@tycooper7780 2 месяца назад

aspect ratio is width divided by height. When you are filming with anamorphic lenses with a 1.33 desqueeze factor, shot originally 3840x2160, the new resolution becomes 5107x2160. Now, with the resolution, if you calculate the aspect ratio, it is 2.36:1. So, is this the number you give the theatre or do I round it to 2.39:1 to the popular ratio?

@jaydoubleu3419 2 месяца назад

I have a few dvds that say widescreen But only play with 4 black bars around the picture how do I stop that and the bars are like this two going up and on the left and right and sand another gong across the top and bottom all on one dvd

@jvnrjkumri9866 2 года назад

Can u please explain iam seeing marvel movies by using 4 way zoom in my tv Is this similar to imax enhanced?

@jeanp.5929 7 месяцев назад

Two years later, I've finally seen a movie in the 2.76 aspect ratio. That movie is...,"The Creator."

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

It really needs to be watched at the cinema or a large Home Screen.

@treasey8655 3 года назад

What's the point of imax? I thought we shoot movies in 2.39:1 because it looks epic and mimics the view of our eyes, imax looks similar to 4:3 so i don't see any reason to use it. Am i wrong? An answer would be greatly appreciated :)

@experi-mentalproductions5358 3 года назад

Because 4:3 is cool..... Ever see Stalker?

@valterspatriks8752 2 года назад

It depends on what you want to achieve. What you want the meaning for the scene to be, what you want audience to see. IMAX can make scene feel grand.

@treasey8655 2 года назад

@@valterspatriks8752 i guess you're right

@ChristofferETJ 2 года назад

Because even rectangles are circular. No, that's not right. But we started with a nearly square image, transitioned to wide images for the added immersion. And now when it's not practical to go any wider, we go taller "for the added immersion". So we've come full circle. In other words, it's a gimmick. I have no strong preference for any aspect ratio. I just wish for consistency within a film.

@moritzstrohriegel8724 11 месяцев назад

i have a question: imagine you would film something in the middle of a room in a wide ratio with two door barely visible left and right in the picture. now imagine filming from the same place with something like 4:3. is it a) you can’t see the doors because there are not filmed in that situation? or b) you can see the doors because the image is just squeezed into a smaller place?

@sebastiangerlic 2 года назад

Hi...It is possible to have a 9:1 video playing on youtube without black up and down??

@JRBowling1997 2 года назад

@0:17 I remember this was common on air force base movie theatres at least the one I went to. Sometimes the bar on the sides would widen bigger to make it look full screen. Most of the time it would be like this... and it drove me nuts. However... on a navy base not to far never had this issue. Maybe because the projector was newer? Idk

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Maybe because the Air Force base had more money? haha

@JRBowling1997 2 года назад

@@MovieUniversity newer movies never do this anymore right? Where the black boxes are on left and right of the screens?

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

@@JRBowling1997 Some do. A recent example is Zack Snyder's Justice League.

@JRBowling1997 2 года назад

@@MovieUniversity one more question. I Even noticed the air.force base also did made a pop bip noise... and it would show a black dot for a second on the side of the screen. Why did it do that every now and then?

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

I couldn’t tell ya. You’d have to ask a technician who works there.

@srujangowdad3503 3 года назад

Please make a video about RDX

@Apxo1014 3 года назад

Quick question - why couldn’t Nolan film in 1.33:1 if he wanted the full frame effect for Dunkirk?

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

IMAX ratio is 1.43:1

@NKBPICTURES 2 года назад

@@MovieUniversity 😂

@frostbitepokin9520 2 года назад

The last knight was horrendous to watch with the aspect ratio change

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

I think this the first time I’ve ever seen/heard someone say that.

@ChristofferETJ 2 года назад

I fully agree that aspect ratio changes mid film are jarring, unnecessary, and indeed horrendous to watch. In most cases. I love The Grand Budapest Hotel and its transitions. But there are fully thought out artistic reasons for those (akin to the transition to colour in Wizard of Oz), not "sell IMAX tickets" reasons.

@fernandolopezalvarez2007 2 года назад

hello, amazing video I hace a question, Is it worthy to see Dune in Imax?

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

I would not recommend seeing it in IMAX. Dune is shot with digital IMAX cameras which means the image resolution is not as high as IMAX film cameras. The imagery will no doubt look amazing, but since it's NOT IMAX then you should see it in another premium theater such as Dolby Cinema or THX Ultimate Cinema.

@LeonBosset 10 месяцев назад

I don't agree about the difficulty of finding widescreen AR's in the 90's. Most DVD's I bought have it.

@volpedo2000 Год назад

I wonder if this debate will be settled some time in the future when we will be able to afford wall-to-wall micro led screens. Directors will be able to pick any aspect ratio and we’ll still retain a massive image.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

It will not look as good as film.

@volpedo2000 3 месяца назад

@@Art-is-craft what does the film vs digital debate have anything to do with aspect ratio. Also do you regularly watch films and TV on a film projector?

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

@@volpedo2000 I have not been able to regularly watch movies on film projectors for decades. With film the aspect ratio is like a force multiplier. In an out doors movie ratios from 2.2 to 2.8 to 1 look amazing and the color tone of film really makes it look very artistic in a way that digital cannot it dies it at minimum of 8k resolution.

@mixdown78 11 месяцев назад

@Movie Universe, as a side-Fact, as we have experienced these days, the 1.43 IMAX 70mm Theater-Geometry / Ratio has the most immersive Effect of the Formats, even more than big 1.9 Ratios like IMAX Leonberg, because the hight is so important for the effect. (The 1.43 Ratio has nothing to do with the old TV 4:3 Standard)

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

No it does not have the most immersive. A cinema with a large 2.4 to 1 will wipe the floor with.

@Ghosthound_X Год назад

I was watching Transformers The Last Knight on TV the other day and it was annoying how much the aspect ratio would randomly change

@TheRealJohnHooper 4 месяца назад

TV stations got complaints when they saw black bars..

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

Very small black bars and audiences do not care.

@ArnoldTohtFan 2 года назад

Why don't they just make the dimensions of the film cell identical to the desired aspect ratio? I also think it's ridiculous that IMAX is so boxy. It would work so much better as 1:85:1 (adjusted for scale, of course).

@cheetahluv210 2 года назад

Short answer cost and quality

@cheetahluv210 2 года назад

To make imax 16:9 it probably would need to be 20 perf and would make imax film very expensive

@SuperCartoonist 2 года назад

11:00 Why not let the consumer have a choice on what aspect ratio they want to see the movie? I mean if anything was made in open format, I would like to see what is mostly available on the film. Well, I understand if a boom mic or lights was in the shot and the directors and producers wouldn't want us to see that, but I want to see everything that was meant to be seen. I don't care if there black bars on the side or top to bottom, I want to see the full 4:3 or 16:9 images.

@backtoklondike 2 года назад

In Imax movies case it's because they own the rights to the format so they want compensation for that but some studios are unwilling to do that. It took a long while for Disney to negotiate a deal with Imax to show that version in Disney plus in spite of Avengers Infinity war and Endgame being entirely shot in imax. And Dunkirk is only shown in imax on the 4K bluray because that's the version Warner wanted to show the movie on.

@SuperCartoonist 2 года назад

@@backtoklondike They don't own the right to a format, because I can make that format in my backyard.

@Rilumai 2 года назад

@@SuperCartoonist "Why not let the consumer have a choice on what aspect ratio they want to see the movie?" Because it's not your movie. Filmmakers are artists. It'd be like saying a painter should paint on a 20 x 24 inch canvas because that's the size I want in my house. "...but I want to see everything that was meant to be seen." You are seeing everything that was meant to be seen. Movies are usually framed wider than how they're intended to be seen, so adjustments can be made in post-production.

@SuperCartoonist 2 года назад

@@Rilumai I was being sarcastic in the question.

@Rilumai 2 года назад

@@SuperCartoonist I sure hope so, because that's not the first time I've seen someone ask that question.

@NoelEmmanPader 3 года назад

What is the difference between shooting a Movie, a Documentary or a Music Video? In terms of aspects ratio why is Music Videos go beyond 2.39:1 or 2.76:1 and why artistic intent rather than viewing experience is the purpose on MV aspects ratio?

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

It all comes down to the directors and singers intent. They're choosing to shoot wider in those cases.

@NoelEmmanPader 3 года назад

@@MovieUniversity it this had to do is Psychology?

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

@tristan_840 2 года назад

Music videos specially with dancing shots are a lot better if it's wide as it include more dancers in the frame.

@Theophan123 Год назад

So this is ultimately a question of end-user watching experience. Do you want your audience to watch your movie in cinemas or at their homes via streaming services?

@MovieUniversity Год назад

What does that have to do with aspect ratios?

@9latinumStudioz Год назад

Dirty game 🤦

@mikekaye3874 Год назад

I really enjoyed when Nolan chose to use IMAX with Batman. But I did't feel that the IMAX was placed or became an actual character or part of the movie as well as BATMAN V SUPERMAN. And had the best continued multiple watch of how well it was used in THE GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY in 3D. I own these all in 3D except NOLAN's BATMAN. And project them on a huge home theatre screen. - Toronto, Canada. PS: I would love to see a documentary on 3D and what happened. Really to 3D home bluray releases in NORTH AMERICA, About a week before FROZEN was released. It was pulled from being places on shelves, and for weeks all advertisements and package deals were for nothing. Since Disney owns Marvel, Star Wars, and now FOX. 3D Blurays have not be available in North America and I have had to get mine oversea's where they are still releases. I did major research to find out why this is. But have not found any solid proof or discussions about it. I wonder what you would come up with. Thanks.

@faisalbajwa1568 2 года назад

Thank God I have imax enhanced on my tv and no black bars

@Lag22987 3 года назад

Does Avengers 3 and 4 were not completely filmed in IMAX?

@Horos_de_Vega 3 года назад

They were filmed on IMAX... digital. Not 70mm. Aspect ratio is 1.90 at best. Not “true” imax.

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

As @Actarus said, Avengers Infinity War and Endgame were shot using the IMAX & Arri digital cameras. Reportedly, the Arri cameras have a unique aspect ratio for IMAX of 1.9:1 and have the IMAX sticker on the side. They're also physically half the size of an IMAX film camera.

@michaelwyckoff7593 2 года назад

I hate those black bars on the top and bottom and especially on the sides. I know many people don't do it but I ZOOM them out. I use zoom from the picture settings because I just can't deal with those black bars at all.

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Interesting. I might give that a shot sometime to see if I like that. But when you zoom in you're losing picture on the sides though. . .

@michaelwyckoff7593 2 года назад

@@MovieUniversity yes you are I agree with you. But for me I've gotten used to it because I did it a lot when I had smaller screen TV's. Yes you do lose some of the picture but given a choice I'd rather that then those black bars. I watch a lot of old westerns and most of them have those side black bars. Bottom line I've gotten used to the zoom mode for those situations. I don't zoom everything I watch just basically the old westerns. It's a matter of choices.

@tirsomorales750 Год назад

Digital IMAX’s aspect ratio is 1.9:1.

@kalebv1161 3 года назад

So Just to confirm because I'm a bit slow, Zack Snyder justice league will be in the same format we see in the trailer rn?

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Yes, that’s what I’m tracking. Not sure about the non IMA scenes.

@trevorriches136 Год назад

10:40 actually, this is false. Christopher Nolan chose to shoot only about 30% of Dunkirk on 5-perf 65mm in a 2.20:1 aspect ratio because the 70mm IMAX cameras were too loud to film some dialogue scenes, specifically the ones on the boat. The rest was shot on IMAX. It had nothing to do with budget.

@DC_R 3 года назад

As much as we pay for these damn TV's it should do it on it's own.

@9latinumStudioz Год назад

It seems like anything with 🦇 or going against the establishment is jacked up 🤦

@carlgiraulo8282 2 года назад

So pretty much marketing to get us in theaters to spend more money. What a suprise.

@tonymcneil 3 года назад

Its IMAX 3D Frame Breaks.

@GreatDXR Год назад

My dad explained this to me as a child and I think I'm one of the few who understood this over 50 years ago! Even with this fantastic presentation people still do not want to see black bars anywhere on their TV. The solution here would be a TV that is able to physically (or appear physically) to change it's aspect ratio on the fly. Remember that you heard it here first. LOL

@Chitchatjf2 3 года назад

I am a VERY STRONG proponent of OAR! The 4:3 reformatting of the original Star Wars in 1983 was done to mY knowledge AT ILM by cinematographers INVOLVED IN the original film I woukld noty be surprised of George Lucas himself wasn't involved The 16:9 reformatting of the Star Wars movies by TBS/TNT was a disaster -even doing the reformatted version on Turner Movie Classics

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Based on my research, Lucas was in charge of ALL restoration until Disney took over. If you have a link stating otherwise please share. There are various fan groups who are devoted to the original 70s/80s theatrical cuts and have persevered them for viewing.

@scottyee707 3 года назад

I really wish they made ultra wide 4k tvs so I would have no black bars on my movies but will just have to use projectors I guess... TV who cares.

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

It would be nice! I actually edit video on my 34 inch ultra monitor. While I don't normally watch movies on it, it's nice when I do watch movies shot in 2.35:1 and there are no black bars.

@RobertK1993 2 года назад

1:43:1 IMAX is the best

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

No.

@nathanthesubzeromangold4615 2 года назад

4.3 aspect ratio is quite famous movie picture the way how the vhs tapes Home Videos were from out a long time ago making a great way on a DVD home video I changing it everything it's more Just Like VHS Home Video Entertainment for DVD picture. To be very honest I think 4.3 show is one of my favorite TV pictures of all time since when it was quite famous on VHS The good way to put on a DVD

@job3rg 3 года назад

Is it possible to show all the film aspects in a one frame/picture?

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Yes, you can, that's why the images are reduced to fit your TV. =D However, if your question is, why can't they just zoom out to show more? They can obviously zoom in out to show more images, however when you do that, you lose picture quality. The pan and scan method that I mention in the video showed the sides being cut off and then the desired parts enlarged to fill up the entire screen. When you do that you lose picture quality.

@ThomasSirHandel 2 года назад

Black bars on the top and bottom are annoying. Just do what the first Cars movie did and have a full screen version (with the extra detail) and a theater version.

@cinemaipswich4636 Год назад

Lawrence of Arabia is a wide-screen cinematic masterpiece. Only film at a cinema can give us this movie, the way it should be shown.

@kitcat2449 2 года назад

I thought the black bars were there just to make the movie look like a professional movie XDDD

@MovieUniversity 2 года назад

Unfortunately, a lot of armature film makers will put black bars into their videos not understanding aspect ratios.

@vikramjio7651 Год назад

i call it filling black bars on tv, it means alredy tv serials alredy in imax ratio 😂

@SeanFanelli 3 года назад

We need a video explaining consessions prices. The whole "wow I could buy a house with this money!" joke is so damn annoying

@MovieUniversity 3 года назад

Sean, if you watch this video I think your answer will be covered. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9-pPB75hH2Q.html

@JayInDecent Год назад

My favorite has always been1:85:1

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

I think it is the closest cinema representation that will work at home.

@vtrip_ 11 месяцев назад

i hate the changing of aspect ratios in movies because some scenes are shot in IMAX. thanks Christopher Nolan.

@Art-is-craft 3 месяца назад

He is using the best available to him. If there was 35mm cinema projectors he may select differently

@RobertK1993 2 года назад

2.40.1 is the best

@thundereagle97 2 года назад

Movie companies really need to start making movies that can be experienced the same at home and in a theater. Cinemas are already on a decline

@borg386 Год назад

So what's the solution to get rid of the black bars? Are we stuck with this nonsense just because a director or producer wants it to be that way? Is there adjustments on modern TVs to eliminate this stupidity?

@borg386 Год назад

@wilko3491 Thanks, and of course, you are right, unfortunately.

@SneakyShelf00 11 месяцев назад

@borg386 why would you intentionally distort or cut off the image? What you see is usually the full image

@borg386 11 месяцев назад

@@SneakyShelf00 but why doesn't that image fill the whole screen to start with so we don't have to cut off the image? They might as well make tvs skinnier if part of it is not even bring utilized.

@SneakyShelf00 11 месяцев назад

@borg386 well because aspect ratios are like canvases. The artist can choose whichever aspect ratio/canvas they want. However the reason that TVs are the way they are is because when we switched to digital broadcasting, a new standard had to be made. This new standard is essentially a compromise between the 4:3 aspect ratio of old CRT television and the 2.39:1 aspect ratio which is the cinema standard. No matter which aspect ratio you choose to make televisions in, compromises will have to be made, and I'd much rather preserve the integrity of whatever I'm watching rather than distort it

@borg386 11 месяцев назад

@@SneakyShelf00 OK, thanks so much for taking the time to explain this to me. I'm obviously not happy about it, but now I know. Peace from Florida USA 🇺🇸 .