I think Arno was the weakest in terms of character and personality, even more than Conor. I love Conor btw, but i think the problem people have with him is that he holds back too much, he went through too much his life and he doesnt know how to deal with it. He is just differante. Not everyone can be Ezio :D
Exactly. While Conor held his emotions back, Arno just... banished them. He was so promising at the start, for like a new Ezio or smth., but after the death of François de la Serre he just went quiet, like he killed all his emotions. In Dead Kings he gets some character back, but its not enough.
Ehh, i dont think you understand my point Red Sheep, i am saying, that after everything that has happened in his life, Ezio still kept and cherished his emotions- always the fun and exciting type of character, never dull, more vengfull yes, but he never abandoned his interesting character,while Arno did.
In the first game- maybe. He was arrogant and ignorrant, trying to prove himself, but in the end he redeemed himself. And we can see how much he has matured in AC Revelations, holding the order in his hands and when he leaves, it crumbles. He is filled with saddness over the loss of his wife and youngest son, but when he came back at the peek of his age with the knowledge o the Apple to rebuild the creed, he still kept some humour. If you've played it, the campfire scene shows that perfectly and the final scene with Abbas too.
