Astra rocket fails to deliver NASA TROPICS satellites - See the launch 

Like the guvmnt - aircraft maintained by the lowest bidder.

sad but u right bro

Should have had Bezos do it. Get it!? Because the only thing he's got into orbit is his ego.

@@eamonia bezos' big space achievement is giving captin kirk a few seconds of weightlessness.

@@yehimstone5492 I can't wait until someone else comes along and offers Mr. Kirk an opportunity to go to REAL space. Not that I'm disparaging the once in a lifetime experience that so many yern for, that he had the opportunity to take part in (breaking the Karmen line) but I just really hope that he gets to go to REAL space.

Right 👍

Didn't we go to the moon and back a bunch of times without any hitches ??? Lol

@@ktmenifee Apollo 13?

@@Paul51178 Apollo 1 was the most serious failure, 3 astronauts died. still on the ground.

@@EnzoFerenczyo True, but it wasn't a failed attempt to get to the moon, it was ground testing.

It fail 3 Times it didnt look easy at all

Absolutely no one thinks the task looks easy lol

@@hokucurnan2183 lol. You'd be surprised.

Yeah, it only took space x 50 years to do what NASA did with bubble gum and a calculator....

It shows how good the Russians are in rocket technology.

Better than "Oh Fuck" or something lmao

@@iandonnelly959 Would be more fitting to hear F-bombs flying all over the room 😆

@@Network126 Oh, it happened down on the factory floor lmao

Muted mics so you can't hear the f bombs lol

@6:30, did you notice the impact with something? Or the upper stage tank blew out. Only thing I can think of.

Thanks

@peterbrehmj not all heroes 🦸🏻‍♂️ wear capes

I owe you the last 6 minutes of my life. Thx bro

@@mickfunny4185 But they all wear tights.

Where does it fall to?

You are right rocket science is hard as aircraft aviation industry. Ask Boeing!. Shame!. Better luck next time!. Perhaps you can save some souls. 🇪🇺 😇🤗🖖👌

1 minute in launch terms is a lifetime!

Best they leave it to the pros...nasa is a waste of money

It’s only hard to NASA anymore. They have more failures with active payloads than anyone. Yea they been doing it longer but launches are happening at a exponential rate today compared to before and NASA is wasting our tax dollars on stuff they have long been proven can be more efficient when given to a 3rd party. Stop wasting our money if you want to keep using it. SpaceX seems to have rocketry down pretty solid considering they land their 1st stages back on the planet. With active payloads they have what 1-2 failures? Out of 100’s of launches?

NASA should stick with SpaceX !

And yet, SpaceX make it look so incredibly easy! 😁😎

Everyone else angrily shakes fist!! 🤣

@@arturmeinild2461 same as the Russians …but still they had Lot of failures too

I hope their budget is cut to shreds because of this epic fail. I can throw my own tax money in the ocean. Let them splash their own cash.

@@arturmeinild2461 SpaceX had their share of failures. It happens. The key is to never make the same mistake twice.

All about insurance. If the insurance companies payout, they can build more satellites.

Will the payload get back to the ground?

nasa is becomming a joke. Elon is our man if he can't do it no one can.

@@Dularr not always true but yes insurance pays for the loss but insurance can not cover the loss time. Some of these satellites take a long time to build then time for integration, getting a spot for delivering payload to space ext. takes a long time and a lot of man power to setup

This was a real payload.

BS. This company knew or had a pretty good idea it wasnt gonna launch properly but cuz of deadlines and bureaucracy etc, they decided just to launch a bunk rocket. Theres a reason Astra doesnt get contracts... Just stealing money from the American Taxpayers....

NASA should learn a thing or two from Indians, India has fantastic launch records

@@Judaspriest66624 yep. spaceX is doing things so cheap too. And in future spaceX will be more cheaper than isro. But ISRO is doing great. And no hate for NASA for being expensive .

7:29

@@Judaspriest66624 this is not nasa. America has nasa and private space industries

I hope none of my tax dollars went into this flop. But so, I hope somebody gets fired -- somebody high up!

Yeah but how much money has to be burned before they get it? Hope it's soon

I love Astra's system. It's perfect for these types of missions. They sure need a win right now though.

I recall even SpaceX was only one launch away from bankruptcy at some point. Not an industry for the faint of heart for sure.

You are correct about having "diversity." Someone needs to fail so that others may learn from them.

nasa has been around a long time, space x not so much, has done a hell of a lot better.

up where? up where the earth's curve is concave? 3:29

@@yellowcat1310 dumb.

@@yellowcat1310 What does that tell you?

@@Yusuke_Denton that they use a gopro and can not rely on a normal camera. they only use a camera that shows a curve, at least at a certain angle. then no matter what, no matter how many times they see the concave portions of the video, they will still swear that the convex parts "show the curve of the earth" what does it tell you?

space x much better, nasa a waste money.

Was this the second failure they had recently?

Unfortunately, they are having more failures than success. They have had 10 launches and only 2 successes. That is a 20% success rate (although i will give them the first two launches - also failures, but they were the test systems for their rocket). Still a very high failure rate.

Hopefully they can get up to speed, at this rate I’m not sure clients (or future clients) are going to be up for rolling the dice and hope it works.

what a stupid fucking statement.

they definitely can learn something from the Chinese !

I think this is due to being a really small rocket. Much more influenced by atmospheric conditions than something like a F9

@@iandonnelly959 The excessive control movements were evident in the second stage which is well above interference with the atmosphere. I'm guessing that there was combustion instability within the bell which will create unwanted side thrust. "The second stage engine shut down early" they say...looked like it was more like "the second stage engine blew up". "Shutting down early" makes it sound like it was just something little....that engine looked like it failed with a bunch of fuel being sprayed once the chamber let go. Hey...the reason it costs a lot to put stuff into space is it's HARD to do it. SpaceX makes it look routine but is far from that and I understand people wanting to have more than one company able to launch satellites, but people funding these little and so far unsuccessful attempts make me wonder why they didn't just contract with SpaceX in the first place and save a LOT of money...plus get their satellites into orbit.

As that 2nd stage burnt fuel it got lighter. I wonder if the instability occurred at that point due to changing centre of mass ?

@@recoilrob324 Well Tropics didn't use a spaceX rideshare because spacex doesn't fly to this orbit. So to fly on spacex would have cost a full launch price which is like 10x more expensive I believe. But also, probably wouldn't have failed lol. And I'm guessing some sort of oscillation in the second stage thrust vector control, but we'll see when the data is reviewed!

@@recoilrob324 Rocket Lab seem to be able to do it on a consistent basis

7:29 Time codes aren't difficult.

That’s roughly 14500 mph at an altitude of 350 miles? How is that possible?

The ISS orbits at about 250 miles while traveling at 17,500 mph. It only takes it about 90 minutes to orbit the Earth.

"GUBMINT DO TAKE A BITE, DON'T SHE??" - Raising Arizona 🤣

@@jefsel881 That's how orbits work sir!

all these companies do is steal from taxpayers and start their own civilization on these other continents they don't tell us about. NASA was started by a Nazi scientist. Loot at Hitlers maps of forbidden continents

It might sounds funny, but i can imagine in the future there will be OEM rocket manufacturers and a lot of small integrators only rebadging the same products. It's industry standard in aviation to buy a plane and brand it to your airline. Maybe in the future there will be more launch providers using spacex or astra rockets to launch satellites for cheap.

😂 I was thinking of the same thing.

Nah they’re to proud to do that and rather waste more taxpayers money on dead ends,fire them all.

It is their fault......inferior engineering....

There's no turbopump on the second stage, it's a pressure fed engine.

Maybe they need to wear more covid masks or fly a bigger rainbow flag

@@dmurray2978 what the hell are you on about lmao

@@iandonnelly959 oh thanks

isn't that a chinese take-out across the hallway there???

😂

🤣💀💀

Yes...

@DontWorryDiaperJoeGotYouCovered The "mode" of failure was different. Which means they solved the previous issues.

Expensive photos

Pretty pics at the expense of seeing their payload burn up in our atmosphere!

Rocket Lab

Falling to earth you say at altitude +500km

@@Slapwapy Yes, all objects in lower orbit fall towards the earth at some point. Basic science dude.

@@turanamo Crap load of stuff is then going to start dropping

@@Slapwapy Nope, which is why attitude determination and control subsystem (ADCS) in conjunction with telemetry correction is used to offset drag effects by a booster.

@@Slapwapy Do you not understand how orbits work?

Wait are you saying that nasa doesn’t have the ability to accept failure and carry on? Lol bro, they do the investigation first, decide affirmatively what the problem is, and then comment. Even if what you think you see is obvious, that’s not how investigations work. And it would be ridiculous to comment as they are investigating as the information delivered in piecemeal wouldn’t present the correct picture of what failed.

They won't comment on American failures

@@ajokpaniovojoel1049 they use to be much more professional when failures occurred. Maybe because it was a private company’s vehicle the representative didn’t continue to communicate, I’m not sure. If go back and watch some of the big NASA failures like the Space Shuttle Challenger failure where astronauts died, they continued to talk even after it became obvious there was catastrophic failure.

No, that isn't how this works, companies are not going to rely on you if you fail. They will go with proven providers. As they should. This is extremely sad as we need more competition to drive innovation, but you can't have a failure like this occur.

No, hard work pays off down the road, Laziness pays off Now!

They just lost satellites 😐

Just call Elon

were did my ballon go ?

It is. Capitalism is by far the most limiting factor.

Unless we teleport... Domari Nolo PA III

Not for SpaceX.

Close only counts in horse shoes and handgrnads. =)

Unless spelling is involved.

Not spaceX but ISRO lol

My question would be how honest the company was about the risks, SpaceX was very honest about the risks in the early days.

*Elon.*

You know what's easy? Glib, vacuous comments on the internet.

Pimpin' just got moved up a rung on the Easy Ladder. {0.o}

And? They spent a ton more money too and it had to succeed.

@@stickytourbus He didn't say it was easy.

I think second stage’s Aether engine is pressure fed. Sad to see failure anyway.

WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS! MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RU-vid STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE! JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU! Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6 "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33 “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

Totally agree with your assessment; I was viewing the launch and can't describe the letdown I had experienced.

It left me feeling that this was almost a declaration of power over me... and when it went wrong then the discussion was curtailed. I did not feel a part of this at all.

They did tell us what happened and will likely collect logs and try to get a more precise cause so that the risk for a similar problem can be reduced for future missions. Speculating further can be left to mainstream media who are experts at this sort of thing. NASA will, as usual, give a little bit more details later at a press conference but some of it is for internal specs only. This is normal and seems rational.

@@nerfherder5211 I totally understand that they will not have all the answers 1 minute after the failure. That process takes a long time to work out root cause if it is even possible. What I am saying is that they could have stayed with the viewers and given them some explanation of what will happen next, what their standard process is in the event of a failure. Basically there was a reasonable chance of failure and so having a plan in place that was better than, it failed, thanks for watching, would have been nice. If a major sporting event ended on a contentious umpire call or if there was an injury in the final seconds. I am sure the commentators wouldn't just say "wow, that's bad, thanks for watching" and switch off the coverage. They would replay what they had, they would talk about the rules, what was done the last time this happened, what the options are, etc. When you have a captivated audience you make the best use of that, you don't just throw it away and hope that the media paints a favourable picture.

Is Not Biden the Great just so so so so so so

@@ablewindsor1459 bruh Russia started the war. Even if US supplied everyone with oil, everyone would experience high price no matter what

Trans kedz need your money for transitions

@@emmanuelpalecpec9025 Bro under Trump NO War in Europe... Gasoline $1.79 a gallon. December Before Putin In invaded gas at $3.50. Biden's New Green Deal Energy Policy had Already ready pushed Energy back to new Highs! Under Trump45 America became Energy Independent for the FIRST Time since 1970 !!! Biden ticks off Saudis then tries to BEG them for more OIL, Begs Venezuela for oil, and wants IRAN who hates the Great Satan to start selling the USA Oil. US production down two million barrels a day of crude. Allllll Haillll Biden !!!!

@@ablewindsor1459 America doesn't want to use it's oil because they've gone to conserve mode.

Objection. Speculation.

BO is Jeff Bezos' 1:1 scale Estes rocketry hobby.

sub orbit hop is like the kindergarden for space

BO is an amusement park ride. They’ve never been to orbit.

yeah dude. these lads were really close to succeed

WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS! MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RU-vid STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE! JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU! Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6 "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33 “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

well with the fail rate the have, I think there is no future for them

@@oceyho Thanks... what's the old saying, try try and finally give up - LOL

this company is a waste of taxpayer money.

@@tc539 I both agree and disagree. Biggest waste of TP money are companies like Boeing and ULA. Only way they can be shook to move their asses or remove them from market completely is to have a lot of alternatives. SpaceX is up there but you need more players with orbital capability in the market.

@@YohXoX true but they are not it

@@tc539 Hmm are you saying that based on amount of failures they had or something else? Perhaps you know a more than me. To me it seems they lack in hardware experience but are on point with software(Tokyo Drift rocket was amazing showcase of software IMO).

@@YohXoX no im saying they need to pull their heads outta their a ses and stop wasting tax dollars on problems that others have already solved

No it ain't - tax money flushed down the toilet.

@@mikel4690 I'd rather have my tax dollars wasted on blowing up rockets than most of the idiotic wasteful programs it goes to now. At least when a rocket fails you learn something about rockets.

@@mikel4690 Nah, Just Federal Reserve debt notes, your tax dollars go straight to Vatican Bankers.

This is why diversity hires have no place in the workforce. Let men do the engineering work.

@@liamprincetech ofc lmao

Explosion

That’s about a 9 on the tension scale Rafael toro. Relax.

You are a bystander, they share this, by choice. They are a business, striving to succeed. Their purpose is not to entertain you nor are they bound to provide you with an experience you deem “fitting”. RE timid? That’s not information the public has a right to nor would any SANE person expect them to divulge it. Re what you appreciate? No one cares what you appreciate. That’s not the purpose of the effort nor the live stream.

If tax payers money was used in anyway for this launch, then yes we deserve all video and information

Upper management probably ordered the stream stopped. They just wanted to get the hell out of there.

@@TheJacklwilliams Wow my friend, you are suffering a serious case of either stress or anxiety that needs immediate care. Calm down, relax. I appreciate your thoughtful remarks. 😃

I believe third. DARPA, previous NASA mission and this one. In total 7/9 failures giving them 1/5 success rate.

I checked, one space force and two NASA missions lost. DARPA wasn't launched as they missed the timeline.

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l 👍

Very true I endorse your view, but if it were Russia, China or India all the west would have ridiculed. I think there is no success without fear of failure.

Screw these people. They still want us to think that these silly paper face mask work to stop viruses.

The engine was on. You just can't see the plume. The engine seemed to flame out and the vectoring went nuts right as the velocity started dropping. Was a strange malfunction that sent the craft spinning.

SpaceX was the same way in the beginning

@@RedKnight. No it wasn't. SpaceX has a 94% success launch rate and most of the failures have been on the booster stage return.

No sane person wants to see expensive failures, but rocketry has always been a risky and expensive undertaking. Modern telemetry will pinpoint the cause, and smart people will make sure the next bird flies right.

@@reefhound9902 94% now but the first couple launches of the falcon 1 didn't succeed

@@bcrox I guess you don't want GPS weather data satellite images or good maps then. Because satellites fall back to earth and we need rockets to take them back up, and when companies are making cheaper and cheaper rockets it allows companies to make better satellite technology. It's allowing global internet constellations to be put up.

Common core math. They didn't count enough boxes.

WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS! MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RU-vid STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE! JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU! Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6 "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33 “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

But this is not longer development test, these were real payloads from customers, too much failures. Not viable, sorry.

Lol SpaceX achieved it first and with half the "error". Some companies have to know when to just stop.

@@agustinbs Amen. These derps on here think this is a test or something.

and the Chinese are 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Government diversity hiring programs nice job lmfao

Yeah, but they suck. They're struggling to practice an art that was nearly perfected HALF A CENTURY ago.

@@jl5392 wow thats kinda ignorant! They suck? Really? Factors change… everything from the thickness of the atmosphere to the moister in the air to the position of the planets and the gravitational pull of those planets on this specific day and time need to be calculated. If one thing is off it could cause something to fail. To say they suck or even imply that its in any way perfected is ignorant and id like to see you do better. Don’t cast stones when you live in a glass world… Don’t make it sound easy cause its not. Do your research before you shame scientists on something they worked hard to even get partially right.

Imagine how the rocket must have felt.

Where did they land the booster?

@@zippymax1 lol this one doesn't land my dude, it's supposed to be cost efficient in its own right but not reusable

@@brianressler569 Lame. So 1969.

@@zippymax1 I'm all for SpaceX and reusability but I don't necessarily rule out companies that aren't doing it yet, these are some talented engineers trying to make a name for themselves in a competitive industry with less resources than the big names out there, I think thats worthy of appreciation even if it is old tech

@@brianressler569 As long as NASA doesn't interfere and put a finger on the scale. It's NASA I don't trust. NASA should be completely dismantled except as a negotiation/contracting link between the governnent and private space industry. The government doesn't belong in the rocket-building business. Without Nasa, we would have been where we are now by 2000. And that rocket looked and acted suspiciously like an awkward NASA lemon.

so does Rocket Lab :)

@@azjatyckieklimaty2172 who? 🤣

@@woolymittens The people sending NASA's Capstone satellite to the moon in preparation for their Lunar Gateway project. They're a US company launching out of New Zealand. Electron is pretty cool, if only a small-sat launcher. Neutron should be pretty interesting, if it goes according to plan.

@@woolymittens seems you're pretty ignorant lol, that's weird cuz RKLB has achieved far more than Astra.

Lol

@@stanweatherfield681 everyone gets a trophy

@@ozgott1415 of course! silly me, I forgot that now we applaud failure in America..

​@@stanweatherfield681 They have come a long way thanks to failures and learning from them. Be happy and positive for them my guy, Not everyone can be a SpaceX but they case sure as hell help make space more accessible. If rocket companies were easy there would be no shortage of them...

Couldn’t really hide it. And then say bye quickly.

@@TheBooban Most of the time they say "We lost contact and will update you later."

Man, I bet they didn’t think of that! So glad you’re here to set things straight. Appreciate it!

Astra is a small company operating on a shoestring.

@@dalethelander3781 oh ok. Then they should post a disclaimer, “We are small and can’t test as much as we should but we will launch your satellites off the pad at your risk “. That should cover it…besides if the ULA with their bazillions of dollars only just launched a capsule to the ISS with only a few faults on the way…Rocket Science is HARD. 👍👍🥃

@@missionplatinum This just might bankrupt the company like Orbital Sciences launching an ISS resupply in 2014. One KA-BLAM and done.

@@dalethelander3781 it does take some deeeeeep pockets with long bills in them.

0.1 is more like it and the .1 is being nice

Spacex was simple, poach NASA talent and acquire private funding...

Not enough credit is given to the engineer behind Falcon 9. If Bezos, Astra, Boeing, or anyone had that engineer, we would be talking about them instead of SpaceX.

@@TheBooban Really? One engineer? 🤣😅

@@Chris-bg8mk yeah. His design. Look it up.

Maybe they can get a participation trophy.

Nobody said it is easy but these guys clearly can't handle hard.

its not as hard as they are making it look SPACE X is doing great even better than nasa

@@tc539nah rockets are hard u should try

@@cccheezy no thanks i do what im good at. they should really find what they are good at and go do it instead of wasting tax dollars doing what they are not good at

NASA?

the owner is US citizens, aka tax money

Hope Astra's got good insurance.

that must be so frustrating.

That’s not how it works. Companies take any chance they can get to have the to chance to launch. Failure can happen to ANY launch

@@feelincrispy7053 That’s not how it works. Companies are not going to use a launch service that is 2 for 10 if they can use one that is 32 of 34. The only reason Astra had any cargo this time is because the US govt was trying to save them.

@@feelincrispy7053 You don't seem to have a grasp on how things work in the real world!! A small failure rate for rocket launches is fine but anything above 5% is unacceptable! Astra has a failure rate of more than 50% for customer payloads!! that makes their product 100% unviable. No private company will trust their payloads to this level of catastrophic incompetence going forward and if the US government continues to award contracts to Astra, they should be investigated for misuse of taxpayers money and probable corruption! … Not saying they should go bankrupt however, they should fix their rocket issues and sufficiently prove it by several test payload deliveries as opposed to paid-for customer payloads.

@@OperationXX1 I think you’ve forgotten about spacex’s failures as well as nasa. They had a shit load more than you are even considering

@@feelincrispy7053 If you are referring to Falcon 1, no rocket should be compared to Falcon 1 as it was a proof of concept in a successful attempt to create a new first-of-its-kind industry from the ground up. Falcon 1's payloads were mostly demo payloads for that very reason. Rocket lab's Electron would be a good comparison point for Astra ...

1000m/s is kind of allot isn't it?