Тёмный

AT-4 is Really Effective Against the Russian Armour 

Interesting Engineering
Подписаться 1,5 млн
Просмотров 19 тыс.
50% 1

Sweden, which has been a major player in military technology for many decades, continues its achievements with the Saab Gripen JAS 39E and super stealth Gotland-class submarines.
Today we will talk about another Swedish weapon that has earned its time in the spotlight.
AT-4 has proven its worth numerous times during the Ukrainian war, and made its name heard in a category populated by heavy weights such as Javelin and NLAW.
It may not be as well-known as the RPG-7, but it has achieved a notable presence in popular culture.
This weapon has appeared in a number of films, including Terminator Salvation, where John Connor (Christian Bale) used this one to destroy a disabled Hunter-Killer.
And, allow me to remind you that this was Buffy the Vampire Slayer's preferred missile launcher.
The AT4 is an unguided anti-armor weapon produced by Saab Bofors Dynamics based on Carl Gustaf 8.4cm recoilless rifle.
After modifying the weapon's launch tube bumpers, sights, and slings, the US Army adopted AT4 as the lightweight multipurpose weapon M136.
Join our RU-vid channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

24 янв 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 45   
@ycplum7062
@ycplum7062 Год назад
A soldier can carry a couple of AT-4s while you need a couple of soldiers to carry a Javelin missile and launcher. Both have their uses.
@tbthegr81
@tbthegr81 10 месяцев назад
Dang that pronounciation of "Förenade Fabriksverken" wasn't half bad
@jamesnesselrode3155
@jamesnesselrode3155 Год назад
It's so cool and so scary how you can kill and Destroy Tanks With Just Using A little missle that comes out of a javelin tank kill..
@gregrobertson5576
@gregrobertson5576 Год назад
I love Carl Gustaffs ☺
@gilianrampart8514
@gilianrampart8514 Год назад
Should I assume that anti-tank munitions are affective against tanks?
@anticom6099
@anticom6099 Год назад
No, they just don’t believe in tank rights
@onlypeaceindeath
@onlypeaceindeath Год назад
It was intended to be used against lighter armored vehicles. Officers of the Swedish Military was apparently slightly shocked at how good it was against heavier armor.
@snoken1000
@snoken1000 Год назад
​@@onlypeaceindeath yes we trained to shoot atleast 3 at4 at heavy tanks whith reactive armor like T 90, easy to handle an light so everybody could carry atleast one or more with them on the back.
@CrowColdblade
@CrowColdblade Год назад
No, the Swedish Army thought it would need 12-15 hits to knock out modern armor. Thats why the NLAW exists. That Russian tanks were so badly protected came as a surprise.
@niclink1030
@niclink1030 Год назад
​@@CrowColdblade i dont think the number is right
@bradleyanderson4315
@bradleyanderson4315 Год назад
Most armored vehicles aren’t tanks.
@mooneyes2k478
@mooneyes2k478 Месяц назад
But all tanks are armored vehicles.
@syedafik6487
@syedafik6487 19 дней назад
Rpg-28 and rpg29 can penetrate 700 to 900 mm armored respectively
@uss-usaf-atlantis
@uss-usaf-atlantis Год назад
I am.not Swedish
@TheShak35
@TheShak35 10 месяцев назад
turns out cheap lancet is also really effective against leopards,challengers and soon abrahams
@obi-wankenobi5332
@obi-wankenobi5332 5 месяцев назад
visual info is totally inaccurate 😂
@mooneyes2k478
@mooneyes2k478 5 месяцев назад
Buffy? Might be excused for thinking that it's a "missile launcher". A channel with over a million subs is not. There's nothing "rocket type" about it, it has neither an engine nor any form of steering. There's nothing "missile" about the AT-4, and nothing "rifled" either.
@MarkBerenger
@MarkBerenger Месяц назад
incoherent af lol
@mooneyes2k478
@mooneyes2k478 Месяц назад
@@MarkBerenger That you didn't watch the video doesn't mean it's "incoherent", it means that you didn't watch the video and so didn't understand it.
@alexpark2971
@alexpark2971 7 месяцев назад
At 4 is effective Against Western TanKs???
@Sierrawavemp4
@Sierrawavemp4 3 месяца назад
unlikely
@MarkBerenger
@MarkBerenger Месяц назад
yes it is. No tanks are indestructable lol
@uwekonnigsstaddt524
@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Год назад
Effective against Abrams and Leopards
@ilovetechnology8436
@ilovetechnology8436 Год назад
All so-called captured javelins and nlaws shown on video were expended empty tubes, their effective load was used to send Russian tank turrets sky high.
@looseyourzlf
@looseyourzlf Год назад
@@ilovetechnology8436 not true. many videos showing the javelin failure's.
@ilovetechnology8436
@ilovetechnology8436 Год назад
@@looseyourzlf Alternative realities don't count !
@looseyourzlf
@looseyourzlf Год назад
@@ilovetechnology8436 are you stupid? kid go play video games. better than talking like that
@nacebedace8243
@nacebedace8243 Год назад
​@@looseyourzlf more videos show its success.
@oldmonk7339
@oldmonk7339 Год назад
Don't worry captured javelins and nlaws are waiting for leopard and challengers
@montanus5661
@montanus5661 Год назад
Do the Russians have the training needed for the Javelins though?
@FXGreggan.
@FXGreggan. Год назад
So you're admitting western weapons are superior? Wow
@niclink1030
@niclink1030 Год назад
Dont think they have training for them or the ammo
@JimmyEatDirt
@JimmyEatDirt 10 месяцев назад
​@@montanus5661I don't think russians have training for their own weapons
@carterhaynes8703
@carterhaynes8703 2 месяца назад
Everything is effective against Russian armor
@asithalk
@asithalk 10 месяцев назад
Apparently NATO weapons not good enough to war with Russians..🥴please make better ones.😆
@javir1669
@javir1669 10 месяцев назад
Really?
@asithalk
@asithalk 10 месяцев назад
@@javir1669 no doubt..those weapons suitable for war with Jihadis only!😂😂
@jamesscott2894
@jamesscott2894 6 месяцев назад
Several thousand destroyed and burned Russian tanks and vehicles would disagree with you...
Далее
PIAT: Better than the Panzerfaust?
18:57
Просмотров 148 тыс.
Why China is Against THAAD?
6:54
Просмотров 197 тыс.
How Russia’s Kornet Missile Launcher Works
13:06
Просмотров 800 тыс.
World War Nerf
4:13
Просмотров 61 млн
Why Protecting Tanks is Getting Much More Difficult
12:36
What Actually IS a “Recoilless” Rifle?
11:52
Просмотров 311 тыс.
Самый быстрый пылесос!
0:30
Просмотров 21 тыс.
iPhone 15 Pro в реальной жизни
24:07
Просмотров 399 тыс.